, Volume 138, Issue 3, pp 379–386 | Cite as

Persistent maternal identity effects on life history traits in Daphnia

  • Olga SakwińskaEmail author
Population Ecology


The aim of the present study was to examine the magnitude and persistence of maternal effects in Daphnia, in particular maternal identity effects. I studied life history traits of a single clone of Daphnia galeata born to 40 different mothers belonging to three age groups. Maternal identity had large effects on offspring traits, that is, identically treated clonal females differed substantially in respect to the traits of their offspring, including size at birth, age at maturity, and number of second generation offspring. The effects of maternal identity on these traits were largely independent of maternally induced differences in offspring size, indicating that maternal effects were mediated through offspring quality. Maternal age also affected offspring traits: older mothers gave birth to larger offspring which matured earlier, were larger and more fecund, and survived better until maturity. Individuals which were larger at birth also had a better chance of survival. Contrary to expectation, I found little evidence that maternal identity or maternal age had any influence on their offsprings’ response to fish kairomones.


Daphnia galeata Plasticity Fish kairomones Offspring size Survival 



I thank Dieter Ebert for hosting me in his laboratory and sharing Daphnia life history expertise. Kerstin Bitter helped me to get the experimental animals. I am grateful to Dita Vizoso for her assistance in the laboratory, and Tadeusz Kawecki for help with statistical analyses. Steve Stearns, Tadeusz Kawecki, Dieter Ebert, Ian Sanders, and two anonymous referees provided critical comments which helped me to improve the manuscript.


  1. Barata C, Baird DJ (1998) Phenotypic plasticity and constancy of life-history traits in laboratory clones of Daphnia magna Straus: effects of neonatal length. Funct Ecol 12:442–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boersma M (1997) Offspring size and parental fitness in Daphnia magna. Evol Ecol 11:439–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brett MT (1993) Resource quality effects on Daphnia longispina offspring fitness. J Plankton Res 15:403–412Google Scholar
  4. Brooks JL, Dodson SI (1965) Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science 150:28–35Google Scholar
  5. Cleuvers M, Goser B, Ratte HT (1997) Life-strategy shift by intraspecific interaction in Daphnia magna: change in reproduction from quantity to quality. Oecologia 110:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dudycha JL, Tessier AJ (1999) Natural genetic variation of life span, reproduction, and juvenile growth in Daphnia. Evolution 53:1744–1756Google Scholar
  7. Ebert D (1991) The effect of size at birth, maturation threshold and genetic differences on the life-history of Daphnia magna. Oecologia 86:243–250Google Scholar
  8. Ebert D (1993) The trade-off between offspring size and number in Daphnia magna: The influence of genetic, environmental and maternal effects. Arch Hydrobiol [Suppl] 90:453–473Google Scholar
  9. Ebert D (1994) A maturation size threshold and phenotypic plasticity of age and size at maturity in Daphnia magna. Oikos 69:309–317Google Scholar
  10. Ebert D (1997) The evolution and genetics of maturation in Daphnia. In: Streit B, Städler T, Lively CM (eds) Evolutionary ecology of freshwater animals. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 152–178Google Scholar
  11. Fox CW, Czesak ME (2000) Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 45:341–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Glazier DS (1992) Effects of food, genotype, and maternal size and age on offspring investment in Daphnia magna. Ecology 73:910–926Google Scholar
  13. Gliwicz ZM, Guisande C (1992) Family planning in Daphnia: resistance to starvation in offspring born to mothers grown at different food levels. Oecologia 91:463–467Google Scholar
  14. Guisande C, Gliwicz ZM (1992) Egg size and clutch size in two Daphnia species grown at different food levels. J Plankton Res 14:997–1007Google Scholar
  15. Hercus MJ, Hoffmann AA (2000) Maternal and grandmaternal age influence offspring fitness in Drosophila. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:2105–2110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kern S, Ackermann M, Stearns SC, Kawecki TJ (2001) Decline in offspring viability as a manifestation of aging in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 55:1822–1831PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Klüttgen B, Dülmer U, Engels M, Ratte HT (1994) ADaM, an artificial freshwater for the culture of zooplankton. Water Res 28:743–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. LaMontagne JM, McCauley E (2001) Maternal effects in Daphnia: what mothers are telling their offspring and do they listen? Ecol Lett 4:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lampert W (1993) Phenotypic plasticity of the size at first reproduction in Daphnia—the importance of maternal size. Ecology 74:1455–1466Google Scholar
  20. LogXact 4 (1999) Software for exact logistic regression. Cytel Software, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  21. Lynch M (1980) The evolution of cladoceran life histories. Q Rev Biol 55:23–42Google Scholar
  22. Lynch M (1985) Spontaneous mutations for life history characters in an obligate parthenogen. Evolution 39:804–818Google Scholar
  23. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  24. McIntyre GS, Gooding RH (2000) Egg size, contents, and quality: maternal-age and -size effects on house fly eggs. Can J Zool 78:1544–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKee D, Ebert D (1996) The interactive effects of temperature, food level and maternal phenotype of offspring size in Daphnia magna. Oecologia 107:189–196Google Scholar
  26. Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) (1998) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Reede T (1997) Effects of neonate size and food concentration on the life history responses of a clone of the hybrid Daphnia hyalina x galeata to fish kairomones. Freshw Biol 37:389–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rossiter MC (1996) Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:451–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sakwińska O (2002) Response to fish kairomone in Daphnia galeata life history traits relies on shift to earlier instar at maturation. Oecologia 131:409–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. SAS (1993) SAS/STAT, Version 6.06. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.Google Scholar
  31. Schwaegerle KE, McIntyre H, Swingley C (2000) Quantitative genetics and the persistence of environmental effects in clonally propagated organisms. Evolution 54:452–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Stibor H (1992) Predator induced life-history shifts in a freshwater cladoceran. Oecologia 92:162–165Google Scholar
  33. Tessier AJ, Consolatti NL (1989) Variation in offspring size in Daphnia and consequences for individual fitness. Oikos 56:269–276Google Scholar
  34. Tessier AJ, Consolatti NL (1991) Resource quantity and offspring quality in Daphnia. Ecology 72:468–478Google Scholar
  35. Wade MJ (1998) The evolutionary genetics of maternal effects. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Weider LJ, Pijanowska J (1993) Plasticity of Daphnia life histories in response to chemical cues from predators. Oikos 67:385–392Google Scholar
  37. Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Moore AJ (1999) The role of maternal and paternal effects in the evolution of parental quality by sexual selection. J Evol Biol 12:1157–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zoology InstituteUniversity of Basel BaselSwitzerland
  2. 2. LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations