Oecologia

, 150:61

A field test of the directed deterrence hypothesis in two species of wild chili

  • Douglas J. Levey
  • Joshua J. Tewksbury
  • Martin L. Cipollini
  • Tomás A. Carlo
Plant Animal Interactions

Abstract

The directed deterrence hypothesis posits that secondary metabolites in ripe fruit function to deter fruit consumption by vertebrates that do not disperse seeds, while not impacting consumption by those that do. We tested this hypothesis in two species of wild chilies (Capsicum spp.). Both produce fruits that contain capsaicinoids, the compounds responsible for the pungency of chilies. Previous work suggests seed-dispersing birds but not seed-destroying rodents consume chili fruits, presumably because rodents are deterred by capsaicin. However, fruit removal from chili plants by rodents and other mammals has not been previously explored. Because laboratory rodents can develop a preference for capsaicin, it is quite possible that wild rodents are natural consumers of chili fruits. We monitored the fate of 125 marked fruits of Capsicum chacoense and 291 fruits of Capsicum annuum. For both species, essentially all fruit removal occurred during the day, when rodents are inactive. Video monitoring revealed fruit removal only by birds, mostly by species known to disperse chili seeds in viable condition. Furthermore, these species are from taxonomic groups that tend to specialize on lipid-rich fruits. Both species of chili produce fruits that are unusually high in lipids (35% in C. chacoense, 24% in C. annuum). These results support the directed deterrence hypothesis and suggest that fruiting plants distinguish between seed predators and seed dispersers by producing fruits that repel the former and attract the latter.

Keywords

Birds Capsaicin Chili Directed deterrence Fruit 

References

  1. Adler LS, Karban R, Strauss SY (2001) Direct and indirect effects of alkaloids on plant fitness via herbivory and pollination. Ecology 82:2032–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andelt WF, Burnham KP, Baker DL (1994) Effectiveness of capsaicin and Bitrex repellents for deterring browsing by captive mule deer. J Wildl Manage 58:330–334Google Scholar
  3. Anderson S (1997) Mammals of Bolivia: taxonomy and distribution. American Museum of Natural History, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernays EA, Chapman RF (1994) Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bollen A, Van Elsacker L, Ganzhorn JU (2004) Relations between fruits and disperser assemblages in a Malagasy littoral forest: a community-level approach. J Trop Ecol 20:599–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosland PW (2001) Preliminary field tests of capsaicinoids to reduce lettuce damage by rabbits. Crop Prot 20:535–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown DE (1982) Biotic communities of the American Southwest: United States and Mexico. Desert Plants 4:1–342Google Scholar
  8. Brown JH, Whitham TG, Ernest SKM, Gehring CA (2001) Complex species interactions and the dynamics of ecological systems: long-term experiments. Science 293:643–650Google Scholar
  9. Caras RA (1967) North American mammals. Meredith, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Chu YK, Owen RD, Gonzalez LM, Jonsson CB (2003) The complex ecology of hantavirus in Paraguay. Am J Trop Med Hyg 69:263–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cipollini ML (2000) Secondary metabolites of vertebrate-dispersed fruits: evidence for adaptive functions. Rev Chil Hist Nat 73:421–440Google Scholar
  12. Cipollini ML, Levey DJ (1997a) Antifungal activity of Solanum fruit glycoalkaloids: implications for frugivory and seed dispersal. Ecology 78:799–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cipollini ML, Levey DJ (1997b) Secondary metabolites of fleshy vertebrate-dispersed fruits: adaptive hypotheses and implications for seed dispersal. Am Nat 150:346–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cipollini ML, Levey DJ (1997c) Why are some fruits toxic? Glycoalkaloids in Solanum and fruit choice by vertebrates. Ecology 78:782–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cipollini ML, Levey DJ (1998) Secondary metabolites as traits of ripe fleshy fruits: a response to Eriksson and Ehrlen. Am Nat 152:908–911CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Coley PD, Barone JA (1996) Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:305–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cordell GA, Araujo OE (1993) Capsaicin: identification, nomenclature, and pharmacotherapy. Ann Pharmacother 27:330–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Corlett RT (1996) Characteristics of vertebrate-dispersed fruits in Hong Kong. J Trop Ecol 12:819–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Debussche M, Isenmann P (1989) Fleshy fruit characters and the choices of bird and mammal seed dispersers in a Mediterranean region. Oikos 56:327–338Google Scholar
  20. Delgado Garcia JD (2002) Interaction between introduced rats and a frugivore bird-plant system in a relict island forest. J Nat Hist 36:1247–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dib B (1990) After two weeks habituation to capsaicinized food, rats prefer this to plain food. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 37:649–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ehrlen J, Eriksson O (1993) Toxicity in fleshy fruits—a non-adaptive trait? Oikos 66:107–113Google Scholar
  23. Eisenberg JF, Redford KH (1999) Mammals of the neotropics. The central neotropics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  24. Fuentes M (1994) Diets of fruit-eating birds: what are the causes of interspecific differences? Oecologia 97:134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fujiwake H, Suzuki T, Iwai K (1982) Formation and metabolism of the pungent principle of Capsicum fruits. II. Capsaicinoid formation in the protoplast from the placenta of Capsicum fruits. Agric Biol Chem 46:2591–2592Google Scholar
  26. Furuse T, Blizard DA, Moriwaki K, Miura Y, Yagasaki K, Shiroishi T, Koide T (2002) Genetic diversity underlying capsaicin intake in the Mishima battery of mouse strains. Brain Res Bull 57:49–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galef BG (1989) Enduring social enhancement of rats’ preferences for the palatable and the piquant. Appetite 13:81–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Green BG (1989) Capsaicin sensitization and desensitization on the tongue produced by brief exposures to a low concentration. Neurosci Lett 107:173–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Green BG (1991) Temporal characteristics of capsaicin sensitization and desensitization on the tongue. Physiol Behav 49:501–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herrera CM (1982) Defense of ripe fruits from pests: its significance in relation to plant–disperser interactions. Am Nat 120:218–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herrera CM (2002) Seed dispersal by vertebrates. In: Herrera CM, Pellmyr O (eds) Plant–animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 185–210Google Scholar
  32. Heske EJ, Brown JH, Mistry S (1994) Long-term experimental study of a Chihuanhuan desert rodent community: 13 years of competition. Ecology 75:438–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hilker DM, Hee J, Higashi J, Ikehara S, Paulsen E (1967) Free choice consumption of spiced dishes by rats. J Nutr 91:129–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoffmeister DF (1971) Mammals of the Grand Canyon. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill.Google Scholar
  35. Iwai K, Suzuki T, Fujiwake H (1979) Formation and accumulation of pungent principle of hot pepper fruits, capsaicin and its analogs, in Capsicum annuum var. annuum cv. karayatsubusa at different growth-stages after flowering. Agric Biol Chem 43:2493–2498Google Scholar
  36. Izhaki I (2002) Emodin—a secondary metabolite with multiple ecological functions in higher plants. New Phytol 155:205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jahn AE, Davis SE, Saavedra AM (2002) Patterns of austral bird migration in the Bolivian Chaco. J Field Ornithol 73:258–267Google Scholar
  38. Janson CH (1983) Adaptation of fruit morphology to dispersal agents in a neotropical forest. Science 219:187–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Janzen DH (1977) Why fruits rot, seeds mold, and meat spoils. Am Nat 111:691–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jones CG, Hare JD, Compton SJ (1989) Measuring plant protein with the Bradford assay. I. Evaluation and standard method. J Chem Ecol 15:979–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jordano P (1995) Angiosperm fleshy fruits and seed dispersers: a comparative analysis of adaptation and constraints in plant–animal interactions. Am Nat 145:163–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jordano P (2000) Fruits and frugivory. In: Fenner M (eds) Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in natural plant communities. CAB International, London, pp 105–151Google Scholar
  43. Jordt SE, Julius D (2002) Molecular basis for species-specific sensitivity to “hot” chili peppers. Cell 108:421–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Karrer T, Bartoshuk LM (1991) Capsaicin desensitization and recovery on the tongue. Physiol Behav 49:757–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kwit C, Levey DJ, Greenberg CH, Pearson SF, McCarty JP, Sargent S (2004) Cold temperature increases winter fruit removal rate of a bird-dispersed shrub. Oecologia 139:20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Levey DJ (1987) Sugar-tasting ability and fruit selection in tropical fruit-eating birds. Auk 104:173–179Google Scholar
  47. Levey DJ, Cipollini ML (1998) A glycoalkaloid in ripe fruit deters consumption by Cedar Waxwings. Auk 115:359–367Google Scholar
  48. Levey DJ, Martínez del Rio C (2001) It takes guts (and more) to eat fruit: lessons from avian nutritional ecology. Auk 118:819–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Li X, Baskin JM, Baskin CC (1999) Contrasting dispersal phenologies in two fleshy-fruited congeneric shrubs, Rhus aromatica Ait and Rhus glabra L. (Anacardiaceae). Can J Bot 77:976–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Loiselle BA, Blake JG (1990) Diets of understory fruit-eating birds in Costa Rica: seasonality and resource abundance. Stud Avian Biol 13:91–103Google Scholar
  51. Martin AC, Zim HS, Nelson AL (1951) American wildlife and plants. A guide to wildlife food habitats. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Mason JR, Clark L (1995) Mammalian irritants as chemical stimuli for birds: the importance of training. Auk 112:511–514Google Scholar
  53. Mason JR, Bean NJ, Shah PS, Clark L (1991) Taxon-specific differences in responsiveness to capsaicin and several analogs: correlates between chemical structure and behavioral aversiveness. J Chem Ecol 17:2539–2551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McBurney DH, Balaban CD, Christopher DE, Harvey C (1997) Adaptation to capsaicin within and across days. Physiol Behav 61:181–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McCarty J, Levey D, Greenberg C, Sargent S (2002) Spatial and temporal variation in fruit use by wildlife in a forested landscape. For Ecol Manage 164:277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McKey D (1975) The ecology of coevolved seed dispersal systems. In: Gilbert LE, Raven PH (eds) Coevolution of animals and plants. University of Texas Press, Austin, Tex., pp 159–191Google Scholar
  57. Moermond TC, Denslow JS (1985) Neotropical avian frugivores: patterns of behavior, morphology, and nutrition with consequences for fruit selection. In: Buckley PA, Foster MS, Morton EW, Ridgely RS, Buckley F (eds) Neotropical ornithology. American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D.C., pp 865–897Google Scholar
  58. Norman DM, Mason JR, Clark L (1992) Capsaicin effects on consumption of food by cedar waxwings and house finches. Wilson Bull 104:549–551Google Scholar
  59. Pizo MA (2002) The seed-dispersers and fruit syndromes of Myrtaceae in the Brazilian atlantic forest. In: Levey DJ, Silva WR, Galetti M (eds) Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology, evolution, and conservation. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 129–144Google Scholar
  60. Place AR, Stiles EW (1992) Living off the wax of the land: bayberries and yellow-rumped warblers. Auk 109:223–245Google Scholar
  61. Prescott J (1999) The generalizability of capsaicin sensitization and desensitization. Physiol Behav 66:741–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Prescott J, Stevenson RJ (1995) Pungency in food perception and preference. Food Rev Int 11:665–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rozin P, Kennel K (1983a) Acquired preferences for piquant foods by chimpanzees. Appetite 4:69–77Google Scholar
  64. Rozin P, Kennel K (1983b) The nature and acquisition of a preference for chili pepper by humans. Appetite 4:69–77Google Scholar
  65. Rozin P, Gruss L, Berk G (1979) Reversal of innate aversions: attempts to induce a preference for chili peppers in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:1001–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rozin P, Mark M, Shilter D (1981) The role of desinitization to capsaicin in chili pepper ingestion and preference. Chem Senses 6:23–31Google Scholar
  67. Santilli F, Mori L, Galardi L (2004) Evaluation of three repellents for the prevention of damage to olive seedlings by deer. Eur J Wildl Res 50:85–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schaefer HM, Schmidt V, Bairlein F (2003) Discrimination abilities for nutrients: which difference matters for choosy birds and why? Anim Behav 65:531–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shumake SA, Sterner RT, Gaddis SE (2000) Repellents to reduce cable gnawing by Norway rats. J Wildl Manage 64:1009–1013Google Scholar
  70. Simmons CT, Dessirier J-M, Jinks SL, Carstens E (2001) An animal model to assess aversion to intra-oral capsaicin: increased threshold in mice lacking substance P. Chem Senses 26:491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith D (1981) Removing and analyzing total nonstructural carbohydrates from plant tissue. Wis Agric Exp Stn Bull No. 2107Google Scholar
  72. Snow DW (1985) The web of adaptation: bird studies in the American tropics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  73. Spiro RG (1966) Analysis of sugars found in glycoproteins. In: Newfield EG, Ginsberg V (eds) Methods in enzymology, vol VIII. Complex carbohydrates. Academic Press, New York, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  74. Stiles EW (1993) The influence of pulp lipids on fruit preference by birds. Vegetatio 107/108:227–235Google Scholar
  75. Suzuki T, Fujiwake H, Iwai K (1980) Formation and metabolism of pungent principle of Capsicum fruits. 5. Intracellular-localization of capsaicin and its analogs, capsaicinoid, in Capsicum fruit. 1. Microscopic investigation of the structure of the placenta of Capsicum annuum var. annuum. Plant Cell Physiol 21:839–853Google Scholar
  76. Swihart RK, Conover MR (1991) Responses of woodchucks to potential garden crop repellents. J Wildl Manage 55:177–181Google Scholar
  77. Taber A, Navarro G, Arribas MA (1997) A new park in the Bolivia Gran Chaco: an advance in tropical dry forest conservation and community-based management. Oryx 31:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tewksbury JJ, Nabhan GP (2001) Directed deterrence by capsaicin in chilies. Nature 412:403–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tewksbury JJ, Nabhan GP, Norman DM, Suzan H, Toxill J, Donovan J (1999) In situ conservation of wild chiles and their biotic associates. Conserv Biol 13:98–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tewksbury JJ, Manchego C, Haak D, Levey DJ (2006) Where did the chili get its spice? Biogeography of capsaicinoid production in ancestral wild chili species. J Chem Ecol 32:547–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Traveset A (1998) Effect of seed passage through vertebrate frugivores’ guts on germination: a review. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 1/2:151–190Google Scholar
  82. Tsahar E, Friedman J, Izhaki I (2002) Impact of fruit removal and seed predation of a secondary metabolite, emodin, in Rhamnus alaternus fruit pulp. Oikos 99:290–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tsahar E, Friedman J, Izhaki I (2003) Secondary metabolite emodin increases food assimilation efficiency of yellow-vented bulbuls (Pycnonotus xanthopygos). Auk 120:411–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wagner KK, Nolte DL (2000) Evaluation of Hot Sauce (R) as a repellent for forest animals. Wildl Soc Bull 28:76–83Google Scholar
  85. Williams S (1984) Official methods of analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists, 14th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  86. Willson MF, Whelan CJ (1993) Variation of dispersal phenology in a bird-dispersed shrub, Cornus drummondii. Ecol Monogr 63:151–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Witmer MC (1996) Annual diet of cedar waxwings based on U.S. Biological Survey records (1885–1950) compared to diet of American robins: contrasts in dietary patterns and natural history. Auk 113:414–430Google Scholar
  88. Witmer MC, Van Soest PJ (1998) Contrasting digestive strategies of fruit-eating birds. Funct Ecol 12:728–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas J. Levey
    • 1
  • Joshua J. Tewksbury
    • 2
  • Martin L. Cipollini
    • 3
  • Tomás A. Carlo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyBerry CollegeMount BerryUSA

Personalised recommendations