Oecologia

, Volume 145, Issue 4, pp 564–574 | Cite as

Trade-off between current reproductive effort and delay to next reproduction in the leatherback sea turtle

  • Philippe Rivalan
  • Anne-Caroline Prévot-Julliard
  • Remi Choquet
  • Roger Pradel
  • Bertrand Jacquemin
  • Marc Girondot
Population Ecology

Abstract

The trade-off between current and future reproduction plays an important role in demographic analyses. This can be revealed by the relationship between the number of years without reproduction and reproductive investment within a reproductive year. However, estimating both the duration between two successive breeding season and reproductive effort is often limited by variable recapture or resighting effort. Moreover, a supplementary difficulty is raised when nonbreeder individuals are not present sampling breeding grounds, and are therefore unobservable. We used capture–recapture (CR) models to investigate intermittent breeding and reproductive effort to test a putative physiological trade-off in a long-lived species with intermittent breeding, the leatherback sea turtle. We used CR data collected on breeding females on Awa:la-Ya:lima:po beach (French Guiana, South America) from 1995 to 2002. By adding specific constraints in multistate (MS) CR models incorporating several nonobservable states, we modelled the breeding cycle in leatherbacks and then estimated the reproductive effort according to the number of years elapsed since the last nesting season. Using this MS CR framework, the mean survival rate was estimated to 0.91 and the average resighting probability to 0.58 (ranged from 0.30 to 0.99). The breeding cycle was found to be limited to 3 years. These results therefore suggested that animals whose observed breeding intervals are greater than 3 years were most likely animals that escaped detection during their previous nesting season(s). CR data collected in 2001 and 2002 allowed us to compare the individual reproductive effort between females that skipped one breeding season and females that skipped two breeding seasons. These inferences led us to conclude that a trade-off between current and future reproduction exists in leatherbacks nesting in French Guiana, likely linked to the resource provisioning required to invest in reproduction.

Keywords

Reproductive skipping Reproductive trade-off Capture–recapture models Multistate-model Dermochelys coriacea 

Notes

Acknowledgments

For data used in this study, we are indebted to everyone that has participated in the Kawana project in French Guiana and especially to J. Fretey and J. Lescure, who were in charge of this project from 1977 to 1996. We also thank the authorities and inhabitants of Awa:la and Ya:lima:po villages for their active participation in the marine turtle study and conservation program. The tag database used for this study is the result of a joint effort of the organizations involved in sea turtles conservation in French Guiana (Direction Régionale de l’Environnement, Greenpeace, Kulalashi, Kwata, ONCFS, Sépanguy, WWF) and in Suriname (Biotopic, STINASU, WWF). Finally, we thank E. Baudry, D. Drolet, J.-S. Lauzon-Guay, M. Godfrey, T. Giraud, E. Johannesen, R. Julliard, and J. Shykoff for their comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automatic Control 19:716–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson DR, Burnham KP, White GC (1994) AIC model selection in overdispersed capture–recapture data. Ecology 75:1780–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonnet X, Naulleau G, Shine R, Lourdais O (2001) Short-term versus long-term effects of food intake on reproductive output in viviparous snake (Vipera aspis). Oikos 92:297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brownie C, Hines JE, Nichols JD, Pollock KH, Hestbeck JB (1993) Capture–recapture studies for multistrata including non-markovian transitions. Biometrics 49:1173–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bull JJ, Shine R (1979) Iteroparous animals that skip opportunities for reproduction. Am Nat 114:296–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnham KP, Anderson DR, White GC, Brownie C, Pollock KH (1987) Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture. Am Fish Soc Monogr 5:1–437Google Scholar
  8. Cam E, Hines JE, Monnat JY, Nichols JD, Danchin E (1998) Are adult nonbreeders prudent parents? The kittiwake model. Ecology 79:2917–2930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cam E, Oro D, Pradel R, Jiménez J (2004) Assessment of hypotheses about dispersal in a long-lived seabird using multistate capture–recapture models. J Anim Ecol 73:723–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr AF, Carr MH (1970) Modulated reproductive periodicity in Chelonia mydas. Ecology 51:335–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chevalier J, Cazelles B, Girondot M (1998) Apports scientfiques à la stratégie de conservation des tortues luths en Guyane française. JATBA Rev Ethnobiol 40:485–507Google Scholar
  12. Choquet R, Reboulet AM, Pradel R, Gimenez O, Lebreton JD (2004) M-SURGE : new software specifically designed for multistate recapture models. Anim Biodivers Conserv 27:207–215Google Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock TH (1988) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Cormack RM (1964) Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals. Biometrika 51:429–438Google Scholar
  15. Coulson JC (1984) The population dynamics of Eider Duck Somateria mollissima and evidence of extensive non-breeding by adult ducks. Ibis 126:525–543Google Scholar
  16. Danchin E, Cam E (2002) Non-breeding as a potential cost of breeding dispersal. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davenport J (1991) Biology of leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea (Vandelli, 1761). BCG Testudo 3:24–33Google Scholar
  18. Drent RH, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68:225–252Google Scholar
  19. Ferraroli S, Eckert S, Chevalier J, Girondot M, Kelle L, Maho YL (2000) Marine behavior of leatherback turtles nesting in French Guiana for conservation strategy. In: Mosier A, Foley A, Brost B (eds) 20th annual symposium on sea turtle biology and conservation. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-477, Orlando, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferraroli S, Georges J-Y, Gaspar P, Le Maho Y (2004) Endangered species: where leatherback turtles meet fisheries. Nature 429:521–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fretey J, Girondot M (1988) Nidification de la tortue luth sur le littoral de Guyane française pendant la saison 1987. Ann Soc Sci Nat Charente-Maritime 7:729–737Google Scholar
  22. Fujiwara M, Caswel H (2002) Estimating population projection matrices from multi-stage mark-recapture data. Ecology 83:3257–3265Google Scholar
  23. Girondot M, Fretey J (1996) Leatherback turtles, Dermochelys coriacea, nesting in French Guiana, 1978–1995. Chelonian Conserv Biol 2:204–208Google Scholar
  24. Girondot M, Tucker AD, Rivalan P, Godfrey M, Chevalier J (2002) Density-dependent nest destruction and population decline of Guianan leatherback turtles. Anim Conserv 5:75–84Google Scholar
  25. Godley BJ, Broderick AC, Moraghan S (1999) Short-term effectivness of Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tags used in the study of Mediterranean marine turtles. Chelonian Conserv Biol 3:477–479Google Scholar
  26. Hughes GR (1982) Nesting cycles in sea turtles—typical or atypical? In: Bjorndal KA (ed) Biology and conservation of sea turtles. Smithsonian institut press, Washington DC, pp 81–89Google Scholar
  27. Husting EL (1965) Survival and breeding structure in a population of Ambystoma maculatum. Copeia:352–362Google Scholar
  28. Jolly GM (1965) Explicit estimates from capture–recapture data with both death and immgration - stochastic model. Biometrika 52:225–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kendall WL, Nichols JD (2002) Estimating state-transition probabilities for unobservable states using capture–recapture/resighting data. Ecology 83:3276–3284Google Scholar
  30. Lebreton J-D, Clobert J (1991) Bird population dynamics, management, and conservation: the role of mathematical modelling. In: Perrins CM, Lebreton JD, Hirons GJM (eds) Bird population studies, relevance to conservation and management. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 105–125Google Scholar
  31. Lebreton J-D, Pradel R (2002) Multistate recapture models: modelling incomplete individual histories. J Appl Stat 29:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lebreton J-D, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62:67–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lourdais O, Bonnet X, Shines R, Denardo D, Naulleau G, Guillon M (2002) Capital-breeding and reproductive effort in a variable environment: a longitudinal study of viviparous. J Anim Ecol 71:470–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller JD (1996) Reproduction in sea turtles. In: Lutz PL, Musick JA (eds) The biology of sea turtles. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton Floria, pp 52–71Google Scholar
  35. Naulleau G, Bonnet X (1996) Body condition threshold for breeding in viviparous snake. Oecologica 107:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nichols JD, Hines JE, Pollock KH, Hinz RL, Link WA (1994) Estimating breeding proportions and testing hypotheses about costs of reproduction with capture–recapture data. Ecology 75:2052–2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pollock KH (1982) A capture–recapture design robust to unequal probability of capture. J Wildl Manage 46:752–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pradel R (1993) Flexibility in survival analysis from recapture data : handling trap-dependence. In: Lebreton J-D, North PM (eds) Study of bird population. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 29–37Google Scholar
  39. Pradel R, Hines JE, Lebreton J-D, Nichols JD (1997) Capture–recapture survival models taking account of transients. Biometrics 53:60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prévot-Julliard A-C, Lebreton J-D, Pradel R (1998) Re-evaluation of the adult survival of Black-headed Gulls (Larus ridibundus) in presence of recapture heterogeneity. The Auk 115:85–95Google Scholar
  41. Reznick D (1985) Cost of reproduction: an evaluation of the empirical evidence. Oikos 44:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rivalan P, Godfrey MH, Prévot-Julliard A-C, Girondot M (2005) Maximum likelihood estimates of tag loss in leatherback sea turtles. J Wildl Manage 69:540–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rostal DC, Grumbles JS, Palmer KS, Lance VA, Spotila JR, Paladino FV (2001) Changes in gonadal and adrenal steroid levels in the leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) during the nesting cycle. Gen Comp Endocrinol 122:139–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schaffer WM (1974) Optimal reproductive effort in fluctuating environments. Am Nat 108:783–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schaub M, Pradel R (2004) Assessing the relative importance of different sources of mortality from recoveries of marked animals. Ecology 85:930–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schaub M, Pradel R, Jenni L, Lebreton J-D (2001) Migrating birds stop over longer than usually thought: an improved capture–recapture analysis. Ecology 82:852–859Google Scholar
  47. Schaub M, Gimenez O, Schmidt BR, Pradel R (2004) Estimating survival and temporay emigration using multistatecapture–recapture framework. Ecology 85:2107–2113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seber GAF (1965) A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika 52:249–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Spotila JR, Dunham AE, Leslie AJ, Steyermark AC, Plotkin PT, Paladino FV (1996) Worldwide population decline of Dermochelys coriacea: are leatherback turtles going to extinct? Chelonian Conserv Biol 2:209–222Google Scholar
  50. Stearns SC (1989) Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol 3:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Viallefont A, Cooke F, Lebreton JD (1995) Age-specific cost of first-time breeding. The Auk 112:67–76Google Scholar
  52. Weimerskirch H (1998) How can a pelagic seabird provision its chick when relying on a distant resource? Cyclic attendance, foraging decision and body condition in sooty shearwaters. J Anim Ecol 67:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Williams GC (1966) Natural selection,the cost of reproduction and a rafinement of Lack’s principle. Am Nat 100:687–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wooller RD, Bradley JS, Skira IJ, Serventy DL (1990) The late reproductive success of Short-tailed Shearwaters Puffinus tenuirostris in relation to their age and breeding experience. J Anim Ecol 59:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  56. Zug GR, Parham JF (1996) Age and growth in leatherback turtles, Dermochelys coriacea (Testudines: Dermochelyidae): a skeletochronological analysis. Chelonian Conserv Biol 2:244–249Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Rivalan
    • 1
    • 3
  • Anne-Caroline Prévot-Julliard
    • 1
  • Remi Choquet
    • 2
  • Roger Pradel
    • 2
  • Bertrand Jacquemin
    • 1
  • Marc Girondot
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire Ecologie, Systématique et EvolutionUMR 8079, CNRS, ENGREF & Université Paris SudOrsay cedexFrance
  2. 2.Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et EvolutiveCNRS UMR 5175Montpellier Cedex 5France
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of New Brunswick FrederictonNew BrunswickCanada

Personalised recommendations