Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 149, Issue 2, pp 256–264 | Cite as

Habitat context influences predator interference interactions and the strength of resource partitioning

  • A. Randall HughesEmail author
  • Jonathan H. Grabowski
Community Ecology

Abstract

Despite increasing evidence that habitat structure can shape predator–prey interactions, few studies have examined the impact of habitat context on interactions among multiple predators and the consequences for combined foraging rates. We investigated the individual and combined effects of stone crabs (Menippe mercenaria) and knobbed whelks (Busycon carica) when foraging on two common bivalves, the hard clam (Mercenaria mercenaria) and the ribbed mussel (Geukensia demissa) in oyster reef and sand flat habitats. Because these species co-occur across these and other estuarine habitats of varying physical complexity, this system is ideal for examining how habitat context influences foraging rates and the generality of predator interactions. Consistent with results from previous studies, consumption rates of each predator in isolation from the other were higher in the sand flat than in the more structurally complex oyster reef habitat. However, consumption by the two predators when combined surprisingly did not differ between the two habitats. This counterintuitive result probably stems from the influence of habitat structure on predator–predator interactions. In the sand-flat habitat, whelks significantly reduced their consumption of their less preferred prey when crabs were present. However, the structurally more complex oyster reef habitat appeared to reduce interference interactions among predators, such that consumption rates when the predators co-occurred did not differ from predation rates when alone. In addition, both habitat context and predator–predator interactions increased resource partitioning by strengthening predator dietary selectivity. Thus, an understanding of how habitat characteristics such as physical complexity influence interactions among predators may be critical to predicting the effects of modifying predator populations on their shared prey.

Keywords

Context dependency Habitat structure Oyster reef Predator dietary selectivity Predator interference 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Peterson for his advice on the design of the experiment. E. Calvert, M. Dolan, D. Kimbro, and R. Wagaman helped in the field and the lab. We are grateful to B. Miner and J. Stachowicz for their assistance with statistical analyses and interpretation. M. Bracken, J. Byrnes, L. Carney, B. Griffen, S. Olyarnik, C. Peterson, J. Stachowicz, D. Strong, and three anonymous reviewers provided useful comments on the manuscript. Financial support was provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration–National Estuarine Research Reserve System Graduate Research Fellowship Program and the North Carolina Fishery Resource Grant Program. This experiment was in compliance with the current laws of the USA.

References

  1. Beck MW (2000) Separating the elements of habitat structure: independent effects of habitat complexity and structural components on rocky intertidal gastropods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 249:29–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck CW, Watts BD (1997) The effect of cover and food on space use by wintering song sparrows and field sparrows. Can J Zool 75:1636–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beukers JS, Jones GP (1997) Habitat complexity modifies the impact of piscivores on a coral reef fish population. Oecologia 114:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blundon JA, Kennedy VS (1982) Refuges for infaunal bivalves from blue crab, Callinectes sapidus Rathbun, predation in Chesapeake Bay. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 65:67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botsford LW, Castilla JC, Peterson CH (1997) The management of fisheries and marine ecosystems. Science 277:509–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrnes JE, Stachowicz JJ, Hultgren K, Hughes AR, Olyarnik SV, Thornber CS (2006) Predator diversity increases trophic cascades in kelp forests by modifying herbivore behavior. Ecol Lett 9:61–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapin FS, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RT, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavorel S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE, Mack ME, Diaz S (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chesson J (1983) The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology 64:1297–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesson P (1991) A need for niches? Trends Ecol Evol 6:26–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowlishaw G (1997) Trade-offs between foraging and predation risk determine habitat use in a desert baboon population. Anim Behav 53:667–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crowder LB, Cooper WE (1982) Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63:1802–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diehl S (1992) Fish predation and benthic community structure: the role of omnivory and habitat complexity. Ecology 73:1646–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dill LM, Heithaus MR, Walters CJ (2003) Behaviorally mediated indirect interactions in marine communities and their conservation implications. Ecology 84:1151–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duffy JE, Richardson JP, France KE (2005) Ecosystem consequences of diversity depend on food chain length in estuarine vegetation. Ecol Lett 8:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finke DL, Denno RF (2002) Intraguild predation diminished in complex-structured vegetation: implications for prey suppression. Ecology 83:643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grabowski JH (2004) Habitat complexity disrupts predator–prey interactions but not the trophic cascade on oyster reefs. Ecology 85:995–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grabowski JH, Kimbro DL (2005) Predator-avoidance behavior extends trophic cascades to refuge habitats. Ecology 86:1312–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grabowski JH, Powers SP (2004) Habitat complexity mitigates trophic transfer on oyster reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 277:291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grabowski JH, Hughes AR, Kimbro DL, Dolan MA (2005) How habitat setting influences restored oyster reef communities. Ecology 86:1926–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffen BD, Byers JE (2006) Partitioning mechanisms of predator interference in different habitats. Oecologia 146:608–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guillemain M, Loreau M, Daufresne T (1997) Relationships between the regional distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and the abundance of their potential prey. Acta Oecol 18:465–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heck KL Jr, Wetstone GS (1977) Habitat complexity and invertebrate species richness and abundance in tropical seagrass meadows. J Biogeogr 4:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huffaker CB (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator–prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27:343–383Google Scholar
  24. Irlandi EA, Peterson CH (1991) Modification of animal habitat by large plants: mechanisms by which seagrasses influence clam growth. Oecologia 87:307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ives AR, Cardinale BJ, Snyder WE (2005) A synthesis of subdisciplines: predator–prey interactions, and biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 8:102–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson JBC, Kirby MX, Berger WH, Bjorndal KA, Botsford LW, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke R, Erlandson J, Estes JA, Hughes TP, Kidwell S, Lange CB, Lenihan HS, Pandolfi JM, Peterson CH, Steneck RS, Tegner MJ, Warner RR (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lenihan HS, Peterson CH, Byers JE, Grabowski JH, Thayer GW, Colby DR (2001) Cascading of habitat degredation: oyster reefs invaded by refugee fishes escaping stress. Ecol Appl 11:764–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Littler MM, Taylor PR, Littler DS (1989) Complex interactions in the control of coral zonation on a Caribbean reef flat. Oecologia 80:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Micheli F (1997) Effects of predator foraging behavior on patterns of prey mortality in marine soft bottoms. Ecol Monogr 67:203–224Google Scholar
  30. Micheli F, Peterson CH (1999) Estuarine vegetated habitats as corridors for predator movements. Conserv Biol 13:869–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakaoka M (2000) Nonlethal effects of predators on prey populations: predator-mediated change in bivalve growth. Ecology 81:1031–1045Google Scholar
  32. Peterson CH (1982) Clam predation by whelks (Busycon spp.): experimental tests of the importance of prey size, prey density, and seagrass cover. Mar Biol 66:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peterson CH, Kneib RT, Manen CA (2003) Scaling restoration actions in the marine environment to meet quantitative targets of enhanced ecosystem services. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 264:173–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pfennig DW, Rice AM, Martin RA (2006) Ecological opportunity and phenotypic plasticity interact to promote character displacement and species coexistence. Ecology 87:769–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rothschild BJ, Ault JS, Goulletquer P, Heral M (1994) Decline of the Chesapeake Bay oyster population: a century of habitat destruction and overfishing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 111:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. SAS Institute (2001) JMP 4.0, Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. Schmitz OJ, Sokol-Hessner L (2002) Linearity in the aggregate effects of multiple predators in a food web. Ecol Lett 5:168–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmitz OJ, Krivan V, Ovadia O (2004) Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 7:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schriver P, Bøgestrand J, Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M (1995) Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish–zooplankton–phytoplankton interactions—large-scale enclosure experiments in a shallow eutrophic lake. Freshwater Biol 33:255–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shurin JB, Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Anderson K, Blanchette CA, Broitman B, Cooper SD, Halpern BS (2002) A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades. Ecol Lett 7:153–163Google Scholar
  41. Siddon CE, Witman JD (2004) Behavioral indirect interactions: multiple predator effects and prey switching in the rocky subtidal. Ecology 85:2938–2945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sih A, Englund G, Wooster D (1998) Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol Evol 13:350–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soluk DA, Collins NC (1988) Synergistic interactions between fish and stoneflies: facilitation and interference among stream predators. Oikos 52:94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sponaugle S, Lawton P (1990) Portunid crab predation on juvenile hard clams: effects of substrate type and prey density. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 67:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Strong DR (1992) Are trophic cascases all wet? Differentiation and donor control in speciose ecosystems. Ecology 73:747–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Summerson HC, Peterson CH (1984) Role of predation in organizing benthic communities of a temperate-zone seagrass bed. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 15:63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tegner MJ, Dayton PK (1981) Population structure, recruitment and mortality of two sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. purpuratus) in a kelp forest. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 5:255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Bertness MD (2003) Trait-mediated effects in rocky intertidal food chains: predator risk cues alter prey feeding rates. Ecology 84:629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walker RL (1988) Observations on intertidal whelk (Busycon and Busycotypus) populations in Wassaw Sound, Georgia. J Shellfish Res 7:473–478Google Scholar
  51. Warfe DM, Barmuta LA (2004) Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species. Oecologia 141:171–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weissburg MJ, Zimmer-Faust RK (1993) Life and death in moving fluids: hydrodynamic effects on chemosensory mediated predation. Ecology 74:1428–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Werner EE, Peacor SD (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ, Mittelbach GG (1983) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Williams AB (1984) Shrimps, lobsters, and crabs of the Atlantic Coast of the eastern United States, Maine to Florida. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bodega Marine Laboratory and Section of Evolution and EcologyUniversity of California-DavisBodega BayUSA
  2. 2.Gulf of Maine Research InstitutePortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations