Oecologia

, Volume 153, Issue 3, pp 761–773 | Cite as

Hang on or run? Copepod mating versus predation risk in contrasting environments

  • Christian D. Jersabek
  • Martin S. Luger
  • Robert Schabetsberger
  • Susanne Grill
  • J. Rudi Strickler
Behavioral Ecology

Abstract

Mating durations of copepods were found to differ significantly between fishless high-altitude waters and lowland lakes containing fish. In lowland species the whole mating process was completed within a few minutes, but it averaged over an hour in high-altitude species. Alpine copepods showed a prolonged post-copulatory association between mates, during which the male clasped the female for an extended period after spermatophore transfer, while in lowland species males abandoned their partner immediately after copulation. Prolonged associations also occurred after transfer of spermatophores to heterospecific females with shorter conspecific mating duration, suggesting that male interests largely dictate the time spent in tandem. The differences observed may be adaptations to environments with different predation pressure, as pairs in tandem are more conspicuous and less reactive than single animals. We argue that differences in mating behavior and mating duration evolved under sexual versus natural selection, reflecting trade-offs between enhancement of fertilization success and reduction of vulnerability to visual predation. In fishless mountain lakes with high intrasexual competition, guarding males can reduce the risk of spermatophore displacement or the risk that the female will accept sperm from rival males without increased risk of being eaten, thereby maximizing paternity. Populations from fishless alpine lakes further differed from lowland species by exhibiting higher female/male size dimorphism and more intense pigmentation. While these traits vary between populations according to predation pressure, mating duration appears to be more species-specific.

Keywords

Mating duration Sperm competition Spermatophore guarding Visual predation 

References

  1. Anderson RS (1980) Relationship between trout and invertebrate species as predators and the structure of the crustacean and rotiferan plankton in mountain lakes. In: Kerfoot C (ed) Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH, pp 635–641Google Scholar
  2. Barthelemy RM, Cuoc C, Defaye D, Brunet M (1998) Female genital structures in several families of Centropagoidea (Copepoda: Calanoida). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353:721–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman PW, MacFadyen DN (1999) Mate guarding in the cricket Gryllodes sigillatus: influence of multiple potential partners. Ethology 105:949–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayly IAE (1978) Variation in sexual dimorphism in nonmarine calanoid copepods and its ecological significance. Limnol Oceanogr 23:1224–1228Google Scholar
  5. Berger I, Maier G (2001) The mating and reproductive biology of the freshwater planktonic calanoid copepod Eudiaptomus gracilis. Freshw Biol 46:787–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birkhead TR, Johnson SD, Nettleship DN (1985) Extra-pair matings and mate guarding in the common murre Uria aalge. Anim Behav 33:608–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blades-Eckelbarger PI (1991) Functional morphology of spermatophores and sperm transfer in calanoid copepods. In: Bauer RT, Martin JW (eds) Crustacean sexual biology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 246–270Google Scholar
  8. Brooks JL, Dodson SI (1965) Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science 150:28–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burghard W, Maier G (2000) The effect of temperature on mating duration in the freshwater cyclopoid copepod Cyclops vicinus (Uljanin, 1875). Crustaceana 73:1259–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buskey EJ (1998) Components of mating behavior in planktonic copepods. J Mar Syst 15:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byron ER (1982) The adaptive significance of calanoid copepod pigmentation: a comparative and experimental analysis. Ecology 63:1871–1886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeFrenza J, Kirner RJ, Maly EJ, Van Leeuwen HC (1986) The relationships of sex size ratio and season to mating intensity in some calanoid copepods. Limnol Oceanogr 31:491–496Google Scholar
  13. Defaye D, Cuoc C, Brunet M (2000) Genital structures and spermatophore placement in female Paradiaptominae (Copepoda, Calanoida, Diaptomidae). J Crust Biol 20:245–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dürbaum J (1995) Discovery of postcopulatory mate guarding in Copepoda Harpacticoida (Crustacea). Mar Biol 123:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farr JA (1975) The role of predation in the evolution of social behaviour of natural populations of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 29:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geddes MC, Cole GA (1981) Variation in sexual size differentiation in North American diaptomids (Copepoda: Calanoida): does variation in the degree of dimorphism have ecological significance? Limnol Oceanogr 26:367–374Google Scholar
  17. Gilbert JJ, Williamson CE (1983) Sexual dimorphism in zooplankton (Copepoda, Cladocera, and Rotifera). Annu Rev Ecol Syst 14:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grad G, Maly EJ (1988) Sex size ratios and their influence on mating success in a calanoid copepod. Limnol Oceanogr 33:1629–1634Google Scholar
  19. Grad G, Maly EJ (1992) Further observations relating sex size ratios to mating success in calanoid copepods. J Plankton Res 14:903–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hairston NG (1976) Photoprotection by carotenoid pigments in the copepod Diaptomus nevadensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:971–974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hairston NG (1979) The adaptive significance of color polymorphism in two species of Diaptomus (Copepoda). Limnol Oceanogr 24:15–37Google Scholar
  22. Hansson LA (2000) Induced pigmentation in zooplankton: A trade-off between threats from predation and ultraviolet radiation. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2327–2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hebert PDN, Emery CJ (1990) The adaptive significance of cuticular pigmentation in Daphnia. Funct Ecol 4:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hopkins CCE, Machine D (1977) Patterns of spermatophore distribution and placement in Euchaeta norvegica (Copepoda: Calanoida). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 57:113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacoby CA, Youngbluth MJ (1983) Mating behavior in three species of Pseudodiaptomus (Copepoda: Calanoida). Mar Biol 76:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jersabek CD, Schabetsberger R (1995) Resting egg production and oviducal cycling in two sympatric species of alpine diaptomids (Copepoda: Calanoida) in relation to temperature and food availability. J Plankton Res 17:2049–2078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jersabek CD, Brancelj A, Stoch F, Schabetsberger R (2001) Distribution and ecology of copepods in mountainous regions of the Eastern Alps. Hydrobiologia 454:309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnsen S, Widder EA (2001) Ultraviolet absorption in transparent zooplankton and its implications for depth distribution and visual predation. Mar Biol 138:717–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Katona SK (1975) Copulation in the copepod Eurytemora affinis (Poppe, 1880). Crustaceana 28:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kiefer F (1978) Freilebende Copepoda. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  31. Knapp RA, Matthews KR, Sarnelle O (2001) Resistance and resilience of alpine lake fauna to fish introductions. Ecol Monogr 71:401–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Löffler H (1983) Aspects of the history and evolution of Alpine lakes in Austria. Hydrobiologia 100:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luger MS, Schabetsberger R, Jersabek CD, Goldschmid A (2000) Life cycles, size and reproduction of the two coexisting calanoid copepods Arctodiaptomus alpinus (Imhof, 1885) and Mixodiaptomus laciniatus (Lilljeborg, 1889) in a small high-altitude lake. Arch Hydrobiol 148:161–185Google Scholar
  34. Magnhagen C (1990) Reproduction under predation risk in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus, and the black goby, Gobius niger. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Magnhagen C (1991) Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends Ecol Evol 6:183–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maier G (1996) Variable mating durations in cyclopoid copepods: an adaptation to changing predation risks? Arch Hydrobiol 137:349–361Google Scholar
  37. Maier G, Berger I, Burghard W, Nassal B (2000) Is mating of copepods associated with increased risk of predation? J Plankton Res 22:1977–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maly EJ (1983) Some further observations on diaptomid body size and clutch size relationships. Limnol Oceanogr 28:148–152Google Scholar
  39. Maly EJ, Maly MP (1999) Body size and sexual size dimorphism in calanoid copepods. Hydrobiologia 391:173–179Google Scholar
  40. Mauchline J (1998) The biology of calanoid copepods. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Moog O (1979) Zur Populationsökologie des Crustaceenplanktons im Attersee, OÖ. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Wien, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  42. Ohtsuka S, Huys R (2001) Sexual dimorphism in calanoid copepods: morphology and function. Hydrobiologia 453/454:441–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olsson M (1993) Contest success and mate guarding in male sand lizards, Lacerta agilis. Anim Behav 46:408–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parker GA (1974) Courtship persistence and female-guarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour 48:157–184Google Scholar
  45. Rondeau A, Sainte-Marie B (2001) Variable mate-guarding time and sperm allocation by male snow crabs (Chionoecetes opilio) in response to sexual competition, and their impact on the mating success of females. Biol Bull 201:204–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rowe L, Arnqvist G, Sih A, Krupa JJ (1994) Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol Evol 9:289–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schabetsberger R, Jersabek CD (1995) Alpine newts (Triturus alpestris) as top predators in a high-altitude karst lake: daily food consumption and impact on the copepod Arctodiaptomus alpinus. Freshw Biol 33:47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schabetsberger R, Jersabek CD (2004) Shallow males, deep females: sex-biased differences in habitat distribution of the freshwater calanoid copepod Arctodiaptomus alpinus. Ecography 27:506–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schabetsberger R, Grill S, Hauser G, Wukits P (2006) Zooplankton successions in neighboring lakes with contrasting impacts of amphibian and fish predators. Int Rev Hydrobiol 91:197–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sherman PW (1989) Mate guarding as paternity insurance in Idaho ground squirrels. Nature 338:418–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating systems and strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  52. Siebeck O, Vail T, Williamson CE, Vetter R, Hessen DO, Zagarese H, Little E, Balseiro E, Modenutti BE, Seva J, Shumate A (1994) Impact of UV-B radiation on zooplankton and fish in pelagic freshwater ecosystems. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnol 43:101–114Google Scholar
  53. Sih A, Krupa J, Travers S (1990) An experimental study of the effects of predation risk and feeding regime on the mating behavior of the water strider. Am Nat 135:284–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  55. Starkweather PL (1990) Zooplankton community structure of high elevation lakes: biogeographic and predator–prey interactions. Verh Internat Verein Limnol 24:513–517Google Scholar
  56. Svensson JE (1995) Predation risk increases with clutch size in a copepod. Funct Ecol 9:774–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  58. Tsuda A, Miller CB (1998) Mate-finding behaviour in Calanus marshallae Frost. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353:713–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Leeuwen HC, Maly EJ (1991) Changes in swimming behavior of male Diaptomus leptopus (Copepoda: Calanoida) in response to gravid females. Limnol Oceanogr 36:1188–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watras CJ (1983a) Mate location by diaptomid copepods. J Plankton Res 5:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Watras CJ (1983b) Reproductive cycles in diaptomid copepods: effects of temperature, photocycle, and species on reproductive potential. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:1607–1613Google Scholar
  62. Watras CJ, Haney JF (1980) Oscillations in the reproductive condition of Diaptomus leptopus (Copepoda: Calanoida) and their relation to rates of egg-clutch production. Oecologia 45:94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williamson CE, Butler NM (1987) Temperature, food and mate limitation of copepod reproductive rates: separating the effects of multiple hypotheses. J Plankton Res 9:821–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolf E (1905) Die Fortpflanzungsverhältnisse unserer einheimischen Copepoden. Zool Jb Abt Syst 22:101–280Google Scholar
  65. Ylönen H (1994) Vole cycles and antipredatory behaviour. Trends Ecol Evol 9:426–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zellmer ID (1995) UV-B-tolerance of alpine and arctic Daphnia. Hydrobiologia 307:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian D. Jersabek
    • 1
  • Martin S. Luger
    • 1
  • Robert Schabetsberger
    • 1
  • Susanne Grill
    • 1
  • J. Rudi Strickler
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Organismal BiologyUniversity of SalzburgSalzburgAustria
  2. 2.WATER InstituteUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations