, Volume 150, Issue 4, pp 569–581 | Cite as

Spatial heterogeneity in parasite infections at different spatial scales in an intertidal bivalve

Population Ecology


Spatial heterogeneities in the abundance of free-living organisms as well as in infection levels of their parasites are a common phenomenon, but knowledge on parasitism in invertebrate intermediate hosts in this respect is scarce. We investigated the spatial pattern of four dominant trematode species which utilize a common intertidal bivalve, the cockle Cerastoderma edule, as second intermediate host in their life cycles. Sampling of cockles from the same cohort at 15 sites in the northern Wadden Sea (North Sea) over a distance of 50 km revealed a conspicuous spatial heterogeneity in infection levels in all four species over the total sample as well as among and within sampling sites. Whereas multiple regression analyses indicated the density of first intermediate upstream hosts to be the strongest determinant of infection levels in cockles, the situation within sites was more complex with no single strong predictor variable. However, host size was positively and host density negatively correlated with infection levels and there was an indication of differential susceptibility of cockle hosts. Small-scale differences in physical properties of the habitat in the form of residual water at low tide resulted in increased infection levels of cockles which we experimentally transferred into pools. A complex interplay of these factors may be responsible for within-site heterogeneities. At larger spatial scales, these factors may be overridden by the strong effect of upstream hosts. In contrast to first intermediate trematode hosts, there was no indication for inter-specific interactions. In other terms, the recruitment of trematodes in second intermediate hosts seems to be largely controlled by pre-settlement processes both among and within host populations.


Trematodes Bivalves Metacercariae Spatial structure Aggregation 



We wish to thank Jan Fermer, Kristin Finger, Doreen Kazmierczak, Sylvia Pross and Katrin Prinz for their help in the field and laboratory. Dörte Poszig is thanked for assisting in a laborious field campaign. Werner Armonies and three anonymous referees considerably helped to improve our manuscript.


  1. Andrewartha HG, Birch LC (1954) The distribution and abundance of animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  2. Begon M, Harper JL, Townshend CR (1996) Ecology. Individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Boulinier T, Ives AR, Danchin E (1996) Measuring aggregation of parasites at different host population levels. Parasitology 112:581–587Google Scholar
  4. Combes C (2001) Parasitism. The ecology and evolution of intimate interactions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  5. Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am Nat 122:661–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Esch GE, Curtis LA, Barger MA (2001) A perspective on the ecology of trematode communities in snails. Parasitology 123:S57–S75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernandez J, Esch GW (1991) Guild structure of larval trematodes in the snail Helisoma anceps: patterns and processes at the individual level. J Parasitol 77:528–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fredensborg BL, Mouritsen KN, Poulin R (2006) Relating bird host distribution and spatial heterogeneity in trematode infections in an intertidal snail—from small to large scale. Mar Biol 149:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gätje C, Reise K (1998) Ökosystem Wattenmeer, Austausch-, Transport- und Stoffumwandlungsprozesse. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Grosholz ED (1994) The effects of host genotype and spatial distribution on trematode parasitism in a bivalve population. Evolution 48: 1514–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hechinger RF, Lafferty KD (2005) Host diversity begets parasite diversity: bird final hosts and trematodes in snail intermediate hosts. Proc Biol Sci 272:1059–1066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kareiva P, Tilman D (eds) (1998) Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  13. Kuris AM (1990) Guild structure of larval trematodes in molluscan hosts: prevalence, dominance, and significance of competition. In: Esch GW, Bush AO, Aho JM (eds) Parasite communities: patterns and processes. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 69–100Google Scholar
  14. Kuris AM, Lafferty KD (1994) Community structure: larval trematodes in snail hosts. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:189–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lackschewitz D, Menn I, Reise K (2002) Das marine Ökosystem um Sylt unter veränderten Klimabedingungen. In: Daschkeit H, Schottes P (eds) Klimafolgen für Mensch und Küste am Beispiel der Nordseeinsel Sylt. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 153–180Google Scholar
  16. Lauckner G (1971) Zur Trematodenfauna der Herzmuscheln Cardium edule und Cardium lamarcki. Helgol Wiss Meeresunt 22:377–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lauckner G (1980) Diseases of Mollusca: Gastropoda. In: Kinne O (ed) Diseases of marine animals, vol I. General aspects, Protozoa to gastropoda. Wiley, New York, pp 311–424Google Scholar
  18. Lauckner G (1983) Diseases of Molusca: Bivalvia. In: Kinne O (eds) Diseases of marine animals, vol 2 .Introduction, Bivalvia to Scaphopoda. Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Hamburg, pp 477–961Google Scholar
  19. Lepitzki DAW, Scott ME, McLaughlin JD (1994) Influence of storage and examination methods on the recovery and size of metacercariae of Cyathocotyle bushiensis and Sphaeridiotrema pseudoglobulus (Digenea). J Parasitol 80:454–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loos-Frank B (1967) Experimentelle Untersuchungen über Bau, Entwicklung und Systematik der Himastlinae (Trematoda, Echinostomatidae) des Nordseeraumes. Z Parasitenkd 28:299–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Montaudouin X de, Kisielewski I, Bachelet G, Desclaux C (2000) A census of macroparasites in an intertidal bivalve community, Arcachon Bay, France. Oceanol Acta 23:453-468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mouritsen KN, McKechnie S, Meenken E, Toynbee JL, Poulin R (2003) Spatial heterogeneity in parasite loads in the New Zealand cockle: the importance of host condition and density. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83:307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ostfeld RS, Glass GE, Keesing F (2005) Spatial epidemiology: an emerging (or re-emerging) discipline. Trends Ecol Evol 20:328–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pietrock M, Marcogliese DJ (2003) Free-living endohelminth stages: at the mercy of environmental conditions. Trends Parasitol 19:293–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Poulin R (2006) Global warming and temperature-mediated increases in cercarial emergence in trematode species. Parasitology 132:134–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Poulin R, Mouritsen KN (2004) Small-scale spatial variation in rates of metacercarial accumulation by a bivalve second intermediate host. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 84:1209–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Poulin R, Rate SR (2001) Small-scale heterogeneity in infection levels by symbionts of the amphipod Talorchesta quoyana (Talitridae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 212:211–216Google Scholar
  29. Poulin R, Steeper MJ, Miller AA (2000) Non-random patterns of host use by the different parasite species exploiting a cockle population. Parasitology 121:289–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Rantanen J, Valtonen E, Holopainen I (1998) Digenean parasites of the bivalve mollusc Pisidium amnicum in a small river in eastern Finland. Dis Aquat Org 33:201–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rohde K (1979) A critical evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic factors responsible for niche restriction in parasites. Am Nat 114:648–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rohde K (1994) Niche restriction in parasites: proximate and ultimate causes. Parasitology 109:69–84Google Scholar
  34. Shaw DJ, Dobson AP (1995) Patterns of macroparasite abundance and aggregation in wildlife populations: a quantitative review. Parasitology 111:S111–S133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sousa WP (1990) Spatial scale and the processes structuring a guild of larval trematode parasites. In: Esch GW, Bush AO. Aho JM (eds) Parasite communities: patterns and processes. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 41–67Google Scholar
  36. Thieltges DW, Reise K (2006a) Metazoan parasites in intertidal cockles (Cerastoderma edule) from the northern Wadden Sea. J Sea Res (in press)Google Scholar
  37. Thieltges DW, Rick J (2006b) Effect of temperature on emergence, survival and infectivity of cercariae of the marine trematode Renicola roscovita (Digenea: Renicolidae). Dis Aquat Organ (in press)Google Scholar
  38. Thomas F, Poulin R (1998) Manipulation of a mollusc by a trophically transmitted parasite: convergent evolution ot phylogenetic inheritance? Parasitology 116:431–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomas F, Mete K, Helluy S, Santalla F, Verneau O, Meeus T de, Cezilly F, Renaud F (1997) Hitch-hiker parasites or how to benefit from the strategy of another parasite. Evolution 51:1316–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thomas F, Renaud F, Poulin R (1998) Exploitation of manipulators: “hitch-hiking" as a parasite transmission strategy. Anim Behav 56:199–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wegeberg AM, Jensen KT (2003) In situ growth of juvenile cockles, Cerastoderma edule, experimentally infected with larval trematodes (Himasthla interrupta). J Sea Res 50:37– 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wegeberg AM, Montaudouin X de, Jensen KT (1999) Effect of intermediate host size (Cerastoderma edule) on infectivity of cercariae of three Himasthla species (Echinostomatidae, Trematoda). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 238:259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Werding B (1969) Morphologie, Entwicklung und Ökologie digener Trematoden-Larven der Strandschnecke Littorina littorea. Mar Biol 3:306–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wetzel EJ, Shreve EW (2003) The influence of habitat on the distribution and abundance of Marovestibulum obtusicaudum (Pronocephalidae) in a small Indina stream. J Parasitol 89:1088–1090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilson K, Bjornstad ON, Dobson AP, Merler S, Poglayen G, Randolph SE, Read AF, Skorping A (2002) Heterogeneities in macroparasite infections: patterns and processes. In: Hudson PJ, Rizzoli A, Grenfell BT, Heesterbeek, Dobson AP (eds) The ecology of wildlife diseases. Oxford Univeristy Press, Oxford, pp 6–44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchWadden Sea Station SyltListGermany

Personalised recommendations