Oecologia

, Volume 140, Issue 3, pp 516–522 | Cite as

Fly parasitoid Megaselia opacicornis uses defensive secretions of the leaf beetle Chrysomela lapponica to locate its host

Plant Animal Interactions

Abstract

Larvae of the leaf beetle Chrysomela lapponica derive a defensive secretion from salicyl glucosides found in the host plant Salix borealis. This secretion protects beetle larvae from some natural enemies, but does not appear to repel parasitoids. We tested the hypothesis that the fly parasitoid Megaselia opacicornis (Diptera, Phoridae) uses the larval defensive secretion of Ch. lapponica in its search for prey. In the field, nearly 30 times more M. opacicornis individuals were caught on leaves coated with sticky resin next to a source of secretion than on control leaves. In the laboratory, M. opacicornis females laid six times more eggs next to a cotton ball soaked in secretion than next to one soaked in water. Fly females also lay more eggs on prey rich in larval secretion than on secretion-poor prey. In the field, removal of defensive secretion from beetle prepupae resulted in a 7.5-fold reduction of oviposition by fly females. Parasitoids were nearly twice as likely to lay eggs on prepupae, rich in secretion, as on pupae, which contain little secretion. Fly offspring reared from beetle prepupae reached a 21% larger body mass than those reared from pupae. Finally, M. opacicornis females avoided host prepupae already parasitized by the tachinid fly Cleonice nitidiuscula, which possess little secretion. These experiments indicate that host plant-derived defensive secretions are used by this parasitoid for host location. Adaptation of parasitoids to use defensive secretions of hosts may selectively favor an increase in diet breadth in specialist herbivores.

Keywords

Three trophic-level interactions Oviposition Host selection behavior Kairomone Olfactory attractant 

References

  1. Blum MS (1994) Antipredator devices in larvae of the Chrysomelidae: a unified synthesis for defensive eclecticism. In: Jolivet PH, Cox ML, Petitpierre E (eds) Novel aspects of the biology of Chrysomelidae, vol 50. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 277–288Google Scholar
  2. Brown WL, Eisner T, Whittaker RH (1970) Allomones and kairomones: transpecific chemicals messengers. BioScience 20:21–22Google Scholar
  3. Chabora PC, Pimentel D (1977) Effects of host (Musca domestica Linnaeus) age on the pteromalid parasite Nasonia vitripennis. Can Entomol 98:1226–1231Google Scholar
  4. Denno RF, Larsson S, Olmstead KL (1990) Role of enemy-free space and plant quality in host-plant selection by willow beetles. Ecology 71:124–137Google Scholar
  5. Dicke M, Sabelis MW (1988) Infochemical terminology: based on cost-benefit analysis rather than origin of compounds. Funct Ecol 2:131–139Google Scholar
  6. Godfray HCJ (1994) Parasitoids: behavioural and evolutionary ecology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  7. Gratton C, Welter SC (1999) Does “enemy-free space” exist? Experimental host shifts of an herbivorous fly. Ecology 80:773–785Google Scholar
  8. Gross J (2001) On the evolution of host plant specialization in leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelina). Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades. Institut für Biologie—Angewandte Zoologie/Oekologie der Tiere, Freie Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Gross J, Hilker M (1995) Chemoecological studies of the exocrine glandular larval secretion of two chrysomelid species (Coleoptera): Phaedon cochleariae and Chrysomela lapponica. Chemoecology 5(6):185–189Google Scholar
  10. Hilker M, Schulz S (1994) Composition of larval secretion of Chrysomela lapponica (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) and its dependence on host plant. J Chem Ecol 20:1075–1093Google Scholar
  11. Julkunen-Tiitto R (1989) Distribution of certain phenolics in Salix species (Salicaceae). Univ Joensuu Publ Sci 15:1–19Google Scholar
  12. Kanervo V (1946) Tutkimuksia lepän lehtikuoriaisen, Melasoma aenea L. (Col., Chrysomelidae), luontaisista vihollisista. [Studien über die natürlichen Feinde des Erlenblattkäfers, Melasoma aenea L. (Col., Chrysomelidae)]. Ann Zool Soc Zool-Bot Fenn Vanamo 12:1–202Google Scholar
  13. Köpf A, Rank N, Roininen H, Tahvanainen J (1997) Defensive larval secretions of leaf beetles attract a specialist predator Parasyrphus nigritarsis. Ecol Entomol 22:176–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lawton JH (1986) The effect of parasitoids on phytophagous insect communities. In: Waage J, Greathead D (eds) Insect parasitoids. Academic, London, pp 265–289Google Scholar
  15. Mattiacci L, Vinson SB, Williams HJ, Aldrich JR, Bin F (1993) A long-range attractant kairomone for egg parasitoid Trissolcus basalis, isolated from defensive secretion of its host, Nezara viridula. J Chem Ecol 19:1167–1181Google Scholar
  16. Palokangas P, Neuvonen S (1992) Differences between species and instars of leaf beetles in the probability to be preyed on. Ann Zool Fenn 29:273–278Google Scholar
  17. Paré PW, Lewis WJ, Tumlinson JH (1999) Induced plant volatiles: biochemistry and effects on parasitoids. In: Agrawal AA, Tuzun S, Bent E (eds) Induced plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 167–180Google Scholar
  18. Pasteels JM, Rowell-Rahier M (1992) The chemical ecology of herbivory on willows. Proc R Soc Edinb 98B:63–73Google Scholar
  19. Pasteels JM, Braekman JC, Daloze D, Ottinger R (1982) Chemical defence in chrysomelid larvae and adults. Tetrahedron 38:1891–1897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pasteels JM, Daloze D, Rowell-Rahier M (1986) Chemical defense in chrysomelid eggs and neonate larvae. Physiol Entomol 11:29–37Google Scholar
  21. Pasteels JM, Braekman JC, Daloze DD (1988) Chemical defense in the Chrysomelidae. In: Jolivet P, Petitpierre E, Hsiao TH (eds) Biology of chrysomelidae, vol 42. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 233–260Google Scholar
  22. Rank NE (1994) Host plant effects on larval survival in a salicin-using leaf beetle Chrysomela aeneicollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Oecologia 97:342–353Google Scholar
  23. Rank NE, Smiley JT (1994) Host-plant effects on Parasyrphus melanderi Curran (Diptera: Syrphidae) feeding on a willow leaf beetle Chrysomela aeneicollis Schaeffer (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ecol Entomol 19:31–38Google Scholar
  24. Rank NE, Smiley JT, Köpf A (1996) Natural enemies and host plant relationships for chrysomeline leaf beetles feeding on Salicaceae. In: Jolivet PH, Cox ML (eds) Chrysomelidae biology, vol 2. Ecological studies. SPB Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 147–171Google Scholar
  25. Rank NE, Köpf A, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Tahvanainen J (1998) Host preference and larval performance of the salicylate-using leaf beetle Phratora vitellinae. Ecology 79:618–631Google Scholar
  26. Richter VA, Zvereva EL (1996) The tachinid species Cleonice nitidiuscula Zetterstedt new for fauna of Murmansk Province (Diptera: Tachinidae). Zoosyst Rossica 6:202Google Scholar
  27. Schulz S, Gross J, Hilker M (1997) Origin of defensive secretion of the leaf beetle Chrysomela lapponica. Tetrahedron 53:9203–9212Google Scholar
  28. Sengonca Ç, Liu B (1994) Responses of the different instar predator, Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), to the kairomones produced by the prey and non-prey insects as well as the predator itself. J Plant Dis Prot 101:173–177Google Scholar
  29. Smiley JT, Horn JH, Rank NE (1985) Ecological effects of salicin at three trophic levels: new problems from old adaptations. Science 229:649–651Google Scholar
  30. Tahvanainen J, Helle E, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Lavola A (1985) Phenolic compounds of willow bark as deterrents against feeding by mountain hare. Oecologia 65:319–323Google Scholar
  31. Topp W, Bell D (1992) Melasoma vigintipunctata (Scop.): ein Weidenblattkäfer mit Massenvermehrung. Faun Ökol Mitt 6:267–286Google Scholar
  32. Turlings TCJ, Tumlinson JH, Lewis WJ, Vet LEM (1990) Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250:1251–1253Google Scholar
  33. Vet LEM, Dicke M (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu Rev Entomol 37:141–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zvereva EL, Kozlov MV (2000) Effects of air pollution on natural enemies of the leaf beetle Melasoma lapponica. J Appl Ecol 37:298–308Google Scholar
  35. Zvereva EL, Rank NE (2003) Host plant effects on parasitoid attack on the leaf beetle Chrysomela lapponica. Oecologia 135:258–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zvereva EL, Kozlov MV, Neuvonen S (1995a) Decrease of feeding niche breadth of Melasoma lapponica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with increase of pollution. Oecologia 104:323–329Google Scholar
  37. Zvereva EL, Kozlov MV, Neuvonen S (1995b) Population density and performance of Melasoma lapponica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in surroundings of a smelter complex. Environ Entomol 24:707–715Google Scholar
  38. Zvereva EL, Kozlov MV, Haukioja E (1997a) Population dynamics of a herbivore in an industrially modified landscape: case study with Melasoma lapponica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung 32:251–258Google Scholar
  39. Zvereva EL, Kozlov MV, Niemelä P, Haukioja E (1997b) Delayed induced resistance and increase in leaf fluctuating asymmetry as responses of Salix borealis to insect herbivory. Oecologia 109:368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Ecology, Department of BiologyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  2. 2.Department of BiologySonoma State UniversityRohnert ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations