Oecologia

, Volume 139, Issue 2, pp 318–324 | Cite as

Detection of conspecific alarm cues by juvenile salmonids under neutral and weakly acidic conditions: laboratory and field tests

  • Antoine O. H. C. Leduc
  • Jocelyn M. Kelly
  • Grant E. Brown
Behavioural Ecology

Abstract

A variety of fishes possess damage-released chemical alarm cues, which play a critical role in the detection and avoidance of potential predation threats. Recently, we have demonstrated that the ability of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and finescale dace (Phoxinus neogaeus) to detect and respond to conspecific alarm cues is significantly reduced under weakly acidic conditions (pH 6.0). Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) possess an analogous alarm cue system. However, it is unknown if the trout alarm cue system is likewise affected by relatively small changes in pH. In addition, previous studies have not verified this phenomenon under natural conditions. We conducted laboratory and field trials to examine the potential effects of acute exposure to weakly acidic (pH 6.0) conditions on the detection and response of conspecific alarm cues by juvenile trout. Our laboratory results demonstrate that while juvenile rainbow trout exhibit significant increases in antipredator behaviour under normal pH conditions (pH 7.0–7.2), they do not respond to the presence of conspecific chemical alarm cues (i.e. response is not different from controls) under weakly acidic conditions. Similarly, a wild strain of brook charr in their natural streams near Sudbury, Ontario, failed to detect conspecific alarm cues in a weakly acidic stream (mean pH 6.11) while they responded to these cues in a neutral stream (mean pH of 6.88). This is the first demonstration that relatively small changes in ambient pH can influence alarm responses under natural conditions. These data suggest significant, sub-lethal effects of acid precipitation on natural waterways.

Keywords

Acid rain Antipredator behaviour Brook charr Chemical alarm cues Rainbow trout 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank John Gunn and the Ministry of Natural Resources of Ontario for their help with the field trials, and Peter Kelly and his family for their help and generosity. All work reported herein was conducted in accordance with Concordia University Animal Care Committee protocol No. AC-2002-BROW. Financial support was provided by NSERC of Canada and Concordia University to G.E.B.

References

  1. Åtland A (1998) Behavioural responses of brown trout, Salmo trutta, juveniles in concentration gradients of pH and Al—a laboratory study. Environ Biol Fish 53:331–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry KL, Grout AG, Levings CD, Nidle BH, Piercy E (2000) Impact of acid mine drainage on juvenile salmonids in an estuary near Britannia Beach in Howe Sound, British Columbia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:2032–2043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown C, Laland K (2001) Social learning and life skills training for hatchery reared fish. J Fish Biol 59:471–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown GE (2003) Learning about danger: chemical alarm cues and local risk assessment in prey fishes. Fish Fish 4:227–234Google Scholar
  5. Brown GE, Magnavacca G (2003) Predator inspection behaviour in a characin fish: an interaction between chemical and visual information? Ethology 109:739–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown GE, Smith RJF (1997) Conspecific skin extracts elicit anti-predator responses in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can J Zool 75 1916–1922Google Scholar
  7. Brown GE, Smith RJF (1998) Acquired predator recognition in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): conditioning hatchery reared fish to recognize chemical cues of a predator. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:611–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown GE, Adrian JC Jr, Smyth E, Leet H, Brennan S (2000) Ostariophysan alarm pheromones: Laboratory and field tests of the functional significance of nitrogen oxides. J Chem Ecol 26:139–154Google Scholar
  9. Brown GE, Adrian JC Jr, Kaufman IH, Erickson JL, Gershaneck D (2001) Responses to nitrogen-oxides by Characiforme fishes suggest evolutionary conservation in Ostariophysan alarm pheromones. In: Marchlewska-Koj A, Lepri JJ, Müller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates, vol 9. Plenum, New York, pp 305–312Google Scholar
  10. Brown GE, Adrian JC Jr, Lewis MG, Tower JM (2002) The effects of reduced pH on chemical alarm signaling in Ostariophysan fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1331–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1998) Chemical alarm signaling in aquatic predator-prey systems: A review and prospectus. Ecoscience 5:338–352Google Scholar
  12. Chivers DP, Mirza RS, Johnston JG (2002) Learned recognition of heterospecific alarm cues enhances survival during encounters with predators. Behaviour 139:929–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donnelly WA, Whoriskey FG Jr (1993) Transplantation of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and crypsis breakdown. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 118:25–34Google Scholar
  14. Environment Canada (1997) Canadian acid rain assessment, vol 3: the effects on Canada’s lakes, rivers and wetlands. Ministry of Environment, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  15. Gazdewich KJ, Chivers GP (2002) Acquired predator recognition by fathead minnows: influence of habitat characteristics on survival. J Chem Ecol 20:439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grant JWA, Kramer DL (1990) Territory size as a predictor of the upper limit to population density of juvenile salmonids in streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:1724–1737Google Scholar
  17. Hazlett BA (1997) The organization of behaviour in hermit crabs: response to variation in stimulus strength. Behaviour 134:59–70Google Scholar
  18. Hesthagen T, Jonsson B (2002) Life history characteristics of brown trout in lakes at different stages of acidification. J Fish Biol 60:415–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawrence BJ, Smith RJF (1989) Behavioural response of solitary fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, to alarm substance. J Chem Ecol 15:209–219Google Scholar
  20. Leduc AOHC, Noseworthy MK, Adrian JC Jr, Brown GE (2003) Detection of conspecific and heterospecific alarm signals by juvenile pumpkinseed under weak acidic conditions. J Fish Biol 63:1331–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lorz HW, McPherson BP (1976) Effects of copper or zinc in fish on the adaptation to sea water and ATPase activity and the effects of copper on migratory disposition of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). J Fish Res Bd Can 33:2023–2030Google Scholar
  22. Magurran AE, Irving PW, Henderson PA (1996) Is there a fish alarm pheromone? A wild study and critique. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1551–1556Google Scholar
  23. Mirza RS, Chivers DP (2000) Predator-recognition training enhances survival of brook trout: evidence from laboratory and field-enclosure studies. Can J Zool 78:2198–2208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mirza RS, Chivers DP (2001a) Chemical alarm signals enhance survival of brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) during encounters with predatory chain pickerel (Esox niger). Ethology 107:909–1005Google Scholar
  25. Mirza RS, Chivers DP (2001b) Do chemical alarm signals enhance survival of aquatic vertebrates? An analysis of the current research paradigm. In: Marchlewska-Koj A, Lepri JJ, Müller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates, vol 9. Kluwer, New York, pp 19–26Google Scholar
  26. Mirza RS, Chivers DP (2001c) Are chemical alarm cues conserved within salmonid fishes? J Chem Ecol 27:1641–1655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mirza RS, Chivers (2003a) Response of juvenile rainbow trout to varying concentrations of chemical alarm cue: response thresholds and survival during encounters with predators. Can J Zool 81:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mirza RS, Chivers (2003b) Predator diet cues and the assessment of predation risk by juvenile brook charr: do diet cues enhance survival? Can J Zool 81:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moyle PB, Cech JJ Jr (1996) Fishes: an introduction to ichthyology, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp 271–273Google Scholar
  30. Rodhe H, Langner J, Gallardo L, Kjellstrom E (1995) Global scale transport of acidifying pollutants. Water Air Soil Pollut 85: 37–50Google Scholar
  31. Scott WB, Crossman EJ (1973) Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fish Res Bd Can Bull 184Google Scholar
  32. Shively RS, Poe TP, Sauter ST (1996) Feeding response by northern squawfish to a hatchery release of juvenile salmonids in the Clearwater River, Idaho. Trans Am Fish Soc 125:230–236Google Scholar
  33. Smith RJF (1997) Does one result trump all others?: a response to Magurran, Irving and Henderson. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith RJF (1999) What good is smelly stuff in the skin? Cross function and cross taxa effects in fish “alarm substances”. In: Johnston RE, Müller-Schwarze D, Sorensen PW (eds) Advances in chemical signals in vertebrates. Kluwer, New York, pp 475–487Google Scholar
  35. Steingrímsson SE, Grant JWA (2003) Patterns and correlates of movement and site fidelity in individually tagged young-of-the-year Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Subaski MD, Templeton JJ (1989) Life skills training for hatchery fish: social learning and survival. Fish Res 7:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Sickle J, Backer JP, Simonin HA, Baldigo BP, Krestser WA, Sharpe WE (1996) Episodic acidification of small streams in the Northeastern United States: fish mortality in field bioassay. Ecol Appl 6:408–421Google Scholar
  38. Wilson RW, Bergman HL, Wood CM (1994) Metabolic costs and physiological consequences of acclimation to aluminum in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): acclimation specificity, resting physiology, feeding, and growth. Can J Fish Aqua Sci 51:527–535Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antoine O. H. C. Leduc
    • 1
  • Jocelyn M. Kelly
    • 1
  • Grant E. Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyConcordia UniversityMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations