Is microbial community composition in boreal forest soils determined by pH, C-to-N ratio, the trees, or all three?
- 3.3k Downloads
In Fennoscandian boreal forests, soil pH and N supply generally increase downhill as a result of water transport of base cations and N, respectively. Simultaneously, forest productivity increases, the understory changes from ericaceous dwarf shrubs to tall herbs; in the soil, fungi decrease whereas bacteria increase. The composition of the soil microbial community is mainly thought to be controlled by the pH and C-to-N ratio of the substrate. However, the latter also determines the N supply to plants, the plant community composition, and should also affect plant allocation of C below ground to roots and a major functional group of microbes, mycorrhizal fungi. We used phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) to analyze the potential importance of mycorrhizal fungi by comparing the microbial community composition in a tree-girdling experiment, where tree belowground C allocation was terminated, and in a long-term (34 years) N loading experiment, with the shifts across a natural pH and N supply gradient. Both tree girdling and N loading caused a decline of ca. 45% of the fungal biomarker PLFA 18:2ω6,9, suggesting a common mechanism, i.e., that N loading caused a decrease in the C supply to ectomycorrhizal fungi just as tree girdling did. The total abundance of bacterial PLFAs did not respond to tree girdling or to N loading, in which cases the pH (of the mor layer) did not change appreciably, but bacterial PLFAs increased considerably when pH increased across the natural gradient. Fungal biomass was high only in acid soil (pH < 4.1) with a high C-to-N ratio (>38). According to a principal component analysis, the soil C-to-N ratio was as good as predictor of microbial community structure as pH. Our study thus indicated the soil C-to-N ratio, and the response of trees to this ratio, as important factors that together with soil pH influence soil microbial community composition.
KeywordsFungi-to-bacteria ratio Mycorrhizal fungi Nitrogen fertilization Tree belowground carbon allocation Tree girdling
We thank Professor Åsa Frostegård and Dr Rockie Yarwood for valuable advice. Funding was provided by Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences, and Spatial Planning (FORMAS), and Swedish Science Council (VR).
- Alexander M (1977) Introduction to soil microbiology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 467Google Scholar
- Dahl E, Gjems O, Kjelland-Lund J (1967) On the vegetation of Norwegian conifer forest in relation to the chemical properties of the humus layer. Medd Norske Skogsforsøksvesen 85:501–531Google Scholar
- FAO (1988) FAO/ UNESCO soil map of the world. Revised legend. (World resources report no. 60). FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Federle TW (1986) Microbial distributions in soil–new techniques. In: Megusar F, Gantar M (eds) Perspectives in microbial ecology. Slovene Society for Microbiology, Ljubljana, pp 493–498Google Scholar
- Frostegård Å, Tunlid A, Bååth E (1993b) Phospholipid fatty acid composition, biomass, and activity of microbial communities from two soil types experimentally exposed to different heavy metals. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3605–3617Google Scholar
- Harrison AF, Harkness DD, Rowland AP, Garnett JS, Bacon PJ (2000) Annual carbon nitrogen fluxes in soils along the European forest transect determined using 14C-bomb. In: Schulze E-D (ed) Carbon and nitrogen cycling in european forest ecosystems. ecological studies, vol 142. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 237–256Google Scholar
- Högberg P (2001) Interactions between hillslope hydrochemistry, nitrogen dynamics, and plants in Fennoscandian boreal forest. In: Schulze ED, Heimann M, Harrison S, Holland E, Lloyd J, Prentice IC, Schimel D (eds) Global biogeochemical cycles in the climate system. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., pp 227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Myrold DD (1999) Transformations of nitrogen. In: Sylvia DM, Fuhrmann JJ, Hartel PG, Zuberer DS (eds) Principles and applications of soil microbiology. Prentice-Hall, N.J., pp 259–294Google Scholar
- Ohlsson KEA, Wallmark H (1999) Novel calibration with correction for drift and non-linear response for continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry applied to the determination of delta N−15, total nitrogen, delta C-13 and total carbon in biological material. Analyst 124:571–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Leary WM and Wilkinson SG (1988) Gram-positive bacteria. In: Microbial lipids. Ratledge C, Wilkinson SG (eds) vol 1. Academic Press, London, pp 117–185Google Scholar
- Persson T, Karlsson PS, Seyfert U, Sjöberg RM, Rudebäck A (2000) Carbon mineralisation in European forest soils. In: Schulze E-D (ed) Carbon and nitrogen cycling in European forest ecosystems. Ecological studies, vol 142. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 257–275Google Scholar
- Pinkart HC, Ringelberg DB, Piceno MY, MacNaughton SJ, White DC (2002) Biochemical approaches to biomass measurements and community structure analysis. In: Crawford RL, Knudsen GR, McInerny MJ, Stetzenbach LD (eds) Manual of environmental microbiology. 2nd edn. ASM, Washington, D.C., pp 101–113Google Scholar
- Smith SE, Read DJ (1997) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 2nd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
- Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. In: studies in ecology, vol 5. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Tamm CO (1999) Optimum nutrition and nitrogen saturation in Scots pine stands. Stud For Suec 206:126Google Scholar
- Tunlid A, White DC (1992) Biochemical analysis of biomass, community structure, nutritional status, and metabolic activity of microbial communities in soil In: Stotsky G, Bollag J-M (eds) Soil biochemistry. Dekker, New York, pp 229–261Google Scholar
- Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Valentine SM, Walters SM, Webb DA (1964–1980) Flora Europea. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Waring RH, Running SW (1998) Forest ecosystems—analysis at multiple scales, 2nd edn. Academic, San Diego, Calif.Google Scholar