Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 136, Issue 1, pp 96–106 | Cite as

Density-dependent shoot-borer herbivory increases the age of first reproduction and mortality of neotropical tree saplings

  • Jon J. Sullivan
Plant Animal Interactions

Abstract

Shoot herbivory by the sapling specialist shoot-borer Cromarcha stroudagnesia (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae, Chrysauginae) is shown to have large direct and indirect effects on the rates of height increment and mortality of saplings of its host tree, Tabebuia ochracea (Bignoniaceae), in the secondary successional tropical dry forests of the Area de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Experiments and field observations over 3–4 years show a substantial reduction in sapling height increments due to C. stroudagnesia herbivory, of equivalent magnitude to the difference in height increments between undamaged saplings in canopy gaps and full understorey shade. Extrapolating this data at average amounts of C. stroudagnesia herbivory increases the duration of the pre-reproductive sapling life stage by about 40% relative to undamaged plants. This is an underestimate, as top shoot herbivory by C. stroudagnesia also increased the probability of canopy gap saplings being overtopped and shaded by surrounding vegetation. Sapling mortality was increased by C. stroudagnesia herbivory, with 11.8% of the most heavily damaged young saplings dying in 3 years while no undamaged saplings died. Cromarcha stroudagnesia herbivory strongly increases with the number of conspecific T. ochracea saplings and the number of conspecific shoots within 50 m of focal saplings. It is therefore likely to disproportionately decrease the number of saplings and rate of recruitment to reproductive age in areas of high conspecific sapling density. These results suggest that sapling herbivory, especially herbivory of terminal meristems, has an important but largely unexplored influence on the population dynamics of tropical tree species. They further demonstrate that sapling herbivory by insects, in addition to the well-studied insect predation and herbivory of seedlings, is likely to influence tree species coexistence in tropical forests.

Keywords

Janzen-Connell effect Neotropical dry forest Plant-insect herbivore interaction Tree fall gaps 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dan Janzen and Winnie Hallwachs assisted with all aspects of this study. Alex Peréz made invaluable contributions to all field work. The field work was also assisted by H. Eras Arayo, C. Camargo, E. Cantillano, G. Cantillano, F. Chavarría, B. Enquist, C. Finance-Enquist, O. Espínoza, R. Espínoza, R. Franco, A. Guadamuz, A. Masis, L. Molles, R. Moraga, G. Pereira, M. Pereira, D. Pérez, H. Ramirez, L. Rios, L. Rose, G. Sihezar, B., D., and P. Sullivan, and T. Wright. Improvements to the experimental designs and comments on early drafts were made by B. Casper, A. Dunham, J. Castelli, C. Hawkes, R. Latham, J. Klemens, P. Petraitis, P. Sniegowski, and anonymous reviewers. This study was supported in part by a United States—New Zealand Fulbright graduate fellowship, a Sigma Xi Grant-in-aid-of-Research, the facilities of the ACG, a University of Pennsylvania Dean's Fellowship (D.H. Janzen, P.I.), and NSF DEB-9705072 (D.H. Janzen, P.I.).

References

  1. Augspurger CK (1983) Seed dispersal of the tropical tree, Platypodium elegans, and the escape of its seedlings from fungal pathogens. J Ecol 71:759–771Google Scholar
  2. Barone JA (1996) Herbivory and tropical tree diversity, a test of the Janzen-Connell model. PhD dissertation, The University of Utah, UtahGoogle Scholar
  3. Basset Y, Aberlenc HP, Barrios H, Curletti G, Berenger JM, Vesco JP, Causse P, Haug A, Hennion AS, Lesobre L, Marques F, O'Meara R (2001) Stratification and diel activity of arthropods in a lowland rainforest in Gabon. Biol J Linn Soc 72:585-607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker P, Lee LL, Rothman ED, Hamilton WD (1985) Seed predation and the coexistence of tree species: Hubbell's models revisited. Oikos 44:382–390Google Scholar
  5. Bernays EA, Chapman, RF (1994) Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Blundell AG, Peart DR (1998) Distance-dependence in herbivory and foliar condition for juvenile Shorea trees in Bornean dipterocarp rain forest. Oecologia 117:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borchert R, Tomlinson PB (1984) Architecture and crown geometry in Tabebuia rosea (Bignoniaceae). Am J Bot 71:958–969Google Scholar
  8. Browne FG (1968) Pests and diseases of forest plantation trees. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Burkey TV (1994) Tropical tree species diversity: a test of the Janzen-Connell model. Oecologia 97:533–540Google Scholar
  10. Charlesworth B (1980) Evolution in age-structured populations. Cambridge studies in mathematical biology 1. University of Cambridge, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark DA, Clark DB (1984) Spacing dynamics of a tropical rain forest tree: evaluation of the Janzen-Connell model. Am Nat 124:769–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark DB, Clark DA (1985) Seedling dynamics of a tropical tree, impacts of herbivory and meristem damage. Ecology 66:1884–1892Google Scholar
  13. Clark DB, Clark DA (1991) The impact of physical damage on canopy tree regeneration in tropical rain forest. J Ecol 79:447–457Google Scholar
  14. Clark JS, Beckage B, Camill P, Cleveland B, HilleRisLambers J, Lighter J, McLachlan J, Mohan J Wyckoff P (1999) Interpreting recruitment limitation in forests. Am J Bot 86:1–16Google Scholar
  15. Coley PD, Barone JA (1996) Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:305–335Google Scholar
  16. Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB (1992) Recruitment near conspecific adults and the maintenance of tree and shrub diversity in a neotropical forest. Am Nat 140:261–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Connell JH (1971) On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and rain forest trees. In: den Boer BJ, Gradwell GR (eds) Dynamics of populations. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 298–310Google Scholar
  18. Crawley MJ (1997) Plant-herbivore dynamics. In: Crawley MJ (ed) Plant ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 401–474Google Scholar
  19. De Groot P, Schnekenburger F (1999) Variation in damage by terminal shoot insects among jack pine families. For Ecol Manage 12:251–255Google Scholar
  20. Denslow JS (1980) Notes on the seedling ecology of a large-seeded species of Bombacaceae. Biotropica 12:220–222Google Scholar
  21. De Steven D (1994) Tropical tree seedling dynamics: recruitment patterns and their population consequences for three canopy species in Panama. J Trop Ecol 10:369–383Google Scholar
  22. Edwards PJ, Gillman MP (1987) Herbivores and plant succession. In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Edwards PJ (eds) Colonization, succession and stability. The 26th Symposium of the British Ecological Society held jointly with the Linnean Society of London. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 295–314Google Scholar
  23. Emlen JM (1984) Population biology—the coevolution of population dynamics and behavior. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Enquist BJ, West G, Charnov EL, Brown J (1999) Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants. Nature 410:907–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gentry AH (1983) Tabebuia ochracea ssp. neochrysantha (Guayacán, Corteza, Cortes, Corteza Amarilla). In: Janzen DJ (ed) Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 335–336Google Scholar
  26. Gentry AH (1992) Flora Neotropica, Bignoniaceae-Part II (Tribe Tecomeae). Flora Neotropica Monograph Number 25 (II). The New York Botanical Garden, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilbert GS, Hubbell SP, Foster RB (1994) Density and distance-to-adult effects of a canker disease of trees in a moist tropical forest. Oecologia 98:100–108Google Scholar
  28. Gray B (1972) Economic tropical forest entomology. Annu Rev Entomol 17:313–354Google Scholar
  29. Harms KE, Wright SJ, Calderon O, Hernandez A, Herre EA (2000) Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest. Nature 404:493–495CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hubbell SP (1980) Seed predation and the coexistence of tree species in tropical forests. Oikos 35:214–229Google Scholar
  31. Hubbell SP (1998) The maintenance of diversity in a neotropical tree community: conceptual issues, current evidence, and challenges ahead. In: Dallmeier F, Comiskey JA (eds) Forest biodiversity research, monitoring and modelling—conceptual background and Old World case studies. Man and the biosphere series, vol 20. Parthenon, New York, pp 17–44Google Scholar
  32. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Monographs in population biology 32. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Hubbell SP, Condit R, Foster RB (1990) Presence and absence of density dependence in a neotropical tree community. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 330:269–281Google Scholar
  34. Hubbell SP, Foster RB, O'Brien ST, Harms KE, Condit R, Wechsler B, Wright SJ, Loo de Lao S (1999) Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest. Science 283:554–557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hubbell SP, Ahumada JA, Condit R, Foster RB (2001) Local neighborhood effects on long-term survival of individual trees in a neotropical forest. Ecol Res 16:859–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature, 4th edn. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Janzen DH (1967) Interaction of the bull's-horn acacia (Acacia cornigera L.) with an ant inhabitant (Pseudomyrmex ferruginea F. Smith) in Eastern Mexico. Univ Kansas Sci Bull 157:315–558Google Scholar
  38. Janzen DH (1970) Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am Nat 104:501–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Janzen DH (1971) Escape of juvenile Dioclea megacarpa (Leguminosae) vines from predators in a deciduous tropical forest. Am Nat 105:97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Janzen DH (1982) Wild plant acceptability to a captive Costa Rican Baird's tapir. Brenesia 19/20:99–128Google Scholar
  41. Janzen DH (1983) Food webs: who eats what, why, how, and with what effects in a tropical forest? In: Golley FB (ed) Tropical rain forest ecosystems. A. Structure and function. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 167–182Google Scholar
  42. Janzen DH (1986) Mice, big mammals, and seeds: it matters who defecates what where. In: Estrada A, Fleming TH (eds) Frugivores and seed dispersal. Junk, Dordrecht, pp 251–271Google Scholar
  43. Janzen DH (1988a) Ecological characterization of a Costa Rican dry forest caterpillar fauna. Biotropica 20:120–135Google Scholar
  44. Janzen DH (1988b) Guanacaste National Park: Tropical ecological and biocultural restoration. In: Cairns J Jr (ed) Rehabilitating damaged ecosystems, vol II. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 143–192Google Scholar
  45. Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2002) Janzen and Hallwachs caterpillar rearing database. http://janzen.sas.upenn.edu/index.html. Cited 26 April 2002Google Scholar
  46. John R, Dattaraja HS, Suresh HS, Sukumar R (2002) Density-dependence in common tree species in a tropical dry forest in Mudumalai, southern India. J Veg Sci 13:45–56Google Scholar
  47. Kimmins JP (1997) Forest ecology—a foundation for sustainable management, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  48. Kulman HM (1971) Effects of insect defoliation on growth and mortality of trees. Annu Rev Entomol 16:289–324Google Scholar
  49. Marquis RJ (1992) Selective impact of herbivores. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. Ecology, evolution, and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 301–325Google Scholar
  50. Marquis RJ, Alexander HM (1992) Evolution of resistance and virulence in plant-herbivore and plant-pathogen interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 7:126–129Google Scholar
  51. Marquis RJ, Braker E (1994) Plant-herbivore interactions, diversity, specificity, and impact. In: McDade LA, Bawa KS, Hespenheide HA, Hartshorn GS (eds) La Selva. Ecology and natural history of a neotropical rainforest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 261–281Google Scholar
  52. Menalled FD, Kelty MJ, Ewel JJ (1998) Canopy development in tropical tree plantations: a comparison of species mixtures and monocultures. For Ecol Manage 104:249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mo J, Tanton MT, Bygrave FL (1997a) Temporal and inter-tree variations of attack by Hypsipyla robusta Moore (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Australian Red Cedar [Toona australis (F Muell) Harmes]. For Ecol Manage 96:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mo J, Tanton MT, Bygrave FL (1997b) Within-tree distribution of attack by Hypsipyla robusta Moore (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Australian red cedar (Toona australis (F Muell) Harmes). For Ecol Manage 96:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Muller-Landau HC, Dalling JW, Harms KE, Wright SJ, Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB (2003) Seed dispersal and density-dependent seed and seedling survival in Trichilia tuberculata and Miconia argentea. In: Losos EC, Condit R, LaFrankie JV, Leigh EG (eds) Tropical forest diversity and dynamism: findings from a network of large-scale tropical forest plots. Chicago University Press, Chicago (in press)Google Scholar
  56. Nakashizuka T (2001) Species coexistence in temperate, mixed deciduous forests. Trends Ecol Evol 16:205–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Newton AC, Baker P, Ramnarine S, Mesen JF, Leakey RRB (1993) The mahogany shoot-borer—prospects for control. For Ecol Manage 57:301–328Google Scholar
  58. Newton AC, Cornelius JP, Mesen JF, Corea EA, Watt AD (1998) Variation in attack by the mahogany shoot-borer, Hypsipyla grandella (Lepidoptera : Pyralidae), in relation to host growth and phenology. Bull Entomol Res 88:319–326Google Scholar
  59. Packer A, Clay K (2000) Soil pathogens and spatial patterns of seedling mortality in a temperate tree. Nature 404:278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Price PW (1991) The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62:244–251Google Scholar
  61. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Solis MA, Sullivan JJ, Janzen DH (2003) Cromarcha stroudagnesia, a new species of Chrysauginae (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) boring in Tabebuia ochracea (Bignoniaceae) shoots in a Costa Rica dry forest. Trop Lepid 11:33–39Google Scholar
  63. Solomon JD (1995) Guide to insect borers in North American broadleaf trees and shrubs. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Agriculture handbook AH-706, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  64. Speight MR (1997) Forest pests in the tropics: current status and future threats. In: Watt AD, Stork NE, Hunter MD (eds) Forests and insects. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 207–227Google Scholar
  65. Sullivan JJ (2000) How a sapling specialist shoot-borer, Cromarcha stroudagnesia (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae, Chrysauginae), alters the population dynamics of the Costa Rican dry forest tree Tabebuia ochracea (Bignoniaceae). PhD dissertation, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  66. Swaine MD (ed) (1996) The ecology of tropical forest tree seedlings. Man and the biosphere, vol 17. UNESCO (Paris) and Pathernon, UKGoogle Scholar
  67. Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitmore TC (1996) A review of some aspects of tropical rain forest seedling ecology with suggestions for further enquiry. In: Swaine MD (ed) The ecology of tropical forest tree seedlings. Man and the biosphere, vol 17. UNESCO (Paris) and Pathernon, UK, pp 3–39Google Scholar
  69. Wills C, Condit R, Foster RB, Hubbell SP (1997) Strong density- and diversity-related effects help to maintain tree species diversity in a neotropical forest. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:1252–1257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Wright SJ (2002) Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia 130:1–14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Soil, Plant and Ecological Sciences DivisionLincoln UniversityLincolnNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations