Advertisement

Oecologia

, 150:545 | Cite as

Salinity and light interactively affect neotropical mangrove seedlings at the leaf and whole plant levels

  • Laura López-HoffmanEmail author
  • Niels P. R. Anten
  • Miguel Martínez-Ramos
  • David D. Ackerly
Ecophysiology

Abstract

We have studied the interactive effects of salinity and light on Avicennia germinans mangrove seedlings in greenhouse and field experiments. We hypothesized that net photosynthesis, growth, and survivorship rates should increase more with an increase in light availability for plants growing at low salinity than for those growing at high salinity. This hypothesis was supported by our results for net photosynthesis and growth. Net daily photosynthesis did increase more with increasing light for low-salinity plants than for high-salinity plants. Stomatal conductance, leaf-level transpiration, and internal CO2 concentrations were lower at high than at low salinity. At high light, the ratio of leaf respiration to assimilation was 2.5 times greater at high than at low salinity. Stomatal limitations and increased respiratory costs may explain why, at high salinity, seedlings did not respond to increased light availability with increased net photosynthesis. Seedling mass and growth rates increased more with increasing light availability at low than at high salinity. Ratios of root mass to leaf mass were higher at high salinity, suggesting that either water or nutrient limitations may have limited seedling growth at high salinity in response to increasing light. The interactive effects of salinity and light on seedling size and growth rates observed in the greenhouse were robust in the field, despite the presence of other factors in the field—such as inundation, nutrient gradients, and herbivory. In the field, seedling survivorship was higher at low than at high salinity and increased with light availability. Interestingly, the positive effect of light on seedling survivorship was stronger at high salinity, indicating that growth and survivorship rates are decoupled. In general, this study demonstrates that environmental effects at the leaf-level also influence whole plant growth in mangroves.

Keywords

Growth analysis Avicennia germinans Gas exchange Ecophysiology Venezuela 

Notes

Acknowledgments

L.L.H. thanks R. Baskhar, J. DeNoyer, E. Edwards, F. Garcia, A. Loaiza, W. Ludington, I. Monroe, E. Marin-Spiotta, and R. Shaftel. L.L.H especially thanks E. Medina for the introduction to Venezuela’s mangroves and for advice on the study design and F. Barboza and E. Narváez of the Instituto para la Conservación del Lago de Maracaibo for logistical support. The authors also thank J. Berry and B. Haxo. We appreciate the comments of H. Paz and other reviewers. Funding was provided by a Mellon Foundation grant to Stanford University and Carnegie Institute of Washington, and a N.S.F. dissertation improvement grant (no. 0003023) and Mellon Mays Fellowship to L.L.H.

References

  1. Ackerly DD, Monson RK (2003) Waking the sleeping giant: the evolutionary foundations of plant function. Int J Plant Sci 164:51–56Google Scholar
  2. Andrews TJ, Muller GJ (1985) Photosynthetic gas exchange of the mangrove, Rhizophora stylosa Griff., in its natural environment. Oecologia 65:449–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anten NPR, Ackerly DD (2001) A new method of growth analysis for plants that experience periodic losses of leaf mass. Funct Ecol 15:804–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anten NPR, Hirose T (2001) Limitations on photosynthesis of competing individuals in stands and the consequences for canopy structure. Oecologia 129:186–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball MC (1988). Salinity tolerance in the mangroves Aegiceras corniculatum and Avicennia marina I. Water use in relation to growth, carbon partitioning, and salt balance. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:447–464Google Scholar
  6. Ball MC (1996) Comparative ecophysiology of mangrove forest and tropical lowland moist rainforest. In: Mulkey SS, Chazdon RL, Smith (eds) Tropical plant ecophysiology. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Ball MC (2002) Interactive effects of salinity and irradiance on growth: implications for mangrove forest structure along salinity gradients. Trees 16:126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ball MC, Farquhar GD (1984) Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of two mangrove species, Aegiceras corniculatum and Avicennia marina, to long-term salinity and humidity conditions. Plant Physiol 74:1–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ball MC, Pidsley SM (1995) Growth responses to salinity in relation to distribution of two mangrove species, Sonneratia alba and S. lanceolata, in northern Australia. Funct Ecol 9:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouwer R (1962) Nutritive influences on the distribution of dry matter in the plant. Neth J Agric Sci 10:361–376Google Scholar
  11. vd Boogaard RS, Goubitz S, Veneklass EJ, Lambers H (1996) Carbon and nitrogen economy of four Triticum aestivum cultivars differing in relative growth rate and water use efficiency. Plant Cell Environ 19:998–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burchett MD, Field CD, Pulkownik A (1984) Salinity, growth and root respiration in the grey mangrove, Avicennia marina. Physiol Plant 60:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke LD, Hannon NJ (1970) The mangrove swamp and salt marsh communities of the Sydney district: III Plant growth in relation to salinity and waterlogging. J Ecol 58:351-369Google Scholar
  14. Clarke PJ, Kerrigan RA (2000) Do forest gaps influence the population structure and species composition of mangrove stands in N Australia? Biotropica 32:642–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clough BF (1984) Growth and salt balance of the mangroves Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh. and Rhizophora stylosa Griff. in relation to salinity. Aust J Plant Physiol 11:419–430Google Scholar
  16. Collatz GJ, Ball JT, Grivet C, Berry JA (1991) Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agric Forest Meteorol 54:107–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crawley MJ (1993) GLIM for Ecologists. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Dominguez CA, Dirzo R, Bullock SH (1989) On the function of floral nectar in Croton suberosus (Euphorbiaceae). Oikos 56:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ehleringer J, Björkman O (1977) Quantum yields for CO2 uptake in C3 and C4 plants: dependence on temperature, CO2 and O2 concentration. Plant Physiol 59:86–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellison AM, Farnsworth EJ (1996) Spatial and temporal variability in growth of Rhizophora mangle saplings on coral cays: links with variation in insolation, herbivory, and local sedimentation rate. J Ecol 84:717–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellison AM, Farnsworth EJ (1997) Simulated sea level changes alter anatomy, physiology, and reproduction of red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.). Oecologia 11:435–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feller IC, Whingham DF, O’Neill JP, McKee KM (1999) Effects of nutrient enrichment on within-stand nutrient cycling in a mangrove forest. Ecology 80:2193–2205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Givnish TJ (1988) Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:63–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirose T, Werger MJA (1987) Nitrogen use efficiency in instantaneous and daily photosynthesis of leaves in the canopy of a Solidago altissima stand. Physiol Plant 70:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirose T, Ackerly DD, Traw MB, Ramseier D, Bazzaz FA (1997) CO2 elevation, canopy photosynthesis and optimal leaf area index. Ecology 78:2339–2350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hutchings P, Saenger P (1987) Ecology of Mangroves. University of Queensland Press, St. LuciaGoogle Scholar
  27. Janzen DH (1985) Mangroves: where is the understory? J Trop Ecol 1:89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kitajima K (1994) Relative importance of photosynthetic traits and allocation patterns as correlates of seedling shade tolerance of 13 tropical trees. Oecologia 98:419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krauss KW, Allen JA (2003) Influences of salinity and shade on seedling photosynthesis and growth of two mangrove species, Rhizophora mangle and Bruguiera sexangula, introduced to Hawaii. Aquat Bot 77:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL (1998) Plant physiological ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Lin G, Sternberg LdSL (1992) Effect of growth form, salinity, nutrient and sulfide on photosynthesis, carbon isotope discrimination and growth of red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.). Aust J Plant Physiol 19:509–517Google Scholar
  32. Lindquist ES, Carroll CR (2004) Differential seed and seedling predation by crabs: impacts of tropical coastal forest competition. Oecologia 141:661–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. López-Hoffman L (2003) Mangrove ecology: from photosynthesis to forest dynamics. PhD thesis, Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  34. López-Hoffman L, DeNoyer JL, Monroe I, Shaftel R, Anten NPR, Martinez-Ramos M, Ackerly DD (2006) Mangrove seedling net photosynthesis, growth, and survivorship are interactively affected by salinity and light. Biotropica (in press)Google Scholar
  35. Lovelock CE, Feller IC (2003) Photosynthetic performance and resource utilization of two mangrove species coexisting in a hypersaline scrub forest. Oecologia 134:455–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lovelock CE, Feller IC, McKee KL, Englebrecht BMJ, Ball MC (2004) The effect of nutrient enrichment on growth, photosynthesis and hydraulic conductance of dwarf mangroves in Panamá. Funct Ecol 18:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marshall B, Biscoe PV (1980) A model for C3 leaves describing the dependence of net photosynthesis on irradiance. J Exp Bot 31:29–39Google Scholar
  38. McGuinness KA (1997) Dispersal, establishment and survival of Ceriops tagal propagules in a north Australian mangrove forest. Oecologia 109:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McKee KL (1995) Interspecific variation in growth, biomass partitioning, and defensive characteristics of neotropical mangrove seedlings: response to light and nutrient availability. Am J Bot 82:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Medina E, Francisco M (1997) Osmolality and d13C of leaf tissue of mangrove species from environments of contrasting rainfall and salinity. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 45:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Minchinton TE, Dalby-Ball M (2001) Frugivory by insects on mangrove propagules: effects on the early life history of Avicennia marina. Oecologia 129:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mooney HA (1991) Plant physiological ecology: determinants of progress. Funct Ecol 5:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Naidoo G, Tuffers AV, von Willert DJ (2002) Changes in gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of two mangroves and a mangrove associate in response to salinity in the natural environment. Trees 16:140–146Google Scholar
  44. Narváez EM (1998) Estructura y composición de los manglares de Cano Paijana. Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Zulia, Maracaibo, Venezuela. B.S. ThesisGoogle Scholar
  45. Osborne K, Smith TJ (1990) Differential predation on mangrove propagules in open and closed canopy forest habitats. Vegetatio 89:1-6Google Scholar
  46. Passioura JB, Ball MC, Knight JH (1992) Mangroves may salinize the soil and in so doing limit their transpiration rate. Functional Ecol 6:476-481Google Scholar
  47. Penning de Vries FWT (1975) The cost of maintenance processes in plant cells. Ann Bot 39:77–92Google Scholar
  48. Pezeshki SR, DeLaune RD, Patrick WHP (1990) Differential response of selected mangroves to soil flooding and salinity: gas exchange and biomass partitioning. Can J Forest Res 20:869–874Google Scholar
  49. Rich PM, Wood J, Vieglais D, Burek K, Webb N (1999) HemiView User Manual 2.1 Delta-T Devices, LtdGoogle Scholar
  50. Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Hemmingsen EA, Bradstreet ED (1964) Hydrostatic pressure and osmotic potential in leaves of mangroves and some other plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 52:119–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schulze ED (1991) Water and nutrient interactions with plant water stress. In: Mooney HA, Winner WE, Pell EJ (eds) Responses of plants to multiple stresses. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 89–101Google Scholar
  52. Smallwood MF, Calvert CM, Bowles DJ (1999) Plant responses to environmental stress. BIOS Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith TJ (1992) Forest structure. In: Robertson AI, Alongi DM (eds) Tropical mangrove ecosystems. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 101–136Google Scholar
  54. Sobrado MA (1999a) Leaf photosynthesis of the mangrove Avicennia germinans as affected by NaCl. Photosynthetica 36:547–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sobrado MA (1999b) Drought effects on the photosynthesis of the mangrove, Avicennia germinans, under contrasting salinities. Trees 13:125–130Google Scholar
  56. Sobrado MA, Ball MC (1999) Light use in relation to carbon gain in the mangrove, Avicennia marina, under hypersaline conditions. Aust J Plant Physiol 26:245–251Google Scholar
  57. Sousa WP, Kennedy PG, Mitchell BJ (2003a) Propagule size and predispersal damage by insects affect establishment and early growth of mangrove seedlings. Oecologia 135:564–575Google Scholar
  58. Sousa WP, Quek SP, Mitchell BJ (2003b) Regeneration of Rhizophora mangle in a Carribbean mangrove forest: the interactive effects of canopy disturbance and a stem-boring beetle. Oecologia 137:436–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. West C, Briggs GE, Kidd F (1920) Methods and significant relations in the quantitative analysis of plant growth. New Phytol 19:200–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura López-Hoffman
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Niels P. R. Anten
    • 3
  • Miguel Martínez-Ramos
    • 1
  • David D. Ackerly
    • 4
  1. 1.Centro de Investigaciones en EcosistemasUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMorelia, MichoacánMexico
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Environmental BiologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations