Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 140, Issue 3, pp 458–467 | Cite as

Carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry and nitrogen cycling rates in streams

  • Walter K. DoddsEmail author
  • Eugenia Martí
  • Jennifer L. Tank
  • Jeffrey Pontius
  • Stephen K. Hamilton
  • Nancy B. Grimm
  • William B. Bowden
  • William H. McDowell
  • Bruce J. Peterson
  • H. Maurice Valett
  • Jackson R. Webster
  • Stan Gregory
Ecosystem Ecology

Abstract

Stoichiometric analyses can be used to investigate the linkages between N and C cycles and how these linkages influence biogeochemistry at many scales, from components of individual ecosystems up to the biosphere. N-specific NH4+ uptake rates were measured in eight streams using short-term 15N tracer additions, and C to N ratios (C:N) were determined from living and non-living organic matter collected from ten streams. These data were also compared to previously published data compiled from studies of lakes, ponds, wetlands, forests, and tundra. There was a significant negative relationship between C:N and N-specific uptake rate; C:N could account for 41% of the variance in N-specific uptake rate across all streams, and the relationship held in five of eight streams. Most of the variation in N-specific uptake rate was contributed by detrital and primary producer compartments with large values of C:N and small values for N-specific uptake rate. In streams, particulate materials are not as likely to move downstream as dissolved N, so if N is cycling in a particulate compartment, N retention is likely to be greater. Together, these data suggest that N retention may depend in part on C:N of living and non-living organic matter in streams. Factors that alter C:N of stream ecosystem compartments, such as removal of riparian vegetation or N fertilization, may influence the amount of retention attributed to these ecosystem compartments by causing shifts in stoichiometry. Our analysis suggests that C:N of ecosystem compartments can be used to link N-cycling models across streams.

Keywords

Carbon Carbon:Nitrogen ratio Nitrogen Stoichiometry Streams 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Gudder for technical assistance, as well as the participation of all the Lotic Intersite Nitrogen eXperiment grant (LINX) project workers. Thanks to Linda Ashkenas and Jeff Merriam for data and Ed Rastetter for modeling the expected slope of the N-uptake vs. C:N relationship. The research was supported by the United States National Science Foundation, LINX and the Konza Long-Term Ecological Research grant. This is publication 01-147-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

  1. Aber JD, Melillo JM (1980) Litter decomposition: measuring relative contributions of organic matter and nitrogen to forest soils. Can J Bot 58:416–421Google Scholar
  2. Aber JD, Melillo JM (2001) Terrestrial ecosystems, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. Google Scholar
  3. Aber J, McDowell W, Nadelhoffer K, Magill A, Berntson G, Kamakea M, McNulty S, Currie W, Rustad L, Fernandez I (1998) Nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems. BioScience 48:921–934Google Scholar
  4. Alexander RB, Smith RA, Schwarz GE (2000) Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico. Nature 403:758–761CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aufdenkampe AK, Hedges JI, Richey JE, Krusche AV, Llerna CA (2001) Sorptive fractionation of dissolved organic nitrogen and amino acids onto fine sediments within the Amazon Basin. Limnol Oceanogr 46:1921–1935Google Scholar
  6. Bosatta E, Ågren GI (1991) Dynamics of carbon and nitrogen in the organic matter of the soil: A generic theory. Am Nat 138:227–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkholder JM, Glasgow HB (1997) Pfiesteria piscida and other Pfiesteria like dinoflagellates: behavior, impacts, and environmental controls. Limnol Oceanogr 42:1052–1075Google Scholar
  8. Chapin FS III, Miller PC, Billings WD, Coyne PI (1980) Carbon and nutrient budget and their control in coastal tundra. In: Brown J, Miller PC, Tieszen LL, Bunnell FL (eds) An arctic ecosystem. The coastal tundra at Barrow, Alaska. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pa., pp 458–482Google Scholar
  9. Currie WS (1999) The responsive C and N biogeochemistry of the temperate forest floor. Trees 14:316–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dodds WK, Castenholz RW (1988) The nitrogen budget of an oligotrophic cold water pond. Arch Hydrobiol [Suppl] 79:343–362Google Scholar
  11. Dodds WK, Priscu JC, Ellis BK (1991) Seasonal uptake and regeneration of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus in a large oligotrophic lake: size fractionation and antibiotic treatment. J Plankton Res 13:1339–1358Google Scholar
  12. Dodds WK, Blair JM, Henebry GM, Koelliker JK, Ramundo R, Tate CM (1996) Nitrogen transport from tallgrass prairie by streams. J Environ Qual 25:973–981Google Scholar
  13. Dodds WK, Evans-White MA, Gerlanc N, Gray L, Gudder DA, Kemp MJ, López, AL, Stagliano D, Strauss E, Tank JL, Whiles MR, Wollheim W (2000) Quantification of the nitrogen cycle in a prairie stream. Ecosystems 3:574–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dodds WK, Smith VH, Lohman K (2002) Nitrogen and phosphorus relationships to benthic algal biomass in temperate streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:865–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Egli T (1991) On multiple-nutrient-limited growth of microorganisms, with special reference to dual limitation by carbon and nitrogen substrates. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J Microbiol Serol 60:225–234Google Scholar
  16. Elser JJ, Urabe J (1999) The stoichiometry of consumer-driven nutrient recycling: theory, observations, and consequences. Ecology 80:735–751Google Scholar
  17. Elser JJ, Marzolf ER, Goldman CR (1990) Phosphorus and nitrogen limitation of phytoplankton growth in the freshwaters of North America: a review and critique of experimental enrichments. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:1468–1477Google Scholar
  18. Elser JJ, Sterner RW, Gorokhova E, Fagan WF, Markow TA, Cotner JB, Harrison JF, Hobbie SE, Odell GM, Weider LJ (2000) Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems. Ecol Lett 3:540–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fenchel T, King GM, Blackburn TH (1998) Bacterial biogeochemistry: the ecophysiology of mineral cycling. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. Google Scholar
  20. Fenn ME, Poth MA, Aber JD, Baron JS, Bormann BT, Johnson DW, Lemly AD, McNulty SG, Ryan DS, Stottlemyer R (1998) Nitrogen excess in North American ecosystems: predisposing factors, ecosystem responses, and management strategies. Ecol Appl 8:706–733Google Scholar
  21. Findlay S, Tank J, Dye S, Vallett HM, Mulholland P, McDowell WH, Johnson S, Hamilton SK, Edmonds J, Dodds WK, Bowden WB (2002) A cross-system comparison of bacterial and fungal biomass in detritus pools of headwater streams. Microb Ecol 43:55–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Francez A-J (1995) Dynamique du carbone et de l’azote chez le Carex rostrata, l’ Eriophorum vaginatum et le Calluna vulgaris dans une tourbière à sphaignes des monts du Fores (France). Can J Bot 73:121–129Google Scholar
  23. Garvey JE, Marschall AE, Wright RA (1998) From star charts to stoneflies; detecting relationships in concinuous bivariate data. Ecology 79:442–447Google Scholar
  24. Goldman JC, Caron DA, Dennett MR (1987) Regulation of gross growth efficiency and ammonium regeneration in bacteria by substrate C:N ratio. Limnol Oceanogr 32:1239–1252Google Scholar
  25. Grimm NB, Fisher SG (1986) Nitrogen limitation potential of Arizona streams and rivers. J Ariz-Nev Acad Sci 21:31–43Google Scholar
  26. Hall RW Jr, Peterson BJ, Meyer J (1998) Testing a nitrogen-cycling model of a forest stream by using a nitrogen-15 tracer addition. Ecosystems 1:283–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamilton SK, Tank JL, Raikow DF, Wollheim WM, Peterson BJ, Webster JR (2001) Nitrogen uptake and transformation in a midwestern US stream: a stable isotope enrichment study. Biogeochemistry 54:297–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hecky RE, Campbell P, Hendzel LL (1993) The stoichiometry of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in particulate matter of lakes and oceans. Limnol Oceanogr 38:709–724Google Scholar
  29. Laws E (1984) Isotope dilution models and the mystery of vanishing 15N. Limol Oceanogr 29:379–386Google Scholar
  30. Loehr RC (1974) Characteristics and comparative magnitude of on-point sources. J Water Pollut Contr Fed 46:1849–1872Google Scholar
  31. Magill AH, Aber JD, Hendricks JJ, Bowden RD, Melillo J, Steudler PA (1997) Biogeochemical response of forest ecosystems to simulated chronic nitrogen deposition. Ecol Appl 7:402–415Google Scholar
  32. McClaugherty CA, Pastor J, Aber JD (1985) Forest litter decomposition in relation to soil nitrogen dynamics and litter quality. Ecology 66:266–275Google Scholar
  33. Merriam JL, McDowell WH, Tank JL, Wollheim WM, Crenshaw CC, Johnson SL (2002) Characterizing nitrogen dynamics, retention and transport in a tropical rainforest stream using an in situ 15 N addition. Freshwater Biol 47:143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meybeck M (1982) Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus transport by world rivers. Am J Sci 282:401–450Google Scholar
  35. Mulholland PJ, Tank JL, Sanzone DM, Wollheim WM, Peterson BJ, Webster JR, Meyer JL (2000) Nitrogen cycling in a deciduous forest stream determined from a tracer 15N addition experiment in Walker Branch, Tennessee. Ecol Monogr 70:471–493Google Scholar
  36. Mulholland PJ, Tank JL, Sanzone DM, Webster JR, Wollheim WM, Peterson BJ, Meyer JL (2001) Ammonium and nitrate uptake lengths in a small forested stream determined by 15N tracer and short −term nutrient enrichment experiments. Verh Int Ver Theor Angew Limnol 27:1320–1325Google Scholar
  37. Mulholland PJ, Tank JL, Webster JR, Bowden WB, Dodds WK, Gregory SV, Grimm NB, Hamilton SK, Johnson SL, Martí E, McDowell WH, Merriam J, Meyer JL, Peterson BJ, Valett HM, Wollheim WM (2002) Can uptake length in streams be determined by nutrient addition experiments? Results from an inter-biome comparison study. J North Am Benthol Soc 21:544–560Google Scholar
  38. Nadelhoffer KJ, Downs MR, Fry B (1999) Sinks for 15N-enriched additions to an oak forest and a red pine plantation. Ecol Appl 9:72–86Google Scholar
  39. Neill C, Deegan LA, Thomas SM, Cerri CC (2001) Deforestation for pasture alters nitrogen and phosphorus in small Amazonian streams. Ecol Appl 11:1817–1828Google Scholar
  40. Newbold JD, Elwood JW, O’Neil RV, Van Winkle W (1981) Measuring nutrient spiraling in streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:860–863Google Scholar
  41. Peterson BJ, Wollheim W, Mulholland PJ, Webster JR, Meyer JL, Tank JL, Grimm NB, Bowden WB, Vallet HM, Hershey AE, McDowell WB, Dodds WK, Hamilton SK, Gregory S, D’Angelo DJ (2001) Stream processes alter the amount and form of nitrogen exported from small watersheds. Science 292:86–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Wiseman WJ, Dortch Q (1998) Consequences of the 1993 Mississippi River flood in the Gulf of Mexico. Reg Rivers Res Manage 14:161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Redfield AC (1958) The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am Sci 46:205–22Google Scholar
  44. Robles MD, Burke IC (1997) Legume, grass, and conservation reserve program effects on soil organic matter recovery. Ecol Appl 7:345–357Google Scholar
  45. Schimel DS (1995) Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biol 1:77–91Google Scholar
  46. Sterner RW (1995) Elemental stoichiometry of species in ecosystems. In: Jones C, Lawton J (eds) Linking species and ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 240–251Google Scholar
  47. Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  48. Takamura N, Iwakuma T (1991) Nitrogen uptake and C:N:P ratio of epiphytic algae in the littoral zone of Lake Kasumigaura. Arch Hydrobiol 121:161–170Google Scholar
  49. Tank J, Dodds WK (2003) Responses of heterotrophic and autotrophic biofilms to nutrients in ten streams. Freshwater Biol 48:1031–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tank JL, Meyer JL, Sanzone DM, Mulholland PJ, Webster JR, Peterson BJ, Leonard NE (2000) Analysis of nitrogen cycling in a forest stream during autumn using a 15N tracer addition. Limnol Oceanogr 45:1013–1029Google Scholar
  51. Tate CM, Gurtz ME (1986) Comparison of mass loss, nutrients, and invertebrates associated with elm leaf litter decomposition in perennial and intermittent reaches of tallgrass prairie streams. Southwest Nat 31:511–520Google Scholar
  52. Turner RE (2002) Element ratios and aquatic food webs. Estuaries 25:694–703Google Scholar
  53. Vitousek PM, Howarth RW (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13:87–115Google Scholar
  54. Vitousek PM, Aber J, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman GD (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: causes and consequences. Iss Ecol 1:2–15Google Scholar
  55. Webster JR, Patten BC (1979) Effects of watershed perturbation on stream potassium and calcium dynamics. Ecol Monogr 49:51–72Google Scholar
  56. Webster JR, Benfield F, Ehrman TP, Schaeffer MA, Tank JL, Hutchens JJ, D’Angelo DJ (1999) What happens to allochthonous material that falls into streams? A synthesis of new and published information from Coweeta. Freshwater Biol 41:677–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Webster JR, Tank JL, Wallace JB, Meyer JL, Eggert SL, Ehrman TP, Ward BR, Bennett BL, Wagner BF, McTammany ME (2000) Effects of litter exclusion and wood removal on phosphorus and nitrogen retention in a forest stream. Verh Int Verein Limnol 27:1337–1340Google Scholar
  58. Webster JR, Mulholland PJ, Tank JL, Valett HM, Dodds WK, Peterson BJ, Bowden WB, Dahm CN, Findlay S, Gregory SV, Grimm NB, Hamilton SK, Johnson SL, Martí E, McDowell WH, Meyer JL, Morrall DD, Thomas SA, Wollheim WM (2003) Factors affecting ammonium uptake in streams—an inter-biome perspective. Freshwater Biol 48:1329–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wollheim WM, Peterson BJ, Deegan LA, Bahr M, Hobbie JE, Jones D, Bowden WB, Hershey AE, Kling GW, Miller MC (1999) A coupled field and modeling approach for the analysis of nitrogen cycling in streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 18:199–221Google Scholar
  60. Zheng DW, Ågren GI, Bengtsson J (1999) How do soil organisms affect total organic nitrogen storage and substrate nitrogen to carbon ratio in soils? A theoretical analysis. Oikos 86:430–442Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter K. Dodds
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eugenia Martí
    • 2
  • Jennifer L. Tank
    • 3
  • Jeffrey Pontius
    • 4
  • Stephen K. Hamilton
    • 5
  • Nancy B. Grimm
    • 6
  • William B. Bowden
    • 7
  • William H. McDowell
    • 8
  • Bruce J. Peterson
    • 9
  • H. Maurice Valett
    • 10
  • Jackson R. Webster
    • 10
  • Stan Gregory
    • 11
  1. 1.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Centre d’ Estudis Avancats deBlanesCami de Sta. Barabra s/nGironaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  4. 4.Department of Statistics, Dickens HallKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  5. 5.Kellogg Biological Station Hickory CornersUSA
  6. 6.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  7. 7.School of Natural ResourcesUniversity of Vermont BurlingtonUSA
  8. 8.Department of Natural Resources, James HallUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  9. 9.Marine Biological LaboratoryEcosystems CenterWoods HoleUSA
  10. 10.Department of BiologyVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  11. 11.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations