, 143:501 | Cite as

Seasonal changes in light and temperature affect the balance between light harvesting and light utilisation components of photosynthesis in an evergreen understory shrub

  • Onno Muller
  • Kouki Hikosaka
  • Tadaki Hirose


In a temperate climate, evergreen species in the understory are exposed to large changes in photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) and temperature over the year. We determined the photosynthetic traits of leaves of an evergreen understory shrub Aucuba japonica at three sites at monthly intervals: understorys of a deciduous forest; an evergreen forest; and a gap in a mixed forest. This set up enabled us to separate the effects of seasonal change in PPFD and temperature on photosynthetic acclimation under natural conditions. The effects of PPFD and temperature were analysed by simple and multiple regression analyses. The amounts of light utilisation components (LU), represented by nitrogen and rubisco contents per area, were higher in winter, when temperature was low and PPFD was high. The LU relative to the amount of light harvesting components (LH), represented by chlorophyll a/b and rubisco/chlorophyll ratios, and the inverse of chlorophyll/nitrogen ratio were also higher in winter. We quantified the effects of PPFD and temperature on the LU and LH components. Across sites PPFD had stronger effects than air temperature, while within a site temperature had stronger effects on photosynthetic acclimation. We concluded that the photosynthetic apparatus is strongly affected by the prevailing PPFD at the time of leaf development. Within a given light regime, however, plants acclimated by increasing LU relative to LH primarily in response to temperature and to a lesser extent to PPFD.


Seasonality Aucuba japonica Leaf nitrogen Rubisco Chlorophyll 



We would like to thank Marinus Werger, Niels Anten and three anonymous reviewers for useful comments and Riichi Oguchi and Yusuke Onoda and other members of the Functional Ecology Laboratory of Tohoku University for help during the study. The Botanical Garden of Tohoku University gave us the opportunity to conduct our study in her beautiful forest. This study was supported by grants from the Dutch Schure-Beijrinck-Popping-fund, VSB-fund and Funke-fund to OM. It was also supported by an AIEJ Short-term student exchange promotion scholarship, a MEXT scholarship and partly by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Government of Japan.


  1. Adams WW III, Demmig-Adams B, Rosentiel TN, Brightwell AK, Ebbert V (2002) Photosynthesis and photoprotection in overwintering plants. Plant Biol (Stuttgart) 4:545–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JM, Chow WS, Park Y-I (1995) The grand design of photosynthesis: acclimation of the photosynthetic apparatus to environmental cues. Photosynth Res 46:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badger MR, Björkman O, Armond PA (1982) An analysis of photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants: temperature acclimation in the desert evergreen Nerium oleander L. Plant Cell Environ 5:85–99Google Scholar
  4. Ball MC (1994) The role of photoinhibition during tree seedling establishment at low temperatures. In: Baker NR, Bowyer JR (eds) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis, molecular mechanisms to the field. Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 367–378Google Scholar
  5. Blennow K, Lang ARG, Dunne P, Ball MC (1998) Cold-induced photoinhibition and growth of seedling snow gum (Eucalyptus pauciflora) under differing temperature and radiation regimes in fragmented forests. Plant Cell Environ 21:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry J, Björkman O (1980) Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 31:491–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Björkman O (1981) Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology new series, vol. 2A. Springer, Berlin, pp 57–109Google Scholar
  8. Egerton JJG, Banks JCG, Gibson A, Cunnigham RB, Ball MC (2000) Facilitation of seedling establishment: reduction in irradiance enhances winter growth of Eucalyptus pauciflora. Ecology 81:1437–1449Google Scholar
  9. Evans JR (1993) Photosynthetic acclimation and nitrogen partitioning within a lucerne canopy: I. Canopy characteristics. Aust J Plant Physiol 20:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans JR (1989) Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans JR, Seemann JR (1989) The allocation of protein nitrogen in the photosynthetic apparatus: costs, consequences, and control. In: Briggs WR (ed) Photosynthesis. Liss, New York, pp 183–205Google Scholar
  12. Field C (1983) Allocating leaf nitrogen for the maximization of carbon gain: leaf age as a control on the allocation program. Oecologia 56:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frak E, Roux XL, Millard P, Dreyer E, Jaouen G, Saint-Joanis B, Wendler R (2001) Changes in total leaf nitrogen and partitioning of leaf nitrogen drive photosynthetic acclimation to light in fully developed walnut leaves. Plant Cell Environ 24:1279–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graves JD (1990) A model of the seasonal pattern of carbon acquisition in two woodland herbs Mercurialis perennis L. and Geum urbanum L. Oecologia 83:479–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hikosaka K (1996) Effects of leaf age- nitrogen nutrition and photon flux density on the organization of the photosynthetic apparatus in leaves of a vine (Ipomoea tricolor Cav.) grown horizontally to avoid mutual shading of leaves. Planta 198:144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hikosaka K (1997) Modelling optimal temperature acclimation of the photosynthetic apparatus in C3 plants with respect to nitrogen use. Ann Bot 80:721–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hikosaka K, Terashima I (1995) A model of the acclimation of photosynthesis in the leaves of C3 plants to sun and shade with respect to nitrogen use. Plant Cell Environ 18:605–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hikosaka K, Terashima I (1996) Nitrogen partitioning among photosynthetic components and its consequence in sun and shade plants. Funct Ecol 10:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hikosaka K, Hanba Y, Hirose T, Terashima I (1998) Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency in leaves of woody herbaceous species. Funct Ecol 12:896–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hikosaka K, Murakami A, Hirose T (1999) Balancing carboxylation and regeneration of ribulose-1,5-biphosphate in leaf photosynthesis: temperature acclimation of an evergreen tree, Quercus myrsinaefolia. Plant Cell Environ 22:841–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirose T, Werger MJA (1987) Nitrogen use efficiency in instantaneous and daily photosynthesis of leaves in the canopy of a Solidago altissima stand. Physiol Plantarum 70:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huner NPA, Oquist A, Hurry V, Krol M, Falk S, Griffith M (1993) Photosynthesis, photoinhibition and low temperature acclimation in cold tolerant plants. Photosynth Res 37:19–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huner NPA, Maxwell DP, Gray GR, Savitch LV, Krol M, Ivanov AG, Falk S (1996) Sensing environmental temperature change through imbalances between energy supply and energy consumption: redox state of photosystem II. Physiol Plantarum 98:358–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huner NPA, Oquist G, Sarhan F (1998) Energy balance and acclimation to light and cold. Trends Plant Sci 3:224–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kato MC, Hikosaka K, Hirotsu N, Makino A, Hirose T (2003) The excess light energy that is neither utilized in photosynthesis nor dissipated by photoprotective mechanisms determines the rate of photoinactivation in photosystem II. Plant Cell Physiol 44:318–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kume A, Ino Y (1993) Comparison of ecophysiological responses to heavy snow in two varieties of Aucuba japonica with different areas of distribution. Ecol Res 8:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kurosawa T, Tateishi Y, Kajita T (1995) Flora of Aobayama, wild vascular plants in the botanical garden of Tohoku university, Japan. Ecol Rev 23:111–170Google Scholar
  28. Niinemets U, Kull O, Tenhunen JD (1998) An analysis of light effects on foliar morphology, physiology, and light interception in temperate deciduous woody species of contrasting shade tolerance. Tree Physiol 18:681–696PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Oguchi R, Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2003) Does the photosynthetic light-acclimation need change in leaf anatomy? Plant Cell Environ 26:505–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochem Biophys Acta 975:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Röhrig E (1991) Climatic conditions. In: Röhrig E, Ulrich B (eds) Temperate deciduous forests. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp 7–16Google Scholar
  32. Rothstein DE, Zak DR (2001) Photosynthetic adaptation and acclimation to exploit seasonal periods of direct irradiance in three temperate, deciduous-forest herbs. Funct Ecol 15:722–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sims DA, Pearcy RW (1989) Photosynthetic characteristics of a tropical forest understory herb, Alocasia macrorrhiza, and a related crop species, Colocasia esculenta grown in contrasting light environments. Oecologia 79:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sims DA, Pearcy RW (1992) Response of leaf anatomy and photosynthetic capacity in Alocasia macorrhiza (Araceae) to a transfer from low to high light. Am J Bot 79:449–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Skillman JB, Strain BR, Osmond CB (1996) Contrasting patterns of photosynthetic acclimation and photoinhibition in two evergreen herbs from a winter deciduous forest. Oecologia 107:446–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Steffen KL, Wheeler RM, Arora R, Palta JP, Tibbitts TW (1995) Balancing photosynthetic light-harvesting and light-utilization capacities in potato leaf tissue during acclimation to different growth temperatures. Physiol Plantarum 94:51–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sugawara K (1969) Ecological studies in the Botanical Garden of the Tohoku University I. Present state of vegetation. Ecol Rev 17:111–127Google Scholar
  38. Terashima I, Miyazawa SI, Hanba YT (2001) Why are sun leaves thicker than shade leaves? Consideration based on analyses of CO2 diffusion in the leaf. J Plant Res 114:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weih M, Karlsson PS (1999) Growth response of altitudinal ecotypes of mountain birch to temperature and fertilisation. Oecologia 119:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weih M, Karlsson PS (2001) Growth response of mountain birch to air and soil temperature: is increasing leaf-nitrogen content an acclimation to lower air temperature? New Phytol 150:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yamamura Y (1986) Matter-economical roles of evergreen foliage of Aucuba japonica, an understory shrub in the warm-temperate region of Japan 1. Leaf demography, productivity and dry matter economy. Bot Mag-Tokyo 99:323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yamamura Y, Kimura M (1992) Matter-economical roles of evergreen foliage of Aucuba japonica, an understory shrub in the warm-temperate region of Japan 2. Dynamics and budgets of nutrients. Bot Mag-Tokyo 105:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate school of life sciencesTohoku UniversityAoba, SendaiJapan
  2. 2.Department of Plant EcologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations