Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 156, Issue 3, pp 559–568 | Cite as

Escaping an evolutionary trap: preference and performance of a native insect on an exotic invasive host

  • Margaret S. Keeler
  • Frances S. Chew
Plant-Animal Interactions - Original Paper

Abstract

Exotic plants may act as population sinks or evolutionary traps for native herbivores. The native butterfly Pieris oleracea lays eggs on garlic mustard, Alliaria petiolata, but larvae develop very poorly on this exotic invasive plant. We examined oviposition preference of individual females and larval performance of their offspring for individuals from one area where garlic mustard is well established and one where it is absent. These data were used to assess whether garlic mustard is being incorporated into or excluded from the diet. Females from the area without garlic mustard showed a wide range of preference, families had low larval survival on garlic mustard, and larval survivorship showed no correlation with mothers’ preferences. Females from the area with garlic mustard preferred it to the native host, and larval survivorship on garlic mustard was positively correlated with the mother’s preference. Individuals surviving on garlic mustard took longer to pupate and weighed >30% less compared to pupae reared on normal hosts. Our results suggest that where garlic mustard is well established P. oleracea may be adapting to this plant by both improved larval performance and increased adult female oviposition preference for it.

Keywords

Pieris Alliaria petiolata Oviposition Diet breadth Population sink 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Urie family (Craftsbury, Vermont) for permission to collect on their land; Sheena Harris, Zoe Hastings, Mayu Uchihashi, and Richard Bryan for laboratory and field assistance; Ihsan Al-Shebaz for determining some species identifications; Bernd Blossey for correspondence about garlic mustard; Colin Orians for laboratory equipment; Carol Boggs for sharing unpublished results on P. napi macdunnoughii; Michael Reed, Durwood Marshall, and Sara Lewis for statistical assistance; Carol Boggs, Dick Casagrande, Ross Feldberg, Sara Lewis, Colin Orians, Jan A. Pechenik, Michael Reed, J. Alan A. Renwick, and two reviewers for improving the manuscript. We thank Tufts Institute for the Environment and the Arabis Fund for financial support. All collections of living material and experiments were done in compliance with current law, including permits for collection of Massachusetts threatened species, no. 024.05SCI.

References

  1. Anderson RC, Kelley TC, Dhillion SS (1996) Aspects of the ecology of an invasive plant, garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in central Illinois. Restor Ecol 4:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benson J, Van Driesche RG, Pasquale A, Elkinton J (2003) Introduced braconid parasitoids and range reduction of a native butterfly in New England. Biol Control 28:197–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berdegue M, Reitz SR, Trumble JT (1998) Host plant selection and development in Spodoptera exigua: do mother and offspring know best? Entomol Exp Appl 89:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR (1994) Costs of inducible defense: protein limitation, growth, and detoxification in parsnip webworms. Ecology 75:2311–2317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergstrom A, Nylin S, Nygren GH (2004) Conservative resource utilization in the common blue butterfly—evidence for low costs of accepting absent host plants? Oikos 107:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernays E (1999) Plasticity and the problem of choice in food selection. Annu Rev Entomol Soc Am 92:944–951Google Scholar
  7. Bernays E, Graham M (1988) On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology 59:886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berube, DE (1972) Behavioral and physiological adaptation in the evolution of foodplant specificity in a species complex of Colias butterflies. PhD dissertation, Yale University, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  9. Blossey B, Nuzzo V, Hinz H, Gerber E (2001) Developing biological control of Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara and Grande (garlic mustard). Nat Areas J 21:357–367Google Scholar
  10. Boggs CL, Niell RS, Shaw F, Ezenwa VO, Simmers S, White K, Leidner AK (2008) Introduced host and native herbivore: a case of maladaptation (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Bossart JL (2003) Covariance of preference and performance on normal and novel hosts in a locally monophagous and locally polyphagous butterfly population. Oecologia 135:477–486PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bossart JL, Scriber JM (1995) Maintenance of ecologically significant genetic variation in the tiger swallowtail butterfly through differential selection and gene flow. Evolution 49:1163–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bossart JL, Scriber JM (1999) Preference variation in the polyphagous tiger swallowtail butterfly (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Environ Entomol 28:628–637Google Scholar
  14. Bowden SR (1971) American white butterflies (Pieridae) and English food-plants. J Lepidopt Soc 25:6–12Google Scholar
  15. Bowers MD, Stamp NE, Collinge SK (1992) Early stage of host range expansion by a specialist herbivore, Euphydryas phaeton (Nymphalidae). Ecology 73:526–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Camara MD (1997) A recent host range expansion in Junonia coenia Hubner (Nymphaliedae): oviposition preference, survival, growth, and chemical defense. Evolution 51:873–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Casagrande RA, Dacey JE (2007) Monarch butterfly oviposition on swallow-worts (Vincetoxicum spp.), Environ Entomol 36:631–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Caubet Y, Jaisson P (1991) A post-eclosion early learning involved in host recognition by Dinarmus basalis Rondani (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Anim Behav 58:977–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cavers PB, Heagy MI, Kokron RF (1979) The biology of Canadian weeds.35. Alliaria petiolata (M.Bieb.) Cavara and Grande. Can J Plant Sci 59:217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Charlesworth B, Coyne JA, Barton NH (1987) The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am Nat 130:113–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chew FS (1975) Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. I. The relative quality of available resources. Oecologia 20:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chew FS (1977) Coevolution of pierid butterflies and the cruciferous foodplants. II. The distribution of eggs of potential foodplants. Evolution 31:568–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chew FS (1980) Larval preferences of Pieris caterpillars (Lepidoptera). Oecologia 46:347–353Google Scholar
  24. Chew FS (1981) Coexistence and local extinction in two pierid butterflies. Am Nat 118:655–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chew FS, Watt WB (2006) The green-veined white (Pieris napi L.), its pierine relatives, and the systematics dilemmas of divergent character sets (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Biol J Linn Soc 88:413–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cipollini D, Gruner B (2007) Cyanide in the chemical arsenal of garlic mustard, Alliaria petiolata. J Chem Ecol 33:85–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Courant AV (1996) The effect of a naturalized crucifer on the feeding ecology of Pieris napi oleracea and Pieris virginiensis (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). MS thesis biology. Tufts University, MedfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Courant AV, Holbrook AE, Van der Reijden ED, Chew FS (1994) Native pierine butterfly (Pieridae) adapting to naturalized crucifer. J Lepidopt Soc 48:168–170Google Scholar
  29. Cuda JP, Parker PE, Coon BR, Vasquez FE, Harrison JM (2002) Evaluation of exotic Solanum spp. (Solnanales: Solanaceae) in Florida as host plants for the leaf beetles Leptinotarsa defecta and L. texana (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Fla Entomol 85:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Davis JM, Stamps JA (2004) The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends Ecol Evol 19:411–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dethier VG (1954) Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects. Evolution 8:33–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. DiTommaso A, Losey JE (2003) Oviposition preference and larval performance of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) on two invasive swallow-wort species. Entomol Exp Appl 108:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Feder JL, Reynolds K, Go W, Wang EC (1995) Intra- and interspecific competition and host race formation in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae). Oecologia 101:416–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Feldman TS, Haber WA (1998) Oviposition behavior, host plant use, and diet breadth of Anthanassa butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) using plants in the Acanthaceae in Costa Rican community. Fla Entomol 81:396–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Forister ML (2005) Independent inheritance of preference and performance in hybrids between host races of Mitoura butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Evolution 59:1149–1155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Fox CW, Lalonde RG (1993) Host confusion and the evolution of insect diet breadths. Oikos 67:577–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Futuyma DJ (1995) Genetic constraints on macroevolution: the evolution of host-affiliation in the leaf-beetle genus Ophraella. Evolution 49:797–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gilbert N (1984) Control of fecundity in Pieris rapae. I. The problem. J Anim Ecol 53:581–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gossard TW, Jones RE (1977) The effects of age and weather on egglaying in Pieris rapae (L.). J Appl Ecol 14:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gross J, Fatouros NE, Hilker M (2004) The significance of bottom-up effects for host plant specialization in Chrysomela leaf beetles. Oikos 105:368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Haggstrom H, Larsson S (1995) Slow larval growth on a suboptimal willow results in high predation mortality in the leaf beetle Galerucella lineola. Oecologia 104:308–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hämback PA, Beckerman AP (2003) Herbivory and plant resource competition: a review of two interacting interactions. Oikos 101:26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Haribal M, Yang Z, Attygalle AB, Renwick JAA, Meinwald J (2001) A cyanoallyl glucoside from Alliaria petiolata as a feeding deterrent for larvae of Pieris napi oleracea. J Nat Prod 64:440–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Haukioja E, Neuvonen S (1985) Induced long-term resistance of birch foliage against defoliators: defensive or incidental? Ecology 66:1303–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hopkins AD (1917) A discussion of H.G. Hewitt’s paper on ‘Insect behaviour’. J Econ Entomol 10:92–93Google Scholar
  46. Hovanitz W, Chang VCS (1964) Adult oviposition responses in Pieris rapae. J Res Lepidopt 3:159–172Google Scholar
  47. Hovanitz W, Chang VCS (1965) The alteration of host-plant specificity in larvae of Pieris rapae by induction. J Res Lepidopt 4:13–21Google Scholar
  48. Huang XP, Renwick JAA, Chew FS (1995) Oviposition stimulants and deterrents control acceptance of Alliaria petiolata by Pieris rapae and P. napi oleracea. Chemoecology 5/6:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. IPANE: Invasive Plant Atlas of New England (2003) Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs. http://www.ipane.org Cited 14 August 2006
  50. Jaenike J (1978) On optimal oviposition behavior in phytophagous insects. Theor Popul Biol 14:350–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Janz N (1998) Sex-linked inheritance of host-plant specialization in a polyphagous butterfly. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 265:1675–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Janz N (2003) Sex linkage of host plant use in butterflies. In: Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR (eds) Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 229–239Google Scholar
  53. Jones RE, Hart JR, Bull GD (1982) Temperature, size and egg production in the cabbage butterfly, Pieris rapae L. Aust J Zool 30:223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Joshi A, Thompson JN (1995) Trade-offs and the evolution of host specialization. Evol Ecol 9:82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Karowe DN (1990) Predicting host range evolution: colonization of Coronilla varia by Colias philodice. Evolution 44:1637–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Keeler MS, Chew FS, Goodale BC, Reed JM (2006) Modelling the impacts of two exotic invasive species on a native butterfly: top-down vs. bottom-up effects. J Anim Ecol 75:777–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Klots AB (1951) A field guide to the butterflies of North America east of the Great Plains. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  58. Loader C, Damman H (1991) Nitrogen content of food plants and vulnerability of Pieris rapae to natural enemies. Ecology 72:1586–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Louda SM, Rand TA, Arnett AE, McClay AS, Shea K, McEachern AK (2005) Evaluation of ecological risk to populations of threatened plant from an invasive biocontrol insect. Ecol Appl 15:234–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mattila HR, Otis GW (2003) A comparison of the host preference of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) for milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) over dog-strangler vine (Vincetoxicum rossicum). Entomol Exp Appl 107:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mayhew PJ (1997) Adaptive patterns of host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Oikos 79:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mayhew PJ (2001) Herbivore host choice and optimal bad motherhood. Trends Ecol Evol 16:165–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mulatu B, Applebaum SW, Coll M (2004) A recently acquired host plant provides an oligophagous insect herbivore with enemy-free space. Oikos 107:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Murphy SM (2004) Enemy-free space maintains swallowtail butterfly host shift. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:18048–18052PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nitao JK, Ayres MP, Lederhouse RC, Scriber JM (1991) Larval adaptation to lauraceous hosts: geographic divergence in the spicebush swallowtail butterfly. Ecology 72:1428–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nuzzo V (1993) Distribution and spread of the invasive biennial Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) in North America. In: McKnight BN (ed) Biological pollution, the control and impact of invasive exotic species. Indiana Academy of Sciences, Indianapolis, pp 137–145Google Scholar
  67. Nylin S, Nygren GH, Windig JJ, Janz N, Bergstrom A (2005) Genetics of host-plant preference in the comma butterfly Polygonia c-album (Nymphalidae), and evolutionary implications. Biol J Linn Soc 84:755–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ohsaki N, Sato Y (1994) Food plant choice of Pieris butterflies as a trade-off between parasitoid avoidance and quality of plants. Ecology 75:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Opler PA, Krizek GO (1984) Butterflies east of the Great Plains. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  70. Porter A (1994) Implications of introduced garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in the habitat of Pieris virginiensis (Pieridae). J Lepidopt Soc 48:171–172Google Scholar
  71. Rausher MD (1978) Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 200:1071–1073PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Renwick JAA (2002) The chemical world of crucivores: lures, treats and traps. Entomol Exp Appl 104:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Renwick JAA, Zhang WQ, Haribal M, Attygalle AB, Lopez KD (2001) Dual chemical barriers protect a plant against different larval stages of an insect. J Chem Ecol 27:1575–1583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rodman JE, Chew FS (1980) Phytochemical correlates of herbivory in a community of native and naturalized Cruciferae. Biochem Syst Ecol 8:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rojas JC, Wyatt TD (1999) The role of pre- and post-imaginal experience in the host-finding and oviposition behaviour of the cabbage moth. Physiol Entomol 24:83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schlaepfer MA, Sherman PW, Blossey B, Runge MC (2005) Introduced species as evolutionary traps. Ecol Lett 8:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sezer M, Butlin RK (1998) The genetic basis of oviposition preference differences between sympatric host races of the brown planthooper (Nilaparvata lugens). Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 265:2399–2405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shapiro AM (1975) Developmental and phenotypic responses to photo-period in uni and bivoltine Pieris napi in California. Trans R Entomol Soc Lond 127:65–71Google Scholar
  79. Sims SR (1980) Diapause dynamics and host plant suitability of Papilio zelicaon (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Am Midl Nat 103:373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Singer MC (1971) Evolution of food-plant preference in the butterfly Euphydryas editha. Evolution 25:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Singer MC, Ng D, Thomas CD (1988) Heritability of oviposition preference and its relationship to offspring performance within a single insect population. Evolution 42:977–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stanton ML (1982) Searching in a patchy environment: foodplant selection by Colias p. eriphyle butterflies. Ecology 63:839–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tabashnik BE (1983) Host range evolution: the shift from native legume hosts to alfalfa by the butterfly, Colias philodice eriphyle. Evolution 37:150–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thomas CD, Ng D, Singer MC, Mallet JLB, Parmesan C, Billington HL (1987) Incorporation of a European weed into the diet of a North American herbivore. Evolution 41:892–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Thompson JN (1988a) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomol Exp Appl 47:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thompson JN (1988b) Evolutionary genetics of oviposition preference in swallowtail butterflies. Evolution 42:1223–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Thompson JN, Pellmyr O (1991) Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 36:65–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thompson JN, Wehling W, Podolsky R (1990) Evolutionary genetics of host use in swallowtail butterflies. Nature 344:148–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Van der Reijden ED, Chew FS (1992) Assessing host-plant suitability in caterpillars: is the weight worth the wait? In: Mencken SB, Visser JH, Harrewijn P (eds) Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on insect–plant relationships. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 69–70Google Scholar
  90. Van Driesche RG, Nunn C, Pasquale A (2004) Life history pattern, host plants, and habitat as determinants of population survival of Pieris napi oleracea interacting with an introduced braconid parasitoid. Biol Control 29:278–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Welk E, Schubert K, Hoffman MH (2002) Present and potential distribution of invasive garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in North America. Div Distrib 8:219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. White DJ, Haber E, Keddy C (1993) Canadian museum of natural history. In: Invasive plants of natural habitats in Canada, Ottawa, p 121Google Scholar
  93. Wiklund C (1984) Egg laying patterns in butterflies in relation to their phenology and the visual apparency of their host plants. Oecologia 63:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Yamamoto M, Ohtani T (1979) Number of eggs laid by Pieris rapae crucivora, compared with P. napi nesis, in Sapporo (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Kontyu 47:530–539Google Scholar
  95. Zangerl AR, Huang T, McGovern JL, Berenbaum MR (2002) Paradoxical host shift by Depressaria pastinacella in North America: is enemy free space involved? Oikos 98:431–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyTufts UniversityMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations