Density dependence, spatial scale and patterning in sessile biota
Sessile biota can compete with or facilitate each other, and the interaction of facilitation and competition at different spatial scales is key to developing spatial patchiness and patterning. We examined density and scale dependence in a patterned, soft sediment mussel bed. We followed mussel growth and density at two spatial scales separated by four orders of magnitude. In summer, competition was important at both scales. In winter, there was net facilitation at the small scale with no evidence of density dependence at the large scale. The mechanism for facilitation is probably density dependent protection from wave dislodgement. Intraspecific interactions in soft sediment mussel beds thus vary both temporally and spatially. Our data support the idea that pattern formation in ecological systems arises from competition at large scales and facilitation at smaller scales, so far only shown in vegetation systems. The data, and a simple, heuristic model, also suggest that facilitative interactions in sessile biota are mediated by physical stress, and that interactions change in strength and sign along a spatial or temporal gradient of physical stress.
KeywordsCompetition Facilitation Mussels Mytilus edulis Self-organisation
Thanks to Kim Mould of Myti Mussels for use of the field site and the setting up of the experiment, to Gwynne Parry-Jones and members of CREAM for field work, and to Johan van de Koppel for helpful comments on several drafts. JG and CS are supported by grants from BBSRC and DEFRA and HB was supported by a grant from NERC.
- Beadman HA (2003) The sustainability of mussel culture. PhD Thesis, School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales Bangor, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, UKGoogle Scholar
- Bertness MD, Leonard GH (1997) The role of positive interactions in communities: lessons from intertidal habitats. Ecology 78:1976–1989Google Scholar
- Bertness MD, Gaines SD, Yeh SM (1998) Making mountains out of barnacles: the dynamics of acorn barnacle hummocking. Ecology 79:1382–1394Google Scholar
- Hunt HL, Schiebling RE (2001a) Patch dynamics of mussels on rocky shores: integrating process to understand pattern. Ecology 82:3213–3231Google Scholar
- Hunt HL, Schiebling RE (2001b) Predicting wave dislodgement of mussels: variation in attachment strength with body size, habitat and season. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 25:181–188Google Scholar
- van de Koppel J, Rietkerk M, Dankers M, Herman PMJ (2005) Scale-dependent feedback and regular spatial patterns in young mussel beds. Am Nat 165 (in press)Google Scholar
- Morgan R, Brown J, Thorson J (1997) The effects of spatial scale on the functional response of fox squirrels. Ecology 78:1087–1097Google Scholar
- Newell CR (1990) The effects of mussel (Mytilus edulis Linnaeus 1758) position in seeded bottom patches on growth at subtidal lease sites in Maine. J Shellfish Res 9:113–118Google Scholar
- Schneider DC (1994) Quantitive ecology: spatial and temporal scaling. San Diego University Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in Ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar