Oecologia

, Volume 141, Issue 3, pp 411–419 | Cite as

The effect of different zooplankton grazing patterns resulting from diel vertical migration on phytoplankton growth and composition: a laboratory experiment

  • Elke S. Reichwaldt
  • Isabelle D. Wolf
  • Herwig Stibor
Population Ecology

Abstract

Diel vertical migration (DVM) of herbivorous zooplankton is a widespread behavioural phenomenon in freshwater ecosystems. So far only little attention has been paid to the impact of DVM on the phytoplankton community in the epilimnion. Some theoretical models predict that algal population growth in the epilimnion should depend on the herbivores’ migration and grazing patterns: even if migrating zooplankton consume the same total amount of algae per day in the epilimnion as non-migrating zooplankton, nocturnal grazing should result in enhanced algal growth and favour algal species with high intrinsic growth rates over species with lower intrinsic growth rates. To test these hypotheses we performed experiments in which several algal species were confronted with different feeding regimes of Daphnia. In the experiments algal growth did not only depend on the absolute time of grazing but was comparatively higher when grazing took place only during the night, even when the grazing pressure was the same. Furthermore, algal species with higher intrinsic growth rates had higher advantages when being grazed upon only discontinuously during the night than algal species with a smaller intrinsic growth rate. The grazing pattern itself was an important factor for relative algal performance.

Keywords

Daphnia Diel vertical migration Grazing rate Direct effects Algal performance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Sebastian Diehl for valuable suggestions on the manuscript. During the experiments E. S. Reichwaldt was supported by a scholarship for PhD students from the University of Munich and I. D. Wolf was supported by a scholarship from the Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes.

References

  1. Angeli N, Pinel-Alloul B, Balvay G, Ménard I (1995) Diel patterns of feeding and vertical migration in daphnids and diaptomids during the clear water phase in Lake Geneva (France). Hydrobiologia 301:163–184Google Scholar
  2. Burns CW (1968) The relationship between body size of filter-feeding Cladocera and the maximum size of particles ingested. Limnol Oceanogr 13:675–678Google Scholar
  3. Dawidowicz P, Loose CJ (1992) Metabolic costs during predator-induced diel vertical migration of Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr 37:1589–1595Google Scholar
  4. Diehl S, Eklöv P (1995) Effects of piscivore-mediated habitat use on resources, diet, and growth of perch. Ecology 76:1712–1726Google Scholar
  5. Diehl S, Cooper SD, Kratz KW, Nisbet RM, Roll SK, Wiseman SW, Jenkins TM (2000) Effects of multiple, predator-induced behaviors on short-term producer-grazer dynamics in open systems. Am Nat 156:293–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dini ML, O’Donnell J, Carpenter SR, Elser MM, Elser JJ, Bergquist AM (1987) Daphnia size structure, vertical migration, and phosphorus redistribution. Hydrobiologia 150:185–191Google Scholar
  7. Duval WS, Geen GH (1976) Diel feeding and respiration rhythms in zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 21:823–829Google Scholar
  8. Geller W, Pinto-Coelho R, Pauli H-R (1992) The vertical distribution of zooplankton (Crustacea, Rotatoria, Ciliata) and their grazing over the diurnal and seasonal cycles in Lake Constance. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergeb Limnol 35:79–85Google Scholar
  9. Giebelhausen B, Lampert W (2001) Temperature reaction norms of Daphnia magna: the effect of food concentration. Freshwater Biol 46:281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gliwicz ZM (1986) Predation and the evolution of vertical migration in zooplankton. Nature 320:746–748Google Scholar
  11. Gulati RD, Siewertsen K, Postema G (1982) The zooplankton: its community structure, food and feeding, and role in the ecosystem of Lake Vechten. Hydrobiologia 95:127–163Google Scholar
  12. Haney JF (1973) An in situ examination of the grazing activities of natural zooplankton communities. Arch Hydrobiol 72:87–132Google Scholar
  13. Haney JF (1985) Regulation of cladoceran filtering rates in nature by body size, food concentration, and diel feeding patterns. Limnol Oceanogr 30:379–411Google Scholar
  14. Haney JF, Hall DJ (1975) Diel vertical migration and filter-feeding activities of Daphnia. Arch Hydrobiol 75:413–441Google Scholar
  15. Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156Google Scholar
  16. Lampert W (1986) Limnologie: funktionelle Beziehungen in Ökosystemen; Kaskadeneffekte in See-Ökosystemen: die Bedeutung der tagesperiodischen Vertikalwanderung des Zooplankton. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 79:105-116Google Scholar
  17. Lampert W (1987) Vertical migration of freshwater zooplankton: Indirect effects of vertebrate predators on algal communities. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of England, N.H., pp 291–298Google Scholar
  18. Lampert W (1992) Zooplankton vertical migrations: implications for phytoplankton-zooplankton interactions. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergeb Limnol 35:69–78Google Scholar
  19. Lampert W (1993) Ultimate causes of diel vertical migration of zooplankton: new evidence for the predator-avoidance hypothesis. Arch Hydrobiol 39:79–88Google Scholar
  20. Lampert W, Taylor BE (1985) Zooplankton grazing in a eutrophic lake: implication of vertical migration. Ecology 66:68–82Google Scholar
  21. Loose C, Dawidowicz P (1994) Trade-offs in diel vertical migration by zooplankton: the costs of predator avoidance. Ecology 75:2255–2263Google Scholar
  22. Lund JWG, Kipling G, Le Creen ED (1958) The inverted microscope method of estimating algae numbers and the statistical basis of estimation by counting. Hydrobiologia 11:143–170Google Scholar
  23. McAllister CD (1969) Aspects of estimating zooplankton production from phytoplankton production. J Fish Res Bd Can 26:199–220Google Scholar
  24. McIntosh AR, Townsend CR (1996) Interactions between fish, grazing invertebrates and algae in a New Zealand stream: a trophic cascade mediated by fish induced changes to grazer behaviour? Oecologia 108:174–181Google Scholar
  25. McKee D, Ebert D (1996) The interactive effects of temperature, food level and maternal phenotype on offspring size in Daphnia magna. Oecologia 107:189–196Google Scholar
  26. Neill WE (1990) Induced vertical migration in copepods as a defence against invertebrate predation. Nature 345:524–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Orcutt JD, Porter KG (1984) The synergistic effects of temperature and food concentration on life history parameters of Daphnia. Oecologia 63:300–306Google Scholar
  28. Persson L (1993) Predator-mediated competition in prey refuges—the importance of habitat dependent prey resources. Oikos 68:12–22Google Scholar
  29. Petipa TS, Makarova NP (1969) Dependence of phytoplankton production on rhythm and rate of elimination. Mar Biol 3:191–195Google Scholar
  30. Power ME, Dudley TL, Cooper SD (1989) Grazing catfish, fishing birds, and attached algae in a Panamanian stream. Environ Biol Fishes 26:285–294Google Scholar
  31. Ringelberg J (1991) A mechanism of predator-mediated induction of diel vertical migration of Daphnia hyalina. J Plankton Res 13:83–89Google Scholar
  32. Ringelberg J (1993) Phototaxis as a behavioural component of diel vertical migration in a pelagic Daphnia. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergeb Limnol 39:45–55Google Scholar
  33. Sarnelle O (1992) Nutrient enrichment and grazer effects on phytoplankton in lakes. Ecology 73:551–560Google Scholar
  34. Schmitz OJ, Beckerman AP, O’Brien KM (1997) behaviourally mediated trophic cascades: Effects of predation risk on food web interactions. Ecology 78:1388–1399Google Scholar
  35. Stich H-B, Lampert W (1981) Predator evasion as an explanation of diurnal vertical migration by zooplankton. Nature 293:396–398Google Scholar
  36. Stich H-B, Lampert W (1984) Growth and reproduction of migrating and non-migrating Daphnia species under simulated food and temperature conditions of diurnal vertical migration. Oecologia 61:192–196Google Scholar
  37. Svensson J-E, Stenson JAE (1991) Herbivoran impact on phytoplankton community structure. Hydrobiologia 226:71–80Google Scholar
  38. Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Bertness MD (2003) Trait-mediated effects in rocky intertidal food chains: predator risk cues alter prey feeding rates. Ecology 84:629–640Google Scholar
  39. Turner AM, Mittelbach GG (1990) Predator avoidance and community structure—interactions among piscivores, planktivores, and plankton. Ecology 71:2241–2254Google Scholar
  40. Turner AM, Fetterolf SA, Bernot RJ (1999) Predator identity and consumer behaviour: differential effects of fish and crayfish on the habitat use of a freshwater snail. Oecologia 118:242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Utermöhl H (1958) Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Mitt Int Ver Limnol 9:1–38Google Scholar
  42. Zaret TM, Suffern JS (1976) Vertical migration in zooplankton as a predator avoidance mechanism. Limnol Oceanogr 21:804–813Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elke S. Reichwaldt
    • 1
  • Isabelle D. Wolf
    • 1
  • Herwig Stibor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department Biologie II, Abteilung Aquatische ÖkologieLudwig-Maximilians UniversitätMartinsriedGermany

Personalised recommendations