, Volume 147, Issue 3, pp 434–444 | Cite as

Sexual reproduction, clonal diversity and genetic differentiation in patchily distributed populations of the temperate forest herb Paris quadrifolia (Trilliaceae)

  • Hans Jacquemyn
  • Rein Brys
  • Olivier Honnay
  • Martin Hermy
  • Isabel Roldán-Ruiz
Population Ecology


Clonal plant species have been shown to adopt different strategies to persist in heterogeneous environments by changing relative investments in sexual reproduction and clonal propagation. As a result, clonal diversity and genetic variation may be different along environmental gradients. We examined the regional and local population structure of the clonal rhizomatous forest herb Paris quadrifolia in a complex of forest fragments in Voeren (Belgium). Relationships between population size (the number of shoots), shoot density (the number of shoots per m2) and local growth conditions were investigated for 47 populations. Clonal diversity and genetic variation within and among 19 populations were investigated using amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. To assess the importance of sexual reproduction, seed set, seed weight and germination success were determined in 18 populations. As predicted, local growth conditions largely affected population distribution, size and density of P. quadrifolia. Populations occurring in moist and relatively productive sites contained significantly more shoots. Here, shoots were also much more sparsely distributed compared to populations occurring in dry and relatively unproductive sites, where shoots showed a strongly aggregated distribution pattern. Clonal diversity was relatively high, compared with other clonal species (G/N ratio = 0.43 and Simpson’s D=0.81). Clonal diversity significantly (P<0.01) decreased with increasing shoot density while molecular genetic variation was significantly (P<0.01) affected by population size and local environmental conditions. Lack of recruitment and out-competition of less-adapted genotypes may explain the decreased genetic variation in dry sites. Analysis of molecular variance revealed significant genetic variation among populations (Φ ST=0.42, P<0.001), whereas pairwise genetic distances were not correlated to geographic distances, suggesting that gene flow among populations is limited. Finally, the number of generative shoots, the number of seeds per fruit and seed weight were significantly and positively related to population size and local growth conditions. We conclude that under stressful conditions populations of clonal forest plant species can slowly evolve into remnant populations characterized by low levels of genetic variation and limited sexual reproduction. Conservation of suitable habitat conditions is therefore a prerequisite for effective long-term conservation of clonal forest plant species.


AFLP Clonal diversity Environmental variability Morphological variation Patchy population 



This study was funded by the Fund of Scientific Research (FWO). We are grateful to Alex Zeevaert for permission to perform this research and to Nancy Mergan for more than excellent assistance with the molecular analyses. Hans de Kroon and two anonymous referees provided useful comments on a previous version of the manuscript.


  1. Auge H, Neuffer B, Erlinghagen F, Grupe R, Brandl R (2001) Demographic and random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses reveal high levels of genetic diversity in a clonal violet. Mol Ecol 10:1811–1819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aspinwall N, Christian T (1992) Clonal structure, genotypic diversity, and seed production in populations of Filipendula rubra (Rosaceae) from the northcentral United States. Am J Bot 79:294–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cain ML, Damman H (1997) Clonal growth and ramet performance in the clonal herb, Asarum canadense. J Ecol 85:883–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cain ML, Dudle DA, Evans JP (1996) Spatial models of foraging in clonal plant species. Am J Bot 83:76–85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Damman H, Cain ML (1998) Population growth and viability analyses of the clonal woodland herb, Asarum canadense. J Ecol 86:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Kroon H, Hutchings MJ (1995) Morphological plasticity in clonal plants: the foraging concept reconsidered. J Ecol 83:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diekmann M (2002) Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology: a review. Basic Appl Ecol 4:493–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dupré C, Ehrlén J (2002) Habitat configuration, species traits and plant distributions. J Ecol 90:796–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eckert CG (1999) Clonal plant research: proliferation, integration, but not much evolution. Am J Bot 86:1649–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eckert CG, Barrett SCH (1993) Clonal reproduction and patterns of genotypic diversity in Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Am J Bot 80:1175–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrlén J, Eriksson O (2000) Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology 81:1667–1674Google Scholar
  12. Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulissen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobot 18:1–248Google Scholar
  13. Ellstrand NC, Roose ML (1987) Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Am J Bot 74:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eriksson O (1993) Dynamics of genets in clonal plants. Trends Ecol Evol 8:313–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eriksson O (1994) Stochastic population dynamics of clonal plants: Numerical experiments with ramet and genet models. Ecol Res 9:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eriksson O (1996) Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulations. Oikos 77:248–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer M, Matthies D (1998) RAPD variation in relation to population size and plant performance in the rare Gentianella germanica (Gentianaceae). Am J Bot 85:811–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischer M, Husi R, Prati D, Peintinger M, van Kleunen M, Schmid B (2000) RAPD variation among and within small and large populations of the rare clonal plant Ranunculus reptans (Ranunculaceae). Am J Bot 87:1128–1137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gardner SN, Mangel M (1999) Modeling investments in seeds, clonal offspring, and translocation in a clonal plant. Ecology 80:1202–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giles BE, Goudet J (1997) Genetic differentiation in Silene dioica metapopulations: Estimation of spatiotemporal effects in a successional plant species. Am Nat 149:507–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1990) Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS (eds) Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 43–63Google Scholar
  22. Hegi G (1975) Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa-5 Band: Dicotyledons. P Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  23. Honnay O, Verheyen K, Butaye J, Jacquemyn H, Bossuyt B, Hermy M (2002) Possible effects of habitat fragmentation and climate change on the range of forest plant species. Ecol Lett 5:525–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huff DR, Peakall R, Smouse PE (1993) RAPD variation within and among natural populations of outcrossing buffalograss (Buchloë dactyloides (Nutt) Engelm). Theor Appl Genet 86:927–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Husband BC, Barrett SCH (1998) Spatial and temporal variation in population size of Eichhornia paniculata in ephemeral habitats: implications for metapopulation dynamics. J Ecol 86:1021–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hutchings MJ, de Kroon H (1994) Foraging in plants: the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Adv Ecol Res 25:159–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacquemyn H, Brys R, Hermy M (2002) Patch occupancy, population size and reproductive success of a forest herb (Primula elatior) in a fragmented landscape. Oecologia 130:617–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacquemyn H, Butaye J, Hermy M (2003) Influence of environmental and spatial variables on regional distribution of forest plant species in a fragmented and changing landscape. Ecography 26:768–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jónsdóttir IS, Watson MA (1997) Extensive physiological integration: an adaptive trait in resource-poor environments. In: de Kroon H, van Groenendael J (eds) The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 109–136Google Scholar
  30. Kranczoch J (1997) Struktur and Dynamik in dichten Beständen von Paris quadrifolia (Trilliaceae). J Cramer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  31. Kudoh H, Shibaike H, Takasu H, Whigham DF, Kawano S (1999) Genet structure and determinants of clonal structure in a temperate deciduous woodland herb, Uvularia perfoliata. J Ecol 87:244–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lechowicz MJ, Bell G (1991) The ecology and genetics of fitness in forest plants 2 Microspatial heterogeneity of the edaphic environment. J Ecol 79:687–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lefort F, Douglas GC (1999) An efficient micro-method of DNA isolation from mature leaves of four hardwood tree species Acer, Fraxinus, Prunus and Quercus. Ann Sci 56:259–263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lezberg AL, Halpern CB, Antos JA (2001) Clonal development of Maianthemum dilatatum in forests of differing age and structure. Can J Bot 79:1028–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loehle C (1987) Partitioning of reproductive effort in clonal plants: a benefit-cost model. Oikos 49:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Londo G (1976) Decimal scale for releves of permanent plots. Vegetatio 33:61–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lynch M, Milligan BG (1994) Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Mol Ecol 3:91–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. McCune B, Mefford MF (1999) Multivariate analysis of ecological data. PC-ORD Version 4.0 MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OregonGoogle Scholar
  40. McLellan AJ, Prati D, Kaltz O, Schmid B (1997) Structure and analysis of phenotypic and genetic variation in clonal plants. In: de Kroon H, van Groenendael J (eds) The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 185–210Google Scholar
  41. Olivieri I, Michalakis I, Gouyon PH (1995) Metapopulation genetics and the evolution of dispersal. Am Nat 146:202–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2005) GenAlEx V6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
  43. Pielou EC (1969) An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Piquot Y, Petit D, Valero M, Cuguen J, de Laguerie P, Vernet P (1998) Variation in sexual and asexual reproduction among young and old populations of the perennial macrophyte Sparganium erectum. Oikos 82:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pornon A, Escaravage N, Thomas P, Taberlet P (2000) Dynamics of genotypic structure in clonal Rhododendron ferruginuem (Ericaceae) populations. Mol Ecol 9:1099–1111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Prati D, Schmid B (2000) Genetic differentiation of life-history traits within populations of the clonal plant Ranunculus reptans. Oikos 90:442–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roldán-Ruiz I, Dendauw J, Van Bockstaele E, Depicker A, De Loose M (2000) AFLP markers reveal high polymorphic rates in ryegrasses (Lolium spp). Mol Breed 6:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Salisbury EJ (1942) Reproductive capacity of plants. Bell and Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Schaal BA, Leverich WJ (1996) Molecular variation in isolated plant populations. Plant Species Biol 11:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Soane ID, Watkinson AR (1979) Clonal variation in populations of Ranunculus repens. New Phytol 82:557–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stanton ML, Galen C (1997) Life on the edge: adaptation versus environmentally mediated gene flow in the snow buttercup, Ranunculus adoneus. Am Nat 150:143–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stanton ML, Galen C, Shore J (1997) Population structure along a steep environmental gradient: consequences of flowering time and habitat variation in the snow buttercup, Ranunculus adoneus. Evolution 51:79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stehlik I, Holderegger R (2000) Spatial genetic structure and clonal diversity of Anemone nemorosa in late successional deciduous woodlands of Central Europe. J Ecol 88:424–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thompson JN (1999) Specific hypothesis on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. Am Nat 156:156–174Google Scholar
  56. Thompson FL, Eckert CG (2004) Trade-offs between sexual and clonal reproduction in an aquatic plant: experimental manipulations vs phenotypic correlations. J Evol Biol 17:581–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van Kleunen M, Fischer M, Schmid B (2001) Effects of intraspecific competition on size variation and reproductive allocation in a clonal plant. Oikos 94:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M et al (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wade M, Goodnight CJ (1998) The theories of Fisher and Wright in the context of metapopulations: when nature does many small experiments. Evolution 52:1537–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watkinson RA, Powell JC (1993) Seedling recruitment and the maintenance of clonal diversity in plant populations – a computer simulation of Ranunculus repens. J Ecol 81:707–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhivotovsky LA (1999) Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers. Mol Ecol 8:907–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Jacquemyn
    • 1
  • Rein Brys
    • 1
  • Olivier Honnay
    • 1
  • Martin Hermy
    • 1
  • Isabel Roldán-Ruiz
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory for Forest, Nature and Landscape ResearchCatholic University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department Plant Genetics and BreedingAgricultural Research CentreMelleBelgium

Personalised recommendations