, Volume 147, Issue 4, pp 576–584 | Cite as

Carotenoids modulate the trade-off between egg production and resistance to oxidative stress in zebra finches

  • Sophie Bertrand
  • Carlos Alonso-Alvarez
  • Godefroy Devevey
  • Bruno Faivre
  • Josiane Prost
  • Gabriele Sorci


The allocation of resources to reproduction and survival is a central question of studies of life history evolution. Usually, increased allocation to current reproduction is paid in terms of reduced future reproduction and/or decreased survival. However, the proximal mechanisms underlying the cost of reproduction are poorly understood. Recently, it has been shown that increased susceptibility to oxidative stress might be one of such proximate links between reproduction and self-maintenance. Organisms possess a range of antioxidant defenses, including endogenously produced molecules (e.g., enzymes) and compounds ingested with food (e.g., carotenoids). If reproductive effort increases the production of reactive oxygen species, the availability of antioxidant defenses may partly or fully counteract the free-radical damages. One could, therefore, expect that the trade-off between reproduction and oxidative stress is modulated by the availability of antioxidant defenses. We tested this hypothesis in zebra finches. We manipulated reproductive effort by either allowing or preventing pairs to breed. Within each breeding or non-breeding group, the availability of antioxidant compounds was manipulated by supplementing or not supplementing the drinking water with carotenoids. We found that although birds in the breeding and non-breeding groups did not differ in their resistance to oxidative stress (the breakdown of red blood cells submitted to a controlled free-radical attack), one aspect of breeding effort (i.e., the number of eggs laid by birds in both breeding and non-breeding groups) was negatively correlated with resistance to oxidative stress only in birds that did not benefit from a carotenoid-supplemented diet. This result therefore suggests that carotenoid availability can modulate the trade-off between reproduction and resistance to oxidative stress.


Free radicals Carotenoids Oxidative stress Reproduction Zebra finch 



We are very grateful to Kemin France for kindly providing the carotenoids (Oro GloTM) used in this study. We thank the staff of the Station Biologique de Foljuif (École Normale Supérieure) for helping us to maintain the birds. Financial support was provided by the Ministère de la Recherche (ACI Jeunes Chercheurs to GS) and the Université de Bourgogne (BQR to GD, MG, JP and BF). CA-A was funded by Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (Spain). This experiment complies with the current laws of France.


  1. Alonso-Alvarez C, Bertrand S, Devevey G, Prost J, Faivre B, Sorci G (2004a) Increased susceptibility to oxidative stress as a proximate cost of reproduction. Ecol Lett 7:363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso-Alvarez C, Bertrand S, Devevey G, Gaillard M, Prost J, Faivre B, Sorci G (2004b) An experimental test of dose-dependent effect of carotenoids and immune activation on sexual signals and antioxidant activity. Am Nat 164:651–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badyaev AV, Hill GE (2000) Evolution of sexual dichromatism: contribution of carotenoid- versus melanin-based coloration. Biol J Linn Soc 69:153–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes AI, Partridge L (2003) Costing reproduction. Anim Behav 66:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckman KB, Ames BN (1998) The free radical theory of aging matures. Physiol Rev 78:547–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Birkhead TR, Pellatt J, Hunter FM (1988) Extra-pair copulation and sperm competition in the zebra finch. Nature 334:60–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blache D, Prost M (1992) Free radical attack: biological test for human resistance capability. In: Ponnamperuma C, Gehrke CW (eds) A lunar-based chemical analysis laboratory. Deepak A, Hampton, pp 82–98Google Scholar
  8. Blount JD, Metcalfe NB, Birkhead TR, Surai PF (2003) Carotenoid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finches. Science 300:125–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burley N, Coopersmith CB (1987) Beak color preferences of Zebra finches. Ethology 76:133–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burley NT, Price DK, Zann RA (1992) Beak color, reproduction and condition effects in wild and domesticated zebra finches. Auk 109:13–23Google Scholar
  11. Chew BP, Park JS (2004) Carotenoid action on the immune response. J Nutr 134:257S–261SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chidambara Murthy KN, Vanitha A, Rajesha J, Mahadeva Swamy M, Sowmya PR, Ravishankar GA (2005) In vivo antioxidant activity of carotenoids from Dunaliella salina—a green microalga. Life Sci 76:1381–1390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins SA, Ten Cate C (1996) Does beak colour affect female preference in zebra finches? Anim Behav 52:105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2004) Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc R Soc Lond B 271:771–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eberhardt LS (1994) Oxygen consumption during singing by male Carolina wrens Thryothorus ludovicianus. Auk 111:124–130Google Scholar
  16. El-Agamey A, Lowe GM, McGarvey DJ, Mortensen A, Phillip DM, Truscott TG, Young AJ (2004) Carotenoid radical chemistry and antioxidant/pro-oxidant properties. Arch Biochem Biophys 430:37–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finkel T, Holbrook NJ (2000) Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 408:239–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Girard A, Madani S, El Boustani ES, Belleville J, Prost J (2005) Changes in lipid metabolism and antioxidant defense status in spontaneously hypertensive rats and Wistar rats fed a diet enriched with fructose and saturated fatty acids. Nutrition 21:240–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Girodon F, Blache D, Monget AL, Lombart M, Brunet-Lecompte P, Arnaud J (1997) Effect of a two-year supplementation with low doses of antioxidant vitamins and/or minerals in elderly subjects on levels of nutrients and antioxidant defense parameters. J Am Coll Nutr 16:357–365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffith SC (2000) A trade-off between reproduction and a condition-dependent sexually selected ornament in the house sparrow Passer domesticus. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1115–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gustafsson L, Qvarnström A, Sheldon BC (1995) Trade-offs between life-history traits and a secondary sexual character in male collared flycatchers. Nature 375:311–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harman D (1956) Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J Gerontol 11:298–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartley RC, Kennedy MW (2004) Are carotenoids a red herring in sexual display? Trends Ecol Evol 19:353–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hill G (1990) Female house finches prefer colourful males: sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait. Anim Behav 40:563–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hill G (1991) Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350:337–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kiokias S, Gordon MH (2004) Antioxidant properties of carotenoids in vitro and in vivo. Food Rev Int 20:99–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kodric-Brown A (1985) Female preference and sexual selection for male coloration in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kodric-Brown A (1989) Dietary carotenoids and male mating success in the guppy: an environmental component to female choice. Am Nat 124:309–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lesgards JF, Durand P, Lassare M, Stocker P, Lesgard G, Lanteaume A (2002) Assessment of lifestyle effects on the overall antioxidant capacity of healthy subjects. Environ Health Perspect 110:479–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lozano GA (1994) Carotenoids, parasites, and sexual selection. Oikos 70:309–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin OY, Hosken DJ (2004) Copulation reduces male but not female longevity in Saltella sphondylli (Diptera:Sepsidae). J Evol Biol 17:357–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGraw KJ, Ardia DR (2003) Carotenoids, immunocompetence, and the information content of sexual colors: an experimental test. Am Nat 162:704–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Navara KJ, Hill GE (2003) Dietary carotenoid pigments and immune function in a songbird with extensive carotenoid-based plumage coloration. Behav Ecol 14:909–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Partridge L, Andrews R (1985) The effect of reproductive activity on the longevity of male Drosophila melanogaster is not caused by an acceleration of ageing. J Insect Physiol 31:393–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pieri C, Moroni F, Marra M (1996) Food restriction increases the protection of erythrocytes against the hemolysis induced by peroxyl radicals. Mech Ageing Dev 87:15–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prior RL, Cao G (1999). In vivo total antioxidant capacity: comparison of different analytical methods. Free Radic Biol Med 27:1173–1181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reznick D (1985) Costs of reproduction: an evaluation of the empirical evidence. Oikos 44:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reznick D (1992) Measuring the costs of reproduction. Trends Ecol Evol 7:42–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Rojas Wahl RU, Zeng L, Madison SA, De Pinto RL, Shay BJ (1998) Mechanistic studies on the decomposition of water soluble azo-radical-initiators. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2 9:2009–2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rose MR, Bradley TJ (1998) Evolutionary physiology of the cost of reproduction. Oikos 83:443–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salmon AB, Marx DB, Harshman LG (2001) A cost of reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster: stress susceptibility. Evolution 55:1600–1608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. SAS Institute (2001) SAS/STAT Software: changes and enhancements, Version 8.2. SAS Publishing, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  45. Schabath MB, Grossman HB, Delclos GL, Hernandez LM, Day RS, Davis BR, Lerner SP, Spitz MR, Wu X (2004) Dietary carotenoids and genetic instability modify bladder cancer risk. J Nutr 134:3362–3369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. von Schantz TV, Bensch S, Grahn M, Hasselquist D, Wittzell H (1999) Good genes, oxidative stress and condition-dependent sexual signals. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sheldon B, Verhulst S (1996) Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 11:317–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sohal RS, Ku HH, Agarwal S, Forster MJ, Lal H (1994) Oxidative damage, mitochondrial oxidant generation and antioxidant defenses during aging and in response to food restriction in the mouse. Mech Ageing Dev 74:121–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Stocker P, Lesgards J-F, Vidal N, Chalier F, Prost M (2003) ESR study of a biological assay on whole blood: antioxidant efficiency of various vitamins. Biochem Biophys Acta 1621:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Tamimi RM, Hankinson SE, Campos H, Spiegelman D, Zhang S, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Hunter DJ (2005) Plasma carotenoids, retinol, and tocopherols and risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 161:153–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tinbergen JM, Verhulst S (2000) A fixed energetic ceiling to parental effort in the great tit? J Anim Ecol 69:323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vehrencamp SL, Bradbury JW, Gibson RM (1989) The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse. Anim Behav 38:885–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang Y, Salmon AB, Harshman LG (2001) A cost of reproduction: oxidative stress susceptibility is associated with increased egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. Exp Gerontol 36:1349–1359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wiersma P, Selman C, Speakman JR, Verhulst S (2004) Birds sacrifice oxidative protection for reproduction. Proc R Soc Lond B Suppl 271:360–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zera AJ, Harshman LG (2001) The physiology of life-history trade-offs in animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:95–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophie Bertrand
    • 1
  • Carlos Alonso-Alvarez
    • 1
    • 4
  • Godefroy Devevey
    • 2
    • 5
  • Bruno Faivre
    • 2
  • Josiane Prost
    • 3
  • Gabriele Sorci
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Parasitologie EvolutiveUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie, CNRS UMR 7103Paris cedex 05France
  2. 2.Equipe Ecologie EvolutiveUniversité de Bourgogne, UMR CNRS 5561 BioGéoSciencesDijonFrance
  3. 3.UPRES Lipides NutritionUniversité de BourgogneDijonFrance
  4. 4.Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía AnimalUniversidade de Vigo. EUET ForestalPontevedraSpain
  5. 5.Département d’Ecologie et EvolutionUniversité de Lausanne, Bâtiment de BiologieLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations