Oecologia

, Volume 157, Issue 3, pp 441–452 | Cite as

The influence of pool volume and summer desiccation on the production of the resting and dispersal stage in a Daphnia metapopulation

Ecosystem Ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Dispersal is a key process in metapopulations, as migrants genetically connect populations and enable the colonization of empty habitat patches. Sub-populations may differ in their numerical contribution of migrants within a metapopulation. This has strong implications on evolutionary and ecological dynamics and has led to two different hypotheses about the Daphnia metapopulation studied here: the assessment by some authors is that sub-populations contribute equally to the production of migrants, while others have postulated long-lived core populations in large “mainland” habitat patches as the dominant source of migrants. We have studied the resting and dispersal stage (ephippium) in a natural Daphnia metapopulation and in mesocosm experiments, and tested for effects of habitat size and summer desiccation. We found that a 1000-fold increase in rock pool volume resulted on average in only in a 2.8-fold increase in ephippium production. Mesocosm experiments confirmed these results: a 1000-fold increase of the mesocosms’ volume resulted in a 7.2-fold increase in ephippium production. Additionally, we showed that ephippium production did not depend on the initial population size. Thus, populations in small pools may contribute only marginal fewer potential migrants in the whole metapopulation than populations in large pools. In a second mesocosm experiment we found that summer desiccation, which is a typical occurrence in small pools, is not detrimental for the populations. Daphnia hatched out of ephippia that were produced earlier within the same season and built up viable populations again. The substantial production of ephippia by populations in small pools suggests that these populations might be important for both the dynamics and global stability of metapopulations.

Keywords

Desiccation Dispersal propagule Ephippium production Migrant Migration Resting egg Rock pool 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Hottinger and V. Mislin for technical help, K. Saggese and T. Zumbrunn for help during the field work and I. Pajunen for discussions. O. Balmer, A. Bieger, W. Weisser, T. Zumbrunn and two anonymous reviewers gave helpful comments on the manuscript. The study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation. F. Altermatt thanks the Basler Stiftung für experimentelle Zoologie, the Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft and the Emilia Guggenheim-Schnurr-Stiftung for financial support during the field work. This work is part of project no 97524006 at Tvärminne Zoological Station. D. Ebert was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation. The experiments comply with the current laws in Finland.

References

  1. Altermatt F, Hottinger J, Ebert D (2007) Parasites promote host gene flow in a metapopulation. Evol Ecol 21:561–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altermatt F, Pajunen VI, Ebert D (2008) Climate change affects colonisation dynamics in a metacommunity of three Daphnia species. Glob Chang Biol 14:1209–1220Google Scholar
  3. Banta AM, Brown LA (1929) Control of sex in Cladocera. I. Crowding the mothers as a means of controlling male production. Physiol Zool 2:80–92Google Scholar
  4. Bates AJ, Sadler JP, Fowles AP (2006) Condition-dependent dispersal of a patchily distributed riparian ground beetle in response to disturbance. Oecologia 150:50–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bengtsson J (1989) Interspecific competition increases local extinction rate in a metapopulation system. Nature 340:713–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bengtsson J, Ebert D (1998) Distribution and impacts of microparasites on Daphnia in a rockpool metapopulation. Oecologia (Berlin) 115:213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown LA (1929) The natural history of cladocerans in relation to temperature. I. Distribution and temperature limits for vital activities. Am Nat 63:248–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown JH, Kodrick-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bullock JM, Kenward RE, Hails RS (eds) (2002) Dispersal ecology. The British Ecological Society/Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Bullock JM, Shea K, Skarpaas O (2006) Measuring plant dispersal: an introduction to field methods and experimental design. Plant Ecol 186:217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cáceres CE (1998) Interspecific variation in the abundance, production, and emergence of Daphnia diapausing eggs. Ecology 79:1699–1710Google Scholar
  12. Cáceres CE, Tessier AJ (2003) How long to rest: the ecology of optimal dormancy and environmental constraint. Ecology 84:1189–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cáceres CE, Tessier AJ (2004) To sink or swim: variable diapausing strategies among Daphnia species. Limnol Oceanogr 49:1333–1340Google Scholar
  14. Carvalho GR, Hughes RN (1983) The effect of food availability, female culture-density and photoperiod on ephippia production in Daphnia magna Strauss (Crustacea: Cladocera). Freshw Biol 13:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) (2001) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing. An introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  17. Crone EE, Doak D, Pokki J (2001) Ecological influences on the dynamics of a field vole metapopulation. Ecology 82:831–843Google Scholar
  18. Ebert D (2005) Ecology, epidemiology, and evolution of parasitism in Daphnia. National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  19. Ebert D, Hottinger JW, Pajunen VI (2001) Temporal and spatial dynamics of parasites in a Daphnia metapopulation: which factors explain parasite richness? Ecology 82:3417–3434Google Scholar
  20. Ebert D, Haag C, Kirkpatrick M, Riek M, Hottinger JW, Pajunen VI (2002) A selective advantage to immigrant genes in a Daphnia metapopulation. Science 295:485–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Figuerola J, Green AJ (2002) How frequent is external transport of seeds and invertebrate eggs by waterbirds? A study in Donana, SW Spain. Arch Hydrobiol 155:557–565Google Scholar
  22. Green J (1957) Parasites and epibionts of Cladocera in rockpools of Tvärminne archipelago. Arch Soc Zool Bot Fenn Vanamo 12:5–12Google Scholar
  23. Haag CR, Saastamoinen M, Marden JH, Hanski I (2005) A candidate locus for variation in dispersal rate in a butterfly metapopulation. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:2449–2456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) (2004) Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanski I, Ranta E (1983) Coexistence in a patchy environment: three species of Daphnia in rock pools. J Anim Ecol 52:263–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanski I, Alho J, Moilanen A (2000) Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. Ecology 81:239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanski I, Saastamoinen M, Ovaskainen O (2006) Dispersal-related life-history trade-offs in a butterfly metapopulation. J Anim Ecol 75:91–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harrison S (1991) Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. Biol J Linn Soc 42:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hopper KR (1999) Risk-spreading and bet-hedging in insect population biology. Annu Rev Entomol 44:535–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kawecki TJ (2004) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of source-sink population dynamics. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 387–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kerfoot WC, Wells Budd J, Eadie BJ, Vanderploeg HA, Agy M (2004) Winter storms: sequential sediment traps record Daphnia ephippial production, resuspension, and sediment interactions. Limnol Oceanogr 49:1365–1381Google Scholar
  33. Kleiven OT, Larsson R, Hobæk A (1992) Sexual reproduction in Daphnia magna requires three stimuli. Oikos 65:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klüttgen B, Dülmer U, Engels M, Ratte HT (1994) ADaM, an artificial freshwater for the culture of zooplankton. Water Res 28:743–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lass S, Ebert D (2006) Apparent seasonality of parasite dynamics: analysis of cyclic prevalence patterns. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levins R (1970) Extinction. Lect Notes Math 2:75–107Google Scholar
  37. Maguire B (1963) The passive dispersal of small aquatic organisms and their colonization of isolated bodies of water. Ecol Monogr 33:161–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ovaskainen O, Hanski I (2004) Metapopulation dynamics in highly fragmented landscapes. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 73–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pajunen VI (1986) Distributional dynamics of Daphnia species in a rock-pool environment. Ann Zool Fenn 23:131–140Google Scholar
  40. Pajunen VI, Pajunen I (2003) Long-term dynamics in rock pool Daphnia metapopulations. Ecography 26:731–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pajunen VI, Pajunen I (2007) Habitat characteristics contribution to local occupancy and habitat use in rock pool Daphnia metapopulations. Hydrobiologia 592:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Proctor VW, Malone CR (1965) Further evidence of the passive dispersal of small aquatic organisms via the intestinal tract of bird. Ecology 46:728–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.4.0, 2.4.0 edn. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  44. Ranta E (1979) Niche of Daphnia species in rockpools. Arch Hydrobiol 87:205–223Google Scholar
  45. Scherrer B (1984) Biostatistique. Gaëtan Morin, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  46. Stross RG, Hill JC (1965) Diapause induction in Daphnia requires two stimuli. Science 150:1462–1464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Townsend CR, Harper JL, Begon M (2000) Essentials of ecology. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Vanschoenwinkel B, Gielen S, Seaman M, Brendonck L (2008) Any way the wind blows—frequent wind dispersal drives species sorting in ephemeral aquatic communities. Oikos 117:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Watts PC, Kemp SJ, Saccheri IJ, Thompson DJ (2005) Conservation implications of genetic variation between spatially and temporally distinct colonies of the endangered damselfly Coenagrion mercuriale. Ecol Entomol 30:541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zoologisches InstitutUniversität BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Tvärminne Zoological StationHankoFinland

Personalised recommendations