, Volume 154, Issue 2, pp 291–303 | Cite as

Interspecific and nutrient-dependent variations in stable isotope fractionation: experimental studies simulating pelagic multitrophic systems

  • N. Aberle
  • A. M. Malzahn
Plant Animal Interactions


Stable isotope signatures of primary producers display high inter- and intraspecific variation. This is assigned to species-specific differences in isotope fractionation and variable abiotic conditions, e.g., temperature, and nutrient and light availability. As consumers reflect the isotopic signature of their food source, such variations have direct impacts on the ecological interpretation of stable isotope data. To elucidate the variability of isotope fractionation at the primary producer level and the transfer of the signal through food webs, we used a standardised marine tri-trophic system in which the primary producers were manipulated while the two consumer levels were kept constant. These manipulations were (1) different algal species grown under identical conditions to address interspecific variability and (2) a single algal species cultivated under different nutrient regimes to address nutrient-dependent variability. Our experiments resulted in strong interspecific variation between different algal species (Thalassiosira weissflogii, Dunaliella salina, and Rhodomonas salina) and nutrient-dependent shifts in stable isotope signatures in response to nutrient limitation of R. salina. The trophic enrichment in 15N and 13C of primary and secondary consumers (nauplii of Acartia tonsa and larval herring) showed strong deviations from the postulated degree of 1.0‰ enrichment in δ13C and 3.4‰ enrichment in δ15N. Surprisingly, nauplii of A. tonsa tended to keep “isotopic homeostasis” in terms of δ15N, a pattern not described in the literature so far. Our results suggest that the diets’ nutritional composition and food quality as well as the stoichiometric needs of consumers significantly affect the degree of trophic enrichment and that these mechanisms must be considered in ecological studies, especially when lower trophic levels, where variability is highest, are concerned.


Food quality Homeostasis Clupea harengus Trophic interactions Food-web studies 



We would like to thank Thomas Hansen for conducting the stable isotope analyses and for the fruitful discussions on stable isotope data in general. Christoph Petereit is thanked for the great collaboration and the sharing of facilities during the experiments. The helpful comments and linguistic improvements of Alexandra Kraberg are gratefully acknowledged. This study was part of the DFG-project FRISCA (AB 289/1-1) and the Helgoland Foodweb Project; we are grateful for the funding. This study complies with the current German law.


  1. Aberle N, Hillebrand H, Grey J, Wiltshire KH (2005) Selectivity and competitive interactions between two benthic invertebrate grazers (Asellus aquaticus and Potamopyrgus antipodarum): an experimental study using 13C- and 15N-labelled diatoms. Freshw Biol 50:369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams TS, Sterner RW (2000) The effect of dietary nitrogen content on trophic level 15N enrichment. Limnol Oceanogr 3:601–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burkhardt S, Riebesell U, Zondervan I (1999) Effects of growth rate, CO2 concentration, and cell size on the stable carbon isotope fractionation in marine phytoplankton. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:3729–3741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Focken U, Becker K (1998) Metabolic fractionation of stable carbon isotopes: implications of different proximate compositions for studies of the aquatic food web using δ13C data. Oecologia 115:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fry B (1996) 13C/12C fractionation by marine diatoms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 134:283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fry B, Wainright SC (1991) Diatom sources of 13C-rich carbon in marine food webs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 76:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gannes L, O’Brien D, Martinez del Rio C (1997) Stable isotopes in animal ecology: assumptions, caveats, and a call for more laboratory experiments. Ecology 78:1271–1279Google Scholar
  8. Gaye-Siessegger J, Focken U, Muetzel S, Abel H, Becker K (2004) Feeding level and individual metabolic rate affect δ13C and δ15N values in carp: implications for food web studies. Oecologia 138:175–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gervais F (1997) Light-dependent growth, dark survival, and glucose uptake by cryptophytes isolated from a freshwater chemocline. J Phycol 33:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goedkoop W, Akerblom N, Demandt MH (2006) Trophic fractionation of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in Chironomus riparius reared on food of aquatic and terrestrial origin. Freshw Biol 51:878–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gorokhova E, Hansson S (1999) An experimental study on variations in stable carbon and nitrogen isotope fractionation during growth of Mysis mixta and Neomysis integer. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:2203–2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grey J, Jones RG, Sleep D (2000) Stable isotope analysis of the origins of zooplankton carbon in lakes of differing trophic state. Oecologia 123:232–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guillard RL, Ryther J (1962) Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. Can J Microbiol 8:229–239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Haubert D, Langel R, Scheu S, Ruess L (2005) Effects of food quality, starvation and life stage on stable isotope fractionation in Collembola. Pedobiologia 49:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herzka S, Holt G (2000) Changes in isotope composition of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) larvae in response to dietary shifts: potential applications to settlement studies. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hesslein RH, Hallard KA, Ramlal P (1993) Replacement of sulfur, carbon and nitrogen in tissue of growing broad whitefish (Coregonus nasus) in response to a change in diet traced by delta 34S, 13C, and 15N. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:2071–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klein Breteler WCM, Grice K, Schouten S, Kloosterhuis HT, Damste JSS (2002) Stable carbon isotope fractionation in the marine copepod Temora longicornis: unexpectedly low 13C value of faecal pellets. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 240:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Macko SA, Estep MLF, Lee WY (1983) Stable hydrogen isotope analysis of food webs on laboratory and field populations of marine amphipods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 72:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mauchline J (1998) The biology of calanoid copepods. Academic Press, San Diego, p 710Google Scholar
  20. Minagawa M, Wada E (1984) Stepwise enrichment of 15N along food chains: further evidence and relation between δ15N and animal age. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:1135–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Montoya JP, McCarthy JJ (1995) Isotopic fractionation during nitrate uptake by phytoplankton grown in continuous culture. J Plankton Res 17:439–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Needoba J, Waser N, Harrison P, Calvert S (2003) Nitrogen isotope fractionation in 12 species of marine phytoplankton during growth on nitrate. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 255:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oelbermann K, Scheu S (2002) Stable isotope enrichment (δ15N and δ13C) in a generalist predator (Pardosa lugubris, Araneae: Lycosidae): effects of prey quality. Oecologia 130:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olive PJW, Pinnegar JK, Polunin NVC, Richards G, Welch R (2003) Isotope trophic-step fractionation: a dynamic equilibrium model. J Anim Ecol 72:608–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson B, Fry B (1987) Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18:293–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ponsard S, Arditi R (2000) What can stable isotopes (δ15N and δ13C) tell about the food web of soil macro-invertebrates? Ecology 81:852–864Google Scholar
  27. Ponsard S, Averbuch P (1999) Should growing and adult animals fed on the same diet show different δ15N values? Rapid Commun Mass Spectr 13:1305–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Post D (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Santer B, Sommerwerk N, Grey J (2006) Food niches of cyclopoid copepods in eutrophic Plußsee determined by stable isotope analysis. Arch Hydrobiol 167:301–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schlechtriem C, Focken U, Becker K (2004) Stable isotopes as a tool for nutrient assimilation studies in larval fish feeding on live food. Aquat Ecology 38:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tamelander T, Soreide JE, Hop H, Carroll ML (2006) Fractionation of stable isotopes in the Arctic marine copepod Calanus glacialis: effects on the isotopic composition of marine particulate organic matter. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 333:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vander Zanden M, Rasmussen J (2001) Variation in δ15N and δ13C trophic fractionation: implications for aquatic food web studies. Limnol Oceanogr 46:2061–2066Google Scholar
  33. Vanderklift M, Ponsard S (2003) Sources of variation in consumer-diet δ15N enrichment: a meta-analysis. Oecologia 136:169–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vuorio K, Meili M, Sarvala J (2006) Taxon-specific variation in the stable isotopic signatures (δ13C and δ15N) of lake phytoplankton. Freshw Biol 51:807–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waser NAD, Harrison PJ, Nielsen B, Calvert SE, Turpin DH (1998) Nitrogen isotope fractionation during the uptake and assimilation of nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, and urea by a marine diatom. Limnol Oceanogr 43:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Aberle
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. M. Malzahn
    • 2
  1. 1.IFM-GEOMAR Leibniz Institute of Marine SciencesKielGermany
  2. 2.Biologische Anstalt HelgolandStiftung Alfred-Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchHelgolandGermany

Personalised recommendations