, Volume 143, Issue 4, pp 598–606 | Cite as

Niche differences in phenology and rooting depth promote coexistence with a dominant C4 bunchgrass

Community Ecology


Spatial and temporal niche differentiation are potential mechanisms of plant species’ coexistence in many communities, including many grasslands. In a 6-year field experiment, a dominant prairie bunchgrass, Schizachyrium scoparium, excluded species sharing similar phenology and rooting depth, but coexisted with species differing in phenology and rooting depth. We used a series of experimental plots that differed in S. scoparium abundance to measure the effect of S. scoparium on abundances of other species and on soil nitrate concentrations across time and depth. Because we found that S. scoparium most strongly reduced soil nitrate levels at mid-season and at shallow depths, we hypothesized that at higher S. scoparium abundance, species with mid-season phenology and shallow roots would be excluded and that deep-rooted and early season species would be more likely to persist. As predicted, the proportional number and cover of species exploiting different niches than S. scoparium (early season and deep-rooted species) increased across the S. scoparium abundance gradient. This work provides novel empirical evidence for the factors that contribute to species coexistence in the field. Our study suggests that spatial and temporal niche differentiation promote species coexistence in these grasslands.


Resource competition Invasion Nitrogen Nitrate Spatiotemporal 



We thank Troy Mielke and Stan Harpole for help in the field, Olivia Damon for chemical analysis, Dennis Cook for statistical advice, and the two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments. The experiments performed here comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.


  1. Aarssen LW, Epp GA (1990) Neighbour manipulations in natural vegetation: a review. J Veg Sci 1:13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong RA, McGehee R (1980) Competitive exclusion. Am Nat 115:151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell G (2001) Neutral macroecology. Science 293:2413–2418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berendse F (1979) Competition between plant populations with different rooting depths I. Theoretical considerations. Oecologia 43:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bratton SP (1976) Resource division in an understory herb community: responses to temporal and microtopographic gradients. Am Nat 110:679–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chesson P (1994) Multispecies competition in variable environments. Theor Popul Biol 45:227–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curtis JT (1959) Vegetation of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitter AH (1982) Influence of soil heterogeneity on the coexistence of grassland species. J Ecol 70:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fitter AH (1986) Spatial and temporal patterns of root activity in a species-rich alluvial grassland. Oecologia 69:594–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson DJ (1988) The maintenance of plant and soil heterogeneity in dune grassland. J Ecol 76:497–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldberg DE, Barton AN (1992) Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. Am Nat 139:771–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  14. Inouye, RS, Huntley NJ, Tilman D, Tester J, Stillwell M, and Zinnel K (1987) Old-field succession on a Minnesota sand plain. Ecology 68:12–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) A global analysis of root distributions of terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108:389–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mamolos AP, Veresoglou DS (2000) Patterns of root activity and responses of species to nutrients in vegetation of fertile alluvial soil. Plant Ecol 148:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mamolos AP, Elisseou GK, Veresoglou DS (1995) Depth of root activity of coexisting grassland species in relation to N and P additions, measured using radioactive tracers. J Ecol 83:643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McKane RB, Grigal DF, Russelle MP (1990) Spatiotemporal differences in 15N uptake and the organization of an old-field plant community. Ecology 71:1126–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McKane RB, Johnson LC, Shaver GR, Nadelhoffer KJ, Rastetter EB, Fry B, Giblin AE, Kielland K, Kwiatkowski BL, Laundre JA, Murray G (2002) Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in artic tundra. Nature 415:68–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parrish JAD, Bazzaz FA (1976) Underground niche separation in successional plants. Ecology 57:1281–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. SAS Institute Inc. (2001) JMP 4.0.4. Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sun GW, Coffin DP, Lauenroth WK (1997) Comparison of root distributions of species in North American grasslands using GIS. J Veg Sci 8:587–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  25. Tilman D (1989) Competition, nutrient reduction and the competitive neighborhood of a bunchgrass. Funct Ecol 3:215–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tilman D (1990) Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tilman D, Wedin D (1991) Plant traits and resource reduction for five grasses growing on a nitrogen gradient. Ecology 72:685–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Veresoglou DS, Fitter AH (1984) Spatial and temporal patterns of growth and nutrient uptake of five co-existing grasses. J Ecol 72:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weaver JE (1958) Classification of root systems of forbs of grassland and a consideration of their significance. Ecology 39:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wedin DA, Tilman D (1990) Species effect on nitrogen cycle: a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia 84:433–441Google Scholar
  31. Wedin D, Tilman D (1993) Competition among grasses along a nitrogen gradient: initial conditions and mechanisms of competition. Ecol Monogr 63:199–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilson SD, Tilman D (1993) Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilization. Ecology 74:599–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wright SJ (2002) Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia 130:1–14Google Scholar
  34. Yeaton RI, Travis J Gilinsky E (1977) Competition and spacing in plant communities: the Arizona upland association. J Ecol 65:587–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution and BehaviorUniversity of MinnesotaSaint PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations