Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 134, Issue 3, pp 332–342 | Cite as

Mechanisms promoting higher growth rate in arctic than in temperate shorebirds

  • Hans Schekkerman
  • Ingrid Tulp
  • Theunis Piersma
  • G. Henk Visser
Ecophysiology

Abstract

We compared prefledging growth, energy expenditure, and time budgets in the arctic-breeding red knot (Calidris canutus) to those in temperate shorebirds, to investigate how arctic chicks achieve a high growth rate despite energetic difficulties associated with precocial development in a cold climate. Growth rate of knot chicks was very high compared to other, mainly temperate, shorebirds of their size, but strongly correlated with weather-induced and seasonal variation in availability of invertebrate prey. Red knot chicks sought less parental brooding and foraged more at the same mass and temperature than chicks of three temperate shorebird species studied in The Netherlands. Fast growth and high muscular activity in the cold tundra environment led to high energy expenditure, as measured using doubly labelled water: total metabolised energy over the 18-day prefledging period was 89% above an allometric prediction, and among the highest values reported for birds. A comparative simulation model based on our observations and data for temperate shorebird chicks showed that several factors combine to enable red knots to meet these high energy requirements: (1) the greater cold-hardiness of red knot chicks increases time available for foraging; (2) their fast growth further shortens the period in which chicks depend on brooding; and (3) the 24-h daylight increases potential foraging time, though knots apparently did not make full use of this. These mechanisms buffer the loss of foraging time due to increased need for brooding at arctic temperatures, but not enough to satisfy the high energy requirements without invoking (4) a higher foraging intake rate as an explanation. Since surface-active arthropods were not more abundant in our arctic study site than in a temperate grassland, this may be due to easier detection or capture of prey in the tundra. The model also suggested that the cold-hardiness of red knot chicks is critical in allowing them sufficient feeding time during the first week of life. Chicks hatched just after the peak of prey abundance in mid-July, but their food requirements were maximal at older ages, when arthropods were already declining. Snow cover early in the season prevented a better temporal match between chick energy requirements and food availability, and this may enforce selection for rapid growth.

Keywords

Calidris canutus Energy expenditure Precocial chicks Time budget Tundra arthropods 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Petra de Goeij, Jan van de Kam and Joop Jukema provided indispensable help during fieldwork, with further assistance from Hans Dekkers and Valeri Bozun. Berthe Verstappen (CIO) skilfully performed the isotope analyses. The project was financed by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), Stichting Plancius, Lund University, and c. 80 individual private benefactors. Logistic help was provided by the Institute of Evolutionary Morphology and Animal Ecology, Russian Academy of Sciences, staff of the Great Arctic Reserve, and by Gerard Boere, Bernard Spaans, Bart Ebbinge and Gerard Müskens. The manuscript benefited from comments by Bruno Ens, Rudi Drent, Arie Spaans, and Eric Stienen. This is NIOZ-publication 3599.

References

  1. Amlaner CJ, Ball NJ (1983) A synthesis of sleep in wild birds. Behaviour 87:85–119Google Scholar
  2. Andreev AV (1999) Energetics and survival of birds in extreme environments. Ostrich 70:13–22Google Scholar
  3. Beintema AJ, Visser GH (1989a) The effect of weather on time budgets and development of chicks of meadow birds. Ardea 77:181–192Google Scholar
  4. Beintema AJ, Visser GH (1989b) Growth parameters of charadriiform chicks. Ardea 77:169–180Google Scholar
  5. Boertmann D, Meltofte H, Forchhammer M (1991) Population densities of birds in central northeast Greenland. Dan Ornithol Foren Tidsskr 85:151–160Google Scholar
  6. Brown M, Downs CT (2002) Development of homeothermy in hatchling crowned plovers Vanellus coronatus. J Therm Biol 27:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrk AS, Raudenbush SW (1992) Hierarchical linear models, application and data analysis. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  8. Byrkjedal, I (1980) Nest predation in relation to snow cover a possible factor influencing the start of breeding in shorebirds. Ornis Scand 11:249–252Google Scholar
  9. Carey C (1986) Avian reproduction in cold climates. Proc Int Ornithol Congr 19:2708–2715Google Scholar
  10. Chappell MA (1980) Thermal energetics of chicks of arctic-breeding shorebirds. Comp Biochem Physiol 65A:311–317Google Scholar
  11. Chernov YI (1985) The living tundra. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Fortin D, Gauthier G, Larochelle J (2000) Body temperature and resting behaviour of Greater Snow Goose goslings in the High Arctic. Condor 102:163–171Google Scholar
  13. Gabrielsen GW, Klaassen M, Mehlum F (1992) Energetics of Black-legged Kittwake chicks. Ardea 80:29–40Google Scholar
  14. Gessaman, Nagy KA (1988) Energy metabolism: errors in gas excange conversion factors. Physiol Zool 61:507–513Google Scholar
  15. Holmes RT (1966a) Feeding ecology of the Red-backed Sandpiper (Calidris alpina) in Arctic Alaska. Ecology 47:32–45Google Scholar
  16. Holmes RT (1966b) Breeding ecology and annual cycle adaptations of the red-backed sandpiper (Calidris alpina) in Northern Alaska. Condor 68:3–46Google Scholar
  17. Holmes RT (1972) Ecological factors influencing the breeding season schedule of Western Sandpipers (Calidris mauri) in subarctic Alaska. Am Midl Nat 87:472–491Google Scholar
  18. Hurd PD, Pitelka FA (1954) The role of insects in the economy of certain Arctic Alaskan birds. Proc 3rd Alaskan Sci Conf:136–137Google Scholar
  19. Institute of Education (1995) MLN. Institute of Education, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Karplus, M (1952) Bird activity in the continuous daylight of arctic summer. Ecology 33:129–134Google Scholar
  21. Kirkwood JK (1983) A limit to metabolisable energy intake in mammals and birds. Comp Biochem Physiol 75A:1–3Google Scholar
  22. Klaassen M, Drent RH (1991) An analysis of hatchling resting metabolism: in search of ecological correlates that explain deviations from allometric relations. Condor 93:612–629Google Scholar
  23. Klaassen M, Bech C, Masman D, Slagsvold G (1989) Growth and energetics of Arctic Tern chicks (Sterna paradisaea). Auk 106:240–248Google Scholar
  24. Klaassen M, Zwaan B, Heslenfeld P, Lucas P, Luijckx B (1992) Growth rate associated changes in the energy requirements of tern chicks. Ardea 80:19–28Google Scholar
  25. Konarzewski M, Taylor JRE, Gabrielsen GW (1993) Chick energy requirements and adult energy expenditures of Dovekies (Alle alle). Auk 110:343–353Google Scholar
  26. Koskimies,J, Lahti L (1964) Cold-hardiness of the newly hatched young in relation to ecology and distribution of ten species of European ducks. Physiol Zool 65:803–814Google Scholar
  27. Kvist A, Lindström Å (2000) Maximum daily energy intake: it takes time to lift the metabolic ceiling. Physiol Biochem Zool 73:30–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lack D (1954) The natural regulation of animal numbers. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Lepage D, Gauthier G, Reed A. (1998) Seasonal variation in growth of Greater Snow goose goslings: the role of food supply. Oecologia 114:226–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lifson N, McClintock R (1966) Theory of use of the turnover rates of body water for measuring energy and material balance. J Theor Biol 12:46–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. MacLean SF, Pitelka FA (1971) Seasonal patterns of abundance of tundra arthropods near Barrow. Arctic 24:19–40Google Scholar
  33. Madsen J, Bregneballe T, Frikke J, Kristensen J-B (1998) Correlates of predator abundance with snow and ice conditions and their role in determining timing of nesting and breeding success in Svalbard Light-bellied Brent Geese Branta bernicla hrota. Nor Polarinst Skr 200:221–234Google Scholar
  34. Myhre K, Steen JB (1979) Body temperature and aspects of behavioural temperature regulation in some neonate subarctic and arctic birds. Ornis Scand 10:1–9Google Scholar
  35. Nettleship DN (1974) The breeding of the knot Calidris canutus at Hazen Camp, Ellesmere Island, N.W.T. Polarforschung 44:8–26Google Scholar
  36. Norton DW (1970) Thermal regimes of nests and bioenergetics of chick growth in the Dunlin (Calidris alpina) at Barrow, Alaska. MSc thesis, University of Alaska, FairbanksGoogle Scholar
  37. Norton DW (1973) Ecological energetics of calidridine sandpipers breeding in northern Alaska. PhD, thesis, University of Alaska, FairbanksGoogle Scholar
  38. Obst BS, Nagy KA (1993) Stomach oil and the energy budget of Wilson's Storm-petrel nestlings. Condor 95:792–805Google Scholar
  39. Piersma T (1997) Do global patterns of habitat use and migration strategies co-evolve with relative investments in immunocompetence due to spatial variation in parasite pressure? Oikos 80:623–631Google Scholar
  40. Piersma T, Davidson NC (eds) (1992) The migration of knots. Wader Study Group Bull 64 [Suppl]:1–209Google Scholar
  41. Piersma T, van Gils J, Wiersma P (1996) Family Scolopacidae (sandpipers, snipes and phalaropes). In: del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Sargatal J (eds). Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 3. Lynx, Barcelona, pp 444–553Google Scholar
  42. Ricklefs RE (1983) Avian postnatal development. In Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds). Avian biology, vol VII. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–83Google Scholar
  43. Ricklefs RE (1984) The optimization of growth rate in altricial birds. Ecology 65:1602–1616Google Scholar
  44. Rogers LE, Buschbom LR, Watson CR (1977) Length-weight relationships for shrubsteppe invertebrates. Ann Entomol Soc Am 70:51–53Google Scholar
  45. Salomonsen F (1972) Zoogeographical and ecological problems in arctic birds. Proc Int Ornithol Congr 15:25–77Google Scholar
  46. Schekkerman H (1997) Grassland managements and growth opportunities for meadowbird chicks (in Dutch). IBN-report 292, Institute of Forestry and Nature Research, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  47. Schekkerman H, Visser GH (2001) Prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds: energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development. Auk 118:944–957Google Scholar
  48. Schekkerman H, Nehls G, Hötker H, Tomkovich PS, Kania W, Chylarecki P, Soloviev M, van Roomen M (1998a). Growth of Little Stint Calidris minuta chicks on the Taimyr Peninsula, Siberia. Bird Study 45:77–84Google Scholar
  49. Schekkerman H, van Roomen M, Underhill LG (1998b) Growth, behaviour of broods and weather-related variation in breeding productivity of Curlew Sandpipers Calidris ferruginea. Ardea 86:153–186Google Scholar
  50. Schoener TW, Schoener A (1978) Estimating and interpreting body mass growth in Anolis lizards. Copeia 1978:390–405Google Scholar
  51. Sedinger JS, Raveling DG (1986) Timing of nesting in Canada Geese in relation to the phenology and availability of their food plants. J Anim Ecol 55:1083–1102Google Scholar
  52. Speakman JR (1997) Doubly labelled water. Theory and practice. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  53. Steen JB, Grav H, Borch-Iohnsen B, Gabrielsen GW (1989) Strategies of homeothermy in Eider ducklings (Somateria mollissima). In: Bech C, Reinertsen W (eds) Physiology of cold adaptation in birds. NATO ASI Ser A, vol 173. Plenum Press, New York, pp 361–370Google Scholar
  54. Tomkovich PS, Soloviev MY (1996) Distribution, migration and biometrics of knots Calidris canutus canutus on Taimyr, Siberia. Ardea 84:85–98Google Scholar
  55. Troy D (1996) Population dynamics of breeding shorebirds in Arctic Alaska. Int Wader Stud 8:15–27Google Scholar
  56. Tulp I, Schekkerman H, Piersma T, Jukema J, de Goeij P, van de Kam J (1998) Breeding waders at Cape Sterlegova, northern Taimyr, in 1994. WIWO-report 61. Working Group International Wetland and Waterbird Research, Zeist, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  57. Visser GH (1998) Development of temperature regulation. In Starck JM, Ricklefs RE (eds). Avian growth and development. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 117–156Google Scholar
  58. Visser GH, Ricklefs RE (1993) Development of temperature regulation in shorebirds. Physiol Zool 66:771–792Google Scholar
  59. Visser GH, Ricklefs RE (1995) Relationship between body composition and homeothermy in neonates of precocial and semiprecocial birds. Auk 112:192–200Google Scholar
  60. Visser GH, Schekkerman H (1999) Validation of the doubly labelled water method in precocial birds: the importance of assumptions concerning evaporative water loss. Physiol Biochem Zool 72:740–749CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Walsberg GE, Weathers WW (1986) A simple technique for estimating operative environmental temperature. J Therm Biol 11:67–72Google Scholar
  62. Warnock N, Warnock SE (1993) Attachment of radio-transmitters to sandpipers: review and methods. Wader Study Group Bull 70:28–30Google Scholar
  63. Weathers WW (1992) Scaling nestling energy requirements. Ibis 134:142–153Google Scholar
  64. West GC, Norton DW (1975). Metabolic adaptations of tundra birds. In: Vernberg FJ (ed) Physiological adaptation to the environment. Intext, New York pp 301–329Google Scholar
  65. Wymenga E, Engelmoer E, Smit E, van Spanje TM (1992) Geographical origin and migration of waders wintering in West Africa. In: Altenburg W, Wymenga E, Zwarts L (eds.) Ornithological importance of the coastal wetlands of Guinea-Bissau. WIWO-report 26. Working Group International Wetland and Waterbird Research, Zeist, The Netherlands, pp 23–52Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Schekkerman
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Ingrid Tulp
    • 1
    • 2
  • Theunis Piersma
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
  • G. Henk Visser
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Alterra WageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Working Group International Waterbird and Wetland ResearchZeistThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Netherlands Institute for Sea Research Den BurgThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Centre for Isotope ResearchGroningenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary StudiesUniversity of Groningen HarenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations