Oecologia

, Volume 150, Issue 1, pp 40–49 | Cite as

Pollen and water limitation in Astragalus scaphoides, a plant that flowers in alternate years

Population Ecology

Abstract

Mast seeding is common in plant populations, but its causes have rarely been tested experimentally. We tested mechanisms of alternate-year flowering and fruit set in an iteroparous, bee-pollinated, herbaceous plant, Astragalus scaphoides, in semi-arid sagebrush steppe. Patterns of reproduction from 1986 to 1999 indicated that spring precipitation was a cue for synchronous flowering, and that increased pollination in high-flowering years was a fitness advantage of synchrony. We tested these patterns by adding supplemental water and pollen to plants in high- and low-flowering sites and years. Supplemental water had no effect on flowering or seed set, so water is not a proximate cue for reproduction, though it could be important over longer (>3 year) time scales. Supplemental pollination increased fruit set in low- but not high-flowering years, indicating that synchronous flowering increases pollination success. Many shorter-term studies also report increased fruit set after pollen supplementation, but not after resource addition. This pattern may reflect the fact that plants can store and reallocate resources, but not pollen, across multiple years. For animal-pollinated herbs such as these, uniting theories about pollination ecology and mast seeding may promote an understanding of the mechanisms that determine patterns of reproduction over time.

Keywords

Astragalus scaphoides Mast seeding Precipitation Allee effect 

References

  1. Ashman TL, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mazer SJ, Mitchell RJ, Morgan MT, Wilson WG (2004) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85:2408–2421Google Scholar
  2. Barneby RC (1964) Atlas of North American Astragalus. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. Burd M (1994) Bateman’s principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot Rev 60:83–139Google Scholar
  4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Caldwell M (1985) Cold desert. In: Chabot BF, Mooney HA (eds) Physiological ecology of North American plant communities. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 198–212Google Scholar
  6. Campbell DR, Halama KJ (1993) Resource, pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology 74:1043–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell DR, Motten AF (1985) The mechanism of competition for pollination between two forest herbs. Ecology 66:554–563Google Scholar
  8. Crawley MJ, Long CR (1995) Alternate bearing, predator satiation and seedling recruitment in Quercus robur L. J Ecol 83:683–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crone EE, Lesica P (2004) Causes of synchronous flowering in Astragalus scaphoides, an iteroparous perennial plant. Ecology 85:1944–1954Google Scholar
  10. Crone EE, Polansky L, Lesica P (2005) Empirical models of pollen limitation, resource acquisition, and mast seeding by a bee-pollinated wildflower. Am Nat 166(3):396–408Google Scholar
  11. Ehrlèn J, van Groenendael J (2001) Storage and the delayed costs of reproduction in the understorey perennial Lathyrus vernus. J Ecol 89:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehrlèn J, Lehtilä K (2002) How perennial are perennial plants? Oikos 98:308–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eriksson O (1987) Regulation of seed-set and gender variation in the hermaphroditic plant, Potentilla anserine. Oikos 49:165–171Google Scholar
  14. Forsyth SA (2003) Density-dependent seed set in the Haleakala silversword: evidence for an Allee effect. Oecologia 136:551–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geer SM, Tepedino VJ, Griswold TL, Bowlin WR (1995) Pollinator sharing by three sympatric milkvetches, including the endangered species Astragalus montii. Great Basin Nat 55:19–28Google Scholar
  16. Greene DF, Johnson EA (2004) Modelling the temporal variation in the seed production of North American trees. Can J For Res 34:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Groom MJ (1998) Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. Am Nat 151:487–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hackney EE, McGraw JB (2001) Experimental demonstration of an Allee effect in American ginseng. Conserv Biol 15:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamann A (2004) Flowering and fruiting phenology of a Philippine submontane rain forest: climatic factors as proximate and ultimate causes. J Ecol 92:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Isagi Y, Sugimura K, Sumida A, Ito H (1997) How does masting happen and synchronize? J Theor Biol 187:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Janzen DH (1976) Why bamboos wait so long to flower. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:347–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jennersten O (1988) Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conserv Biol 2:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Juenger T, Bergelson J (1997) Pollen and resource limitation of compenstation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 78:1684–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karron JD (1987) The pollination ecology of co-occurring geographically restricted and widespread species of Astragalus (Fabaceae). Biol Conserv 39:179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, COGoogle Scholar
  28. Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1994) Fly pollination of Linum lewisii (Linaceae). Am J Bot 81:1091–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelly D (1994) The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. Trends Ecol Evol 9:465–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelly D, Sork VL (2002) Mast seeding in perennial plants: Why, how, and where? Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:427–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelly D, Sullivan J (1997) Quantifying the benefits of mast seeding on predator satiation and wind pollination in Chionochloa pallens (Poaceae). Oikos 78:143–150Google Scholar
  32. Kerkhoff AJ (2004) Expectation, explanation and masting. Evol Ecol Res 6:1003–1020Google Scholar
  33. Knight TM (2003) Floral density, pollen limitation and reproductive success in Trillium grandiflorum. Oecologia 137:557–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kobro S, Søreide L, Djønne E, Rafoss T, Jaastad G, Witzgall P (2003) Masting of rowan Sorbus aucuparia L. and consequences for the apple fruit moth Argyresthia conjugella Zellner. Popul Ecol 45:25–30Google Scholar
  35. Kunin WE (1993) Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology 74:2145–2160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kunin EW (1997) Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. J Ecol 85:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lesica P (1995) Demography of Astragalus scaphoides and effects of herbivory on population growth. Great Basin Nat 55:142–150Google Scholar
  38. Mattila E, Kuitunen MT (2000) Nutrient versus pollination limitation in Platanthera bifolia and Dactylorhiza incarnate (Orchidaceae). Oikos 89:360–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Noggle GR, Fritz GJ (1983) Introductory plant physiology, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  40. Primack RB, Hall P (1990) Costs of reproduction in the pink lday’s slipper orchid: a four-year experimental study. Am Nat 136:638–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Primack R, Stacy E (1998) Cost of reproduction in the pink lady’s slipper orchid (Cyperpiedium acaule, Orchidaceae): an eleven-year experimental study of three populations. Am J Bot 85:1672–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. SAS Institute (2002) The SAS System for Windows. SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  43. Satake A, Iwasa Y (2000) Pollen coupling of forest trees: forming synchronized and periodic reproduction out of chaos. J Theor Biol 203:63–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Satake A, Iwasa Y (2002) The synchronized and intermittent reproduction of forest trees is mediated by the Moran effect, only in association with pollen coupling. J Ecol 90:830–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schauber EM, Kelly D, Turchin P, Simon C, Lee WG, Allen RB, Payton IJ, Wilson PR, Cowan PE, Brockie RE (2002) Masting by eighteen New Zealand plant species: temperature as a synchronizing cue. Ecology 83:1214–1225Google Scholar
  46. Sih A, Baltus MS (1987) Patch size pollinator behavior and pollinator limitation in catnip. Ecology 68:1679–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Silvertown JW (1980) The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding in trees. Biol J Linn Soc 14:235–250Google Scholar
  48. Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (1999) Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia 121:432–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stout JC, Allen JA, Goulson D (1998) The influence of relative plant density and floral morphological complexity on the behaviour of bumblebees. Oecologia 117:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vázquez DP, Simberloff D (2004) Indirect effects of an introduced ungulate on pollination and plant reproduction. Ecol Monogr 74:281–308Google Scholar
  51. Waites AR, Årgen J (2004) Pollinator visitation, stigmatic pollen loads and among-population variation in seed set in Lythrum salicaria. J Ecol 92:512–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolf A, Harrison SP (2001) Effects of habitat size and patch isolation on reproductive success of the serpentine morning glory. Conserv Biol 15:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wyka T (1999) Carbohydrate storage and use in an alpine population of the perennial herb, Oxytropis sericea. Oecologia 120:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wildlife Biology Program and Department of Ecosystem and Conservation SciencesUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations