Oecologia

, Volume 155, Issue 2, pp 227–235

The importance of quantifying inherent variability when interpreting stable isotope field data

  • Carolyn Barnes
  • Simon Jennings
  • Nicholas V. C. Polunin
  • John E. Lancaster
Population Ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Stable isotope data are often used to assess diet, trophic level, trophic niche width and the extent of omnivory. Notwithstanding ongoing discussions about the value of these approaches, variations in isotopic signatures among individuals depend on inherent variability as well as differences in feeding habitats. Remarkably, the relative contributions of diet variation and inherent variability to differences in δ15N and δ13C among individuals have not been quantified for the same species at the same life history stages, and inherent variability has been ignored or assumed. We quantified inherent variability in δ13C and δ15N among individuals of a marine fish (the European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax) reared in a controlled environment on a diet of constant isotopic composition and compared it with variability in δ13C and δ15N among individuals from wild bass populations. The analysis showed that inherent variability among reared individuals on a controlled diet was equivalent to a large proportion of the observed variability among wild individuals and, therefore, that inherent variability should be measured to establish baseline variability in wild populations before any assumptions are made about the influence of diet. Given that inherent variability is known to be dependent on species, life history stage and the environment, our results show that it should be quantified on a case-by-case basis if diet studies are intended to provide absolute assessments of dietary habits.

Keywords

Carbon Feeding Food chain Food web Nitrogen Stable isotopes 

References

  1. Araujo MS, Bolnick DI, Machado G, Giaretta AA, Dos Reis SF (2007) Using δ13C stable isotopes to quantify individual-level diet variation. Oecologia 152:643–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badalamenti F, D’Anna G, Pinnegar JK, Polunin NVC (2002) Size-related trophodynamic changes in three target fish species recovering from intensive trawling. Mar Biol 141:561–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes C (2006) Factors influencing the level of stable isotope fractionation in large marine consumers. PhD thesis. School of Marine Science and Technology, Newcastle University, NewcastleGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes C, Sweeting CJ, Jennings S, Barry JT, Polunin NVC (2007) Effect of temperature and ration size on carbon and nitrogen stable isotope trophic fractionation. Funct Ecol 21:356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bearhop S, Adams CE, Waldron S, Fuller RA, MacLeod H (2004) Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. J Anim Ecol 73:1007–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darnaude AM, Salen-Picard C, Polunin NVC, Harmelin-Vivien ML (2004) Trophodynamic linkage between river runoff and coastal fishers yield elucidated by stable isotope data in the Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean). Oecologia 138:325–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davenport SR, Bax NJ (2002) A trophic study of a marine ecosystem off southeastern Australia using stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:514–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeNiro M, Epstein S (1977) Mechanism of carbon isotope fractionation associated with lipid synthesis. Science 197:261–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1978) Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 42:495–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1981) Influence of diet on the distribution of nitrogen isotopes in animals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 45:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. France RL (1997) δ15N examination of the Lindeman-Hutchinson-Peters theory of increasing omnivory with trophic height in aquatic foodwebs. Res Popul Ecol 39:121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gorokhova E, Hansson S (1999) An experimental study on variations in stable carbon and nitrogen isotope fractionation during growth of Mysis mixta and Neomysis integer. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:2203–2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grey J (2001) Ontogeny and dietary specialization in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) from Loch Ness, Scotland, examined using stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen. Ecol Freshw Fish 10:168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacob U, Mintenbeck K, Brey T, Knust R, Beyer K (2005) Stable isotope food web studies: a case for standardized sample treatment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 287:251–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jardine TD, Cunjak RA (2005) Analytical error in stable isotope ecology. Oecologia 144:528–533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jennings S, Lancaster JE, Ryland JS, Shackley SE (1991) The age structure and growth dynamics of young-of-the-year bass, Dicentrarchus labrax, populations. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 71:799–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jennings S, Renones O, MoralesNin B, Polunin NVC, Moranta J, Coll J (1997) Spatial variation in the 15N and 13C stable isotope composition of plants, invertebrates and fishes on Mediterranean reefs: Implications for the study of trophic pathways. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 146:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jennings S, Pinnegar JK, Polunin NVC, Boon TW (2001) Weak cross-species relationships between body size and trophic level belie powerful size-based trophic structuring in fish communities. J Anim Ecol 70:934–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jennings S, Pinnegar JK, Polunin NVC, Warr KJ (2002) Linking size-based and trophic analyses of benthic community structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 226:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lancaster JE (1991) The feeding ecology of juvenile bass Dicentrarchus labrax (L.). PhD thesis. Marine, Environmental and Evolutionary Research Group, University College of Swansea, SwanseaGoogle Scholar
  21. Matthews B, Mazumder A (2004) A critical evaluation of intrapopulation variation of δ13C and isotopic evidence of individual specialization. Oecologia 140:361–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pickett GD, Pawson MG (1994) Sea Bass-Biology, exploitation and conservation. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Pinnegar JK, Polunin NVC (1999) Differential fractionation of δ13C and δ15N among fish tissues: implications for the study of trophic interactions. Funct Ecol 13:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Post DM (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Post DM (2003) Individual variation in the timing of ontogenetic niche shifts in largemouth bass. Ecology 84:1298–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Power M, Guiguer K, Barton DR (2003) Effects of temperature on isotopic enrichment in Daphnia magna: implications for aquatic food-web studies. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:1619–1625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sweeting CJ, Polunin NVC, Jennings S (2004) Tissue and fixative dependent shifts of δ13C and δ15N in preserved ecological material. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 18:2587–2592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sweeting CJ, Jennings S, Polunin NVC (2005) Variance in isotopic signatures as a descriptor of tissue turnover and degree of omnivory. Funct Ecol 19:777–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sweeting CJ, Polunin NVC, Jennings S (2006) Effects of chemical lipid extraction and arithmetic lipid correction on stable isotope ratios of fish tissues. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20:595–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sweeting CJ, Barry JT, Barnes C, Polunin NVC, Jennings S (2007) Effects of body size, age and environment on diet-tissue δ15N fractionation in fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 340:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vander Zanden MJ, Rasmussen JB (1999) Primary consumer δ13C and δ15N and the trophic position of aquatic consumers. Ecology 80:1395–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Webb SC, Hedges REM, Simpson SJ (1998) Diet quality influences the δ13C and δ15N of locusts and their biochemical components. J Exp Biol 201:2903–2911PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn Barnes
    • 1
  • Simon Jennings
    • 2
  • Nicholas V. C. Polunin
    • 1
  • John E. Lancaster
    • 3
  1. 1.Marine Science and TechnologyUniversity of Newcastle upon TyneNewcastleUK
  2. 2.Ecosystem InteractionsCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture ScienceLowestoftUK
  3. 3.School of the Environment and SocietyUniversity of WalesSwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations