, Volume 139, Issue 1, pp 98–107 | Cite as

Decomposition rate of organic substrates in relation to the species diversity of soil saprophytic fungi

Ecosystem Ecology


Despite the great interest concerning the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem functioning, there is virtually no knowledge as to how the diversity of decomposer microbes influences the decomposition rate of soil organic matter. We established a microcosm study in which the number of soil fungi was investigated in relation to the system’s ability to (i) degrade raw coniferous forest humus, and (ii) use resources that were either added to the systems or released into the soils after a disturbance (drought). With the exception of the most diverse treatment, in each of the six replicates of each of the six diversity treatments (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 or 43 taxa), fungal taxa were randomly chosen from a pool of 43 commonly isolated fungal species of raw humus. Two months after initiation of the study CO2 production increased as fungal diversity increased, but in the species-poor end of the diversity gradient only. Addition of various energy resources to the microcosms generally increased the level of soil respiration but did not affect the shape of the diversity-CO2-production curve. Rewetting the soil after severe drought resulted in a rapid flush of CO2, particularly in the most diverse communities. The biomass of the fungi in the non-disturbed soils, and soil NH4-N concentration and soil pH in both disturbed and non-disturbed systems were slightly but significantly higher in the diverse than in the simple systems. Fungal species richness had no influence on the organic matter content of the humus at the end of the experiment. The results suggest that the functional efficiency of fungal communities can increase with the number of fungal taxa. This diversity effect was, however, significant at the species-poor end of the diversity gradient only, which implies considerable functional equivalency (redundancy) among the decomposer fungi.


Disturbance Functional redundancy Respiration Saprophytic fungi 


  1. Aarssen LW (1997) High productivity in grassland ecosystems: effected by species diversity or productive species? Oikos 80:183–184Google Scholar
  2. Andrén O, Bengtsson J, Clarholm M (1995) Biodiversity and species redundancy among litter decomposers. In: Collins HP, Robertson GP, Klug MJ (eds) The significance and regulation of soil biodiversity. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 141–151Google Scholar
  3. Atlas RM, Bartha R (1998) Microbial ecology: fundamentals and applications. Addison Wesley Longman, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapin FS III, Schulze E-D, Mooney HA (1992) Biodiversity and ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 7:107–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chesson P, Pacala S, Neuhauser C (2001) Environmental niches and ecosystem functioning. In: Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 213–245Google Scholar
  6. Cox P, Wilkinson SP, Anderson JM (2001). Effects of fungal inocula on the decomposition of lignin and structural polysaccharides in Pinus sylvestris litter. Biol Fertil Soils 33:246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deacon JW (1985) Decomposition of filter paper cellulose by thermophilic fungi acting singly, in combination, and in sequence. Trans Br Mycol Soc 85:663–669Google Scholar
  8. De Boer W, Gerards S, Klein Gunnewiek PJA, Modderman R (1999) Response of the chitinolytic microbial community to chitin amendments of dune soils. Biol Fertil Soils 29:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Degens BP (1998) Decreases in microbial functional diversity do not result in corresponding changes in decomposition under different moisture conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1989–2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Degens BP, Harris JA (1997) Development of a physiological approach to measuring the catabolic diversity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1309–1320Google Scholar
  11. Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson T-H (1993) Compendium of soil fungi, vol 1. IHW, EchingGoogle Scholar
  12. Emmerson MC, Raffaelli DG (2000) Detecting the effects of diversity on measures of ecosystem function: experimental design, null models and empirical observations. Oikos 91:195–203Google Scholar
  13. Gochenaur SE (1984) Fungi of a Long Island oak-birch forest. II. Population dynamics and hydrolase patterns for the soil penicillia. Mycologia 76:218–231Google Scholar
  14. Gould WD, Bryant RJ, Trofymow JA, Anderson RV, Elliott ET, Coleman DC (1981) Chitin decomposition in a model soil system. Soil Biol Biochem 13:487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffin DH (1994) Fungal physiology, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffith GS, Rayner ADM, Wildman HG (1994) Interspecific interactions and mycelial morphogenesis of Hypholoma fasciculare (Agaricaceae). Nova Hedwig 59:47–75Google Scholar
  17. Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Bardgett RD, Cook R, Christensen S, Ekelund F, Sorensen SJ, Bååth E, Bloem J, de Ruiter PC, Dolfing J, Nicolardot B (2000) Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship. Oikos 90:279–294Google Scholar
  18. Hector A (2001) Biodiversity and the functioning of grassland ecosystems: multi-site comparisons. In: Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 71–95Google Scholar
  19. Hector A, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Diemer M, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Good J, Harris R, Högberg P, Huss-Danell K, Joshi J, Jumpponen A, Körner C, Leadley PW, Loreau M, Minns A, Mulder CPH, O’Donovan G, Otway SJ, Pereira JS, Prinz A, Read DJ, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schulze E-D, Siamantziouras A-SD, Spehn EM, Terry AC, Troumbis AY, Woodward FI, Yachi S, Lawton, J (1999) Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286:1123–1127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hodge A, Alexander IJ, Gooday GW (1995) Chitinolytic enzymes of pathogenic and ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycol Res 99:935–941Google Scholar
  21. Hooper DU (1998) The role of complementarity and competition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. Ecology 79:704–719Google Scholar
  22. Hooper DU, Vitousek PM (1997) The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1302–1305Google Scholar
  23. Hulot FD, Lacroix G, Lescher-Moutoue FO, Loreau M (2000) Functional diversity governs; ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment. Nature 405:340–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Huston MA (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huston MA, Aarssen LW, Austin M P, Cade BS, Fridley JD, Garnier E, Grime JP, Hodgson J, Lauenroth WK, Thompson K, Vandermeer JH, Wardle DA (2000) No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. Science 289:1255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jolliffe PA (2000) The replacement series. J Ecol 88:371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kendrick B (1985) The fifth kingdom. Mycologue, WaterlooGoogle Scholar
  28. Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (2001) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuyper TW, Verschoor BC (1995) Enhancement of nitrification rates in vitro by interacting species of saprotrophic fungi. Mycol Res 99:1128–1130Google Scholar
  30. Laakso J, Setälä H (1999) Sensitivity of primary production to changes in the architecture of belowground food webs. Oikos 87:57–64Google Scholar
  31. Lawler SP, Armesto JJ, Kareiva P (2001) How relevant to conservation are studies linking biodiversity and ecosystem functioning? In: Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 294–313Google Scholar
  32. Liiri M, Setälä H, Haimi J, Pennanen T, Fritze H (2002) Relationships between soil microarthropod species diversity and plant growth does not change when the system is disturbed. Oikos 96:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Loreau M (1998) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5632–5636PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lyons KG, Schwartz MW (2001) Rare species loss alters ecosystem function—invasion resistance. Ecol Lett 4:358–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marin S, Sanchis V, Ramos AJ, Vinas I, Magan N (1998) Environmental factors, in vitro interactions, and niche overlap between Fusarium moniliforme, F. proliferatum , and F. graminearum, Aspergillus and Penicillium species from maize grain. Mycol Res 102:831–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McGrady-Steed J, Harris PM, Morin PJ (1997) Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature 390:162–165Google Scholar
  37. Mikola J, Setälä H (1998) Relating species diversity to ecosystem functioning: mechanistic backgrounds and experimental approach with a decomposer food web. Oikos:83:180–194Google Scholar
  38. Naeem S (1998) Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conserv Biol 12:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Naeem S, Li S (1997) Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390:507–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pacala S, Tilman D (2002) The transition from sampling to complementarity. In: Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 151–174Google Scholar
  41. Parkinson D (1994) Filamentous fungi. In: Weaver RW, Angle JS, Bottomley PS (eds) Methods of soil analysis. 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 329–350Google Scholar
  42. Rayner ADM (1994) Pattern-generating processes in fungal communities. In: Ritz K, Dighton J, Giller KE (eds) Beyond the Biomass. British Society of Soil Sciences, Wiley-Sayce, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Robinson CH, Dighton J, Frankland JC, Coward PA (1993) Nutrient and carbon dioxide release by interacting species of straw-decomposing fungi. Plant Soil 151:139–142Google Scholar
  44. Rodriguez-Kabana R, Godoy G, Morgan-Jones G, Shelby RA (1983) The determination of soil chitinase activity: conditions for assay and ecological studies. Plant Soil 75:95–106Google Scholar
  45. Scheu S, Parkinson D (1994) Changes in bacterial and fungal biomass C, bacterial and fungal biovolume and ergosterol content after drying, remoistening and incubation of different layers of cool temperate forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1515–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schimel JP, Gulledge JM, Clein-Curley JS, Lindstrom JE, Braddock JF (1999) Moisture effects on microbial activity and community structure in decomposing birch litter in the Alaskan taiga. Soil Biol Biochem 31:831–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schulze E-D, Mooney HA (1994) Ecosystem function of biodiversity: a summary. In: Schultze E-D, Mooney HA (eds). Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 498–510Google Scholar
  48. Schwartz MW, Brigham CA, Hoeksema JD, Lyons KG, Mills MH, van Mantgem PJ (2000) Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 122:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sundman V, Nase L (1972) The synergistic ability of some wood-degrading fungi to transform lignins and lignosuphonates on various media. Archiv Mikrobiol 86:339–348Google Scholar
  50. Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems, 1st edn. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Tilman D (1999) The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80:1455–1474Google Scholar
  52. Tilman DA, Wedin D, Knops J (1996) Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379:718–720Google Scholar
  53. Tilman DA, Lehman CL, Thomson KT (1997) Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:1857–1861PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P (2001) Experimental and observational studies of diversity, productivity, and stability. In: Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 42–70Google Scholar
  55. Veldkamp H (1955) A study of the aerobic decomposition of chitin by microorganisms. Meded Landbouwhogesch Wageningen/Nederland 55:127–174Google Scholar
  56. Walker BH (1992) Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv Biol 6:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wall D H, Moore J C (1999) Interactions underground—soil biodiversity, mutualism, and ecosystem processes. BioScience 49:109–17Google Scholar
  58. Wardle DA (1999) Is “sampling effect” a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships. Oikos 87:403–407Google Scholar
  59. Wardle DA (2002) Communities and ecosystems: linking the aboveground and belowground components. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USAGoogle Scholar
  60. Wardle DA, Parkinson D (1990). Comparison of physiological techniques for estimating the response of the microbial biomass to soil moisture. Soil Biol Biochem 22:817–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wardle DA, Bonner KI, Barker KM, Yeates GW, Nicholson KS, Bardgett RN, Watson RN, Ghani A (1999) Plant removals in perennial grassland: vegetation dynamics, decomposers, soil biodiversity and ecosystem properties. Ecol Monogr 69:535–568Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecological and Environmental SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiLahtiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Life SciencesIndiana State UniversityTerre HauteUSA

Personalised recommendations