, Volume 155, Issue 3, pp 405–415 | Cite as

Stem and leaf hydraulics of congeneric tree species from adjacent tropical savanna and forest ecosystems

  • Guang-You Hao
  • William A. Hoffmann
  • Fabian G. Scholz
  • Sandra J. Bucci
  • Frederick C. Meinzer
  • Augusto C. Franco
  • Kun-Fang Cao
  • Guillermo Goldstein
Physiological Ecology - Original Paper


Leaf and stem functional traits related to plant water relations were studied for six congeneric species pairs, each composed of one tree species typical of savanna habitats and another typical of adjacent forest habitats, to determine whether there were intrinsic differences in plant hydraulics between these two functional types. Only individuals growing in savanna habitats were studied. Most stem traits, including wood density, the xylem water potential at 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity, sapwood area specific conductivity, and leaf area specific conductivity did not differ significantly between savanna and forest species. However, maximum leaf hydraulic conductance (K leaf) and leaf capacitance tended to be higher in savanna species. Predawn leaf water potential and leaf mass per area were also higher in savanna species in all congeneric pairs. Hydraulic vulnerability curves of stems and leaves indicated that leaves were more vulnerable to drought-induced cavitation than terminal branches regardless of genus. The midday K leaf values estimated from leaf vulnerability curves were very low implying that daily embolism repair may occur in leaves. An electric circuit analog model predicted that, compared to forest species, savanna species took longer for their leaf water potentials to drop from predawn values to values corresponding to 50% loss of K leaf or to the turgor loss points, suggesting that savanna species were more buffered from changes in leaf water potential. The results of this study suggest that the relative success of savanna over forest species in savanna is related in part to their ability to cope with drought, which is determined more by leaf than by stem hydraulic traits. Variation among genera accounted for a large proportion of the total variance in most traits, which indicates that, despite different selective pressures in savanna and forest habitats, phylogeny has a stronger effect than habitat in determining most hydraulic traits.


Plant water relations Embolism Vulnerability Phylogenetic inertia 



This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (USA) under grant number DEB-0542912, the A. W. Mellon Foundation, and CNPq (Brazil). We are grateful to personnel of the IBGE ecological reserve for logistic support. We thank Ryan Adasme and Eric Manzané for field assistance. We thank Yong-Jiang Zhang and Juan Pablo Giraljo for suggestions on laboratory methods. This work complies with Brazilian law.


  1. Aasamaa K, Sober A, Rahi M (2001) Leaf anatomical characteristics associated with shoot hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance and stomatal sensitivity to changes of leaf water status in temperate deciduous trees. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:765–774Google Scholar
  2. Ackerly DD (1999) Comparative plant ecology and the role of phylogenetic information. In: Press MC, Scholes JD, Barker MG (eds) Physiological plant ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 391–413Google Scholar
  3. Becker P, Tyree MT, Tsuda M (1999) Hydraulic conductances of angiosperms of versus conifers: transport sufficiency at the whole-plant level. Tree Physiol 19:445–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman DM, Fensham RJ (1991) Response of a monsoon forest–savanna boundary to fire protection, Weipa, northern Australia. Aust J Ecol 16:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2003) Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits. Plant Physiol 132:2166–2173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2004) Diurnal depression of leaf hydraulic conductance in a tropical tree species. Plant Cell Environ 27:820–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2005) Leaf hydraulic capacity in ferns, conifers and angiosperms: impacts on photosynthetic maxima. New Phytol 165:839–846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bucci SJ, Scholz F, Goldstein G, Meinzer F, Sternberg L (2003) Dynamic changes in hydraulic conductivity in petioles of two savanna tree species: factors and mechanisms contributing to the refilling of embolized vessels. Plant Cell Environ 26:1633–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bucci SJ, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Scholz FG, Franco AC, Bustamante M (2004a) Functional convergence in hydraulic architecture and water relations of tropical savanna trees: from leaf to whole plant. Tree Physiol 24:891–899PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bucci SJ, Scholz F, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Hinojosa JA, Hoffmann WA, Franco AC (2004b) Processes preventing nocturnal equilibration between leaf and soil water potential in tropical savanna tree species. Tree Physiol 24:1119–1127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bucci SJ, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Franco AC, Campanello P, Scholz FG (2005) Mechanisms contributing to seasonal homeostasis of minimum leaf water potential and predawn disequilibrium between soil and plant water potential in Neotropical savanna trees. Trees 19:296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapin FS, Autumn K, Pugnaire F (1993) Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress. Am Nat (Suppl) 142:S78–S92Google Scholar
  13. Felfili JM, Junior MCDS (1992) Floristic composition, phytosociology and comparison of cerrado and gallery forest at Fazenda Agua Limpa, Federal District, Brazil. In: Furley PA, Procter J, Ratter JA (eds) Nature and dynamics of forest-savanna boundaries. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 393–416Google Scholar
  14. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Furley PA, Ratter JA (1988) Soil resources and plant communities of the central Brazilian cerrado and their development. J Biogeogr 15:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garnier E (1992) Growth analysis on congeneric annual and perennial grass species. J Ecol 80:665–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gartner BL, Meinzer FC (2005) Structure–function relationships in sapwood water transport and storage. In: Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA (eds) Vascular transport in plants. Elsevier, Boston, pp 307–331Google Scholar
  18. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pockman WT, Davis SD, McCulloh KA (2001) Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia 126:457–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoffmann WA, Franco AC (2003) Comparative growth analysis of tropical forest and savanna woody plants using phylogenetically independent contrasts. J Ecol 91:475–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoffmann WA, Orthen B, Franco AC (2004) Constraints to seedling success of savanna and forest trees across the savanna–forest boundary. Oecologia 140:252–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffmann WA, Franco AC, Moreira MZ, Haridasan M (2005) Specific leaf area explains differences in leaf traits between congeneric savanna and forest trees. Funct Ecol 19:932–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hopkins B (1992) Ecological processes at the forest-savanna boundary. In: Furley PA, Procter F, Ratter JA (eds) Nature and dynamics of forest–savanna boundaries. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 21–23Google Scholar
  23. Jackson PC, Meinzer FC, Bustamante M, Goldstein G, Franco A, Caldas L, Igler E, Causin F (1999) Partitioning of soil water among tree species in a Brazilian Cerrado ecosystem. Tree Physiol 19:717–724PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobsen AL, Ewers FW, Pratt RB, Paddock WA, Davis SD (2005) Do xylem fiber affect vessel cavitation resistance? Plant Physiol 149:546–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meinzer FC (2003) Functional convergence in plant responses to the environment. Oecologia 134:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Franco AC, Bustamante M, Igler E, Jackson P, Caldas L, Rundel PW (1999) Atmospheric and hydraulic limitations on transpiration in Brazilian Cerrado woody species. Funct Ecol 13:273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nardini A (2001) Are sclerophylls and malacophylls hydraulically different? Biol Plant 44:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pivello VR, Coutinho LM (1992) Transfer of macronutrients to the atmosphere during experimental burnings in an open cerrado (Brazilian savanna). J Trop Ecol 8:487–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ratter JA (1992) Transitions between cerrado and forest vegetation in Brazil. In: Furley PA, Procter J, Ratter JA (eds) Nature and dynamics of forest-savanna boundaries. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 417–429Google Scholar
  30. Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1985) Contrast analysis: focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Sack L, Frole K (2006) Leaf structural diversity is related to hydraulic capacity in tropical rain forest trees. Ecology 87:483–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sack L, Holbrook NM (2006) Leaf hydraulics. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:361–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sack L, Tyree MT (2005) Leaf hydraulics and its implications in plant structure and function. In: Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA (eds) Vascular transport in plants. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 93–114Google Scholar
  34. Sack L, Melcher PJ, Zwieniecki MA, Holbrook NM (2002) The hydraulic conductance of the angiosperm leaf lamina: a comparison of three measurement methods. J Exp Bot 53:2177–2184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, Holbrook NM (2003) The ‘hydrology’ of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant Cell Environ 26:1343–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sack L, Tyree MT, Holbrook NM (2005) Leaf hydraulic architecture correlates with regeneration irradiance in tropical rainforest trees. New Phytol 167:403–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Brandstreet ED (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148:339–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scholz FG, Bucci SJ, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Franco AC, Miralles-Wilhelm F (2007) Biophysical properties and functional significance of stem water storage tissues in neotropical savanna trees. Plant Cell Environ 30:236–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sperry JS, Tyree MT (1988) Mechanism of water stress-induced xylem embolism. Plant Physiol 88:581–587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sternberg LSL, Bucci S, Franco AC, Goldstein G, Hoffmann WA, Moreira MZ, Scholz F (2004) Long range lateral root activity by Neo-tropical savanna trees. Plant Soil 270:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stratton L, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC (2000) Stem water storage capacity and efficiency of water transport: their functional significance in a Hawaiian dry forest. Plant Cell Environ 23:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Swaine MD, Hawthorne WD, Orgle TK (1992) The effects of fire exclusion on savanna vegetation at Kpong, Ghana. Biotropica 24:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tyree MT, Ewers FW (1991) The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytol 119:345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tyree MT, Hammel HT (1972) The measurement of the turgor pressure and the water relations of plants by the pressure-bomb technique. J Exp Bot 23:267–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tyree MT, Sperry JS (1989) Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation and embolism. Annu Rev Plant Mol Biol 40:19–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tyree MT, Sobrado MA, Stratton LJ, Becker P (1999) Diversity of hydraulic conductance in leaves of temperate and tropical species: possible causes and consequences. J Trop For Sci 11:47–60Google Scholar
  47. Woodruff DR, McCulloh KA, Warren JM, Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B (2007) Impacts of tree height on leaf hydraulic architecture and stomatal control in Douglas-fir. Plant Cell Environ 30:559–569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guang-You Hao
    • 1
    • 2
  • William A. Hoffmann
    • 3
  • Fabian G. Scholz
    • 4
  • Sandra J. Bucci
    • 4
  • Frederick C. Meinzer
    • 5
  • Augusto C. Franco
    • 6
  • Kun-Fang Cao
    • 1
  • Guillermo Goldstein
    • 2
    • 7
  1. 1.Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesMenglaChina
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Plant BiologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  4. 4.Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Técnicas (CONICET), Departamento de BiologíaUniversidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan BoscoComodoro RivadaviaArgentina
  5. 5.USDA Forest Service, Forestry Sciences LaboratoryCorvallisUSA
  6. 6.Departamento de BotanicaUniversidade de BrasiliaBrasiliaBrazil
  7. 7.Laboratorio de Ecología Funcional, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesUniversidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations