Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 137, Issue 3, pp 385–391 | Cite as

Does resource availability, resource heterogeneity or species turnover mediate changes in plant species richness in grazed grasslands?

  • C. BakkerEmail author
  • J. M. Blair
  • A. K. Knapp
Plant Animal Interactions

Abstract

Grazing by large ungulates often increases plant species richness in grasslands of moderate to high productivity. In a mesic North American grassland with and without the presence of bison (Bos bison), a native ungulate grazer, three non-exclusive hypotheses for increased plant species richness in grazed grasslands were evaluated: (1) bison grazing enhances levels of resource (light and N) availability, enabling species that depend on higher resource availability to co-occur; (2) spatial heterogeneity in resource availability is enhanced by bison, enabling coexistence of a greater number of plant species; (3) increased species turnover (i.e. increased species colonization and establishment) in grazed grassland is associated with enhanced plant species richness. We measured availability and spatial heterogeneity in light, water and N, and calculated species turnover from long-term data in grazed and ungrazed sites in a North American tallgrass prairie. Both regression and path analyses were performed to evaluate the potential of the three hypothesized mechanisms to explain observed patterns of plant species richness under field conditions. Experimental grazing by bison increased plant species richness by 25% over an 8-year period. Neither heterogeneity nor absolute levels of soil water or available N were related to patterns of species richness in grazed and ungrazed sites. However, high spatial heterogeneity in light and higher rates of species turnover were both strongly related to increases in plant species richness in grazed areas. This suggests that creation of a mosaic of patches with high and low biomass (the primary determinant of light availability in mesic grasslands) and promotion of a dynamic species pool are the most important mechanisms by which grazers affect species richness in high productivity grasslands.

Keywords

Grazing Species richness Heterogeneity Colonization Tallgrass prairie 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Jelte van Andel and Jan Bakker for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, Oscar van Dam for advice on geostatistical analyses and two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (the Konza Prairie LTER program) and by travel grants from Stichting Fundatie van de Vrijvrouwe van Renswoude te Delft and the Marco Polo fund of Groningen University to C. B.

References

  1. Afzal M, Adams WA (1992) Heterogeneity of soil mineral nitrogen in pasture grazed by cattle. Soil Sci Am J 56:1160–1165Google Scholar
  2. Bakker JP (1998) The impact of grazing on plant communities. In: Wallis de Vries MF, Bakker JP, Van Wieren S (eds) Grazing as a tool in conservation management. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 137–184Google Scholar
  3. Bakker JP, De Leeuw J, Van Wieren S (1984) Micro-patterns in grassland vegetation created and sustained by sheep-grazing. Vegetatio 55:153–161Google Scholar
  4. Blair JM (1997) Fire, N availability and plant response in grasslands: a test of the transient maxima hypothesis. Ecology 78:2359–2368Google Scholar
  5. Callahan JT (1984) Long-term ecological research. BioScience 34:363–367Google Scholar
  6. Collins B, Wein G (1998) Soil resource heterogeneity effects on early succession. Oikos 82:238–245Google Scholar
  7. Collins SL, Glenn SM (1991) Importance of spatial and temporal dynamics in species regional abundance and distribution. Ecology 72:654–664Google Scholar
  8. Collins SL Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Blair JM, Steinauer E (1998) Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tallgrass prairie. Science 280:745–747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cui M, Caldwell MM (1997) A large ephemeral release of nitrogen upon wetting of dry soil and corresponding root responses in the field. Plant Soil 191:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank DA, Groffman PM, Evans RD, Tracy B (2000) Ungulate stimulation of nitrogen cycling and retention in Yellowstone Park grasslands. Oecologia 123:116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grace JB, Pugesek BH (1998) On the use of path analysis and related procedures for the investigation of ecological problems. Am Nat 152:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Gross KL, Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ (1995) Spatial variation in nitrogen availability in three successional plant communities. J Ecol 83:357–367Google Scholar
  14. Hartnett DC, Fay PA (1998) Plant populations: patterns and processes. In: Knapp, AK, Briggs JM, Hartnett DC, Collins SL (eds) Grassland dynamics, long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 81–100Google Scholar
  15. Isaaks E, Shrivastava RM (1989) Applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson RB, Caldwell MM (1993) The scale of nutrient heterogeneity around individual plants and its quantification with geostatistics. Ecology 74:612–614Google Scholar
  17. Johnson LC, Matchett JR (2001) Fire and grazing regulate belowground processes in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 82:3377–3389Google Scholar
  18. Knapp AK, Seastedt TR (1998) Introduction: grasslands, Konza Prairie and long-term ecological research. In: Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Hartnett DC, Collins SL (eds) Grassland dynamics, long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  19. Knapp AK, Blair JM, Briggs JM, Collins SL, Hartnett DC, Johnson LC, Towne EG (1999) The keystone role of bison in North American tallgrass prairie. BioScience 49:39–50Google Scholar
  20. McNaughton SJ, Banyikwa FF, McNaughton MM (1997) Promotion of the cycling of diet-enhancing nutrients by African grazers. Science 278:1798–1800PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Milchunas DG, Sala OE, Lauenroth WK (1988) A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. Am Nat 132:87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC (1998) Livestock grazing: animal and plant biodiversity of shortgrass steppe and the relationship to ecosystem function. Oikos 83:65–74Google Scholar
  23. Miller RE, Verhoeff JM, Fowler NL (1995) Spatial heterogeneity in eight central Texas grasslands. J Ecol 83:919–928Google Scholar
  24. Olff H, Ritchie ME (1998) Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:261–265Google Scholar
  25. Oviatt CG (1998) Geomorphology of Konza prairie. In: Knapp, AK, Briggs JM, Hartnett DC, Collins SL (eds.) Grassland dynamics, long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie. Oxford University press, New York, pp 35–47Google Scholar
  26. Petraitis PS, Dunham AE, Niewiarowski PH (1996) Inferring multiple causality: the limitations of path analysis. Funct Ecol 10:421–431Google Scholar
  27. Proulx M, Mazumder A (1998) Reversal of grazing impact on plant species richness in nutrient-poor vs. nutrient-rich ecosystems. Ecology 79:2581–2592Google Scholar
  28. Robertson GP, Gross KL (1994) Assessing the heterogeneity of belowground resources: quantifying pattern and scale. In: Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW (eds) Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Rossi TE, Mulla DJ, Journel AG, Franz EH (1992) Geostatistical tools for modelling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecol Monogr 62:277–314Google Scholar
  30. Seastedt TR, Knapp AK (1993) Consequences of non-equilibrium resource availability across multiple time scales: the transient maxima hypothesis. Am Nat 141:621–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seastedt TR, Briggs JM, Gibson DJ (1991) Controls of nitrogen limitation in tallgrass prairie. Oecologia 87:72–79Google Scholar
  32. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, San Fransisco, Calif.Google Scholar
  33. Steinauer EM, Collins SL (1995) Effects of urine deposition on small-scale patch structure in prairie vegetation. Ecology 76:1195–1205Google Scholar
  34. Stevens MHH, Carson WP (2002) Resource quality, not resource heterogeneity, maintains plant diversity. Ecol Lett 5:420–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tilman D, Pacala S (1993) The maintenance of species richness in plant communities. In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (eds) Species diversity in Ecological communities, historical and geographical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Turner SJ, O'Neill RV, Conley W, Conley MR, Humphries HC (1994) Pattern and scale: statistics for landscape ecology. In: Turner MG, Gardner RH (eds) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Vinton MA, Hartnett DC, Finck EJ, Briggs JM (1993) Interactive effects of fire, Bison ( Bison bison), grazing and plant community composition in tallgrass prairie. Am Midl Nat 129:10–18Google Scholar
  38. Zar JH (1987) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Physiology of PlantsFree UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  3. 3.Community and Conservation EcologyUniversity of GroningenHarenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations