, 156:193 | Cite as

Coordination between leaf and stem traits related to leaf carbon gain and hydraulics across 32 drought-tolerant angiosperms

  • Atsushi Ishida
  • Takashi Nakano
  • Kenichi Yazaki
  • Sawako Matsuki
  • Nobuya Koike
  • Diego L. Lauenstein
  • Michiru Shimizu
  • Naoko Yamashita
Community Ecology - Original Paper


We examined 15 traits in leaves and stems related to leaf C economy and water use for 32 co-existing angiosperms at ridge sites with shallow soil in the Bonin Islands. Across species, stem density was positively correlated to leaf mass per area (LMA), leaf lifespan (LLS), and total phenolics and condensed tannins per unit leaf N (N-based), and negatively correlated to leaf osmotic potential and saturated water content in leaves. LMA and LLS were negatively correlated to photosynthetic parameters, such as area-, mass-, and N-based assimilation rates. Although stem density and leaf osmotic potential were not associated with photosynthetic parameters, they were associated with some parameters of the leaf C economy, such as LMA and LLS. In the principal component (PCA) analysis, the first three axes accounted for 74.4% of total variation. Axis 1, which explained 41.8% of the total variation, was well associated with parameters for leaf C and N economy. Similarly, axis 2, which explained 22.3% of the total variation, was associated with parameters for water use. Axis 3, which explained 10.3% of the total variation, was associated with chemical defense within leaves. Axes 1 and 2 separated functional types relatively well, i.e., creeping trees, ruderal trees, other woody plants, C3 shrubs and forbs, palms, and CAM plants, indicating that plant functional types were characterized by similar attributes of traits related to leaf C and N economy and water use. In addition, when the plot was extended by two unrelated traits, leaf mass-based assimilation rates and stem density, it also separated these functional types. These data indicate that differences in the functional types with contrasting plant strategies can be attributed to functional integration among leaf C economy, hydraulics, and leaf longevity, and that both leaf mass-based assimilation rates and stem density are key factors reflecting the different functions of plant species.


Functional group Leaf longevity Photosynthesis Water use Wood density 


  1. Ackerly DD (2004) Functional strategies of chaparral shrubs in relation to seasonal water deficit and disturbance. Ecol Monogr 74:25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aerts R (1995) The advantages of being evergreen. Trends Ecol Evol 10:402–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bate-Smith EC (1977) Astringent tannins of Acer species. Phytochemistry 16:1421–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bucci SJ, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Scholz FG, Franco AC, Bustamante M (2004) Functional convergence in hydraulic architecture and water relations of tropical savanna trees: from leaf to whole plant. Tree Physiol 24:891–899PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chabot BF, Hicks DJ (1982) The ecology of leaf life spans. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:229–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapin III FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coley PD (1988) Effects of plant growth rate and leaf lifetime on the amount and type of anti-herbivore defense. Oecologia 74:531–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Díaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, Steege ter H, Morgan HD, Heijden van der MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51:335–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craine JM, Froehle J, Tilman DG, Wedin DA, Chapin FS III (2001) The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients. Oikos 93:274–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Craine JM, Tilman D, Wedin D, Reich P, Tjoelker M, Knops J (2002) Functional traits, productivity and effects on nitrogen cycling of 33 grassland species. Funct Ecol 16:563–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunningham SA, Summerhayes B, Westoby M (1999) Evolutionary divergences in leaf structure and chemistry, comparing rainfall and soil nutrient gradients. Ecology 69:569–588Google Scholar
  12. Díaz S, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Cabido M, Cornelissen JHC, Jalili A, Montserrat-Martí G, Grime JP, Zarrinkamar F, Asri Y, Band SR, Basconcelo S, Castro-Diez P, Funes G, Hamzehee B, Khoshnevi M, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Pérez-Rontomé MC, Shirvany FA, Vendramini F, Yazdani S, Abbas-Azimi R, Bogaard A, Boustani S, Charles M, Dehghan M, de Torres-Espuny L, Falczuk V, Guerrero-Campo J, Hynd A, Jones G, Kowsary E, Kazemi-Saeed F, Maestro-Martínez M, Romo-Díez A, Shaw S, Siavash B, Villar-Salvador P, Zak MR (2004) The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. J Veg Sci 15:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eamus D, Prichard H (1998) A cost-benefit analysis of leaves of four Australian savanna species. Tree Physiol 18:537–545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Escudero A, del Arco JM, Sanz IC, Ayala J (1992) Effects of leaf longevity and retranslocation efficiency on the retention time of nutrients in the leaf biomass of different woody species. Oecologia 90:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garnier E, Laurent G (1994) Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial grass species. New Phytol 128:725–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garnier E, Cordonnier P, Guillerm J-L, Sonié L (1997) Specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration in annual and perennial grass species growing in Mediterranean old-fields. Oecologia 111:490–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Givnish TJ (1995) Plant stems: biomechanical adaptation for energy capture and influence on species distributions. In: Gartner BL (ed) Plant stems. Physiology and functional morphology. Academic Press, California, pp 3–49Google Scholar
  18. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grime JP, Thompson K, Hunt R, Hodgson JG, Cornelissen JHC, Rorison IH, Hendry GAF, Ashenden TW, Askew AP, Band SR, Booth RE, Bossard CC, Campbell BD, Cooper JEL, Davison AW, Gupta PL, Hall W, Hand DW, Hannah MA, Hillier SH, Hodkinson DJ, Jalili A, Liu Z, Mackey JML, Matthews N, Mowforth MA, Neal AM, Reader RJ, Reiling K, Ross-Fraser W, Spencer RE, Sutton F, Tasker DE, Thorpe PC, Whitehouse J (1997) Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. Oikos 79:259–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hacke UG, Sperry JS (2001) Functional and ecological xylem anatomy. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 4:97–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pockman WT, Davis SD, McCulloh KA (2001) Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia 126:457–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hättenschwiler S, Vitousek PM (2000) The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 15:238–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ishida A, Nakano T, Uemura A, Yamashita N, Tanabe H, Koike N (2001) Light-use properties in two sun-adapted shrubs with contrasting canopy structures. Tree Physiol 21:497–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishida A, Diloksumpun S, Ladpala P, Staporn D, Panuthai S, Gamo M, Yazaki K, Ishizuka M, Puangchit L (2006) Contrasting seasonal leaf habits of canopy trees between tropical dry-deciduous and evergreen forests in Thailand. Tree Physiol 26:643–656PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Julkunen-Tiitto R (1985) Phenolic constituents in the leaves of northern willows: methods for the analysis of certain phenolics. J Agric Food Chem 33:213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kobayashi S (1978) A list of the vascular plants occurring in the Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands (in Japanese with English abstract). Ogasawara Res 1–2:1–33Google Scholar
  27. Kogami H, Hanba YT, Kibe T, Terashima I, Masuzawa T (2001) CO2 transfer conductance, leaf structure and carbon isotope composition of Polygonum cuspidatum leaves from low and high altitudes. Plant Cell Environ 24:529–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leishman MR, Westoby M (1992) Classifying plants into groups on the basis of associations of individual traits––evidence from Australian semi-arid woodlands. J Ecol 80:417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matsuki S, Koike T (2006) Comparison of leaf life span, photosynthesis and defensive traits across seven species of deciduous broad-leaf tree seedlings. Ann Bot 97:813–817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol 21:178–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meinzer FC (2003) Functional convergence in plant responses to the environment. Oecologia 134:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mishio M (1992) Adaptations to drought in five woody species co-occurring on shallow-soil ridges. Aust J Plant Physiol 19:539–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morita Y (1981) The dark-red forest soils of the Ogasawara Islands (I) Site condition, and morphological, mechanical and chemical properties (in Japanese with English abstract). J Jpn For Soc 63:1–7Google Scholar
  34. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS, Uhl C (1994) Photosynthesis-nitrogen relations in Amazonian tree species. I. Patterns among species and communities. Oecologia 97:62–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1997) From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:13730–13734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J, Craine JM, Oleksyn J, Westoby M, Walters MB (2003) The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. Int J Plant Sci 164(Suppl):S143–S164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Santiago LS, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Fisher JB, Machado K, Woodruff D, Jones T (2004) Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees. Oecologia 140:543–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schulze E-D, Ehleringer JR (1984) The effect of nitrogen supply on growth and water-use efficiency of xylem-tapping mistletoes. Planta 162:268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shimizu M, Ishida A, Hogetsu T (2005) Root hydraulic conductivity and whole-plant water balance in tropical saplings following a shade-to-sun transfer. Oecologia 143:189–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shimizu Y (1983) Phenological studies of the subtropical broad-leaved evergreen forests at Chichijima island in the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. Jpn J Ecol 33:135–147Google Scholar
  41. Shimizu Y, Tabata H (1991) Forest structures, composition, and distribution on a Pacific island, with reference to ecological release and speciation. Pacific Sci 45:28–49Google Scholar
  42. Sperry JS (2003) Evolution of water transport and xylem structure. Int J Plant Sci 164:S115–S127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tomlinson PB, Fisher JB, Spangler RE, Richer RA (2001) Stem vascular architecture in the rattan palm Calamus (Arecaceae-Calamoideae-Calaminae). Am J Bot 88:797–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Turner NC, Jones MM (1980) Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment: a review and evaluation. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ (eds) Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. Wiley, New York, pp 87–103Google Scholar
  45. Uemura A, Ishida A, Tobias DJ, Koike N, Matsumoto Y (2004) Linkage between seasonal gas exchange and hydraulic acclimation in the top canopy leaves of Fagus trees in a mesic forest in Japan. Trees 18:452–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vitousek PM, Field CB, Matson PA (1990) Variation in foliar δ13C in Hawaiian Metrosideros polymorpha: a case of internal resistance? Oecologia 84:362–370Google Scholar
  47. Westoby M, Wright IJ (2006) Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol 21:261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:125–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson PJ, Thompson K, Hodgson JG (1999) Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies. New Phytol 143:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wright IJ, Falster DS, Pickup M, Westoby M (2006) Cross-species patterns in the coordination between leaf and stem traits, and their implications for plant hydraulics. Physiol Plant 127:114–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas M-L, Niinemets Ü, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yamashita N, Ishida A, Kushima H, Tanaka N (2000) Acclimation to sudden increase in light favoring an invasive over native trees in subtropical islands, Japan. Oecologia 125:412–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atsushi Ishida
    • 1
  • Takashi Nakano
    • 2
  • Kenichi Yazaki
    • 1
  • Sawako Matsuki
    • 3
  • Nobuya Koike
    • 1
  • Diego L. Lauenstein
    • 4
  • Michiru Shimizu
    • 1
  • Naoko Yamashita
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Plant EcologyForestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI)TsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Yamanashi Institute of Environmental Science (YIES)Fuji-YoshidaJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of AgricultureIwate UniversityMoriokaJapan
  4. 4.Institute for Plant Pathology and PhysiologyNational Institute for Agricultural TechnologyCordobaArgentina
  5. 5.Kansai Research CenterForestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI)KyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations