Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 143, Issue 4, pp 629–634 | Cite as

The interactive effects of grazing ungulates and aboveground production on grassland diversity

  • Douglas A. FrankEmail author
Community Ecology

Abstract

The variable and nonlinear relationships between plant species richness (SR) and aboveground production (NAP) among terrestrial ecosystems indicate that the energetic capacity of ecosystems interacts with other environmental factors to control diversity. One contributing factor determining plant diversity is herbivory; but few studies have effectively examined the interaction of herbivores and NAP on SR. The objective of this study was to investigate how NAP and herds of native migrating ungulates determine plant SR in grasslands of Yellowstone National Park. Plant SR at peak aboveground biomass was compared inside and outside ungulate exclosures at two spatial scales, 1.0 m2 (“local”) and 100 m2 (“community”), in ten variable grasslands. NAP also was determined inside and outside exclosures. The relationship between SR and NAP was unimodal for grazed and ungrazed grassland at both spatial scales. Grazers increased local SR, independent of NAP. In contrast, herbivore effects on community SR ranged from no effect among low-productive grassland to an increasingly positive influence as NAP increased. In addition, ungulates reduced beta diversity (the contribution to community SR attributed to variability among local patches) at dry, low-productive and wet, high-productive sites. These results suggest that the size of the pool of species available to colonize grassland is an important factor controlling the response of grassland SR to herbivory, particularly from low- to intermediate-productive grassland.

Keywords

Biodiversity Grassland Ungulate Herbivory Yellowstone National Park 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank J. Carlson, V. Kurth, and H. Loring for help in the field, Yellowstone National Park Center for Resources and the Ranger division for logistic support, and M. Anderson and S. McNaughton for comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by NSF grants DEB-972669 and DEB-0318716 and the InterAmerican Institute for Global Change Research grant CRN-012.

References

  1. Anderson MT, Frank DA (2003) Does defoliation reduce reproductive biomass at the community level? The importance of scale and timing. J Range Manage 56:501–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augustine, DJ, Frank DA (2001) Effects of migratory grazers on spatial heterogeneity of soil nitrogen properties in a grassland ecosystem. Ecology 82:3149–3162Google Scholar
  3. Bullock JM, Franklin J, Stevenson M.J, Silvertown J, Coulson SJ, Gregory SJ, Tofts R (2001) A plant trait analysis of responses to grazing in a long-term experiment. J Appl Ecol 38:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collins SL, Glenn SM (1991) Importance of spatial and temporal dynamics in species regional abundance and distribution. Ecology 72:654–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins SL, Uno GE (1985) Seed predation, seed dispersal, and disturbance in grasslands: a comment. Am Nat 125:866–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins SL, Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Blair JM, Steinauer EM (1998) Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tallgrass prairie. Science 280:745–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fahnestock JT, Knapp AK (1994) Plant responses to selective grazing by bison: interactions between light, herbivory and water stress. Vegetation 115:123–131Google Scholar
  8. Frank DA, McNaughton SJ (1992) The ecology of plants, large mammalian herbivores and drought in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 73:2043–2058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frank DA, Kuns MM, Guido DR (2002) Consumer control of grassland plant production. Ecology 83:602–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glenn SM, Collins SL (1992) Effects of scale and disturbance on rates of immigration and extinction of species in prairies. Oikos 63:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gough L, Grace JB (1998) Predicting effects of environmental change on plant species density: expeimental evaluations in a coastal wetland. Ecology 80:882–890Google Scholar
  12. Gough L, Grace JB, Taylor KL (1994) The relationship between species richness and community biomass: the importance of environmental variables. Oikos 70:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grace JB (2001) The role of community biomass and species pools in the regulation of plant diversity. Oikos 92:193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grace JB, Jutila H (1999) The relationship between species density and community biomass in grazed and ungrazed coastal meadows. Oikos 85:398--408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grace JB, Pugesek BH (1997) A structural equation model of plant species richness and its application to a coastal wetland. Am Nat 149:436–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Gross KL, Willig MR, Gough L, Inoute R, Cox SB (2000) Patterns of species density and productivity at different spatial scales in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 89:417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartnett DC, Hickman KR, Fischer Walter LE (1996) Effects of bison grazing, fire, and topography on floristic diversity in tallgrass prairie. J Range Manage 49:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF (1992) Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv Biol 6:324–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. van der Maarel E, Sykes MT (1993) Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. J Veg Sci 4:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  22. McNaughton SJ (1976) Serengeti migratory wildebeest: Facilitation of energy flow by grazing. Science 191:92–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McNaughton SJ, Milchunas D, Frank DA (1996) How can net primary productivity be measured in grazing ecosystems? Ecology 77:974–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Milchunas DG, Sala OE, Lauenroth WK (1988) A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. Am Nat 132:87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mittlebach GG, Steiner CF, Scheiner SM, Gross KL, Reynolds HL, Waide RB, Willig, MR, Dobson SI, Gough L (2001) What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82:2381–2396Google Scholar
  26. Montalvo J, Casado MA, Levassor C, Pineda FD (1993) Species diversity in Mediterranean grasslands. J Veg Sci 4:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Noy-Meir I, Gutman M, Kaplan Y (1989) Responses of Mediterranean grassland plants to grazing and protection. J Ecol 77:290–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oba G, Vetaas OR, Stenseth NC (2001) Relationships between biomass and plant species richness in arid-zone grazing lands. J Appl Ecol 38:836–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olff H, Ritchie ME (1998) Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:261–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. Todd SW, Hoffman MT (1999) A fence-line contrast reveals effects of heavy grazing on plant diversity and community composition in Namaqualand, South Africa. Plant Ecol 142:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trémont RM (1994) Life-history attributes of plants in grazed and ungrazed grasslands on the northern tablelands of New South Wales. Aust J Bot 42:511–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Waide RB, Willig MR, Steiner CF, Mittelbach GG, Gough L, Dobson SI, Juday GP Parmenter R (1999) The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:257–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biological Research LabsSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations