, Volume 147, Issue 3, pp 489–500 | Cite as

Effects of plant diversity on invertebrate herbivory in experimental grassland

  • Christoph Scherber
  • Peter N. Mwangi
  • Vicky M. Temperton
  • Christiane Roscher
  • Jens Schumacher
  • Bernhard Schmid
  • Wolfgang W. Weisser
Plant-Animal Interactions


The rate at which a plant species is attacked by invertebrate herbivores has been hypothesized to depend on plant species richness, yet empirical evidence is scarce. Current theory predicts higher herbivore damage in monocultures than in species-rich mixtures. We quantified herbivore damage by insects and molluscs to plants in experimental plots established in 2002 from a species pool of 60 species of Central European Arrhenatherum grasslands. Plots differed in plant species richness (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 60 species), number of functional groups (1, 2, 3, 4), functional group and species composition. We estimated herbivore damage by insects and molluscs at the level of transplanted plant individuals (“phytometer” species Plantago lanceolata, Trifolium pratense, Rumex acetosa) and of the entire plant community during 2003 and 2004. In contrast to previous studies, our design allows specific predictions about the relative contributions of functional diversity, plant functional identity, and species richness in relation to herbivory. Additionally, the phytometer approach is new to biodiversity-herbivory studies, allowing estimates of species-specific herbivory rates within the larger biodiversity-ecosystem functioning context. Herbivory in phytometers and experimental communities tended to increase with plant species richness and the number of plant functional groups, but the effects were rarely significant. Herbivory in phytometers was in some cases positively correlated with community biomass or leaf area index. The most important factor influencing invertebrate herbivory was the presence of particular plant functional groups. Legume (grass) presence strongly increased (decreased) herbivory at the community level. The opposite pattern was found for herbivory in T. pratense phytometers. We conclude that (1) plant species richness is much less important than previously thought and (2) plant functional identity is a much better predictor of invertebrate herbivory in temperate grassland ecosystems.


Biodiversity Ecosystem functioning Functional diversity Resource concentration Trophic interactions 



We thank Mick J. Crawley for his generous encouragement and advice in statistical analysis. Winfried Voigt kindly provided data on invertebrate abundances, and the technical assistance of Sylvia Creutzburg and Nadine Mitschunas is greatly acknowledged. We thank Ernst-Detlef Schulze, Christian Körner, and two anonymous referees for many helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript. This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through grants WE2618/4-1 and FOR 456 to WWW. CS was supported by the Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes. All experiments conducted comply with current German laws.


  1. Andow DA (1990) Population dynamics of an insect herbivore in simple and diverse habitats. Ecology 71:1006–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andow DA (1991) Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Ann Rev Entomol 36:561–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bahr C (2005) Effects of plant species diversity, identity and architectural density on the density of slugs in an experimental grassland. Diploma Thesis, University of Jena (in German)Google Scholar
  4. Bernays E, Graham M (1988) On the evolution of host specificity in Phytophagous Arthropods. Ecology 69:886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown VK, Gange AC (1989) Differential effects of above- and below-ground insect herbivory during early plant succession. Oikos 54:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham KP, Anderson DA (1998) Model selection and inference—a practical information—theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Carson WP, Root RB (1999) Top-down effects of insect herbivores during early sucession: influence on biomass and plant dominance. Oecologia 121:260–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crawley MJ (1989) Insect herbivores and plant population dynamics. Ann Rev Entomol 34:531–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing. An introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen, 5 edn. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  11. Finch S, Collier RH (2000) Host-plant selection by insects—a theory based on ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ by pest insects of cruciferous plants. Entomol Exp Appl 96:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson DJ (2002) Methods in comparative plant population ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Giller PS, O´Donovan G (2002) Biodiversity and ecosystem function: do species matter? Biology and environment Proc R Ir Acad 102B:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haddad NM, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie ME, Knops JMH (2001) Contrasting effects of plant richness and composition on insect communities: a field experiment. Am Nat 158:17–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hassell MP (2000) The spatial and temporal dynamics of host-parasitoid interactions. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Hulme PE (1996) Herbivores and the performance of grassland plants: a comparison of arthropod, mollusc and rodent herbivory. J Ecol 84:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knops JMH, Tilman D, Haddad NM, Naeem S, Mitchell CE, Haarstad J, Ritchie ME, Howe KM, Reich PB, Siemann E, Groth J (1999) Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. Ecol Lett 2:286–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koricheva J, Mulder CPH, Schmid B, Joshi J, Huss-Danell K (2000) Numerical responses of different trophic groups of invertebrates to manipulations of plant diversity in grassland. Oecologia 125:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kowalski E (2005) Density patterns of invertebrate herbivores (Auchenorrhyncha and Heteroptera) along a diversity gradient in an experimental grassland. Diploma Thesis, University of Jena (in German)Google Scholar
  20. Kubitzky K (ed) (1993) The families and genera of vascular plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Kyto M, Niemela P, Larsson S (1996) Insects on trees: population and individual response to fertilization. Oikos 75:148–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitchell CE (2003) Trophic control of grassland production and biomass by pathogens. Ecol Lett 6:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mulder CPH, Jumpponen A, Hogberg P, Huss-Danell K (2002) How plant diversity and legumes affect nitrogen dynamics in experimental grassland communities. Oecologia 133:412–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mulder CPH, Koricheva J, Huss-Danell K, Högberg P, Joshi J (1999) Insects affect relationships between plant species richness and ecosystem processes. Ecol Lett 2:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Neal ME, Landis DA, Isaacs R (2002) An inexpensive, accurate method for measuring leaf area and defoliation through digital image analysis. J Econ Entomol 95:1190–1194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perner J, Wytrykush C, Kahmen A, Buchmann N, Egerer I, Creutzburg S, Odat N, Audorff V, Weisser WW (2005) Effects of plant diversity, plant productivity and habitat parameters on arthropod abundance in montane European grasslands. Ecography 28:429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pfisterer AB, Diemer M, Schmid B (2003) Dietary shift and lowered biomass gain of a generalist herbivore in species-poor experimental plant communities. Oecologia 135:234–241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Root RB (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: The fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol Monogr 43:95–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roscher C, Schumacher J, Baade J, Wilcke W, Gleixner G, Weisser WW, Schmid B, Schulze ED (2004) The role of biodiversity for element cycling and trophic interactions: an experimental approach in a grassland community. Basic Appl Ecol 5:107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roscher C, Temperton VM, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmitz M, Schumacher J, Schmid B, Buchmann N, Weisser WW, Schulze ED (2005) Overyielding in experimental grassland communities—irrespective of species pool or spatial scale. (vol 8, pg 419, 2005). Ecol Lett 8:576–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmid B, Hector A, Huston MA, Inchausti P, Nijs I, Leadley PW, Tilman D (2002) The design and analysis of biodiversity experiments. In: Inchausti P (ed) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 61–75Google Scholar
  32. Sedlacek JD, Barrett GW, Shaw DR (1988) Effects of nutrient enrichment on the Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera) in contrasting grassland communities. J Appl Ecol 25:537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siemann E (1998) Experimental tests of effects of plant productivity and diversity on grassland arthropod diversity. Ecology 79:2057–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siemann E, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie M (1998) Experimental tests of the dependence of arthropod diversity on plant diversity. Am Nat 152:738–750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Spehn EM, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B, Hector A, Caldeira MC, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Jumpponen A, O’Donnovan G, Pereira JS, Schulze ED, Troumbis AY, Korner C (2002) The role of legumes as a component of biodiversity in a cross-European study of grassland biomass nitrogen. Oikos 98:205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stamp NE, Bowers MD (2000) Foraging behaviour of caterpillars given a choice of plant genotypes in the presence of insect predators. Ecol Entomol 25:486–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tahvanainen JO, Root RB (1972) Influence of vegetational diversity on the population ecology of a specialized herbivore, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coloeoptera: Chrysomelidae). Oecologia 10:321–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1300–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tonhasca A, Byrne DN (1994) The effects of crop diversification on herbivorous insects: A meta-analysis approach. Ecol Entomol 19:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tscharntke T, Greiler H-J (1995) Insect communities, grasses, and grasslands. Ann Rev Entomol 40:535–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Unsicker S, Renker C, Kahmen A, Spindler S, Buchmann N, Weisser WW (2005) Testing the efficiency of three 15N-labeled nitrogen compounds for indirect labeling of grasshoppers via plants in the field. Entomol Exp Appl 116 (in press)Google Scholar
  42. Voigt W, Perner J, Davis AJ, Eggers T, Schumacher J, Bahrmann R, Fabian B, Heinrich W, Kohler G, Lichter D, Marstaller R, Sander FW (2003) Trophic levels are differentially sensitive to climate. Ecology 84:2444–2453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zangerl AR, Hamilton JG, Miller TJ, Crofts AR, Oxborough K, Berenbaum MR, de Lucia EH (2002) Impact of folivory on photosynthesis is greater than the sum of its holes. PNAS 99:1088–1091PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Scherber
    • 1
  • Peter N. Mwangi
    • 3
  • Vicky M. Temperton
    • 2
  • Christiane Roscher
    • 1
  • Jens Schumacher
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bernhard Schmid
    • 3
  • Wolfgang W. Weisser
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of EcologyUniversity of JenaJenaGermany
  2. 2.Max Planck Institut für BiogeochemieJenaGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Environmental SciencesUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations