Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 155, Issue 4, pp 821–829 | Cite as

Ecosystem engineering affects ecosystem functioning in high-Andean landscapes

  • Ernesto I. BadanoEmail author
  • Pablo A. Marquet
Community Ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Ecosystem engineers are organisms that change the distribution of materials and energy in the abiotic environment, usually creating and maintaining new habitat patches in the landscape. Such changes in habitat conditions have been widely documented to affect the distributions and performances of other species but up to now no studies have addressed how such effects can impact the biotically driven physicochemical processes associated with these landscapes, or ecosystem functions. Based on the widely accepted positive relationship between species diversity and ecosystem functions, we propose that the effects of ecosystem engineers on other species could have an impact on ecosystem functions via two mutually inclusive mechanisms: (1) by adding new species into landscapes, hence increasing species diversity; and (2) by improving the performances of species already present in the landscape. To test these hypotheses, we focused on the effects of a high-Andean ecosystem engineer, the cushion plant Azorella monantha, by comparing the accumulation of plant biomass and nitrogen fixed in plant tissues as species richness increases in landscapes with and without the engineer species. Our results show that both ecosystem functions increased with species richness in both landscape types, but landscapes including A. monantha cushions reached higher outcomes of plant biomass and nitrogen fixed in plant tissues than landscapes without cushions. Moreover, our results indicate that such positive effects on ecosystem functions could be mediated by the two mechanisms proposed above. Then, given the conspicuousness of ecosystem engineering in nature and its strong influence on species diversity, and given the well-known relationship between species diversity and ecosystem function, we suggest that the application of the conceptual framework proposed herein to other ecosystems would help to advance our understanding of the forces driving ecosystem functioning.

Keywords

Alpine ecology Cushion plants Ecosystem engineers Plant communities Plant ecology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the La Parva and Valle Nevado ski centers for logistic support provided during the sampling season. We acknowledge the financial support of the project FONDECYT 3060095 (EIB) and the projects FONDAP-FONDECYT 1501-0001 and ICM P05-002 (PAM). Part of this work was conducted while PAM was a Sabbatical Fellow at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, a Center funded by the NSF (Grant #DEB-0072909), the University of California, and the Santa Barbara campus. All of the experiments presented in this study comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Supplementary material

442_2007_953_MOESM1_ESM.doc (60 kb)
Appendix S1. Species from Mt. Franciscano and Mt. Tres Puntas. Species were classified according to the habitat type in which they were found. Cushions: species were only detected within Azorella monantha cushions; open areas: species were only detected in unmodified open areas surrounding cushions; both: species were detected in both habitat types. Absent indicates species not detected on a given mountaintop (doc 60 KB)

References

  1. Aarssen LW, Laird RA, Pither J (2003) Is the productivity of vegetation plots higher or lower when there are more species? Variable predictions from interaction of the ‘sampling effect’ and ‘competitive dominance effect’ on the habitat templet. Oikos 102:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aho K, Huntly N, Moen J, Oksanen T (1998) Pikas (Ochotona princeps: Lagomorpha) as allogenic engineers in an alpine ecosystem. Oecologia 114:405–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arroyo MTK, Cavieres LA, Peñaloza A, Arroyo-Kalin MA (2003) Positive interactions between the cushion plat Azorella monantha (Apiaceae) and alpine plant species in the Chilean Patagonian Andes. Plant Ecol 169:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badano EI, Molina-Montenegro MA, Quiroz CL, Cavieres LA (2002) Efectos de la planta en cojín Oreopolus glacialis (Rubiaceae) sobre la riqueza y diversidad de especies en una comunidad alto-andina de Chile central. Rev Chil Hist Nat 75:757–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badano EI, Cavieres LA (2006a) Ecosystem engineering across ecosystems: do engineer species sharing common features have generalized or idiosyncratic effects on species diversity? J Biogeogr 33:304–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badano EI, Cavieres LA (2006b) Impacts of ecosystem engineers on community attributes: effects of cushion plants at different elevations of the Chilean Andes. Divers Distrib 12:388–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Badano EI, Jones CG, Cavieres LA, Wright JP (2006) Assessing impacts of ecosystem engineers on community organization: a general approach illustrated by effects of a high-Andean cushion plant. Oikos 115:369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Badano EI, Villarroel E, Bustamante RO, Marquet P, Cavieres LA (2007) Ecosystem engineering facilitates invasions by exotic plants in high-Andean ecosystems. J Ecol 95:682–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borthagaray AI, Carranza A (2007) Mussels as ecosystem engineers: Their contribution to species richness in a rocky littoral community. Acta Oecol 31:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cardinale BJ, Palmer MA, Collins SL (2002) Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation. Nature 415:426–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castilla JC, Lagos NA, Cerda M (2004) Marine ecosystem engineering by the alien ascidian Pyura praeputialis on a mid-intertidal rocky shore. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 268:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cavieres LA, Peñaloza A, Papic C, Tambutti M (1998) Efecto nodriza del cojín Laretia acaulis (Umbelliferae) en la zona alto-andina de Chile central. Rev Chil Hist Nat 71:337–347Google Scholar
  13. Cavieres LA, Arroyo MTK (1999) Tasa de enfriamiento adiabático del aire en la cuenca del Rio Molina, Provincia de Santiago, Chile central (33°S). Rev Geográfica Chile Terra Australis 44:79–86Google Scholar
  14. Cavieres LA, Arroyo MTK, Peñaloza A, Molina-Montenegro MA, Torres C (2002) Nurse effect of Bolax gummifera cushion plants in the alpine vegetation of the Chilean Patagonian Andes. J Veg Sci 13:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cavieres LA, Quiroz CL, Molina-Montenegro MA, Muñoz AA, Pauchard A (2005) Nurse effect of the native cushion plant Azorella monantha on the invasive non-native Taraxacum officinale in the high-Andes of central Chile. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 7:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cavieres LA, Badano EI, Sierra-Almeida A, Gómez-González S, Molina-Montenegro MA (2006) Positive interactions between alpine plant species and the nurse cushion plant Laretia acaulis do not increase with elevation in the Andes of central Chile. New Phytol 169:59–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavieres LA, Badano EI, Sierra-Almeida A, Molina-Montenegro MA (2007) Microclimatic modifications of cushion plants and their consequences for seedling survival of native and non-native herbaceous species in the high Andes of central Chile. Arct Antarct Alp Res 39:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chapin III FS, Walker BH, Hobbs RJ, Hooper DU, Lawton JH, Sala OE, Tilman D (1997) Biotic control over the functioning of ecosystems. Science 227:500–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crooks JA, Khim HS (1999) Architectural vs. biological effects of a habitat-altering, exotic mussel, Musculista senhousia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 240:53–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flecker AS (1996) Ecosystem engineering by a dominant detritivore in a diverse tropical stream. Ecology 77:1845–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fonseca CR, Ganade G (2001) Species functional redundancy, random extinctions and the stability of ecosystems. J Ecol 89:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fritz KM, Gangloff MM, Feminella JW (2004) Habitat modification by the stream macrophyte Justicia americana and its effects on biota. Oecologia 140:388–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Giller PS, O’Donovan G (2002) Biodiversity and ecosystem function: do species matter? P Roy Irish Acad B 102:129–139Google Scholar
  24. Gutiérrez JL, Jones CG (2006) Physical ecosystem engineers as agents of biogeochemical heterogeneity. Bioscience 56:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hector A, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Dimer M, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Good J, Harris R, Högberg P, Huss-Danell K, Joshi J, Jumpponen A, Körner C, Leadley PW, Loreau M, Minns A, Mulder CPH, O’Donovan G, Otway SJ, Pereira JS, Prinz A, Reed DJ, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schulze ED, Siamantziouras ASD, Sphen EM, Terry AC, Troumbis AY, Woodward FI, Yachi S, Lawton JH (1999) Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286:1123–1127Google Scholar
  26. Hood GM (2006) PopTools [2.7.5]. http://www.cse.csiro.au/poptools. Accessed 27 December 2007
  27. Huston MA (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kleier C, Rundel PW (2004) Microsite requirements, population structure and growth of the cushion plant Azorella compacta in the tropical Chilean Andes. Austral Ecol 29:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Le Roux PC, McGeoch MA (2004) The use of size as an estimator of age in the subantarctic cushion plant, Azorella selago (Apiaceae). Arct Antarct Alp Res 36:509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lill JT, Marquis RJ (2004) Leaf ties as colonization sites for forest arthropods: an experimental study. Ecol Entomol 29:300–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Loreau M (1998) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5632–5636Google Scholar
  34. Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mark AF, Wilson JB (2005) Tempo and mode of vegetation dynamics over 50 years in a New Zealand alpine cushion/tussock community. J Veg Sci 16:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Molina-Montenegro MA, Badano EI, Inostroza P, Cavieres LA (2005) Intercambio gaseoso en dos especies de plantas alto andinas de Chile central: efecto de la asociación a plantas en cojín. Ecol Austral 15:49–58Google Scholar
  38. Molina-Montenegro MA, Badano EI, Cavieres LA (2006) Cushion plants as microclimatic shelters for two ladybird beetles species in alpine zone of central Chile. Arct Antarct Alp Res 38:224–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moore JW (2006) Animal ecosystem engineers in streams. BioScience 56:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mulder CPH, Uliassi DD, Doak FD (2001) Physical stress and diversity-productivity relationships: the role of positive interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6704–6708Google Scholar
  41. Naeem S, Thomson LJ, Lawler SP, Lawton JH, Woodfin RM (1995) Empirical evidence that declining species diversity may alter the performance of terrestrial ecosystems. Phil T Roy Soc Lond B 347:249–242Google Scholar
  42. Neira C, Levin LA, Grosholz ED (2005) Benthic macrofaunal communities of three sites in San Francisco Bay invaded by hybrid Spartina, with comparison to uninvaded habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 292:111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neira C, Grosholz ED, Levin LA, Blake R (2006) Mechanisms generating modification of benthos following tidal flat invasion by a Spartina hybrid. Ecol Appl 16:1391–1404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Núñez C, Aizen M, Ezcurra C (1999) Species associations and nurse plant effect in patches of high-Andean vegetation. J Veg Sci 10:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Perelman SB, Burkart SE, Leon RJC (2003) The role of a native tussock grass (Paspalum quadrifarium Lam.) in structuring plant communities in the Flooding Pampa grasslands, Argentina. Biodivers Conserv 12:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Petchey OL (2004) On the statistical significance of functional diversity effects. Funct Ecol 18:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ralph CP (1978) Observations on Azorella compacta (Umbelliferae), a tropical Andean cushion plant. Biotropica 10:62–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Santibáñez F, Uribe JM (1990) Atlas agroclimático de la V Región y Región Metropolitana. Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, ChileGoogle Scholar
  49. Schooley RL, Bestelmeyer BT, Kelly JF (2000) Influence of small-scale disturbances by kangaroo rats on Chihuahuan Desert ants. Oecologia 125:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thomas F, Renaurd F, de Meeûs T, Poulin R (1998) Manipulation of host behavior by parasites: ecosystem engineering in the intertidal zone? Proc Roy Soc Lond B 265:1091–1096Google Scholar
  51. Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1300–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wright JP, Jones CG, Flecker AS (2002) An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale. Oecologia 132:96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wright JP, Jones CG (2006) The concept of organisms as ecosystem engineers ten years on: progress, limitations, and challenges. Bioscience 56:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Center for Advanced Studies in Ecology and Biodiversity (CASEB)Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (IEB)SantiagoChile
  3. 3.National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS)Santa BarbaraUSA
  4. 4.Departamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Escuela de Ingeniería y CienciasUniversidad de las Américas PueblaCholulaMexico

Personalised recommendations