, Volume 147, Issue 4, pp 702–713 | Cite as

Effect of hybridization of the Quercus crassifolia×Quercus crassipes complex on the community structure of endophagous insects

Community Ecology


In a previous study, we showed that the geographic proximity of hybrid plants to the allopatric areas of parental species increases their morphological and genetic similarity with them. In the present work, we explored whether the endophagous fauna of hybrid plants show the same pattern. We studied the canopy species richness, diversity and composition of leaf-mining moths (Lepidoptera: Tischeridae, Citheraniidae) and gall-forming wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) associated with two species of red oaks (Quercus crassifolia and Quercus crassipes) and their interspecific hybrid (Quercus×dysophylla Benth pro sp.) in seven hybrid zones in central Mexico, during four seasons in 2 years. The study was conducted on 194 oak trees with known genetic status [identified by leaf morphology and molecular markers (random amplified polymorphic DNAs)], and the results indicate a bidirectional pattern of gene flow. Hybrid plants supported intermediate levels of infestation of gall-forming and leaf-mining insects compared to their putative parental species. The infestation level of leaf-mining insects varied significantly following the pattern: Q. crassifolia>hybrids>Q. crassipes, whereas the gall-forming insects showed an inverse pattern. A negative and significant relationship was found between these two types of insect guilds in each host taxa, when the infestation percentage was evaluated. It was found that 31.5% (n=11) of the endophagous insects were specific to Q. crassipes, 22.9% (n=8) to Q. crassifolia, and 8.6% (n=3) to hybrid individuals. The hybrid bridge hypothesis was supported in the case of 25.7% (n=9) of insects, which suggests that the presence of a hybrid intermediary plant may favor a host herbivore shift from one plant species to another. Greater genetic diversity in a hybrid zone is associated with greater diversity in the endophagous community. The geographic proximity of hybrid plants to the allopatric site of a parental species increases their similarity in terms of endophagous insects and the Eje Neovolcánico acts as a corridor favoring this pattern.


Hybridization Gall forming Leaf mining Quercus Community structure 

Supplementary material

442_2005_328_MOESM1_ESM.doc (24 kb)
Supplementary material


  1. Aguilar JM, Boecklen WJ (1992) Patterns of herbivory in the Quercus grisea×Quercus gambelii species complex. Oikos 64:498–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson E (1949) Introgressive hybridization. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Ananthakrisham NT (1984) The biology of gall insects. Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Kremer A (1995) Genetic, morphological, ecological and phenological differentiation between Quercus petrea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. in a hybrid zone of the northwest. Silvae Genet 44:1–1Google Scholar
  5. Boecklen WJ, Spellenberg R (1990) Structure of herbivore communities in two oak (Quercus spp.) hybrid zones. Oecologia 85:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boecklen WJ, Larson KC (1994) Gall-forming wasp (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) in an oak hybrid zone: testing hypotheses about hybrid susceptibility to herbivores. In: Price PW, Mattson WJ, Baranchikov YN (eds) The ecology and evolution of gall-forming insects. North Central Forest Experimental Station, Forest Service, USDA, St. Paul, Min., pp 110–120Google Scholar
  7. Bruschi P, Vendramin GG, Bussotti F, Grossoni P (2000) Morphological and molecular differentiation between Quercus petrea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus pubescens Willd. (Fagaceae) in northern and central Italy. Ann Bot 85:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connor EF, Faeth SH, Simberloff D (1983) Leaf-miners on oaks: the role of immigration in situ reproductive recruitment. Ecology 64:191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornell HV (1986) Oak species attributes and host size influence cynipine wasp species richness. Ecology 67:1582–1592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornell HV, Washburn JO (1979) Evolution of the richness-area correlation for cynipid gall wasp on oak tree: a comparison of two geographic areas. Evolution 33:257–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dumolin-Lapeguè S, Demesure B, Fineschi S, LeCorre V, Petit RJ (1997) Phylogeographic structure of white oaks throughout the European Continent. Genetics 146:1475–1487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dungey HS, Potts BM, Whitham TG, Li HF (2000) Plant genetics effects arthropod community richness and composition: evidence from a synthetic eucalypt hybrid population. Evolution 54:1938–1946PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Faith DP, Minchin PR, Belbin L (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetation 69:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrusquía-Villafranca I (1993) Geology of Mexico: a synopsis. In: Ramamoorthy TP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J (eds) Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–107Google Scholar
  16. Floate KD, Whitham TG (1993) The “hybrid bridge” hypothesis: host shifting via plant hybrid swarms. Am Nat 141:651–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fritz RS, Simms EL (1992) Plant resistance to herbivores and phatogens. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  18. Fritz RS, Nichols-Orians CM, Brunsfeld SJ (1994) Interspecific hybridization of plants and resistance to herbivores: hypothesis, genetics, and variable responses in a diverse herbivore community. Oecologia 97:106–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fritz RS, Roche BM, Brunsfeld SJ, Orians CM (1996) Interspecific and temporal variation in herbivores responses to hybrid willows. Oecologia 108:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fritz RS, Roche BM, Brunsfeld SJ (1998) Genetic variation in resistance of hybrid willows to herbivores. Oikos 83:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fritz RS, Moulia C, Newcombe G (1999) Resistance of hybrid plants and animals to herbivores, pathogens, and parasites. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:565–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grant V (1981) Plant speciation. 2nd edn. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Guttman SI, Weight LA (1989) Electrophoretic evidence of relationships among Quercus (oaks) of eastern North America. Can J Bot 67:339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall RW, Towsend AM (1987) Suitability of Ulmus wilsoniana, the “urban” elm, and their hybrids for the elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Müller) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ Entomol 16:1042–1044Google Scholar
  25. Hanhimäki S, Senn J, Haukioja E (1994) Permanence of insect herbivores on hybridizing trees: the case of the subarctic birches. J Anim Ecol 63:163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hardin JW (1975) Hybridization and introgression in Quercus alba. J Arnold Arbor 56:336–363Google Scholar
  27. Jensen RJ, Eshbaugh WH (1976) Numerical taxonomic studies of hybridization in Quercus. Populations of restricted aerial distribution and low taxonomic diversity. Syst Bot 1:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knops JMH, Tilman D, Haddad NM, Naeem S, Mitchell CE, Haarstad J (1999) Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundance and diversity. Ecol Lett 2:286–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawton JH (1978) Host-plant influences on insect diversity: the effects of space and time. Symp R Entomol Soc Lond 9:105–125Google Scholar
  30. Messina FJ, Richards JH, McArthur ED (1996) Variable responses of insects to hybrid versus parental sagebrush in common gardens. Oecologia 107:513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moorehead JR, Taper ML, Case TJ (1993) Utilization of hybrid oak hosts by a monophaghous gall wasp: how little host character is sufficient? Oecologia 95:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morrow PA, Whitham TG, Potts BM, Ladiges P, Ashton DH, Williams J (1994) Gall-forming insects concentrate on hybrid phenotypes of Eucalyptus host. In: Price PW, Mattson WJ Jr, Baranchikov YN (eds) The ecology and evolution of gall-forming insects. North Central Forest Experimental Station, Forest Service, USDA, St. Paul, Min.Google Scholar
  33. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Nixon KC (1993) The genus Quercus in Mexico. In: Nixon KC (ed) Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distributions, Oxford University Press, New York, pp 447–458Google Scholar
  35. Orians CM, Fritz RS (1995) Secundary chemistry of hybrid and parental willows: phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins in Salix sericea, S. eriocephala, and their hybrids. J Chem Ecol 21:1245–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Orians CM (2000) The effects of hybridization in plants on secondary chemistry: implications for the ecology and evolution of plant-herbivore interactions. Am J Bot 87:1749–1756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Osier TL, Lindroth RL (2001) Effects of genotype, nutrient availability, and defoliation on aspen phytochemistry and insect performance. J Chem Ecol 27:1289–1313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Price PW, Abrahamson WG, Hunter MD, Melika G (2004) Using gall wasp on oaks to test broad ecological concepts. Conserv Biol 18:1405–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rieseberg LH, Brunsfeld SJ (1992) Molecular evidence and plant introgression. In: Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Doyle JD (eds) Molecular systematic of plants. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 151–176Google Scholar
  40. Rieseberg LH, Elltrand NC (1993) What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? Crit Rev Plant Sci 12:213–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rieseberg LH, Wendel JF (1993) Introgression and its consequences in plants. In: Harrison RG (ed) hybrid zones and the evolutionary process, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 70–109Google Scholar
  42. Romero RS (1993) El género Quercus (Fagaceae) en el Estado de México. M.Sc. thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  43. Rowell-Rahier M (1984) The food plant preferentes of Phratora vitellinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelinae). Oecologia 64:375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shoonhoven LM, Jermy T, Van Loon JJA (1998) Insect–plant biology: from physiology to evolution. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Simberloff D, Stiling P (1987) Larval dispersion and survivorship in a leaf-mining moth. Ecology 68:1647–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simms EL, Rausher MD (1993) Patterns of selection on phytophage resistance in Ipomoea purpurea. Evolution 47:970–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Slansky F, Scriber JM (1985) Food composition and utilization. In: Kerkurt G, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 87–163Google Scholar
  48. Soetens P, Rowell-Rahier M, Pasteels JM (1991) Influence of phenolglucosides and trichome density on the distribution of insects herbivores on willows. Entomol Exp Appl 59:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stace CA (1987) Hybridization and the plant species. In: Urbanska KM (ed) Differentiation patterns in higher plants. Academic Press, New York, pp 115–127Google Scholar
  50. Stone GN, Schönrogge K, Atkinson RJ, Pujade-Villar J (2002) The population biology of gall wasp (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Annu Rev Entomol 47:633–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strauss SY (1994) Levels of herbivory and parasitism in host hybrid zones. Trends Ecol Evol 9:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strong DR, Lawton JH, Southwood TRE (1984) Insects on plants: community patterns and mechanisms. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  53. Tovar-Sánchez E, Oyama K (2004) Natural hybridization and hybrid zones between Quercus crassifolia and Q. crassipes in Mexico. Morphological and molecular evidence. Am J Bot 91:1352–1363Google Scholar
  54. Warwick RM, Clarke KR, Suharsono A (1990) A statistical analysis of coral community responses to the 1982–1983 El Niño in the Thousand Island, Indonesia. Coral Reefs 8:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wendel LH (1960) Cynipid Galls of the Southwest. Privately printed, Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
  56. Wendel JF, Steward JMcD, Rettig JH (1991) Molecular evidence for homoploid reticulate evolution among Australian species of Gossypium. Evolution 45:694–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Whitham TG, Morrow PA, Potts BM (1994) Plant hybrid zones as center of biodiversity: the herbivore community of two endemic Tasmanian eucalypts. Oecologia 97:481–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whitham TG, Martinsen GD, Floate KD, Dungey H, Potts BM, Keim P (1999) Plant hybrid zones affect biodiversity: tools for a genetic-based understanding of community structure. Ecology 80:416–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Whittemore AT, Schaal BA (1991) Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:2540–2544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wimp GM, Young WP, Woolbright SA, Martinsen GD, Keim P, Whitham TG (2004) Conserving plant genetic diversity for dependent animal communities. Ecol Lett 7:776–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wimp GM, Gregory D, Martinsen GD, Floate KD, Bangert RK, Whitham TG (2005) Plant genetic determinants of arthropod community structure and diversity. Evolution 59:61–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Investigaciones en EcosistemasUNAMMichoacánMéxico

Personalised recommendations