Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 153, Issue 1, pp 37–47 | Cite as

Brown bear body mass and growth in northern and southern Europe

  • Jon E. Swenson
  • Miha Adamič
  • Djuro Huber
  • Sigbjørn Stokke
Population Ecology

Abstract

We tested six hypotheses to explain expected geographical differences in body masses of 1,771 brown bears (Ursus arctos) from northern and southern Europe (Sweden and Norway compared with Slovenia and Croatia): Bergmann’s rule, the fasting endurance hypothesis, and the dietary meat hypothesis, which predicted larger bears in the north; and hypotheses stressing the role of high primary productivity, high population density, low seasonality, and length of the growing season, which predicted larger bears in the south. Although brown bear populations in North America vary greatly in body mass, we found no significant difference in body mass between the two European populations using a new analytical approach incorporating modeled age-standardized body masses in linear models, when correcting for sex and season. The greater variation in North America may be due primarily to the presence of large bears that feed on salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), which does not occur in Europe. Asymptotic body masses were 115 ± 9 (SE) kg in spring and 141 ± 9 kg in autumn for southern females, 248 ± 25 and 243 ± 24 kg for southern males, 96 ± 2 and 158 ± 4 kg for northern females, and 201 ± 4 and 273 ± 6 kg for northern males, respectively. Northern bears gained more body mass before hibernation and lost more during hibernation than southern bears, probably because hibernation was twice as long in the north. Northern bears gained and southern bears lost mass during the spring, perhaps due to the greater availability and use of protein-rich food in spring in the north. As reproductive success in bears is correlated with adult female body mass in interpopulation comparisons, brown bears may have relatively similar reproductive rates throughout Europe, although minimum age at primiparity and litter interval are lower in the south.

Keywords

Body growth Ursus arctos Europe 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We especially thank Steinar Engen, who designed our model and gave us statistical advice, Petra Kaczensky for providing data on denning dates in Slovenia, and Andrew Derocher and Nigel Yoccoz for useful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. The Scandinavian Brown Bear Research Project has been supported by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management, Swedish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management, WWF-Sweden, Research Council of Norway, and several private foundations. The bear research in Slovenia was funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Sports and by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Teeth (P1) for ageing have been extracted by the district wildlife officers of the State Forest Service during the course of regular inspections of dead brown bears. The studies of brown bears in Croatia have been supported by the Croatian Ministry for Science and Technology, the National Geographic Society, the International Association for Bear Research, and Management (Bevins Fund), as well as by local forestry offices.

Supplementary material

References

  1. Adamič M (1997) The analysis of key sources of mortality of the brown bear (Ursus arctos L.) in Slovenia in the last 6-year period (1.4.1991–31.3.1997). Research reports, UNI Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Ljubljana (in Slovene with English summary). For Wood Sci Technol 53:5–28Google Scholar
  2. Almăsan HA, Vasiliu GD (1967) Zur Kenntnis des Rumänischen Karpatenbär. Acta Theriol 12:47–66Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson SN, Ramsay MA (1995) The effects of prolonged fasting on the body composition and reproductive success of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Funct Ecol 9:559–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergmann C (1847) Über die Verhaltnisse der Wärmökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Goettinger Studien 3:595–708Google Scholar
  5. Blanchard BM (1987) Size and growth patterns of the Yellowstone grizzly bear. Proc Int Conf Bear Res Manage 7:99–107Google Scholar
  6. Boyce MS (1978) Climatic variability and body size variation in the muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) in North America. Oecologia 36:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Cicnjak L, Huber D, Roth HU, Ruff RL, Vinovrski Z (1987) Food habits of brown bears in Plitvice Lakes National Park, Yugoslavia. Proc Int Conf Bear Res Manage 7:221–226Google Scholar
  9. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behaviour and ecology of two sexes. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahle B, Sørensen OJ, Wedul EH, Swenson JE, Sandegren F (1998) The diet of brown bears Ursus arctos in central Scandinavia: effect of access to free-ranging domestic sheep Ovis aries. Wildlife Biol 4:147–158Google Scholar
  11. Dahle B, Swenson JE (2003) Home ranges in adult Scandinavian brown bears Ursus arctos: effect of population density, mass, sex, reproductive status and habitat type. J Zool 260:329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derocher AE, Stirling I (1994) Age-specific reproductive performance of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus). J Zool London 234:527–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Derocher AE, Stirling I (1996) Aspects of survival in juvenile polar bears. Can J Zool 74:1246–1252Google Scholar
  14. Derocher AE, Stirling I (1998) Geographic variation in growth of polar bears (Ursus maritimus). J Zool London 245:65–72Google Scholar
  15. Derocher AE, Wiig Ø (2002) Postnatal growth in body length and mass of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) at Svalbard. J Zool London 256:343–349Google Scholar
  16. Elgmork K, Kaasa J (1992) Food habits and foraging of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) in central south Norway. Ecography 15:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferguson SH, McLoughlin PD (2000) Effect of energy availability, seasonality, and geographic range on brown bear life history. Ecography 23:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friebe A, Swenson JE, Sandegren F (2001) Denning chronology of female brown bears in central Sweden. Ursus 12:37–46Google Scholar
  19. Frković A, Huber D, Kusak J (2001) Brown bear litter sizes in Croatia. Ursus 12:103–105Google Scholar
  20. Fujita R (2000) Bait-hunting for brown bear in Sweden: temporal and spatial occurrence and potential effects on the population. Undergraduate thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  21. Große C (1999) Ants—an important food for brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Slovenia? Diploma thesis, Phillips-University of Marburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  22. Große C, Kaczensky P, Knauer F (2003) Ants: a food source sought by Slovenian brown bears (Ursus arctos)? Can J Zool 81:1996–2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hell P (1992) Biometrie und Bewirtshaftung der Population des Braunbären im Slowakischen Teil der Westkarpaten. In: F. Bourlière (President of the Scientific Committee) Management and restoration of small and relictual bears populations. Museum d’Historie Naturelle, Grenoble, France, pp 143–153Google Scholar
  24. Hilderbrand GV, Jenkins SG, Schwartz CC, Hanley TA, Robbins CT (1999b) Effect of seasonal differences in dietary meat intake on changes in body mass and composition in wild and captive brown bears. Can J Zool 77:1623–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hilderbrand GV, Schwartz CC, Robbins CT, Hanley TA (2000) Effect of hibernation and reproductive status on body mass and condition of coastal brown bears. J Wildlife Manage 64:178–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hilderbrand GV, Schwartz CC, Robbins CT, Jacoby ME, Hanley TA, Arthur SM, Servheen C (1999a) Importance of dietary meat, particularly salmon, to body size, population productivity, and conservation of North American brown bears. Can J Zool 77:132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huber D, Frković A (1993) Brown bear management in Croatia. Proc Cong Int Union Game Biol 21(1):287–292Google Scholar
  28. Huber D, Roth HU (1993) Movements of European brown bears in Croatia. Acta Theriol 38:151–159Google Scholar
  29. Huber D, Roth HU (1997) Denning of brown bears in Croatia. Proc Int Conf Bear Res Manage 9(2):79–83Google Scholar
  30. Insightful Corp. (2003) S-PLUS 6.2. Insightful Corp., Seattle, WA. http://www.insightful.com/support/splus62win/. Cited 16 March 2007
  31. Kingsley MCS, Nagy JA, Reynolds HV (1988) Growth in length and weight of northern brown bears: differences between sexes and populations. Can J Zool 66:981–986Google Scholar
  32. Kojola I, Laitala HM (2001) Body size variation of brown bear in Finland. Ann Zool Fennici 38:173–178Google Scholar
  33. Laws RM (1956) Growth and sexual maturity in aquatic mammals. Nature 178:193–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindstedt SL, Boyce MS (1984) Seasonality, fasting endurance, and body size in mammals. Am Nat 125:873–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mahoney SP, Virgl JA, Mawhinney K (2001) Potential mechanisms of phenotypic divergence in body size between Newfoundland and mainland black bear populations. Can J Zool 79:1650–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manchi S, Swenson JE (2005) Denning behavior of male Scandinavian brown bears (Ursus arctos). Wildlife Biol 11:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matson GM, Van Daele L, Goodwin E, Aumiller L, Reynolds H, Hristienko H (1993) A laboratory manual for cementum age determination of Alaska brown bear PM1 teeth. Alaska Department of Fish and Game/Matson’s Laboratory, Milltown, MTGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayr E (1956) Geographical character gradients and climatic adaptation. Evolution 10:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McLellan B (1994) Density-dependent population regulation of brown bears. In: Taylor M (ed) Density-dependent population regulation in black, brown, and polar bears. Int Conf Bear Res Manage Monogr Ser 3:15–24Google Scholar
  40. McNab BK (1971) On the ecological significance of the Bergmann’s rule. Ecology 52:845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McNab BK (1989) Basal rate of metabolism, body size and food habits in the order Carnivora. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behaviour, ecology and evolution. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 335–354Google Scholar
  42. Naves J, Palomero G (1993) Brown bear hibernation ecology in the Cantabrian Mountains. In: Naves J, Palomero G (eds) El oso pardo (Ursus arctos) en España. Instituto Nacional para la Conservacion de la Naturaleza, Madrid (in Spanish with English summary), pp 147–181Google Scholar
  43. Noyce KV, Garshelis DL (1998) Spring weight changes in black bears in northcentral Minnesota: the negative foraging period revisited. Ursus 10:521–531Google Scholar
  44. Opseth O (1998) Brown bear (Ursus arctos) diet and predation on moose (Alces alces) calves in the southern taiga zone in Sweden. Cand Sci Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  45. Persson IL, Wikan S, Swenson JE, Mysterud I (2001) The diet of the brown bear in the Pasvik, Valley, northeastern Norway. Wildlife Biol 7:27–37Google Scholar
  46. Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Pritchard GT, Robbins CT (1990) Digestive and metabolic efficiencies of grizzly and black bears. Can J Zool 68:1645–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rode KD, Robbins CT, Shipley LA (2001) Constraints on herbivory by grizzly bears. Oecologia 128:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rogers L (1976) Effects of mast and berry crop failure on survival, growth, and reproductive success of black bears. Tans North Am Wildlife Nat Resour Conf 41:431–438Google Scholar
  50. Rosenzweig ML (1968) Net primary productivity of terrestrial communities: prediction from climatological data. Am Nat 102:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roth HU, Boscagli G, Gentile L (1992) Movements, activity and hibernation of brown bears in the Abruzzo National Park as revealed by radiotelemetry. In: Bourlière F (ed) Management and restoration of small and relictual bears populations. Museum d’Historie Naturelle, Grenoble, FranceGoogle Scholar
  52. Samson C, Huot J (1995) Reproductive biology of female black bears in relation to body mass in early winter. J Mammal 76:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sæther BE, Engen S, Swenson JE, Bakke Ø, Sandegren F (1998) Assessing the viability of Scandinavian brown bear, Ursus arctos, populations: the effects of uncertain parameter estimates. Oikos 83:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sadleir RMFS (1969) The ecology of reproduction in wild and domestic mammals. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Salvatori V, Okarma H, Ionescu O, Dovhanych Y, Find’o S, Boitani L (2002) Hunting legislation in the Carpathian Mountains: implications for the conservation and management of large carnivores. Wildlife Biol 8:3–10Google Scholar
  56. Schwartz CC, Franzmann AW (1991) Interrelationship of black bears to moose and forest succession in the northern coniferous forest. Wildlife Monogr 113Google Scholar
  57. Schwartz CC, Miller SD, Haroldson MA (2003) Grizzly bear. In: Feldhamer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation, 2nd edn. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, pp 556–586Google Scholar
  58. Simonič A (1994) The legal protection of the brown bear in Slovene territory—past and present, and some suggestions for the future. In: Adamič M (ed) Rjavi medved v deželah Alpe-Adria. Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije, Ministrostvo za kmetijstvo in gozdarstvo, Republike Slovenije. Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp 43–75Google Scholar
  59. SPSS Inc. (2004) SPSS Release 13.01. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL. http://www.spss.com/. Cited 16 March 2007
  60. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  61. Stearns SC, Koella J (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in life history traits: predictions from norms of reaction for age- and size-at-maturity. Evolution 34:893–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stringham SF (1990a) Black bear reproductive rate relative to body weight in hunted populations. Proc Int Conf Bear Res Manage 8:425–432Google Scholar
  63. Stringham SF (1990b) Grizzly bear reproductive rate relative to body size. Proc Int Conf Bear Res Manage 8:433–443Google Scholar
  64. Swenson JE, Dahle B, Sandegren F (2001) Intraspecific predation in Scandinavian brown bears older than cubs-of-the-year. Ursus 12:81–91Google Scholar
  65. Swenson JE, Sandegren F (2000) Conservation of European brown bear populations: experiences from Scandinavia. In: Layna JF, Heredia B, Palomero G, Doadrio I (eds) La conservación del oso pardo en Europa: un reto de cara al siglo XXI (Serie encuentros I). Fundación Biodiversidad, Ministerio de medio ambiente, Madrid, Spain, pp 111–116Google Scholar
  66. Swenson JE, Sandegren F, Bjärvall, Söderberg A., Wabakken P, Franzén R (1994) Size, trend, distribution and conservation of the brown bear Ursus arctos population in Sweden. Biol Conserv 70:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Swenson JE, Sandegren F, Söderberg A, Franzén R (1995) Estimating the total weight of Scandinavian brown bears from field-dressed and slaughter weights. Wildlife Biol 1:177–179Google Scholar
  68. Von Bertalanffy L (1938) A quantitative theory of organic growth (Inquiries on growth laws II). Human Biol 10:181–213Google Scholar
  69. Zedrosser A, Dahle B, Swenson JE (2006) Population density and food conditions determine adult female size in brown bears. J Mammal 87:510–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zedrosser A, Rauer G, Kruckenhauser L (2004) Early primiparity in brown bears. Acta Theriol 49:427–432Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon E. Swenson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Miha Adamič
    • 3
  • Djuro Huber
    • 4
  • Sigbjørn Stokke
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Natural Resource ManagementNorwegian University of Life SciencesÅsNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchTrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Department of Forestry, Biotechnical FacultyUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  4. 4.Biology Department, Veterinary FacultyUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations