, 150:582 | Cite as

Contrasting effects of rabbit exclusion on nutrient availability and primary production in grasslands at different time scales

  • Johan Olofsson
  • C. de Mazancourt
  • M. J. Crawley
Plant Animal Interactions


Herbivores influence nutrient cycling and primary production in terrestrial plant communities. However, both empirical and theoretical studies have indicated that the mechanisms by which herbivores influence nutrient availability, and thus their net effects on primary production, might differ between time scales. For a grassland in southeast England, we show that the effects of rabbits on primary production change over time in a set of grazed plots paired with exclosures ranging from 0 to 14 years in age. Herbivore exclusion decreased net aboveground primary production (APP) in the short term, but increased APP in the long term. APP was closely correlated with N mineralization rates in both grazed and ungrazed treatments, and accumulation of litter within the grazing exclosures led to higher N mineralization rates in exclosures in the long run. Rabbit grazing did not influence litter quality. The low contrast in palatability between species and the presence of grazing-tolerant plants might prevent rabbits from favoring unpalatable plant species that decompose slowly, in contrast to results from other ecosystems. Our results indicate that it is essential to understand the effects on N cycling in order to predict the effect of rabbit grazing on APP. Rabbits might decrease N mineralization and APP in the long term by increasing losses of N from grasslands.


Rabbit Grazing Nitrogen mineralization Primary production Litter decomposition 



The work was founded by The Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning and from the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education. The rabbit exclosures are part of a network of long-term field studies in Silwood Park supported by the Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College London.


  1. Aerts R, Chapin FS (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30:1–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augustine DJ, Frank DA (2001) Effects of migratory ungulates on spatial heterogeneity of soil nitrogen properties on a grassland ecosystem. Ecology 82:3149–3162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardgett RD, Wardle DA (2003) Herbivore-mediated linkages between aboveground and belowground communities. Ecology 84:2258–2268Google Scholar
  4. Bazely DR, Jefferies RL (1989) Lesser snow geese and the nitrogen economy of a grazed salt marsh. J Ecol 77:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belovsky GE, Slade JB (2000) Insect herbivores accelerate nutrient cycling and increases plant production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:14412–14417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cingolani AN, Posse G, Collantes MB (2005) Plant functional traits, herbivore selectivity and response to sheep grazing in Patagonian steppe grasslands. J Appl Ecol 42:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornelissen JHC (1996) An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types. J Ecol 84:589–598Google Scholar
  8. Crawley MJ (1983) Herbivory: the dynamics of plant herbivore interactions. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawley MJ (1990) Rabbit grazing, plant competition and seedling recruitment in acid grasslands. J Appl Ecol 27:803–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawley MJ (2005) The flora of Berkshire. Brambleby Books, HarpendenGoogle Scholar
  11. Del-Val E, Crawley MJ (2005) Are grazing increaser species better tolerators than decreasers? An experimental assessment of defoliation tolerance in eight British grassland species. J Ecol 93:1005–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dias A (1998) Comparison of methods for measuring rabbit incidence on grasslands. Mammalia 62:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Mazancourt C, Loreau M, Abbadie L (1998) Grazing optimization and nutrient cycling: when do herbivores enhance plant production? Ecology 79:2242–2252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Mazancourt C, Loreau M, Abbadie L (1999) Grazing optimization and nutrient cycling: potential impact of large herbivores in a savanna ecosystem. Ecol Appl 9:784–797Google Scholar
  15. de Mazancourt C, Loreau M (2000) Effect of herbivory and plant species replacement on primary production. Am Nat 155:735–754PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frank DA, Evans RD (1997) Effects of native grazers on grassland N cycling in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 78:2238–2248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frank DA, Groffman PM (1998) Ungulate vs landscape control over C and N processes in grasslands of Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 79:2229–2241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frank DA, McNaughton SJ (1993) Evidence for the promotion of aboveground grassland production by native large herbivores in Yellowstone National Park. Oecologia 96:157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank DA, Groffman PM, Evans RD, Tracy BF (2000) Ungulate stimulation of nitrogen cycling and retention in Yellowstone Park grasslands. Oecologica 123:116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank DA, Kuns MM, Guido DR (2002) Consumer control of grassland plant production. Ecology 83:602–606Google Scholar
  21. Frank DA, Evans RD, Tracy BE (2004) The role of ammonia volatilization in controlling the natural N-15 abundance of a grazed grassland. Biogeochemistry 68:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grime JP (1996) Evidence of a causal connection between anti-herbivore defence and the decomposition rate of leaves. Oikos 77:489–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological methodology. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Lauenroth WK (2000) Methods of estimating belowground net primary production. In: Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW (eds) Methods in ecosystem science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 58–71Google Scholar
  25. McNaughton SJ, Milchunas DG, Frank DG (1996) How can net primary productivity be measured in grazing ecosystems? Ecology 77:974–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McNaughton SJ, Banyikwa FF, McNaughton MM (1997) Promotion of the cycling of diet-enhancing nutrients by African grazers. Science 278:1798–1800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Milchunas DG, Laurenroth WK (1993) Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecol Monogr 63:327–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Molvar EM, Bowyer RT, van Ballenberghe V (1993) Moose herbivory, browse quality, and nutrient cycling in an Alaskan treeline community. Oecologia 94:472–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oesterheld M, McNaughton SJ (2000) Herbivory in terrestrial ecosystems. In: Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW (eds) Methods in ecosystem science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 151–158Google Scholar
  30. Olofsson J, Oksanen L (2002) Role of litter decomposition for the increased primary production in areas heavily grazed by reindeer, a litterbag experiment. Oikos 96:507–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olofsson J, Stark S, Oksanen L (2004) Herbivore influence on ecosystem processes in the tundra. Oikos 105:386–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pastor J, Naiman RJ (1992) Selective foraging and ecosystem processes in boreal forests. Am Nat 131:690–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pastor J, Dewey B, Naiman RJ, McInnes PF, Cohen Y (1993) Moose browsing and soil fertility in the boreal forests of Isle Royale National Park. Ecology 74:467–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. R development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07–0, http://www.R-project.org
  35. Raison RJ, Connell MJ, Khanna PK (1987) Methodology for studying fluxes of soil mineral-N in situ. Soil Biol Biochem 19:521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ritchie ME, Tilman DJ, Knops MH (1998) Herbivore effects on plant and nitrogen dynamics in oak savanna. Ecology 79:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Robinson M, Dean TJ (1993) Measurement of near surface soil water content using a capacity probe. Hydrol Proc 7:77–86Google Scholar
  38. Ruess RW, McNaughton SJ (1987) Grazing and the dynamics of nutrients and energy regulated microbial processes in the Serengeti grasslands. Oikos 49:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruess HW, Hik DS, Jefferies RL (1989) The role of lesser snow geese as nitrogen processors in a sub-arctic marsh. Oecologia 79:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sala OE, Austin AT (2000) Methods of estimating aboveground net primary productivity. In: Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW (eds) Methods in ecosystem science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 33–41Google Scholar
  41. Schimel DS, Parton WJ, Adamsen FJ, Woodmansee RG, Senft RI, Stillwell MA (1986) The role of cattle in the volatile loss of nitrogen from a shortgrass steppe. Biogeochemistry 2:39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sirotnak JM, Huntly NJ (2000) Direct and indirect effects of herbivores on nitrogen dynamics: voles in riparian areas. Ecology 81:78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schlesinger WH, Raikes JA, Hartley AE, Cross AF (1996) On the spatial distribution of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology 77:364–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stark S, Grellmann D (2002) Soil microbial responses to herbivory in an arctic tundra heath at two levels of nutrient availability. Ecology 83:2736–2744Google Scholar
  45. Tilman DA (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  46. Van der Wal R, Bardgett RD, Harrison HA, Stien A (2004) Vertebrate herbivores and ecosystem control: cascading effects on tundra ecosystems. Ecography 27:242–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Winjen HJ, Van der Wal R, Bakker JP (1999) The impact of herbivores on nitrogen mineralization rate: consequences for salt-mash succession. Oecologia 118:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vitousek PM, Howarth RW (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13:87–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wardle DA (2002) Communities and ecosystems: linking the aboveground and belowground components. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  50. Willot SJ, Miller AJ, Incoll LD, Compton SG (2000) The contribution of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) to soil fertility in semi-arid Spain. Biol Fertil Soils 31:379–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan Olofsson
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. de Mazancourt
    • 1
    • 3
  • M. J. Crawley
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of BiologyImperial College London, Silwood ParkAscotUK
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Environmental ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeaSweden
  3. 3.Redpath MuseumMcGill UniversityQuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations