, Volume 136, Issue 4, pp 489–498 | Cite as

Community assembly: when should history matter?

  • Jonathan M. Chase


Community assembly provides a conceptual foundation for understanding the processes that determine which and how many species live in a particular locality. Evidence suggests that community assembly often leads to a single stable equilibrium, such that the conditions of the environment and interspecific interactions determine which species will exist there. In such cases, regions of local communities with similar environmental conditions should have similar community composition. Other evidence suggests that community assembly can lead to multiple stable equilibria. Thus, the resulting community depends on the assembly history, even when all species have access to the community. In these cases, a region of local communities with similar environmental conditions can be very dissimilar in their community composition. Both regional and local factors should determine the patterns by which communities assemble, and the resultant degree of similarity or dissimilarity among localities with similar environments. A single equilibrium in more likely to be realized in systems with small regional species pools, high rates of connectance, low productivity and high disturbance. Multiple stable equilibria are more likely in systems with large regional species pools, low rates of connectance, high productivity and low disturbance. I illustrate preliminary evidence for these predictions from an observational study of small pond communities, and show important effects on community similarity, as well as on local and regional species richness.


Beta-diversity Composition Multiple stable equilibria Ponds Regional and local richness 



This paper is based on a talk presented at the 'Metacommunities' symposium of the Ecology Society of America annual meeting organized by M. Holyoak and R. Holt. I thank C. Osenberg for encouraging me to write this article, M. Leibold, J. Shurin, and especially T. Knight for providing many important insights and comments on the ideas presented herein, and S. Diehl, C. Osenberg, and an anonymous reviewer for careful reviews that helped me to clarify a number of issues. Funding was provided by the University of California-Davis, the University of Pittsburgh, and the National Science Foundation (DEB 97–01120, 01–08118, 02–41080).


  1. Amarasekare P (1998) Interactions between local dynamics and dispersal: Insights from single species models. Theor Popul Biol 53:44–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amarasekare P (2000) The geometry of coexistence. Biol J Linn Soc 71:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amarasekare P, Nisbet R (2001) Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species. Am Nat 158:572–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belyea LR, Lancaster J (1999) Assembly rules within a contingent ecology. Oikos 86:402–416Google Scholar
  5. Booth BD, Larson DW (1999) Impact of language, history, and choice of system on the study of assembly rules. In Weiher E, Keddy PA (eds), Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 206–229Google Scholar
  6. Chase JM (1999) Food web effects of prey size-refugia: variable interactions and alternative stable equilibria. Am Nat 154:559–570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chase JM (2003a) Experimental evidence for alternative stable equilibria in a benthic fond food web. Ecology Letters 6:(in press)Google Scholar
  8. Chase JM (2003b) Strong and weak trophic cascades along a productivity gradient. Oikos 101:187–195Google Scholar
  9. Chase JM, Leibold MA (2002) Spatial scale dictates the productivity-diversity relationship. Nature 415:427–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chase JM, Leibold MA (2003). Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  11. Clements FE (1938) Nature and structure of the climax. J Ecol 24:252–282Google Scholar
  12. Clesceri LS., Greeberg AE, Eaton AD (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Cole BJ (1983) Assembly of mangrove ant communities: patterns of geographical distribution. J Anim Ecol 52:397–347Google Scholar
  14. Condit R, Pitman N, Leigh Jr EG, Chave J., Terborgh J, Foster RB, Núñez P, Aguilar S, Valencia R, Villa G, Muller-Landau HC, Losos E, Hubbell SP (2002) Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295:666–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310Google Scholar
  16. Connell JH, Sousa WP (1983) On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability of persistence. Am Nat 1212:789–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conrad KF, Willson, KH, Harvey IF, Thomas CJ, Sherratt, TN (1999) Dispersal characteristics of seven odonate species in an agricultural landscape. Ecography 22:524–531Google Scholar
  18. Currie DJ (1991) Energy and large-scale patterns of animal and plant species richness. Am Nat 137:27–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Currie DJ, Paquin V (1987) Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees. Nature 329:326–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 342–444Google Scholar
  21. Diehl S, Feissel M (2000) Effects of enrichment on three-level food chains with omnivory. Am Nat 155:200–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dodson SI, Arnott SE, Cottingham KL (2000) The relationship in lake communities between primary productivity and species richness. Ecology 81:2662–2679Google Scholar
  23. Drake JA (1991) Community assembly mechanics and the structure of an experimental species ensemble. Am Nat 137:1-26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Drake JA, Flum TE. Witteman GJ. Voskuil J, Hoylman AM, Creason C, Kenny DA, Huxel GR, Larue CS, Duncan JR (1993) The construction and assembly of an ecological landscape. J Anim Ecol 62:117–130Google Scholar
  25. Gilpin ME, Carpenter MP, Pomerantz, MJ (1986) The assembly of a laboratory community: multi-species competition in Drosophila. In: Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York, pp 23–40Google Scholar
  26. Gleason HA (1927) Further views on the succession concept. Ecology 8:299–326Google Scholar
  27. Grover JP, Lawton JH (1994) Experimental studies on community convergence and alternative stable states: comments on a paper by Drake et al. J Anim Ecol 63:484–487Google Scholar
  28. Hastings A, Gavrilets S (1999) Global dispersal reduces local diversity. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2067–2070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Holt RD, Grover J.,Tilman, D (1994) Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitation and apparent competition. Am Nat 144:741–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Inouye RS, Tilman, D (1995) Convergence and divergence of old-field vegetation after 11-year of Nitrogen addition. Ecology 76:1872–1887Google Scholar
  31. Jenkins DG, Buikema Jr. AL (1998) Do similar communities develop in similar sites? A test with zooplankton structure and function. Ecol Monogr 68:421–443Google Scholar
  32. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1995) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386Google Scholar
  33. Keddy PA (1999) Wetland restoration: the potential for assembly rules in the serivice of conservation. Wetlands 19:242–253Google Scholar
  34. Kinzig AP, Pacala S., Tilman D (eds). (2002) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  35. Kodric-Brown A, Brown, JH. (1993) Highly structured fish communities in Australian desert springs. Ecology 74:1847–1855Google Scholar
  36. Law R (1999) Theoretical aspects of community assembly. In: McGlade J (ed.) Advances in ecological theory: principles and applications. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 141–171Google Scholar
  37. Law R, Morton RD (1993) Alternative permanent states of ecological communities. Ecology 74:1347–1361Google Scholar
  38. Law R, Morton RD (1996) Permanence and the assembly of ecological communities. Ecology 77:762–775Google Scholar
  39. Lawler SP (1993) Direct and indirect effects in microcosm communities of protists. Oecologia 93:184–190Google Scholar
  40. Lockwood JL, Pimm SL (1999) When does restoration succeed? In: Weiher E, Keddy PA (eds) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 363–392Google Scholar
  41. Lockwood JL, Powell RD, Nott MP, Pimm SL (1997) Assembling ecological communities in time and space. Oikos 80:549–553Google Scholar
  42. Loreau M, Mouquet N (1999) Immigration and the maintenance of local species diversity. Am Nat 154:427–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Loreau M. et al. (2001) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294:804–808PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Luh HK, Pimm SL (1993) The assembly of ecological communities: a minimalist approach. J Anim Ecol 62:749–765Google Scholar
  45. Mackay RK, Currie DJ (2001) The diversity-disturbance relationship: is it generally strong and peaked? Ecology 82:3479–3492Google Scholar
  46. Maguire B (1963) The passive dispersal of small aquatic organisms and their colonization of isolated bodies of water. Ecol Monogr 33:61–185.Google Scholar
  47. McCune B, Allen TFH (1985) Will similar forests develop on similar sites? Can J Bot. 63:367–376Google Scholar
  48. Mitchell-Olds T, Shaw RG (1987) Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41:1149–1161Google Scholar
  49. Mitchley J, Grubb PJ (1986) Control of relative abundance of perennials in chalk grassland in southern England I. Constance of rank order and results of pot- and field-experiments on the role of interference. J Ecol 74:1139–1166Google Scholar
  50. Mittelbach GG, Steiner CF, Scheiner, SM. Gross KL, Reynolds HL Waide RB, Dodson SI, Gough L (2001) What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82:2381–2396Google Scholar
  51. Mouquet N, Loreau M (2002) Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am Nat 149:420–426Google Scholar
  52. Neill WE (1975) Experimental studies of microcrustacean competition, community composition and efficiency of resource utilization. Ecology 56:809–826Google Scholar
  53. Petraitis PS, Latham RE (1999) The importance of scale in testing the origins of alternative community states. Ecology 80:429–442Google Scholar
  54. Potts MD., Ashton PS, Kaufman LS, Plotkin JB (2002) Habitat patterns in tropical rainforests: a comparison of 105 plots in northwest Borneo. Ecology 83:2782–2797Google Scholar
  55. Quinn JF, Robinson GR (1987) The effects of experimental subdivision on flowering plant diversity in a California annual grassland. J Ecol 75:837–855Google Scholar
  56. Robinson JV, Dickerson JE (1987) Does invasion sequence affect community structure? Ecology 68:587–595Google Scholar
  57. Robinson JV, Edgemon MA (1988) An experimental evaluation of the effect of invasion history on community structure. Ecology 69:1410–1417Google Scholar
  58. Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  59. Samuels CL, Drake JA (1997) Divergent perspectives on community convergence. Trends Ecol Evol 12:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schneider DW (1997) Predation and food web structure along a habitat duration gradient. Oecologia 110:567–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sommer U (1991) Convergent succession of phytoplankton in microcosms with different inoculum species composition. Oecologia 87:171–179Google Scholar
  62. Sousa WP, Connell JH (1985) Further comments on the evidence for multiple stable points in natural communities. Am Nat 125:612–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tilman D (1994) Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2-16Google Scholar
  64. Tilman D, Kiesling R, Sterner R, Kilham S, Johnson FA (1986) Green, bluegreen and diatom algae: taxonomic differences in competitive ability for phosphorus, silicon, and nitrogen. Arch Hydrobiol 106:473–485Google Scholar
  65. Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K, Yli-Halla M (2003) Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of western Amazonian forests. Science 299:241–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Veech JA, Summerville KS, Crist TO, Gering JC (2002) The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent review of an old idea. Oikos 99:3-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weiher E, Keddy P (1995) The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos 73:323–335Google Scholar
  68. Weiher E, Keddy P (1999) Assembly rules as general constraints on community composition. In: Weiher E, Keddy P (eds) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 251–271Google Scholar
  69. Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:337–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and the measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251Google Scholar
  71. Williams DD (1996) Environmental constraints in temporary fresh waters and their consequences for the insect fauna. J North Am Benthol Soc 15:634–650Google Scholar
  72. Wilson JB, Steel ME, Dood BJ, Andreson I, Ullmann, Bannister P (2000) A test of community reassembly using the exotic communities of New Zealand roadsides in comparison to British roadsides. J Ecol 88:757–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Young TP, Chase JM, Huddleston RD (2001) Community succession and assembly: comparing, contrasting, and combining paradigms in the context of ecological restoration. Ecol Rest 19:5-18Google Scholar
  74. Yu DW, Wilson HB (2001) The competition-colonization trade-off is dead; Long live the competition-colonization trade-off. Am Nat 158:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations