Oecologia

, Volume 159, Issue 3, pp 583–595 | Cite as

Pacific salmon effects on stream ecosystems: a quantitative synthesis

  • David J. Janetski
  • Dominic T. Chaloner
  • Scott D. Tiegs
  • Gary A. Lamberti
Ecosystem Ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) disturb sediments and fertilize streams with marine-derived nutrients during their annual spawning runs, leading researchers to classify these fish as ecosystem engineers and providers of resource subsidies. While these processes strongly influence the structure and function of salmon streams, the magnitude of salmon influence varies widely across studies. Here, we use meta-analysis to evaluate potential sources of variability among studies in stream ecosystem responses to salmon. Results obtained from 37 publications that collectively included 79 streams revealed positive, but highly inconsistent, overall effects of salmon on dissolved nutrients, sediment biofilm, macroinvertebrates, resident fish, and isotopic enrichment. Variation in these response variables was commonly influenced by salmon biomass, stream discharge, sediment size, and whether studies used artificial carcass treatments or observed a natural spawning run. Dissolved nutrients were positively related to salmon biomass per unit discharge, and the slope of the relationship for natural runs was five to ten times higher than for carcass additions. Mean effects on ammonium and phosphorus were also greater for natural runs than carcass additions, an effect attributable to excretion by live salmon. In contrast, we observed larger positive effects on benthic macroinvertebrates for carcass additions than for natural runs, likely because disturbance by live salmon was absent. Furthermore, benthic macroinvertebrates and biofilm associated with small sediments (<32 mm) displayed a negative response to salmon while those associated with large sediments (>32 mm) showed a positive response. This comprehensive analysis is the first to quantitatively identify environmental and methodological variables that influence the observed effects of salmon. Identifying sources of variation in salmon–stream interactions is a critical step toward understanding why engineering and subsidy effects vary so dramatically over space and time, and toward developing management strategies that will preserve the ecological integrity of salmon streams.

Keywords

Ecosystem engineering Marine-derived nutrients Meta-analysis Oncorhynchus Resource subsidy 

Supplementary material

442_2008_1249_MOESM1_ESM.doc (42 kb)
(DOC 42 kb)
442_2008_1249_MOESM2_ESM.doc (1 mb)
(DOC 1075 kb)
442_2008_1249_MOESM3_ESM.doc (94 kb)
(DOC 93 kb)

References

  1. Alba-Lynn C, Detling JK (2008) Interactive disturbance effects of two disparate ecosystem engineers in North American shortgrass steppe. Oecologia 157:269–278Google Scholar
  2. Ambrose HE, Wilzbach MA, Cummins KW (2004) Periphyton response to increased light and salmon carcass introduction in northern California streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 23:701–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnqvist G, Wooster D (1995) Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 10:236–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Augerot X (2005) Atlas of Pacific Salmon: the first map-based status assessment of salmon in the North Pacific. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  5. Behnke RJ (2002) Trout and salmon of North America. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilby RE, Fransen BR, Bisson PA (1996) Incorporation of nitrogen and carbon from spawning coho salmon into the trophic system of small streams: evidence from stable isotopes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilby RE, Fransen BR, Bisson PA, Walter JK (1998) Response of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to the addition of salmon carcasses to two streams in southwestern Washington, USA. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1909–1918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bilby RE, Fransen BR, Cederholm JK, Scarlett WJ (2001) Preliminary evaluation of the use of nitrogen stable isotope ratios to establish escapement levels for Pacific salmon. Fisheries 26:6–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cederholm CJ, Houston DB, Cole CL, Scarlett WJ (1989) Fate of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) carcasses in spawning streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:1348–1355Google Scholar
  10. Cederholm CJ, Kunze MD, Murota T, Sibatani A (1999) Pacific salmon carcasses: essential contributions of nutrients and energy for aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Fisheries 24:6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaloner DT, Martin KM, Wipfli MS, Ostrom PH, Lamberti GA (2002) Marine carbon and nitrogen in southeastern Alaska stream food webs: evidence from artificial and natural streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1257–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaloner DT, Lamberti GA, Merritt RW, Mitchell NL, Ostrom PH, Wipfli MS (2004) Variation in responses to spawning Pacific salmon among three south-eastern Alaska streams. Freshw Biol 49:587–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaloner DT, Lamberti GA, Cak AD, Blair NL, Edwards RT (2007) Inter-annual variation in responses of water chemistry and epilithon to Pacific salmon spawners in an Alaskan stream. Freshw Biol 52:478–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Compton JE, Andersen CP, Phillips DL, Brooks JR, Johnson MG, Church MR, Hogsett WE, Cairns MA, Rygiewicz PT, McComb BC, Shaff CD (2006) Ecological and water quality consequences of nutrient addition for salmon restoration in the Pacific Northwest. Front Ecol Environ 4:18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crawford SS (2001) Salmonine introductions to the Laurentian Great Lakes: an historical review and evaluation of ecological effects. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol 132. NRC, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  16. Crooks JA (2002) Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diamond J (1986) Overview: laboratory experiments, field experiments, and natural experiments. In: Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York, pp 3–22Google Scholar
  18. Eastman DE (1996) Response of freshwater fish communities to spawning sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). MS Thesis, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  19. Finney BP, Gregory-Eaves I, Sweetman J, Dougas MSV, Smol JP (2000) Impacts of climatic change and fishing on Pacific salmon abundance over the past 300 years. Science 290:795–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flecker AS (1996) Ecosystem engineering by a dominant detritivore in a diverse tropical stream. Ecology 77:1845–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gende SM, Edwards RT, Willson MF, Wipfli MS (2002) Pacific salmon in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. BioScience 52:917–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gresh T, Lichatowich J, Schoonmaker P (2000) An estimation of historic and current levels of salmon production in the Northeast Pacific ecosystem: evidence of a nutrient deficit in the freshwater systems of the Pacific Northwest. Fisheries 25:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Groot C, Margolis L (1991) Pacific salmon life histories. University of British Columbia Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  24. Gurevitch J, Hedges LV (2001) Meta-analysis: combining the results of independent experiments. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 347–369Google Scholar
  25. Gurevitch J, Morrow LL, Wallace A, Walsh JS (1992) A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. Am Nat 140:539–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hassan MA, Gottesfeld AS, Montgomery DR, Tunnicliffe JF, Clarke GKC, Wynn G, Jones-Cox H, Poirier R, MacIsaac E, Herunter H, Macdonald SJ (2008) Salmon-driven bed load transport and bed morphology in mountain streams. Geophys Res Lett 35:L04405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hedges LV, Olkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  28. Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156Google Scholar
  29. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957Google Scholar
  31. Kitchell JF, Schindler DE, Herwig BR, Post DM, Olson MH, Oldham M (1999) Nutrient cycling at the landscape level: the role of diel foraging migrations by geese at the Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico. Limnol Oceanogr 44:828–836Google Scholar
  32. Kohler AE, Rugenski A, Taki D (2008) Stream food web response to a salmon carcass analogue addition in two central Idaho, USA streams. Freshw Biol 53:446–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kondolf GM, Wolman MG (1993) The sizes of salmonid spawning gravels. Water Resour Res 29:2275–2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krümmel EM, Gregory-Eaves I, MacDonald RW, Kimpe LE, Demers MJ, Smol JP, Finney B, Blais JM (2005) Concentrations and fluxes of salmon-derived polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in lake sediments. Environ Sci Technol 39:7020–7026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lackey RT (2003) Nutrient addition to restore salmon runs: considerations for developing environmental protection policies and regulations. In: Stockner JG (ed) Nutrients in salmonid ecosystems: sustaining production and biodiversity. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 34, Bethesda, pp 283–285Google Scholar
  36. Lamberti GA, Steinman AD (1993) Research in artificial streams: applications, uses, and abuses. J North Am Benthol Soc 12:313–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Langellotto GA, Denno RF (2004) Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis. Oecologia 139:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1947–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marczak LB, Thompson RM, Richardson JS (2007) Meta-analysis: trophic level, habitat, and productivity shape the food web effects of resource subsidies. Ecology 88:140–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Menge BA, Sutherland JP (1987) Community regulation: variation in disturbance, competition, and predation in relation to environmental stress and recruitment. Am Nat 130:730–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Minakawa N, Gara RI (1999) Ecological effects of a chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) spawning run in a small stream of the Pacific Northwest. J Freshw Ecol 14:327–335Google Scholar
  42. Minakawa N, Gara RI (2005) Spatial and temporal distribution of coho salmon carcasses in a stream in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Hydrobiologia 539:163–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitchell NL, Lamberti GA (2005) Responses in dissolved nutrients and epilithon abundance to spawning salmon in southeast Alaska streams. Limnol Oceanogr 50:217–227Google Scholar
  44. Moore JW (2006) Animal ecosystem engineers in streams. BioScience 56:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moore JW, Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD (2004) Disturbance of freshwater habitats by anadromous salmon in Alaska. Oecologia 139:298–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore JW, Schindler DE, Carter JL, Fox J, Griffiths J, Holtgrieve GW (2007) Biotic control of stream fluxes: spawning salmon drive nutrient and matter export. Ecology 88:1278–1291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Naiman RJ, Johnston CA, Kelley JC (1988) Alteration of North American streams by beaver. BioScience 38:753–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Naiman RJ, Bilby RE, Schindler DE, Helfield JM (2002) Pacific salmon, nutrients, and the dynamics of freshwater and riparian ecosystems. Ecosystems 5:399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Osenberg CW, Sarnelle O, Cooper SD, Holt RD (1999) Resolving ecological questions through meta-analysis: goals, metrics, and models. Ecology 80:1105–1117Google Scholar
  50. Oswood MW (1997) Streams and rivers in Alaska: a high latitude perspective on running waters. In: Milner AM, Oswood MW (eds) Freshwaters of Alaska: ecological syntheses. Springer, New York, pp 331–356Google Scholar
  51. Peterson DP, Foote CJ (2000) Disturbance of small-stream habitat by spawning sockeye salmon in Alaska. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:924–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime. BioScience 47:769–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Polis GA, Hurd SD (1995) Extraordinarily high spider densities on islands: flow of energy from the marine to terrestrial food webs and the absence of predation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:4382–4386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Polis GA, Anderson WB, Holt RD (1997) Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:289–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Polis GA, Power ME, Huxel GR (eds) (2004) Food webs at the landscape level. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  56. Quinn TP (2005) The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  57. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J (2000) MetaWin statistical software for meta-analysis version 2. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  58. Scheuerell MD, Moore JW, Schindler DE, Harvey CJ (2007) Varying effects of anadromous sockeye salmon on the trophic ecology of two species of resident salmonids in southwest Alaska. Freshw Biol 52:1944–1956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD, Moore JW, Gende SM, Francis TB, Palen WJ (2003) Pacific salmon and the ecology of coastal ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 1:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stockner JG (ed) (2003) Nutrients in salmonid ecosystems: sustaining production and biodiversity. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 34, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  61. Stockner JG, MacIsaac EA (1996) British Columbia lake enrichment programme: two decades of habitat enhancement for sockeye salmon. Regul Rivers Res Manag 12:547–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stockner JG, Rydin E, Hyenstrand P (2000) Cultural oligotrophication: causes and consequences for fisheries resources. Fisheries 25:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thayer CW (1979) Biological bulldozers and the evolution of marine benthic communities. Science 203:458–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tiegs SD, Chaloner DT, Levi P, Rueegg J, Tank JL, Lamberti GA (2008) Timber harvest transforms ecological roles of salmon in Southeast Alaska rain forest streams. Ecol Appl 18:4–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vanni MJ (2002) Nutrient cycling by animals in freshwater ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:341–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vanni MJ, DeAngelis DL, Schindler DE, Huxel GR (2004) Overview: cross-habitat flux of nutrients and detritus. In: Polis GA, Power ME, Huxel GR (eds) Food webs at the landscape level. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 3–11Google Scholar
  67. Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–750Google Scholar
  68. Wentworth CK (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol 30:377–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Whicker AD, Detling JK (1988) Ecological consequences of prairie dog disturbances. BioScience 38:778–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Willson MF, Gende SM, Marston BH (1998) Fishes and the forest. BioScience 48:455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Willson MF, Gende SM, Bisson PA (2004) Anadromous fishes as ecological links between ocean, fresh water, and land. In: Polis GA, Power ME, Huxel GR (eds) Food webs at the landscape level. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 284–300Google Scholar
  72. Wilzbach MA, Harvey BC, White JL, Nakamoto RJ (2005) Effects of riparian canopy opening and salmon carcass addition on the abundance and growth of resident salmonids. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wipfli MS, Hudson JP, Caouette JP (1998) Influence of salmon carcasses on stream productivity: response of biofilm and benthic macroinvertebrates in southeastern Alaska, USA. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1503–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wipfli MS, Hudson JP, Chaloner DT, Caouette JP (1999) Influence of salmon spawner densities on stream productivity in Southeast Alaska. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:1600–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wipfli MS, Hudson JP, Caouette JP, Chaloner DT (2003) Marine subsidies in freshwater ecosystems: salmon carcasses increase the growth rates of stream-resident salmonids. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:371–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wright JP, Jones CG (2004) Predicting effects of ecosystem engineers on patch-scale species richness from primary productivity. Ecology 85:2071–2081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Janetski
    • 1
  • Dominic T. Chaloner
    • 1
  • Scott D. Tiegs
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gary A. Lamberti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesOakland UniversityRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations