Preferential feeding by an aquatic consumer mediates non-additive decomposition of speciose leaf litter
- 268 Downloads
Forest soils and streams receive substantial inputs of detritus from deciduous vegetation. Decay of this material is a critical ecosystem process, recycling nutrients and supporting detrital-based food webs, and has been attributed, in part, to leaf litter species composition. However, research on why speciose leaf litter should degrade differently has relied on a bottom-up approach, embracing interspecific variation in litter chemistry. We hypothesized that preferential feeding by an aquatic detritivore interacts with species-specific leaf palatability and slows decay of speciose leaf litter. We addressed this by offering four single- and mixed-species leaf resources to field densities of a leaf-shredding consumer. Mixing leaf species resulted in slower total leaf decomposition. Decreases in mixed-species decomposition was partly explained by preferential feeding by the consumers in one case, but the lack of preferential feeding in other mixtures suggested an interactive effect of feeding and microbial degradation. Loss of riparian tree biodiversity may have implications for in-stream consumer-resource interactions.
KeywordsConsumers Decomposition Preferential feeding Riparian Species richness
We thank Robert Denno, Laura Craig, Holly Menninger, Aaron Moore, Dave Richardson, John Richardson, Bob Smith and Gina Wimp for their comments and editing. Comments from Steve Kohler and two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the text. This research was supported by grants awarded to C.M.S. from the Chesapeake Bay Fund (University of Maryland) and to M.A.P. from the National Science Foundation (DEB-9981376).
- Benfield EF (1996) Leaf breakdown in stream ecosystems. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (eds) Methods in stream ecology. Academic, San Diego, pp 579–589Google Scholar
- Ellison AM, Bank MS, Barker-Plotkin AA, Clinton BD, Colburn EA, Elliott K, Ford CR, Foster DR, Jefts S, Kloeppel BD, Knoepp JD, Lovett GM, Malloway J, Mathewson B, McDonald R, Mohan J, Orwig DA, Rodenhouse NL, Sobczak WV, Stinson KA, Snow P, Stone JK, Swan CM, Thompson J, Von Holle B, Webster JR (2005) Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 3:479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Golladay SW , Webster JR, Benfield EF (1983) Factors affecting food utilization by a leaf shredding aquatic insect: leaf species and conditioning time. Holarctic Ecol 6:157–162Google Scholar
- Irons JG III, Oswood MW, Bryant JP (1988) Consumption of leaf detritus by a stream shredder: influence of tree species and nutrient status. Hydrobiologia 160:53–61Google Scholar
- Shepard RB, Minshall GW (1984) Role of benthic insect feces in a rocky mountain stream: fecal production and support of consumer growth. Holarctic Ecol 7:119–127Google Scholar
- Snyder CD, Young JA, Lemarié DP, Smith DR (2002) Influence of eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) forests on aquatic invertebrate assemblages in headwater streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:232–275Google Scholar
- Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Swan CM, Palmer MA (2005) Leaf litter diversity leads to non-additivity in stream detritivore colonization dynamics. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 34:19–38Google Scholar
- Sweeney BW (1993) Effects of streamside vegetation on macroinvertebrate communities of White Clay Creek in eastern North America. Proc Acad Natl Sci Philadelphia 144:291–340Google Scholar
- Westfall PH, Tobias RD, Rom D, Wolfinger RD, Hochberg Y (1999) Concepts and basic methods for multiple comparisons and tests. In: Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using the SAS system. SAS Institute, pp 13–40Google Scholar
- Williams WD (1972) Freshwater isopods (Assellidae) of North America. Biota of freshwater ecosystems identification manual no. 7. U.S.E.P.AGoogle Scholar