Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 150, Issue 3, pp 373–382 | Cite as

Phenotypic plasticity of reproductive traits in response to food availability and photoperiod in white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus)

  • Sarah J. Reilly
  • Robert Oum
  • Paul D. Heideman
Ecophysiology

Abstract

Although most temperate-zone mammals are seasonal breeders, many populations display variation in winter reproductive phenotype. For most mammals, the primary environmental cues regulating reproductive status are food availability and photoperiod, and these two factors can interact in their effect. Low food availability is primarily thought to suppress reproduction by reducing body mass and thereby forcing energy allocations to survival alone. However, because most small mammals rely on an increase in food intake rather than stored nutrients for reproduction, we hypothesized that food availability could act as a signal for low resource availability and affect reproduction even when body condition was not affected. We tested the prediction that restricted food access, without reduced body mass, could alter reproductive responses to short photoperiod. We used genetically distinct lines of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) derived from a wild population with genetic variation in the neuroendocrine pathway that regulates reproduction in response to environmental cues. The lines were created by artificial selection on gonad size in short photoperiods. Individuals from one line strongly suppress gonadal development in response to short photoperiods, while individuals from the other line suppress gonadal development weakly or not at all. Unresponsive individuals from the selected and an unselected control line were exposed to an intermittent food access protocol that did not affect body mass and only slightly reduced total food intake. We found that restricting food access caused reproductive suppression in short photoperiods but not long photoperiods, with no decrease in body mass. These results provide evidence for an interaction between food and photoperiod that is not dependent upon body condition or energy balance. The results also demonstrate plasticity in the reproductive response to photoperiod of otherwise reproductively nonphotoperiodic white-footed mice.

Keywords

Seasonal breeding Food availability Environmental regulation Energy balance Reproductive strategy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank K. King for assistance with mouse care and data collection, and L. L. Moore, A. Pedersen, C. D. Jenkins, and J. R. Reilly for suggestions and comments. Support was provided by the National Science Foundation (IBN-CAREER-9875886), a Batten Scholarship for Pre-Honors Research to S. J. Reilly, and a Cummings summer fellowship to R. Oum.

References

  1. Avigdor M, Sullivan SD, Heideman PD (2005) Response to selection for photoperiod responsiveness on the density and location of mature GnRH-releasing neurons. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 288:1226–1236Google Scholar
  2. Blank JL, Desjardins C (1985) Differential effects of food restriction on pituitary–testicular function in mice. Am J Physiol 248:R181–R189Google Scholar
  3. Blank JL, Desjardins C (1986) Photic cues induce multiple neuroendocrine adjustments in testicular function. Am J Physiol 250:R199–R206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blank JL, Ruf T (1992) Effects of reproductive function and cold tolerance in deer mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 263:R820–R826Google Scholar
  5. Blank JL, Korytko AI, Freeman DA, Ruf TP (1994) Role of gonadal steroids and inhibitory photoperiod in regulating body weight and food intake in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 206:396–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boutin S (1990) Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems, and the future. Can J Zool 68:203–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowers MA, Dooley JL (1993) Predation hazard and seed removal by small mammals: microhabitat versus patch scale effects. Oecologia 94:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bronson FH (1987) Susceptibility of the fat reserves of mice to natural challenges. J Comp Physiol B 157:551–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronson FH, Heideman PD (1994) Seasonal regulation of reproduction in mammals. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds) The physiology of reproduction, vol 2, 2nd edn. Raven, New York, pp 541–584Google Scholar
  10. Bronson FH, Heideman PD, Kerbeshian MC (1991) Lability of fat stores in peripubertal wild house mice. J Comp Physiol B 161:15–18Google Scholar
  11. Carlson LL, Zimmermann A, Lynch GR (1989) Geographic differences for delay of sexual maturation in Peromyscus leucopus: effects of photoperiod, pinealectomy, and melatonin. Biol Reprod 41:1004–1013Google Scholar
  12. Demas GE, Nelson RJ (1998) Photoperiod, ambient temperature, and food availability interact to affect reproductive and immune function in adult male deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). J Biol Rhythms 13:253–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Desjardins C, Lopez MJ (1983) Environmental cues evoke differential responses in pituitary–testicular function in deer mice. Endocrinology 112:1398–1406Google Scholar
  14. Desjardins C, Bronson FH, Blank JL (1986) Genetic selection for reproductive photoresponsiveness in deer mice. Nature 322:172–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ebling FJP (2005) The neuroendocrine timing of puberty. Reproduction 129:675–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edmonds KE, Riggs L, Stetson MH (2003) Food availability and photoperiod affect reproductive development and maintenance in the marsh rice rat (Oryzomys palustris). Physiol Behav 78:41–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elias SP, Witham JW, Hunter ML Jr (2004) Peromyscus leucopus abundance and acorn mast: population fluctuation patterns over 20 years. J Mammal 85:743–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilbert BS, Krebs CJ (1981) Effects of extra food on Peromyscus and Clethrionomys populations in the southern Yukon, Canada. Oecologia 51:326–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldman BD (2001) Mammalian photoperiodic system: formal properties and neuroendocrine mechanisms of photoperiodic time measurement. J Biol Rhythms 16:283–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hammond KA, Kristan DM (2000) Responses to lactation and cold exposure by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Physiol Biochem Zool 73:547–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen LP, Batzli GO (1978) The influence of food availability on the white-footed mouse: populations in isolated woodlots. Can J Zool 56:2530–2541Google Scholar
  22. Heideman PD (2004) Top-down approaches to the study of natural variation in complex physiological pathways using the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) as a model. ILAR J 45:4–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Heideman PD, Bronson FH (1991) Characteristics of a genetic polymorphism for reproductive photoresponsiveness in the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus). Biol Reprod 44:1189–1196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heideman PD, Bruno TA, Singley JW, Smedley JV (1999a) Genetic variation in photoperiodism in Peromyscus leucopus: geographic variation in an alternative life-history strategy. J Mammal 80:1232–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heideman PD, Kane SL, Goodnight AL (1999b) Differences in hypothalamic 2–[125I]iodomelatonin binding in photoresponsive and non-photoresponsive white-footed mice, Peromyscus leucopus. Brain Res 840:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heideman PD, Rightler M, Sharp K (2005) A potential microevolutionary life-history trade-off in white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus). Funct Ecol 19:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Adv Study Behav 27:215–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lynch GR, Gendler SL (1980) Multiple responses to different photoperiods occur in the mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Oecologia 45:318–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lynch GR, Heath HW, Johnston CM (1981) Effect of geographical origin on the photoperiodic control of reproduction in the white-footed mouse Peromyscus leucopus. Biol Reprod 25:475–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson RJ (1987) Photoperiod-nonresponsive morphs: a possible variable in microtine population-density fluctuations. Am Nat 130:350–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nelson RJ, Kita M, Blom JMC, Rhyne-Grey J (1992) Photoperiod influences the critical caloric intake necessary to maintain reproduction among male deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Biol Reprod 46:226–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson RJ, Marinovic AC, Moffatt CA, Kriegsfeld LJ, Kim S (1997) The effects of photoperiod and food intake on reproductive development in male deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Physiol Behav 62:945–950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ostfeld RS, Jones CG, Wolff JO (1996) Of mice and mast. Bioscience 46:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prendergast BJ, Kriegsfeld LJ, Nelson RJ (2001) Photoperiodic polyphenisms in rodents: neuroendocrine mechanisms, costs and functions. Quart Rev Biol 76:293–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prendergast BJ, Nelson RJ, Zucker I (2002) Mammalian seasonal rhythms: behavioral and neuroendocrine substrates. In: Pfaff DW, Arnold A, Etgen A, Fahrbach S, Rubin R (eds) Hormones, brain, and behavior, vol 2. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 93–156Google Scholar
  36. Ruf T, Koryotko AI, Stieglitz A, Lavenburg KR, Blank JL (1997) Phenotypic variation in seasonal adjustments of testis size, body weight, and food intake in deer mice: Role of pineal function and ambient temperature. J Comp Physiol B 167:185–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schneider JE (2004) Energy balance and reproduction. Physiol Behav 81:289–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spears N, Clarke JR (1988) Selection in field voles (Microtus agrestis) for gonadal growth under short photoperiods. J Anim Ecol 57:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Terman CR (1993) Studies of natural populations of white-footed mice: reduction of reproduction at varying densities. J Mammal 74:678–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wade GN, Jones JE (2004) Neuroendocrinology of nutritional infertility. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 287:R1277–R1296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolff JO (1996) Population fluctuations of mast-eating rodents are correlated with production of acorns. J Mammal 77:850–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zollner PA, Lima SL (1999) Illumination and the perception of remote habitat patches by white-footed mice. Anim Behav 58:489–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah J. Reilly
    • 1
  • Robert Oum
    • 2
    • 3
  • Paul D. Heideman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyThe College of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Hawai’i at ManoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations