, Volume 136, Issue 1, pp 107–114 | Cite as

Galactolipids rather than phlorotannins as herbivore deterrents in the brown seaweed Fucus vesiculosus

  • Michael S. Deal
  • Mark E. HayEmail author
  • Dean Wilson
  • William Fenical
Plant Animal Interactions


The first investigation of seaweed chemical defense against herbivores involved the brown seaweed Fucus vesiculosus and suggested defense via phlorotannins. The first demonstration of seaweed induction of secondary metabolites in response to herbivory also involved the genus Fucus and assumed a defensive function for phlorotannins. Many other investigations correlate herbivore feeding preference with changing levels of phlorotannins in this genus and others, but few directly test the effects of phlorotannins. No studies have assessed Fucus chemical defenses using bioassay-guided separation to investigate the complete complement of compounds deterring herbivores. We investigated the deterrence of F. vesiculosus chemical extracts using herbivore bioassays to guide our chemical investigations. Although crude extracts from F. vesiculosus strongly deterred feeding by the sea urchin Arbacia punctulata, phlorotannins from this extract did not deter feeding at 2× or 4× natural concentration by dry mass. Feeding deterrence was due to: (1) a polar galactolipid in the ethyl acetate-soluble extract, and (2) a non-phenolic compound, or compounds, in the water-soluble extract. Although this is the first evidence of galactolipids deterring herbivores, such defenses could be geographically and taxonomically widespread. The galactolipid we discovered in Fucus occurs in marine dinoflagellates, and a related metabolite that deters herbivory has recently been discovered in a tropical green seaweed. We were unable to identify the second deterrent compound, but deterrence occurred in a fraction containing carbohydrates, including sulfated sugars, but no phlorotannins. Given the polarity of these chemical deterrents, they could co-occur with and confound bioassays of phlorotannins if investigators test phlorotannin-containing algal extracts without further purification.


Arbacia punctulata Glycerolipids Plant-herbivore interactions Polyphenolics Seaweed chemical defenses 



This work was funded by NSF grants OCE 95–29784 (MEH) and CHE 98–07098 and CHE 01–11270 (WF); additional support was provided by a dissertation fellowship from the UNC-Chapel Hill graduate school to M. S. D. and by the Harry and Linda Teasley endowment to the Georgia Institute of Technology. Comments from Julia Kubanek, Peter Steinberg, and an anonymous reviewer improved the manuscript. Thanks to Phil Levin for providing Fucus from Maine.


  1. Appel HM, Govenor HI, D'Ascenzo M, Siska E, Schultz JC (2001) Limitations of Folin assays of foliar phenolics in ecological studies. J Chem Ecol 27:761–778PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boettcher AA, Targett NM (1993) Role of polyphenolic molecular size in reduction of assimilation efficiency in Xiphister mucosus. Ecology 74:891–903Google Scholar
  3. Bolser RC, Hay ME (1996) Are tropical plants better defended? Palatability and defenses of temperate vs. tropical seaweeds. Ecology 77:2269–2286Google Scholar
  4. Bryant JP, Chapin FS, Klein DR (1983) Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357–368Google Scholar
  5. Clausen TP, Provenza FD, Burritt EA, Reichardt PB, Bryant JP (1990) Ecological implications of condensed tannin structure: a case study. J Chem Ecol 16:2381–2392Google Scholar
  6. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899Google Scholar
  7. Cronin G, Hay ME (1996) Susceptibility to herbivores depends on recent history of both the plant and animal. Ecology 77:1531–1543Google Scholar
  8. Deal MS (1997) The causes and consequences of within-species variation in seaweed chemical defenses. PhD dissertation. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, N.C.Google Scholar
  9. Denton AB, Chapman ARO (1991) Feeding preferences of gammarid amphipods among four species of Fucus. Mar Biol 109:503–506Google Scholar
  10. Denton AB, Chapman ARO, Markham J (1990) Size-specific concentrations of phlorotannins (anti-herbivore compounds) in three species of Fucus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 65:103–104Google Scholar
  11. Duffy JE, Hay ME (1994) Herbivore resistance to seaweed chemical defense: the roles of herbivore mobility and predation risk. Ecology 75:1304–1319Google Scholar
  12. Duffy JE, Hay ME (2001) Ecology and evolution of marine consumer-prey interactions. In: Bertness M, Hay ME, Gaines SD (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass., pp 131–157Google Scholar
  13. Duffy JE, Paul VJ (1992) Prey nutritional quality and the effectiveness of chemical defenses against tropical reef fishes. Oecologia 90:333–339Google Scholar
  14. Feeny P (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. Recent Adv Phytochem 10:1–40Google Scholar
  15. Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) (1992) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  16. Geiselman JA, McConnell OJ (1981) Polyphenolics in brown algae Fucus vesiculosus and Ascophyllum nodosum: chemical defenses against the marine herbivorous snail Littorina littorea. J Chem Ecol 7:1115–1133Google Scholar
  17. Glombitza KW, Rosener HU, Koch M (1976) Polyhyudroxyoligophenyle und phenylather aus Bifurcaria bifurcata. Phytochemistry 15:1279–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hay ME, Fenical W (1988) Marine plant-herbivore interactions: the ecology of chemical defense. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:111–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hay ME, Lee RR, Guieb RA, Bennett MM (1986) Food preference and chemotaxis in the sea urchin Arbacia punctulata. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 96:147–153Google Scholar
  20. Hay ME, Duffy JE, Pfister CA, Fenical W (1987) Chemical defenses against different marine herbivores: are amphipods insect equivalents? Ecology 68:1567–1580Google Scholar
  21. Hay ME, Renaud PE, Fenical W (1988) Large mobile versus small sedentary herbivores and their resistance to seaweed chemical defenses. Oecologia 75:246–252Google Scholar
  22. Hay ME, Kappel QE, Fenical W (1994) Synergisms in plant defenses against herbivores: interactions of chemistry, calcification, and plant quality. Ecology 75:1714–1726Google Scholar
  23. Hay ME, Stachowicz JJ, Cruz-Rivera E, Bullard S, Deal MS, Lindquist N (1998) Bioassays with marine and freshwater macroorganisms. In: Haynes KF, Millar JG (eds) Methods in chemical ecology, vol 2 (bioassay methods). Kluwer, Norwell, Mass., pp 39–141Google Scholar
  24. Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q Rev Biol 67:283–335Google Scholar
  25. Kitagawa I, Hayashi K, Kobayashi M (1989) Heterosigma-glycolipids I and II, the new galactolipids containing octadecatetraenoyl and eicosapentaenoyl residues from a raphidophyte dinoflagellate Heterosigma sp. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 37:849–851Google Scholar
  26. Koch M, Glombitza KW, Eckhardt G (1980) Phlorotannins of Phaeophycea Laminaria ochroleuca. Phytochemistry 19:1821–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martinez EA (1996) Micropopulation differentiation in phenol content and susceptibility to herbivory in the Chilean kelp Lessonia nigrescens (Phaeophyta, Laminariales). Hydrobiologica 326/327:205–211Google Scholar
  28. McInnes AG, Ragan MA, Smith DG, Walter JA (1985) The high molecular weight polyphloroglucinols of the marine brown alga Fucus vesiculosus L. 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Can J Chem 63:304–313Google Scholar
  29. Metsui K, KurishitaS, Hisamitsu A, Kajiwars T (2000) A lipid-hydrolyzing activity involved in hexenal formation. Biochem Soc Trans 28:857–860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ohlsson LA (2000) Digestion and absorption of galactolipids. In: Christophe AB, De Vriese S (eds) Fat digestion and absorption. AOCS, Champaign, Ill., pp 287–297Google Scholar
  31. Paul VJ, Cruz-Rivera E, Thacker RW (2001) Chemical mediation of macroalgal-herbivore interactions: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. In: McClintock JB, Baker BJ (eds) Marine chemical ecology. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.,, pp 227–265,Google Scholar
  32. Pavia H, Toth GB (2000) Inducible chemical resistance to herbivory in the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum. Ecology 81:3212–3225Google Scholar
  33. Pavia H, Cervin G, Lindgren A, Aberg P (1997) Effects of UV-B radiation and simulated herbivory on phlorotannins in the brown alga Ascophyllum nodosum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 157:139–146Google Scholar
  34. Ragan MA (1985) The high molecular weight polyphloroglucinols of the marine brown alga Fucus vesiculosus L.: degradative analysis. Can J Chem 63:294–303Google Scholar
  35. Ragan MA, Craigie JS (1976) Physodes and the phenolic compounds of brown algae. Isolation and characterization of phloroglucinol polymers from Fucus vesiculosus (Linnaeus) Can J Biochem 54:66–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ragan MA, Glombitza KW (1986) Phlorotannins, brown algal polyphenols. Prog Phycol Res 4:129–241Google Scholar
  37. Rhoades D, Cates R (1976) Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:168–213Google Scholar
  38. Rice WR, Gaines SD (1994) "Heads I win, tails you lose": testing directional alternative hypotheses in ecological and evolutionary research. Trends Ecol Evol 9:235–237Google Scholar
  39. Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR (eds) (1992) Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.Google Scholar
  40. Sakata K (1989) Feeding attractants and stimulants for marine gastropods. Bioorg Mar Chem 3:115–127Google Scholar
  41. Sawai Y, Fujita Y, Sakata K, Tamashiro E (1994) 20-Hydroxy-4,8,13,17-tetramethyl-4,8,12,16-eicosatetraenoic acid, a new feeding deterrent against herbivorous gastropods, from the subtropical brown alga Turbinaria ornata. Fish Sci 60:199–201Google Scholar
  42. Schneider CW, Searles RB (1991) Seaweeds of the southeastern United States. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  43. Schoenwaelder MEA, Clayton MN (1999) The presence of phenolic compounds in isolated cell walls of brown algae. Phycologia 38:161–166Google Scholar
  44. Steinberg PD (1985) Feeding preferences of Tegula funebralis and chemical defenses of marine brown algae. Ecol Monogr 55:333–349Google Scholar
  45. Steinberg PD (1988) The effects of quantitative and qualitative variation in phenolic compounds on feeding in three species of marine invertebrate herbivores. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 120:221–237Google Scholar
  46. Steinberg PD (1992) Geographical variation in the interaction between marine herbivores and brown algal secondary metabolites. In: Paul VJ (ed) Ecological roles of marine natural products. Comstock Press, New York, pp 51–92Google Scholar
  47. Steinberg PD, van Altena I (1992) Tolerance of marine invertebrate herbivores to brown algal phlorotannins in temperate Australasia. Ecol Monogr 62:189–222Google Scholar
  48. Steinberg PD, Edyvane K, de Nys R, Birdsey R, van Altena IA (1991) Lack of avoidance of phenolic-rich brown algae by tropical herbivorous fishes. Mar Biol 109:335–343Google Scholar
  49. Steinberg PD, Estes JA, Winter FC (1995) Evolutiuonary consequences of food chain length in kelp forest communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:8145–8148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Strong DR, Lawton JH, Southwood R (1984) Insects on plants: community patterns and mechanisms. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  51. Targett NM, Arnold TM (1998) Predicting the effects of brown algal phlorotannins on marine herbivores in tropical and temperate oceans. J Phycol 34:195–205Google Scholar
  52. Targett NM, Boettcher AA, Targett TE, Vrolijk NH (1995) Tropical marine herbivore assimilation of phenolic-rich plants. Oecologia 103:170–179Google Scholar
  53. Van Alstyne KL (1988) Herbivore grazing increases polyphenolic defenses in the intertidal brown alga Fucus distichus. Ecology 69:655–663Google Scholar
  54. Van Alstyne KL, Paul VJ (1990) The biogeography of polyphenolic compounds in marine macroalgae: temperate brown algal defenses deter feeding by tropical herbivorous fishes. Oecologia 84:158–163Google Scholar
  55. Van Alstyne KL, Dethier MN, Duggins DO (2001) Spatial patterns in macroalgal chemical defenses. In: McClintock JB, Baker BJ (eds) Marine chemical ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 301–324Google Scholar
  56. Winter FC, Estes JA (1992) Experimental evidence for the effects of polyphenolic compounds from Dictyoneurum californicum Ruprecht (Phaeophyta: Laminariales) on feeding rate and growth in the red abalone Haliotus rufescens Swainson. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 155:263–277Google Scholar
  57. Yates JL, Peckol P (1993) Effects of nutrient availability and herbivory on polyphenolics in the seaweed Fucus vesiculosus. Ecology 74:1757–1766Google Scholar
  58. Zucker WV (1983) Tannins: does structure determine function? An ecological perspective. Am Nat 120:335–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael S. Deal
    • 1
    • 4
  • Mark E. Hay
    • 2
    Email author
  • Dean Wilson
    • 3
  • William Fenical
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Marine SciencesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillMorehead CityUSA
  2. 2.School of BiologyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California — San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  4. 4.BiopraxisSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations