Oecologia

, Volume 139, Issue 4, pp 487–494 | Cite as

Natural selection on light response curve parameters in the herbaceous annual, Impatiens capensis

  • M. Shane Heschel
  • John R. Stinchcombe
  • Kent E. Holsinger
  • Johanna Schmitt
Ecophysiology

Abstract

We tested for genetic variation in light response curves and their acclimation to sun versus shade in recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of the annual species Impatiens capensis derived from a cross between sun and shade populations. We exposed replicates of 49 RILs to experimentally manipulated light levels (open versus shade) in a greenhouse and measured photosynthetic light response curves, height, biomass, and reproduction. Plants were taller in the shade treatment, but we were unable to detect differences between light treatments (i.e., acclimation) in the maximal rate of photosynthesis, the light compensation point, or the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis. Genotypic selection analyses indicated that higher maximal rates of carbon assimilation and higher light compensation points (typical of sun-acclimated light curves) were favored by natural selection in both light treatments. Thus, it appears that the pattern of selection on photosynthetic parameters may not depend on light environment in this species.

Keywords

Photosynthetic acclimation responses Sun–shade ecotypes Impatiens capensis Natural selection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Aguilera, B. Leib, and F. Jackson for help in maintaining our inbred lines and superb plant care. We are grateful to H. Urabe and M. Jackson for experimental assistance, and J. Kelley for discussions about non-linear curve fitting. Our research has been supported by NSF grant DEB 0129018.

References

  1. Argyres AZ, Schmitt J (1991) Microgeographic genetic structure of morphological and life history traits in a natural population of Impatiens capensis. Evolution 45:178–189Google Scholar
  2. Arnold SJ, Peterson CR (2002) A model for optimal reaction norms: the case of the pregnant garter snake and her temperature-sensitive embryos. Am Nat 160:306–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arntz AM, Delph LF (2001) Pattern and process: evidence for the evolution of photosynthetic traits in natural populations. Oecologia 127:455–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baskauf CJ, Eickmeier WG (1994) Comparative ecophysiology of a rare and a widespread species of Echinacea (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 81:958–964Google Scholar
  5. Bennington CC, McGraw JB (1995) Natural selection and ecotypic differentiation in Impatiens pallida. Ecol Monogr 65:303–323Google Scholar
  6. Buchmann N, Brooks JR, Rapp KD, Ehleringer JR (1996) Carbon isotope composition of C-4 grasses influenced by light and water supply. Plant Cell Environ 19:392–402Google Scholar
  7. Chazdon RL, Pearcy RW (1986) Photosynthetic responses to light variation in rainforest species. II. Carbon gain and photosynthetic efficiency during light flecks. Oecologia 69:524–531Google Scholar
  8. Chazdon RL (1992) Photosynthetic plasticity of two rain forest shrubs across natural gap transects. Oecologia 92:586–595Google Scholar
  9. Clough JM, Peet MM, Kramer PJ (1981) Effects of high atmospheric CO2 and sink size on rates of photosynthesis of a soybean cultivar. Plant Physiol 67:1007–1010Google Scholar
  10. Davies SJ (1998) Photosynthesis of nine pioneer Macaranga species from Borneo in relation to life history. Ecology 79:2292–2308Google Scholar
  11. Donohue K, Messiqua D, Hammond Pyle E, Heschel MS, Schmitt J (2000) Evidence of adaptive divergence in plasticity: density- and site-dependent selection on shade avoidance responses in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 54:1956–1968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Donohue K, Hammond Pyle E, Messiqua D, Heschel MS, Schmitt J (2001) Adaptive divergence in plasticity in natural populations of Impatiens capensis and its consequences for performance in novel habitats. Evolution 55:692–702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dudley SA (1996) Differing selection on plant physiological traits in response to environmental water availability: a test of adaptive hypotheses. Evolution 50:92–102Google Scholar
  14. Dudley SA, Schmitt J (1996) Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: density-dependent selection on manipulated stem length in Impatiens capensis. Am Nat 147:445–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehleringer JR (1978) Implications of quantum yield differences on the distributions of 3 carbon and 4 carbon grasses. Oecologia 31:255–268Google Scholar
  16. Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 33:317–345Google Scholar
  17. Farris MA, Lechowicz MJ (1990) Functional interactions among traits that determine reproductive success in a native annual plant. Ecology 71:548–557Google Scholar
  18. Field CB (1988) On the role of photosynthetic responses in contrasting the habitat distribution of rainforest plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:343–358Google Scholar
  19. Garbutt K (1986) Genetic differentiation in leaf and whole plant photosynthetic capacity and unit leaf rate among clones of Phlox paniculata. Am J Bot 73:1364–1371Google Scholar
  20. Geber MA, Dawson TE (1990) Genetic variation in and co-variation between leaf gas exchange, morphology, and development in Polygonum arenastrum, an annual plant. Oecologia 85:153–158Google Scholar
  21. Geber MA, Dawson TE (1997) Genetic variation in stomatal and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis in the annual plant, Polygonum arenastrum. Oecologia 109:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Givnish TJ (1988) Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole plant perspective. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:63–92Google Scholar
  23. Hacker SD, Bertness MD (1995) Morphological and physiological consequences of a positive plant interaction. Ecology 76:2165–2175Google Scholar
  24. Heschel MS, Hausmann NJ (2001) Population differentiation for abscisic acid sensitivity in response to drought in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). Int J Plant Sci 162:1253–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heschel MS, Donohue K, Hausmann NJ, Schmitt J (2002) Population differentiation and natural selection for water-use efficiency in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). Int J Plant Sci 163:907–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirose T, Werger MJA (1987) Maximizing daily canopy photosynthesis with respect to the leaf nitrogen allocation pattern in the canopy. Oecologia 72:520–526Google Scholar
  27. Kirkpatrick M, Lofsvold D, Bulmer M (1990) Analysis of the inheritance, selection, and evolution of growth trajectories. Genetics 124:979–993Google Scholar
  28. Kingsolver JG, Gomulkiewicz RS, Carter PA (2001) Variation, selection, and evolution of function-valued traits. Genetica 112–113:87–104Google Scholar
  29. Lambers H, Chapin FS III, Pons TL (1998) Plant physiological ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226Google Scholar
  31. Larcher W (1995) Physiological plant ecology, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  33. Littell RC, Henry PR, Ammerman CB (1998) Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J Anim Sci 76:1216–1231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Marshall B, Biscoe PV (1980) A model for 3 carbon leaves describing the dependence of net photosynthesis on irradiance derivation. J Exp Bot 31:29–40Google Scholar
  35. Mooney HA (1991) Plant physiological ecology—determinants of progress. Funct Ecol 5:127–135Google Scholar
  36. Mooney HA, Field C, Gulmon SL, Bazzaz FA (1981) Photosynthesis capacity in relation to leaf position in desert vs. old field annuals. Oecologia 50:109–112Google Scholar
  37. Mulkey SS, Smith AP, Wright SJ (1991) Comparative life-history and physiology of 2 understory neotropical herbs. Oecologia 88:263–273Google Scholar
  38. Paoletti C, Holsinger KE (1999) Spatial patterns of polygenic variation in Impatiens capensis, a species with an environmentally controlled mixed mating system. J Evol Biol 12:689–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parkinson KJ (1985) A simple method for determining the boundary layer resistance in leaf cuvettes. Plant Cell Environ 8:223–226Google Scholar
  40. Pearcy RW, Sims DA (1994) Photosynthetic acclimation to changing light environments: scaling from the leaf to the whole plant. In: Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW (eds) Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants: ecophysiological processes above- and belowground. Academic, San Diego, pp 145–174Google Scholar
  41. Peek MS, Russek-Cohen E, Wait DA, Forseth IN (2002) Physiological response curve analysis using nonlinear mixed models. Oecologia 132:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Potvin C, Lechowicz MJ, Tardif S (1990) The statistical analysis of ecophysiological response curves obtained from experiments involving repeated measures. Ecology 71:1389–1400Google Scholar
  43. Rausher MD (1992) The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46:616–626Google Scholar
  44. Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J, Teeri JA (1984) A genetic analysis of the photosynthetic properties of populations of Danthonia spicata that have different growth responses to light level. Oecologia 64:74–77Google Scholar
  45. Schemske DW (1984) Population structure and local selection in Impatiens pallida (Balsaminaceae), a selfing annual. Evolution 38:817–832Google Scholar
  46. Schmitt J (1993) Reaction norms of morphological and life-history traits to light availability in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 47:1654–1668Google Scholar
  47. Schoen DJ, Latta RG (1989) Spatial autocorrelation of genotypes in populations of Impatiens pallida and Impatiens capensis. Heredity 63:181–189Google Scholar
  48. Schoen DJ, Stewart SC Lechowicz MJ, Bell G (1986) Partitioning the transplant site effect in reciprocal transplant experiments with Impatiens capensis and Impatiens pallida. Oecologia 70:149–154Google Scholar
  49. Schulz KE, Smith M, Wu Y (1993) Gas exchange of Impatiens pallida Nutt. (Balsaminaceae) in relation to wilting under high light. Am J Bot 80:361–368Google Scholar
  50. Sims DA, Kelley S (1998) Somatic and genetic factors in sun and shade population differentiation if Plantago lanceolata and Anthoxanthum odoratum. New Phytol 140:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stinchcombe JR, Rausher MD (2001) Diffuse selection on resistance to deer herbivory in the Ivyleaf Morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea. Am Nat 158:376–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stinchcombe JR, Rutter MT, Burdick DS, Tiffin P, Rausher MD, Mauricio R (2002) Testing for environmentally induced bias in phenotypic estimates of natural selection: theory and practice. Am Nat 160:511–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sultan SE, Bazzaz FA (1993) Phenotypic plasticity in Polygonum persicaria. I. Diversity and uniformity in genotypic norms of reaction to light. Evolution 47:1009–1031Google Scholar
  54. Teramura AH, Strain BR (1979) Localized populational differences in the photosynthetic response to temperature and irradiance in Plantago lanceolata. Can J Bot 57:2559–2563Google Scholar
  55. Thornley JHM (1976) Mathematical models in plant physiology. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Valladares F, Wright SJ, Lasso E, Kitajima K, Pearcy RW (2000) Plastic phenotypic response to light of 16 congeneric shrubs from a Panamanian rainforest. Ecology 81:1925–1936Google Scholar
  57. Waller DM (1984) Differences in fitness between seedlings derived from cleistogamous and chasmogamous flowers in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 38:427–440Google Scholar
  58. Wulff RD (1989) The effects of reduced irradiance and low red to far red ratios on the growth and photosynthetic capacity in Impatiens capensis (Abstract 350). Am J Bot 76(Suppl):S131–S132Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Shane Heschel
    • 1
    • 2
    • 2
  • John R. Stinchcombe
    • 3
  • Kent E. Holsinger
    • 1
  • Johanna Schmitt
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Harvard University HerbariaCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations