, Volume 155, Issue 3, pp 641–649 | Cite as

Larval amphibian growth and development under varying density: are parasitized individuals poor competitors?

  • J. Koprivnikar
  • M. R. Forbes
  • R. L. Baker
Community Ecology - Original Paper


Population density and infection with parasites often are important factors affecting the growth and development of individuals. How these factors co-occur and interact in nature should have important consequences for individual fitness and higher-order phenomena, such as population dynamics of hosts and their interactions with other species. However, few studies have examined the joint effects of density and parasitism on host growth and development. We examined the co-influences of rearing density and parasitism, by the trematode Echinostoma trivolvis, on the growth and development of larval frogs, Rana (=Lithobates) pipiens. We also examined the potential role of parasite-mediated intraspecific competition by observing how unparasitized individuals performed when housed with other unparasitized tadpoles, versus housing with a combination of unparasitized and parasitized hosts. Mean mass and mean developmental stage were reduced under high rearing densities. The presence of parasitized conspecifics had no significant effect, but there was a significant interaction of density and parasitism presence on host mass, due to the fact that parasitized conspecifics grew poorly at high densities. Unparasitized individuals reared with parasitized and unparasitized conspecifics fared no better than unparasitized individuals reared only with one another. This result indicates that infected hosts compete as much as uninfected hosts for resources, even though infected individuals have reduced mass under high-density conditions. Resource acquisition and resource allocation are different processes, and parasitism, if it only affects the latter, might not have a discernible impact on competitive interactions.


Density Intraspecific competition Parasitism Tadpole Trematode 



We thank Elaine Cairns and Chad Jankowski for their assistance, and Yemisi Dare for frog eggs and advice. Funding was provided by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant to RLB.


  1. Beasley VR, Faeh SA, Wikoff B, Eisold J, Nichols D, Cole R, Schotthoefer AM, Staehle C, Greenwell M, Brown LE (2005) Risk factors and the decline of the northern cricket frog, Acris crepitans: evidence for involvement of herbicides, parasitism, and habitat modifications. In: Lanoo MJ (ed) Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 75–86Google Scholar
  2. Bedhomme S, Agnew P, Vital Y, Sidobre C, Michalakis Y (2005) Prevalence-dependent costs of parasite virulence. PLoS Biol 3:e262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belden LK (2006) Impact of eutrophication on wood frog, Rana sylvatica, tadpoles infected with Echinostoma trivolvis cercariae. Can J Zool 84:1315–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belden LK, Kiesecker JM (2005) Glucocorticosteroid hormone treatment of larval treefrogs increases infection by Alaria sp. trematode cercariae. J Parasitol 91:686–688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berven KA, Boltz RS (2001) Interactive effects of leech (Desserobdella picta) infection on wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpole fitness traits. Copeia 4:907–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berven KA, Chadra BG (1988) The relationship among egg size, density, and food level on larval development in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Oecologia 75:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boone MD, Bridges CM, Fairchild JF, Little EE (2005) Effects of ammonium nitrate fertilizer and insecticide exposure on populations of the green frog, Rana clamitans. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1267–1272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boone MD, Semlitsch RD, Little EE, Doyle MC (2007) Multiple stressors in amphibian communities: effects of chemical contamination, bullfrogs, and fish. Ecol Appl 17:291–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dare OK, Rutherford PL, Forbes MR (2006) Rearing density and susceptibility of Rana pipiens metamorphs to cercariae of a digenetic trematode. J Parasitol 92:543–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD (2003) Infectious disease and amphibian population declines. Divers Distrib 9:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fried B, Pane PL, Reddy A (1997) Experimental infection of Rana pipiens tadpoles with Echinostoma trivolvis cercariae. Parasitol Res 83:666–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glennemeier KA, Denver RJ (2002) Role of corticoids in mediating the response of Rana pipiens tadpoles to intraspecific competition. J Exp Zool 292:32–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goater CP (1994) Growth and survival of postmetamorphic toads: interactions among larval history, density, and parasitism. Ecology 75:2264–2274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190Google Scholar
  15. Hatcher MJ, Dick JTA, Dunn AM (2006) How parasites affect interactions between competitors and predators. Ecol Lett 9:1253–1271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hochberg ME (1991) Population dynamics consequences of the interplay between parasitism and intraspecific competition for host–parasite systems. Oikos 61:297–306Google Scholar
  17. Holland MP, Skelly DK, Kashgarian M, Bolden SR, Harrison LM, Capello M (2007) Echinostome infection in green frogs (Rana clamitans) is stage and age dependent. J Zool 271:455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holt RD, Pickering J (1985) Infectious disease and species coexistence: a model of Lotka-Volterra form. Am Nat 126:196–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Houlahan JE, Findlay CS (2003) The effects of adjacent land use on wetland amphibian species richness and community composition. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1078–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson PTJ, Chase JM (2004) Parasites in the food web: linking amphibian malformations and aquatic eutrophication. Ecol Lett 7:521–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kiesecker JM (2002) Synergism between trematode infection and pesticide exposure: a link to amphibian limb deformities in nature? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9900–9904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kiesecker JM, Skelly DK (2001) Effects of disease and pond drying on grey tree frog growth, development, and survival. Ecology 82:1956–1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King KC, Gendron AD, McLaughlin JD, Giroux I, Brousseau P, Cyr D, Ruby SM, Fournier M, Marcogliese DJ (2007) Short-term seasonal changes in parasite community structure in northern leopard froglets (Rana pipiens) inhabiting agricultural wetlands. J Parasitol (in press)Google Scholar
  24. Knutson MG, Richardson WB, Reineke DM, Gray BR, Parmelee JR, Weick SE (2004) Agricultural ponds support amphibian populations. Ecol Appl 14:669–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lacan I, Matthews KR (2005) Potential for loss of breeding habitat for imperiled mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana mucosa) in high Sierra Nevada mountain water bodies due to reduced snowpack: interaction of climate change and an introduced predator. Eos Trans AGU 86(Fall Meeting Suppl):Abstr GC32A-07Google Scholar
  26. Lajeunesse MJ, Forbes MR (2002) Host range and local parasite adaptation. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loman J (2001) Intraspecific competition in tadpoles of Rana arvalis: does it matter in nature? A field experiment. Popul Ecol 43:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin TR, Conn DB (1990) The pathogencity, localization, and cyst structure of echinostomatid metacercariae (Trematoda) infecting the kidneys of the frogs Rana clamitans and Rana pipiens. J Parasitol 76:414–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Minchella DJ, Scott ME (1991) Parasitism: a cryptic determinant of animal community structure. Trends Ecol Evol 6:250–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moore J (2002) Parasites and the behaviour of animals. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Olsen OW (1974) Animal parasites: their life cycles and ecology, 3rd edn. University Park Press, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  32. Park T (1948) Experimental studies on interspecies competition. I. Competition between populations of the flour beetles Tribolium confusum (Duval) and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). Ecol Monogr 18:265–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parris MJ, Beaudoin JG (2004) Chytridiomycosis impacts predator–prey interactions in larval amphibian communities. Oecologia 140:626–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Poulin R (1999) The functional importance of parasites in animal communities: many roles at many levels? Int J Parasitol 29:903–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pounds JA, Bustamante MR, Coloma LA, Consuegra JA, Fogden MPL, Foster PN, La Marca E, Masters KL, Merino-Viteri A, Puschendorf R, Ron SR, Sánchez-Azofeifa GA, Still SG, Young BE (2006) Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming. Nature 439:161–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Price PW, Westoby M, Rice B, Atsatt PR, Fritz RS, Thompson JN, Mobley K (1986) Parasite mediation in ecological interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:487–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Price PW, Westoby M, Rice B (1988) Parasite-mediated competition: some predictions and tests. Am Nat 131:544–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rantala MJ, Roff DA (2005) An analysis of trade-offs in immune function, body size and development time in the Mediterranean field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Funct Ecol 19:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Relyea RA (2004) Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Relyea RA, Mills N (2001) Predator-induced stress makes the pesticide carbaryl more deadly to gray treefrog tadpoles (Hyla versicolor). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2491–2496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scheinin S, Yom-Tov Y, Motro U, Geffen E (2006) Behavioural responses of red foxes to an increase in the presence of golden jackals: a field experiment. Anim Behav 71:577–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schell SC (1984) Handbook of trematodes of North America north of Mexico. University Press of Idaho, Moscow, IDGoogle Scholar
  43. Schotthoefer AM, Cole RA, Beasley VR (2003) Relationship of tadpole stage to location of echinostome cercariae encystment and the consequences for tadpole survival. J Parasitol 89:475–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Semlitsch RD, Caldwell JP (1982) Effects of density of growth, metamorphosis, and survivorship in tadpoles of Scaphiopus holbrooki. Ecology 63:905–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith GR, Dingfelder HA, Vaala DA (2003) Distribution and abundance of amphibian larvae within two temporary ponds in central Ohio, USA. J Freshw Ecol 18:491–496Google Scholar
  46. Smith GR, Dingfelder HA, Vaala DA (2004) Asymmetric competition between Rana clamitans and Hyla versicolor tadpoles. Oikos 105:626–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steinwascher K (1979) Competitive interactions among tadpoles: responses to resource level. Ecology 60:1172–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Dick BL, Johnson BK, Kie JG (2005) Density-dependent effects on physical condition and reproduction in North American elk: an experimental test. Oecologia 143:85–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tompkins DM, Draycott RAH, Hudson PJ (2000) Field evidence for apparent competition mediated via the shared parasites of two gamebird species. Ecol Lett 3:10–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tschirren B, Richner H (2006) Parasites shape the optimal investment in immunity. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1773–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Underwood AJ (1997) Ecological experiments: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 535Google Scholar
  52. Washburn JO, Mercer DR, Anderson JR (1991) Regulatory role of parasites: impact on host population shifts with resource availability. Science 253:185–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weldon C, du Preez LH, Hyatt AD, Muller R, Speare R (2004) Origin of the amphibian chytrid fungus. Emerg Infect Dis 10:2100–2105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilbur HM (1977) Density-dependent aspects of growth and metamorphosis in Bufo americanus. Ecology 58:196–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Worden BD, Parker PC, Pappas PW (2000) Parasites reduce attractiveness and reproductive success in male grain beetles. Anim Behav 59:543–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yan G, Stevens L (1995) Selection by parasites on components of fitness in Tribolium beetles: the effect of intraspecific competition. Am Nat 146:795–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Toronto at MississaugaMississaugaCanada
  2. 2.Department of BiologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of the PacificStocktonUSA

Personalised recommendations