, Volume 156, Issue 4, pp 773–781 | Cite as

Never too late? Consequences of late birthdate for mass and survival of bighorn lambs

  • Chiarastella Feder
  • Julien G. A. Martin
  • Marco Festa-Bianchet
  • Céline Bérubé
  • Jon Jorgenson
Population Ecology - Original Paper


In strongly seasonal environments, the timing of birth can have important fitness consequences. We investigated which factors affect parturition date and how birthdate interacts with sex, maternal characteristics and environmental variables to affect the growth and survival of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) lambs in a marked population in Alberta. Over 14 years, the estimated birthdate of 216 lambs ranged from 21 May to 18 July. Parturition date was heritable and genetically correlated with maternal mass the previous fall. Weaning a lamb delayed parturition the following year by about 7 days. Birthdate did not affect summer growth rate, but late-born lambs were lighter in mid September (the approximate time of weaning) than early-born ones. Birthdate did not affect survival to weaning, but late birth decreased survival to 1 year for male lambs. Forage quality, measured by fecal crude protein, did not affect survival to 1 year. Once we accounted for lamb mass in mid September, birthdate no longer affected the probability of survival, suggesting that late birth decreased survival by shortening a lamb’s growing season. Because there was no compensatory summer growth, late-born lambs were smaller than early-born ones at the onset of winter. Our data highlight the importance of birthdate on life history traits and suggest that resource scarcity had more severe consequences for juvenile males than for females.


Dimorphic species Sex Heritability Parturition date 



This research was generously supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Alberta Conservation Association, the Canadian Bureau for International Education and the Université de Sherbrooke. We sincerely thank Dave Coltman and Jocelyn Poissant for providing paternity data. We are grateful to Stéphane Lamoureux, Dominic Grenier, Samuel Haché and many others for assistance with field work. We thank Denis Réale for his help using Asreml. We appreciated the long-term logistic support of the Alberta Fish and Wildlife Division and the valuable help received from Jack Hogg and his field teams. Marc Bélisle and Bill Shipley kindly reviewed an earlier draft of this manuscript.


  1. Adams LG, Dale BW (1998) Timing and synchrony of parturition in Alaskan caribou. J Mamm 79:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger J (1992) Facilitation of reproductive synchrony by gestation adjustment in gregarious mammals: a new hypothesis. Ecology 73:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bérubé CH (1997) Les stratégies d’adaptation vitale chez les brebis du mouflon d’Amérique (Ovis canadensis): la reproduction en fonction de l’âge. PhD thesis, Université de Sherbrooke, SherbrookeGoogle Scholar
  5. Bérubé CH, Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT (1996) Reproductive costs of sons and daughters in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. Behav Ecol 7:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchard P, Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard JM, Jorgenson J (2003) A test of long-term fecal nitrogen monitoring to evaluate nutritional status in bighorn sheep. J Wildl Manage 67:477–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowen WD, Oftedal OT, Boness DJ, Iverson SJ (1994) The effect of maternal age and other factors on birth mass in the harbour seal. Can J Zool 72:8–14Google Scholar
  8. Bowen WD, Ellis SL, Iverson SJ, Boness DJ (2001) Maternal effects on offspring growth rate and weaning mass in harbour seals. Can J Zool 79:1088–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd IL, McCann TS (1989) Pre-natal investment in reproduction by female Antartic fur seal. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bunnell FL (1982) The lambing period of mountain sheep: synthesis hypotheses and tests. Can J Zool 60:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference—a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  12. Cameron RD, Smith WT, Fancy SG, Gerhart KL, White RG (1993) Calving success of female caribou in relation to body weight. Can J Zool 71:480–486Google Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1984) Maternal dominance breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer. Nature 308:358–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1985) Parental investment and sex differences in juvenile mortality in birds and mammals. Nature 313:131–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behavior and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1983) The costs of reproduction to red deer hinds. J Anim Ecol 52:367–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clutton-Brock TH, Major M, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1987) Early development and population dynamics in red deer. I. Density-dependent effects on juvenile survival. J Anim Ecol 56:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1988) Reproductive success in male and female red deer reproductive success. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success: studies of individual variation in contrastingbreeding systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 325–343Google Scholar
  19. Coltman DW, Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Strobeck C (2002) Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coltman DW, O’Donoghue P, Jorgenson JT, Hogg JT, Festa-Bianchet M (2005) Selection and genetic (co) variance in bighorn sheep. Evolution 59:1372–1382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Coltman DW, O’Donoghue P, Jorgenson JT, Hogg JT, Strobeck C, Festa-Bianchet M (2003) Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature 426:655–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (2001) Birthdate mass and survival in mountain goat kids: effects of maternal characteristics and forage quality. Oecologia 127:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Fairbanks WS (1993) Birthdate birthweight and survival in pronghorn fawns. J Mamm 74:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Festa-Bianchet M (1988a) Birthdate and survival in bighorn lambs (Ovis canadensis). J Zool 214:653–661Google Scholar
  26. Festa-Bianchet M (1988b) Age-specific reproduction of bighorn ewes in Alberta Canada. J Mamm 69:157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Festa-Bianchet M (1988c) Nursing behaviour of bighorn sheep: correlates of ewe age parasitism lamb age birthdate and sex. Anim Behav 36:1445–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT (1998) Selfish mothers: reproductive expenditure and resource availability in bighorn ewes. Behav Ecol 9:144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, King WJ, Smith KG, Wishart WD (1996) The development of sexual dimorphism: seasonal and lifetime mass changes of bighorn sheep. Can J Zool 74:330–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Bérubé CH, Portier C, Wishart WD (1997) Body mass and survival of bighorn sheep. Can J Zool 75:1372–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard J-M, Jorgenson JT (1998) Mass- and density-dependent reproductive success and reproductive costs in a capital breeder. Am Nat 152:367–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaillard J-M, Delorme D, Jullien J-M (1993) Effects of cohort sex and birth date on body development of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) fawns. Oecologia 94:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Geist V (1971) Mountain sheep. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  34. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R (2002) ASReml user guide. Release 1.0. VSN international, Hemel Hempstead, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Green WCH (1993) Social effects of maternal age and experience in bison: pre- and post-weaning contact maintenance with daughters. Ethology 93:146–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Green WCH, Rothstein A (1991) Trade-offs between growth and reproduction in female bison. Oecologia 86:521–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Green WCH, Rothstein A (1993) Persistent influences of birthdate on dominance growth and reproductive success in bison. J Zool 230:177–186Google Scholar
  38. Hass CC (1997) Seasonality of births in bighorn sheep. J Mammal 78:1251–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hewison AJM (1996) Variation in the fecundity of roe deer in Britain: effects of age and body weight. Acta Theriol 41:187–198Google Scholar
  40. Hogg JT, Hass CC, Jenni DA (1992) Sex-biased maternal expenditure in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huber S, Palme R, Arnold W (2003) Effect of season sex and sample collection on concentration of fecal cortisol metabolites in red deer. Gen Comp Endocr 130:48–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL (1989) Regression and time-series model selection in small sample sizes. Biometrika 76:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Iason GR, Guinness FE (1985) Synchrony of oestrus and conception in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). J Anim Ecol 33:1169–1174Google Scholar
  44. Jorgenson JT, Festa-Bianchet M, Lucherini M, Wishart WD (1993) Effects of body size population density and maternal characteristics on age of first reproduction in bighorn ewes. Can J Zool 71:2509–2517Google Scholar
  45. Jorgenson JT, Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard J-M, Wishart WD (1997) Effects of age sex disease and density on survival of bighorn sheep. Ecology 78:1019–1032Google Scholar
  46. Kruuk LEB, Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Pemberton JM, Guinness FE (1999) Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer. Nature 399:459–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leslie DM, Starkey EE (1985) Fecal indices to dietary quality of cervids in old-growth forests. J Wildl Manage 49:142–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lindström J (1999) Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 14:343–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lunn NJ, Boyd IL, Barton T, Croxall JP (1993) Factors affecting the growth rate and mass at weaning of Antarctic fur seals at Bird Island South Georgia. J Mammal 74:908–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pelletier F, Réale D, Garant D, Coltman DW, Festa-Bianchet M (2007) Selection on heritable seasonal plasticity of body mass. Evol 61:1969–1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pérez-Barberia FJ, Nores C (1996) Grazing activity of breeding and non breeding female Cantabrian chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica parva). Ethol Ecol Evol 8:353–363Google Scholar
  52. Portier C, Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard J-M, Jorgenson JT, Yoccoz NG (1998) Effects of density and weather on survival of bighorn sheep lambs (Ovis canadensis). J Zool 245:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  54. Réale D, McAdam AG, Boutin S, Berteaux D (2003) Genetic and plastic responses of a northern mammal to climate change. Proc R Soc B 270:591–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rieger JF (1996) Body size litter size timimg of reproduction and juvenile survival in the Uinta ground squirrel Spermophilus armatus. Oecologia 107:463–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rutberg A (1987) Adaptive hypotheses of birth synchrony in ruminants: an interspecific test. Am Nat 130:692–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saltz D, White GC (1991) Urinary cortisol and urea nitrogen responses to winter stress in mule deer. J Wildl Manage 55:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson RW, Turner JC (1982) Temporal geographic variation in the lambing season of bighorn sheep. Can J Zool 60:1781–1793Google Scholar
  59. Wilson AJ, Kruuk LEB, Coltman DW (2005) Ontogenetic patterns in heritable variation for body size: using random regression models in a wild ungulate population. Am Nat 166:E177–E192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiarastella Feder
    • 1
  • Julien G. A. Martin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marco Festa-Bianchet
    • 1
    • 2
  • Céline Bérubé
    • 1
  • Jon Jorgenson
    • 3
  1. 1.Département de BiologieUniversité de SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada
  2. 2.Centre d’Études NordiquesUniversité LavalQuebecCanada
  3. 3.Fish and Wildlife DivisionDepartment of Sustainable DevelopmentCanmoreCanada

Personalised recommendations