Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 141, Issue 2, pp 295–305 | Cite as

Response of net ecosystem gas exchange to a simulated precipitation pulse in a semi-arid grassland: the role of native versus non-native grasses and soil texture

  • Travis E. Huxman
  • Jessica M. Cable
  • Danielle D. Ignace
  • J. Alex Eilts
  • Nathan B. English
  • Jake Weltzin
  • David G. Williams
Pulse Events and Arid Ecosystems

Abstract

Physiological activity and structural dynamics in arid and semi-arid ecosystems are driven by discrete inputs or “pulses” of growing season precipitation. Here we describe the short-term dynamics of ecosystem physiology in experimental stands of native (Heteropogon contortus) and invasive (Eragrostis lehmanniana) grasses to an irrigation pulse across two geomorphic surfaces with distinctly different soils: a Pleistocene-aged surface with high clay content in a strongly horizonated soil, and a Holocene-aged surface with low clay content in homogenously structured soils. We evaluated whole-ecosystem and leaf-level CO2 and H2O exchange, soil CO2 efflux, along with plant and soil water status to understand potential constraints on whole-ecosystem carbon exchange during the initiation of the summer monsoon season. Prior to the irrigation pulse, both invasive and native grasses had less negative pre-dawn water potentials (Ψpd), greater leaf photosynthetic rates (Anet) and stomatal conductance (gs), and greater rates of net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE) on the Pleistocene surface than on the Holocene. Twenty-four hours following the experimental application of a 39 mm irrigation pulse, soil CO2 efflux increased leading to all plots losing CO2 to the atmosphere over the course of a day. Invasive species stands had greater evapotranspiration rates (ET) immediately following the precipitation pulse than did native stands, while maximum instantaneous NEE increased for both species and surfaces at roughly the same rate. The differential ET patterns through time were correlated with an earlier decline in NEE in the invasive species as compared to the native species plots. Plots with invasive species accumulated between 5% and 33% of the carbon that plots with the native species accumulated over the 15-day pulse period. Taken together, these results indicate that system CO2 efflux (both the physical displacement of soil CO2 by water along with plant and microbial respiration) strongly controls whole-ecosystem carbon exchange during precipitation pulses. Since CO2 and H2O loss to the atmosphere was partially driven by species effects on soil microclimate, understanding the mechanistic relationships between the soil characteristics, plant ecophysiological responses, and canopy structural dynamics will be important for understanding the effects of shifting precipitation and vegetation patterns in semi-arid environments.

Keywords

Net ecosystem exchange Invasive species Evapotranspiration Precipitation manipulation Santa Rita Experimental Range 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A number of undergraduate students participated in this research effort, including Janet Chen, Sam Day, Sam Waskow, Josh Polacheck, Dan Koepke and Phil Allen. Their enthusiasm at 2:00 a.m. is appreciated. The Santa Rita Experimental Range provided help in the construction and maintenance of these rainout shelters and housed crews during the experiment. These shelters were built and operated with funds from a USDA-CSREES award to Jake F. Weltzin and David G. Williams (Grant # 00–35101–9308). Stan Smith kindly provided an additional LI-6400 for use in this experiment. The University of Arizona provided substantial financial support for this project. The comments of three anonymous referees and participants of PrecipNet (an NCEAS Working Group) significantly improved the ideas in this manuscript.

References

  1. Anable ME, McClaran MP, Ruyle GB (1992) Spread of introduced Lehmann lovegrass Eragrostis lehmanniana Nees in southern Arizona, USA. Biol Conserv 61:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnone JA III, Obrist D (2003) A large daylight geodesic dome for quantification of whole-ecosystem CO2 and water vapor fluxes in arid shrublands. J Arid Environ 55:629–643Google Scholar
  3. Comstock JP, Ehleringer JR (1986) Canopy dynamics and carbon gain in response to soil water availability in Encelia frutescens Gray, a drought-deciduous shrub. Oecologia 68:271–278Google Scholar
  4. Cox JR, Ruyle GB (1986) Influence of climatic and edaphic factors on the distribution of Eragrostis lehmanniana Nees. in Arizona, USA. J Grassl Soc S Afr 3:25–29Google Scholar
  5. Cunningham GL, Burke JH (1973) The effect of carbonate deposition layers (‘caliche’) on the water status of Larrea divaricata. Am Midl Nat 90:474–480Google Scholar
  6. D’Antiono CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass-fire cycle and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87Google Scholar
  7. Davidson EA, Savage K, Verchot LV, Navarro R (2002) Minimizing artifacts and biases in chamber based measurements of soil respiration. Agric For Meteorol 113:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dukes JS (2000) Will the increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration affect biological invaders? In: Mooney HA, RS Hobbs RS (eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island, Washington, pp 95–113Google Scholar
  9. Ehleringer JR (1985) Annuals and perennials of warm deserts. In Chabot BF, Mooney HA (eds) Physiological ecology of North American plant communities. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 162–180Google Scholar
  10. Enquist BJ, Economo EP, Huxman TE, Allen AP, Ignace DD, Gillooly JF (2003) Scaling the biochemical kinetics of respiration from individuals to the biosphere. Nature 423:639–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Esque TC, Schwalbe CR (2002) Alien grasses and their relationships to fire and biotic change in Sonoran Desert scrub. In: Tellman B (ed) Invasive exotic species in the Sonoran region. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Ariz., pp 165–194Google Scholar
  12. Flanagan LB, Wever LA, Carlson PJ (2002) Seasonal and interannual variation in carbon dioxide exchange and carbon balance in a northern temperature grassland. Global Change Biol 8:599–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franzluebbers K, Franzluebbers AJ, Jawson MD (2002) Environmental controls on soil and whole-ecosystem respiration from a tallgrass prairie. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:254–262Google Scholar
  14. Frasier GW, Cox JR (1994) Water-balance in a pure stand of Lehmann’s Lovegrass. J Range Manage 47:373–378Google Scholar
  15. Giorgi F, Mearns LO, Shields C, McDaniel L (1998) Regional nested model simulations of present day and 2×CO2 climate over the central plains of the United States. Clim Change 40:457–493Google Scholar
  16. Glinski J, Stepniewski W (1985) Soil aeration and it role for plants. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.Google Scholar
  17. Goulden ML, Daube BC, Fan S, Sutton DJ, Bazzaz A, Munger W, Wofsy SC (1997) Physiological responses of a black spruce forest to weather. J Geophys Res 102:28987–28996Google Scholar
  18. Ham JM, Knapp AK (1998) Fluxes of CO2, water vapor, and energy from a prairie ecosystem during the seasonal transition from carbon sink to carbon source. Agric For Meteorol 89:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamerlynck EP, McAuliffe JR, Smith SD (2000) Effects of surface and sub-surface soil horizon on seasonal performance of Larrea tridentata (creosotebush). Funct Ecol 14:596–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamerlynck EP, McAuliffe JR, McDonald EV, Smith SD (2002) Ecological responses of two Mojave Desert shrubs to soil horizon development and soil water dynamics. Ecology 83:768–779Google Scholar
  21. Huxman TE, Turnipseed AA, Sparks JP, Harley PC, Monson RK (2003) Temperature as a control over ecosystem CO2 fluxes in a high-elevation, subalpine forest. Oecologia 134:537–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Knapp AK, Smith MD (2001) Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291:481–484Google Scholar
  23. Law BE, Falge E, Baldocchi DD (2002) Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation. Agric For Meteorol 113:97–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Livingston GP, Hutchinson GL (1995) Enclosure-based measurements of trace gas exchange: applications and sources of error. In: Mastson PA, Harriss RC (eds) Biogenic trace gases: measuring emissions from soil and water. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 14–51Google Scholar
  25. McAuliffe JR (1994) Landscape evolution, soil formation and ecological patterns and processes in Sonoran Desert bajadas. Ecol Monogr 64:111–148Google Scholar
  26. McAuliffe JR (1995) Landscape evolution, soil formation and Arizona’s desert grasslands. In: McClaran MP, Van Devender TR (eds) The desert grassland. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Ariz., pp 100–129Google Scholar
  27. McAuliffe JR (1999) The Sonoran Desert: landscape complexity and ecological diversity. In: Robichaux R (ed) Ecology of Sonoran Desert plants and communities. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Ariz., pp 87–104Google Scholar
  28. McAuliffe JR (2003) The atmosphere–biosphere interface: the importance of soils in arid and semi-arid environments. In: Weltzin JF, McPherson GR (eds) Changing precipitation regimes in terrestrial ecosystems: a North American perspective. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Ariz., pp 9–27Google Scholar
  29. Melgoza G, Nowak RS, Tausch RJ (1990) Soil water exploitation after fire: competition between Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) and two native species. Oecologia 83:7–13Google Scholar
  30. Meyers T (2001) A comparison of summertime water and CO2 fluxes over rangeland for well watered and drought conditions. Agric For Meteorol 106:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Monson RK, Turnipseed AA, Sparks JP, Harley PC, Scott-Denton LE, Sparks K, Huxman TE (2002) Carbon sequestration in a high-elevation subalpine forest. Global Change Biol 8:459–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (2000) Global change and invasive species: where do we go from here? In: Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island, Washington, pp 425–434 Google Scholar
  33. National Assessment Synthesis Team (2000) Climate change impacts on the United States: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. Overview. U.S. Global Change Research Program. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Naumburg E., Housman DC, Huxman TE, Charlet TN, Loik ME, Smith SD (2003) Photosynthetic responses of Mojave Desert shrubs to free air CO2 enrichment are greatest during wet years. Global Change Biol 9:276–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neilson RP (1995) A model for predicting continental-scale vegetation distribution and water balance. Ecol Appl 5:362–385Google Scholar
  36. Noy-Meir I (1973) Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Obrist D, Delucia EH, Arnone JA III (2003) Consequences of wildfire on ecosystem CO2 and water vapor fluxes in the Great Basin. Global Change Biol 9:563–574Google Scholar
  38. Parker KC (1995) Effects of complex geomorphic history on soil and vegetation patterns on arid alluvial fans. J Arid Environ 30:19–39Google Scholar
  39. Sala OE, Parton WJ, Joyce LA, Lauenroth WK (1988) Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 69:40–45Google Scholar
  40. Sala A, Smith SD, Devitt DA (1996) Water use by Tamariz ramosissima and associated phreatophytes in a Mojave Desert floodplain. Ecol Appll 6:888–898Google Scholar
  41. Saleska SR, Harte J, Torn MS (1999) The effect of experimental ecosystem warming on CO2 fluxes in a montane meadow. Global Change Biol 5:125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scott RL, Shuttleworth WJ, Keefer TO, Warrick AW (2000) Modeling multiyear observations of soil moisture recharge in the semiarid American Southwest. Water Resour Res 36:2233–2247Google Scholar
  43. Shreve F, Mallery RD (1933) The relationship of caliche to desert plants. Soil Sci 35:99–113Google Scholar
  44. Smith SD, Nobel PS (1986) Deserts. In: Baker NR, Long SP (eds) Photosynthesis in contrasting environments. Topics in photosynthesis, vol 7. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 13–62Google Scholar
  45. Smith SD, Herr CA, Leary KL, Piorkowski JM (1995) Soil-plant water relations in a Mojave Desert mixed shrub community: a comparison of three geomorphic surfaces. J Arid Environ 29:339–351Google Scholar
  46. Smith SD, Monson RK, Anderson JE (1997) Physiological ecology of North American desert plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Valentini R, Matteucci G, Dolman AJ, et al (2000) Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature 404:861–865CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wainwright J, Parsons AJ, Schlesinger WH, Abrahams AD (2002) Hydrology-vegetation interactions in areas of discontinuous flow on a semi-arid bajada, southern New Mexico. J Arid Environ 51:319–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walker LR, Smith SD (1997) Impacts of invasive plants on community and ecosystem properties. In: Luken JO, Thieret JW (eds) Assessment and management of plant invasions. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 69–86Google Scholar
  50. Weltzin JF, McPherson GR (2003) Changing precipitation and Terrestrial ecosystems: a North American perspective. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Ariz.Google Scholar
  51. Williams DG, Black RA (1994) Drought response of native and introduced Hawaiian grass. Oecologia 97:512–519Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Travis E. Huxman
    • 1
  • Jessica M. Cable
    • 1
  • Danielle D. Ignace
    • 1
  • J. Alex Eilts
    • 1
  • Nathan B. English
    • 2
  • Jake Weltzin
    • 3
  • David G. Williams
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.School of Renewable Natural ResourcesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  4. 4.Renewable Resources and BotanyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations