, Volume 147, Issue 2, pp 369–378

The interplay between shifts in biomass allocation and costs of reproduction in four grassland perennials under simulated successional change

Global Change Ecology

DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0325-8

Cite this article as:
Jongejans, E., de Kroon, H. & Berendse, F. Oecologia (2006) 147: 369. doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0325-8


When perennial herbs face the risk of being outcompeted in the course of succession, they are hypothesized to either increase their biomass allocation to flowers and seeds or to invest more in vegetative growth. We tested these hypotheses in a 3-year garden experiment with four perennials (Hypochaeris radicata, Cirsium dissectum, Succisa pratensis and Centaurea jacea) by growing them in the midst of a tall tussock-forming grass (Molinia caerulea) that may successionally replace them in their natural habitat. In all species except for the short-lived H. radicata, costs of sexual reproduction were significant over the 3 years, since continuous bud removal enhanced total biomass or rosette number. To mimic succession we added nutrients, which resulted in a tripled grass biomass and higher death rates in the shorter-lived species. The simulated succession resulted also in a number of coupled growth responses in the survivors: enhanced plant size as well as elevated seed production. The latter was partly due to larger plant sizes, but mostly due to higher reproductive allocation, which in turn could be partly explained by lower relative somatic costs and by lower root–shoot ratios in the high-nutrient plots. Our results suggest that perennial plants can increase both their persistence and their colonization ability by simultaneously increasing their vegetative size and reproductive allocation in response to enhanced competition and nutrient influxes. These responses can be very important for the survival of a species in a metapopulation context.


Costs of reproduction Root–shoot ratio Sexual reproductive allocation Succession 

Supplementary material

442_2005_325_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (105 kb)
Supplementary material

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eelke Jongejans
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hans de Kroon
    • 2
  • Frank Berendse
    • 1
  1. 1.Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of EcologyRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Biology and IGDP in EcologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations