Advertisement

Cell and Tissue Research

, Volume 375, Issue 1, pp 295–307 | Cite as

Neuropeptides as facilitators of domestication

  • Yury E. HerbeckEmail author
  • Rimma G. Gulevich
Review

Abstract

Animal domestication was an important stage in the human history, which coincided with or probably even promoted the advent of a turning point at which part of the humankind switched from hunting and gathering to husbandry. The leading factor in evolutionary changes at the dawn of domestication was probably selection for behavior towards humans: first natural (as the animals were habituating to a new ecological niche close to humans), then nonconscious, artificial. Selection was supposed to work on the systems that regulate behavior by reducing stress response and aggression and by inducing an emotionally positive response to humans. A possible role of the neuropeptides adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), oxytocin (ОТ), arginine vasopressin (AVP), and their receptors is in the reduction in stress response and in the shaping of domestic behavior. Effects of oxytocin on the behavior of domestic animals have been actively explored in the last 10 years, with special focus on the dog. The results obtained so far suggest that this neuropeptide is substantially important for human-canine interactions, together with sex, amount of aggression experienced, and other factors. The study of AVP demonstrated its importance in aggression in domestic animals. This work lends support to the hypothesis that a substantial factor in the shaping of domestic behavior and in the reduction in stress-response might be selection for an enhanced activity of the central OT system and a reduced activity of the central AVP system, which have effects on ACTH and social behavior.

Keywords

Oxytocin Arginine vasopressin Adrenocorticotropic hormone Domesticated animals Behavior 

Notes

Funding information

This study was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (grant no. 16-14-10216) in the part concerning domestic animals, human, and primates (YuH) and by a state task for IC&G SB RAS (project no. 0324-2018-0016) in the part concerning rodents (RG).

References

  1. Albers HE (2012) The regulation of social recognition, social communication and aggression: vasopressin in the social behavior neural network. Horm Behav 61:283–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.10.007 Google Scholar
  2. Albers HE, Bamshad M (1999) Role of vasopressin and oxytocin in the control of social behavior in Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Prog Brain Res 119:395–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(08)61583-6 Google Scholar
  3. Arahori M, Hori Y, Saito A, Chijiiwa H, Takagi S, Ito Y, Watanabe A, Inoue-Murayama M, Fujita K (2016) The oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) polymorphism in cats (Felis catus) is associated with “Roughness” assessed by owners. J Vet Behav 11:109–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2015.07.039
  4. Arakawa H, Blanchard DC, Blanchard RJ (2015) Central oxytocin regulates social familiarity and scent marking behavior that involves amicable odor signals between male mice. Physiol Behav 146:36–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.04.016 Google Scholar
  5. Axelsson E, Ratnakumar A, Arendt M-L, Maqbool K, Webster MT, Perloski M, Liberg O, Arnemo JM, Hedhammar Å, Lindblad-Toh K (2013) The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature 495(7441):360–364.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11837 Google Scholar
  6. Banlaki Z, Cimarelli G, Viranyi Z, Kubinyi E, Sasvari-Szekely M, Ronai Z (2017) DNA methylation patterns of behavior-related gene promoter regions dissect the gray wolf from domestic dog breeds. Mol Gen Genomics 292:685–697.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-017-1305-5 Google Scholar
  7. Bartz JA, Zaki J, Bolger N, Ochsner KN (2011) Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter. Trends Cogn Sci 15:301–309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.002 Google Scholar
  8. Belyaev DK (1979) The Wilhelmine E. key 1978 invitational lecture. Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. J Hered 70:301–308Google Scholar
  9. Bence M, Marx P, Szantai E, Kubinyi E, Rónai Z, Bánlaki Z (2017) Lessons from the canine Oxtr gene: populations, variants and functional aspects. Genes Brain Behav 16:427–438.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12356 Google Scholar
  10. Bradshaw JWS, Paul ES (2010) Could empathy for animals have been an adaptation in the evolution of Homo? Anim Welf 19:107–112Google Scholar
  11. Bradshaw JW, Rooney N (2017) Dog social behavior and communication. In: The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behavior and Interactions with People. Cambridge University Press Cambridge (UK), pp 133–159Google Scholar
  12. Bradshaw JWS, Blackwell EJ, Casey RA (2009) Dominance in domestic dogs—useful construct or bad habit? J Vet Behav 4:135–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2008.08.004 Google Scholar
  13. Cafazzo S, Natoli E, Valsecchi P (2012) Scent-marking behaviour in a pack of free-ranging domestic dogs. Ethology 118:955–966.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2012.02088.x Google Scholar
  14. Cagan A, Blass T (2016) Identification of genomic variants putatively targeted by selection during dog domestication. BMC Evol Biol 16:10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0579-7 Google Scholar
  15. Calcagnoli F, Meyer N, de Boer SF, Althaus M, Koolhaas JM (2014) Chronic enhancement of brain oxytocin levels causes enduring anti-aggressive and pro-social explorative behavioral effects in male rats. Horm Behav 65:427–433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.03.008 Google Scholar
  16. Caldwell HK, Albers HE (2004) Effect of photoperiod on vasopressin-induced aggression in Syrian hamsters. Horm Behav 46:444–449.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.04.006 Google Scholar
  17. Camerlink I, Reimert I, Bolhuis JE (2016) Intranasal oxytocin administration in relationship to social behaviour in domestic pigs. Physiol Behav 163:51–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.054 Google Scholar
  18. Cimarelli G, Virányi Z, Turcsán B, Rónai Z, Sasvári-Székely M, Bánlaki Z (2017) Social behavior of pet dogs is associated with peripheral OXTR methylation. Front Psychol 8:549.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00549 Google Scholar
  19. Cooper MA, Karom M, Huhman KL, Elliott Albers H (2005) Repeated agonistic encounters in hamsters modulate AVP V1a receptor binding. Horm Behav 48:545–551.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.04.012 Google Scholar
  20. Coppinger R, Coppinger L (2002) Dogs: a new understanding of canine origin, behavior and evolution. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Darwin C (1868) The variation of animals and plants under domestication. O. JuddGoogle Scholar
  22. Darwin C (1872) The expression of the emotions in man and animals, First edn. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. de Boer SF, Vegt BJ, van der Koolhaas JM (2003) Individual variation in aggression of feral rodent strains: a standard for the genetics of aggression and violence? Behav Genet 33:485–501.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025766415159 Google Scholar
  24. de Dreu CKW, Greer LL, Kleef GAV, Shalvi S, Handgraaf MJ (2011) Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. PNAS 108:1262–1266.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015316108 Google Scholar
  25. de Jong TR, Beiderbeck DI, Neumann ID (2014) Measuring virgin female aggression in the female intruder test (FIT): effects of oxytocin, estrous cycle, and anxiety. PLoS One 9:e91701.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091701 Google Scholar
  26. de Jong TR, Neumann ID (2017) Oxytocin and aggression. In: Behavioral pharmacology of neuropeptides: oxytocin. Springer, Cham, pp 175–192Google Scholar
  27. D’eath RB, Ormandy E, Lawrence AB, Sumner BE, Meddle SL (2005) Resident–intruder trait aggression is associated with differences in lysine vasopressin and serotonin receptor 1A (5-HT1A) mRNA expression in the brain of pre-pubertal female domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). J Neuroendocrinol 17:679–686Google Scholar
  28. Decety J, Bartal IB-A, Uzefovsky F, Knafo-Noam A (2016) Empathy as a driver of prosocial behaviour: highly conserved neurobehavioural mechanisms across species. Philos Trans R Soc B 371:20150077.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0077 Google Scholar
  29. Delville Y, Mansour KM, Ferris CF (1996) Testosterone facilitates aggression by modulating vasopressin receptors in the hypothalamus. Physiol Behav 60:25–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(95)02246-5 Google Scholar
  30. Ericsson M, Jensen P (2016) Domestication and ontogeny effects on the stress response in young chickens (Gallus gallus). Sci Rep 6:35818.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35818 Google Scholar
  31. Fam BSO, Paré P, Felkl AB, Vargas-Pinilla P, Paixão-Côrtes VR, Viscardi LH, Bortolini MC (2018) Oxytocin and arginine vasopressin systems in the domestication process. Genet Mol Biol 41:235–242.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2017-0069 Google Scholar
  32. Fiset S, Plourde V (2015) Commentary: oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Front Psychol 6:1845.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01845 Google Scholar
  33. Flinn MV (2006) Evolution and ontogeny of stress response to social challenges in the human child. Dev Rev 26:138–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.02.003 Google Scholar
  34. Freedman AH, Gronau I, Schweizer RM, Ortega-Del Vecchyo D, Han E, Silva PM, Galaverni M, Fan Z, Marx P, Lorente-Galdos B, Beale H (2014) Genome sequencing highlights the dynamic early history of dogs. PLoS Genet 10:e1004016.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004016 Google Scholar
  35. Freedman AH, Lohmueller KE, Wayne RK (2016) Evolutionary history, selective sweeps, and deleterious variation in the dog. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 47(1):73–96.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032155 Google Scholar
  36. Gibbs DM, Vale W, Rivier J, Yen SSC (1984) Oxytocin potentiates the ACTH-releasing activity of CRF(41) but not vasopressin. Life Sci 34:2245–2249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(84)90212-1 Google Scholar
  37. Grinevich V, Desarménien MG, Chini B, Tauber M, Muscatelli F (2015) Ontogenesis of oxytocin pathways in the mammalian brain: late maturation and psychosocial disorders. Front Neuroanat 8:164.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2014.00164 Google Scholar
  38. Grinevich V, Knobloch-Bollmann HS, Eliava M, Busnelli M, Chini B (2016) Assembling the puzzle: pathways of oxytocin signaling in the brain. Biol Psychiatry 79:155–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.04.013 Google Scholar
  39. Guagnin M, Perri AR, Petraglia MD (2018) Pre-Neolithic evidence for dog-assisted hunting strategies in Arabia. J Anthropol Archaeol 49:225–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2017.10.003 Google Scholar
  40. Gulevich RG, Oskina IN, Shikhevich SG, Fedorova EV, Trut LN (2004) Effect of selection for behavior on pituitary-adrenal axis and proopiomelanocortin gene expression in silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Physiol Behav 82:513–518.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.062 Google Scholar
  41. Haase E (2000) Comparison of reproductive biological parameters in male wolves and domestic dogs. Z Säugetierkd 65:257–270Google Scholar
  42. Hale EB (1969) Domestication and the evolution of behavior. In: The bevavior of domestic animals. pp 22–42Google Scholar
  43. Handlin L, Hydbring-Sandberg E, Nilsson A, Ejdebäck M, Jansson A, Uvnäs-Moberg K (2011) Short-term interaction between dogs and their owners: effects on oxytocin, cortisol, insulin and heart rate—an exploratory study. Anthrozoös 24:301–315.  https://doi.org/10.2752/175303711X13045914865385 Google Scholar
  44. Handlin L, Nilsson A, Ejdebäck M, Uvnäs-Moberg K (2012) Associations between the psychological characteristics of the human–dog relationship and oxytocin and cortisol levels. Anthrozoös 25:215–228.  https://doi.org/10.2752/175303712X13316289505468 Google Scholar
  45. Hare B, Plyusnina I, Ignacio N, Schepina O, Stepika A, Wrangham R, Trut L (2005) Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Curr Biol 15:226–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.040 Google Scholar
  46. Hare B, Wobber V, Wrangham R (2012) The self-domestication hypothesis: evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression. Anim Behav 83:573–585.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.007 Google Scholar
  47. Hekman JP, Johnson JL, Edwards W, Vladimirova AV, Gulevich RG, Ford AL, Kharlamova AV, Herbeck Y, Acland GM, Raetzman LT, Trut LN (2018) Anterior pituitary transcriptome suggests differences in ACTH release in tame and aggressive foxes. G3 (Bethesda) 8:859–873.  https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.300508 Google Scholar
  48. Herbeck YE, Amelkina OA, Konoshenko MY, Shikhevich SG, Gulevich RG, Kozhemyakina RV, Plyusnina IZ, Oskina IN (2017a) Effects of neonatal handling on behavior and the stress response in rats selected for their reaction towards humans. Russ J Genet Appl Res 7:71–81.  https://doi.org/10.1134/s2079059717010051 Google Scholar
  49. Herbeck YE, Gulevich RG, Shepeleva DV, Grinevich VV (2017b) Oxytocin: coevolution of human and domesticated animals. Russ J Genet Appl Res 7:235–242.  https://doi.org/10.1134/s2079059717030042 Google Scholar
  50. Hernádi A, Kis A, Kanizsár O, Tóth K, Miklósi B, Topál J (2015) Intranasally administered oxytocin affects how dogs (Canis familiaris) react to the threatening approach of their owner and an unfamiliar experimenter. Behav Process 119:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.07.001 Google Scholar
  51. Horváth Z, Igyártó B-Z, Magyar A, Miklósi Á (2007) Three different coping styles in police dogs exposed to a short-term challenge. Horm Behav 52:621–630.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.08.001 Google Scholar
  52. Horváth Z, Dóka Á, Miklósi Á (2008) Affiliative and disciplinary behavior of human handlers during play with their dog affects cortisol concentrations in opposite directions. Horm Behav 54(1):107–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.02.002 Google Scholar
  53. Johnston AM, Turrin C, Watson L, Arre AM, Santos LR (2017) Uncovering the origins of dog–human eye contact: dingoes establish eye contact more than wolves, but less than dogs. Anim Behav 133:123–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.09.002 Google Scholar
  54. Jurek B, Neumann ID (2018) The oxytocin receptor: from intracellular signaling to behavior. Physiol Rev 98(3):1805–1908.  https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2017 Google Scholar
  55. Jurek B, Slattery DA, Hiraoka Y, Liu Y, Nishimori K, Aguilera G, Neumann ID, van den Burg EH (2015) Oxytocin regulates stress-induced Crf gene transcription through CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 3. J Neurosci 35:12248–12260.  https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1345-14.2015 Google Scholar
  56. Kekecs Z, Szollosi A, Palfi B, Szaszi B, Kovacs KJ, Dienes Z, Aczel B (2016) Commentary: oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Front Neurosci 10:155.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00155 Google Scholar
  57. Kis A, Bence M, Lakatos G, Pergel E, Turcsán B, Pluijmakers J, Vas J, Elek Z, Brúder I, Földi L, Sasvári-Székely M (2014) Oxytocin receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with human directed social behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris). PLoS One 9(1):e83993.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083993 Google Scholar
  58. Kis A, Hernádi A, Kanizsár O, Gácsi M, Topál J (2015) Oxytocin induces positive expectations about ambivalent stimuli (cognitive bias) in dogs. Horm Behav 69:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.12.004 Google Scholar
  59. Knobloch HS, Charlet A, Hoffmann LC, Eliava M, Khrulev S, Cetin AH, Cetin AH, Osten P, Schwarz MK, Seeburg PH, Stoop R, Grinevich V (2012) Evoked axonal oxytocin release in the central amygdala attenuates fear response. Neuron 73:553–566.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.030 Google Scholar
  60. Kovács K, Kis A, Kanizsár O, Hernádi A, Gácsi M, Topál J (2016a) The effect of oxytocin on biological motion perception in dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 19:513–522.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0951-4 Google Scholar
  61. Kovács K, Kis A, Pogány Á, Koller D, Topál J (2016b) Differential effects of oxytocin on social sensitivity in two distinct breeds of dogs (Canis familiaris). Psychoneuroendocrinology 74:212–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.09.010 Google Scholar
  62. Kovács K, Virányi Z, Kis A, Koller D, Topál J (2018) Dog-owner attachment is associated with oxytocin receptor gene polymorphisms in both parties. A comparative study on Austrian and Hungarian border collies. Front Psychol 9:435.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00435 Google Scholar
  63. Kubinyi E, Bence M, Koller D, Wan M, Pergel E, Ronai Z, Sasvari-Szekely M, Miklósi Á (2017) Oxytocin and opioid receptor gene polymorphisms associated with greeting behavior in dogs. Front Psychol 8:1520.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01520 Google Scholar
  64. Künzl C, Sachser N (1999) The behavioral endocrinology of domestication: a comparison between the domestic Guinea pig (Cavia aperea f. porcellus) and its wild ancestor, the cavy (Cavia aperea). Horm Behav 35:28–37.  https://doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.1998.1493 Google Scholar
  65. Lewandowski GW, Mattingly BA, Pedreiro A (2014) Under pressure: the effects of stress on positive and negative relationship behaviors. J Soc Psychol 154(5):463–473.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.933162 Google Scholar
  66. Liu Y, Curtis JT, Wang Z (2001) Vasopressin in the lateral septum regulates pair bond formation in male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Behav Neurosci 115:910–919.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.115.4.910 Google Scholar
  67. Løtvedt P, Fallahshahroudi A, Bektic L, Altimiras J, Jensen P (2017) Chicken domestication changes expression of stress-related genes in brain, pituitary and adrenals. Neurobiol Stress 7:113–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2017.08.002 Google Scholar
  68. MacLean EL, Gesquiere LR, Gruen ME, Sherman BL, Martin WL, Carter CS (2017) Endogenous oxytocin, vasopressin, and aggression in domestic dogs. Front Psychol 8:1613.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01613 Google Scholar
  69. Marsden CD, Vecchyo DO-D, O’Brien DP, Taylor JF, Ramirez O, Vilà C, Marques-Bonet T, Schnabel RD, Wayne RK, Lohmueller KE (2016) Bottlenecks and selective sweeps during domestication have increased deleterious genetic variation in dogs. PNAS 113:152–157.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512501113 Google Scholar
  70. Marshall-Pescini S, Virányi Z, Kubinyi E, Range F (2017) Motivational factors underlying problem solving: comparing wolf and dog puppies’ explorative and neophobic behaviors at 5, 6, and 8 weeks of age. Front Psychol 8:180.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00180 Google Scholar
  71. Meinlschmidt G, Heim C (2007) Sensitivity to intranasal oxytocin in adult men with early parental separation. Biol Psychiatry 61:1109–1111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.007 Google Scholar
  72. Mignon-Grasteau S, Boissy A, Bouix J, Faure J-M, Fisher AD, Hinch GN, Jensen P, Le Neindre P, Mormède P, Prunet P, Vandeputte M, Beaumont C (2005) Genetics of adaptation and domestication in livestock. Livest Prod Sci 93:3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.11.001 Google Scholar
  73. Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference. Wolves Do Not Look Back at Humans, but Dogs Do Curr Biol 13:763–766.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00263-x Google Scholar
  74. Mitsui S, Yamamoto M, Nagasawa M, Mogi K, Kikusui T, Ohtani N, Ohta M (2011) Urinary oxytocin as a noninvasive biomarker of positive emotion in dogs. Horm Behav 60:239–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.05.012 Google Scholar
  75. Mogi K, Ooyama R, Nagasawa M, Kikusui T (2014) Effects of neonatal oxytocin manipulation on development of social behaviors in mice. Physiol Behav 133:68–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.010 Google Scholar
  76. Muráni E, Ponsuksili S, D’Eath RB, Turner SP, Kurt E, Evans G, Thölking L, Klont R, Foury A, Mormède P, Wimmers K (2010) Association of HPA axis-related genetic variation with stress reactivity and aggressive behaviour in pigs. BMC Genet 11:74.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-74 Google Scholar
  77. Nagasawa M, Mitsui S, En S, Ohtani N, Ohta M, Sakuma Y, Onaka T, Mogi K, Kikusui T (2015) Social evolution. Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Science 348:333–336.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261022 Google Scholar
  78. Nagasawa M, Ogawa M, Mogi K, Kikusui T (2017) Intranasal oxytocin treatment increases eye-gaze behavior toward the owner in ancient Japanese dog breeds. Front Psychol 8:1624.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01624 Google Scholar
  79. Neumann ID (2008) Brain oxytocin: a key regulator of emotional and social Behaviours in both females and males. J Neuroendocrinol 20:858–865.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01726.x Google Scholar
  80. Neumann ID, Landgraf R (2012) Balance of brain oxytocin and vasopressin: implications for anxiety, depression, and social behaviors. Trends Neurosci 35:649–659.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2012.08.004 Google Scholar
  81. Neumann ID, Veenema AH, Beiderbeck DI (2010) Aggression and anxiety: social context and neurobiological links. Front Behav Neurosci 4:12.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00012 Google Scholar
  82. Nowak R, Boivin X (2015) Filial attachment in sheep: similarities and differences between ewe-lamb and human-lamb relationships. Appl Anim Behav Sci 164:12–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.09.013 Google Scholar
  83. O’Connell SM (1995) Empathy in chimpanzees: evidence for theory of mind? Primates 36:397–410.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382862 Google Scholar
  84. Odendaal JSJ, Meintjes RA (2003) Neurophysiological correlates of affiliative behaviour between humans and dogs. Vet J 165:296–301Google Scholar
  85. Oláh K, Topál J, Kovács K, Kis A, Koller D, Young Park S, Virányi Z (2017) Gaze-following and reaction to an aversive social interaction have corresponding associations with variation in the OXTR gene in dogs but not in human infants. Front Psychol 8:2156.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02156 Google Scholar
  86. Oliva JL, Rault J-L, Appleton B, Lill A (2015) Oxytocin enhances the appropriate use of human social cues by the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) in an object choice task. Anim Cogn 18:767–775.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0843-7 Google Scholar
  87. Oliva JL, Wong YT, Rault J-L, Appleton B, Lill A (2016) The oxytocin receptor gene, an integral piece of the evolution of Canis familaris from Canis lupus. Pet Behaviour Sci 0:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.21071/pbs.v0i2.4000 Google Scholar
  88. Olmert MD (2009) Made for each other: the biology of the human-animal bond. Da Capo PressGoogle Scholar
  89. Osadchuk LV (1990) Hormones, reproductive behaviour and the fertility in male silver foxes. Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal SSSR Imeni IM Sechenova 76:446–452 [in Russian]Google Scholar
  90. Oskina IN, Herbeck YE, Shikhevich SG, Plyusnina IZ, Gulevich RG (2008) Alterations in the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal and immune systems during selection of animals for tame behavior. Herald Vavilov Soc Genet Breed Sci 12:39–49 [in Russian]Google Scholar
  91. Ovchinnikov VY, Antonov EV, Vasilyev GV, Shihevich SG, Shepeleva DV, Herbeck YE (2018) Hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor and microRNA gene expression and serum cortisol concentration in foxes selected for behavior toward humans. Vavilov J Genet Breed 22:230–234.  https://doi.org/10.18699/VJ18.352 [in Russian]Google Scholar
  92. Pendleton AL, Shen F, Taravella AM, Emery S, Veeramah KR, Boyko AR, Kidd JM (2018) Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication. BMC Biol 16(1):64.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0535-2 Google Scholar
  93. Persson ME, Trottier AJ, Bélteky J, Persson ME, Trottier AJ, Bélteky J (2017) Intranasal oxytocin and a polymorphism in the oxytocin receptor gene are associated with human-directed social behavior in golden retriever dogs. Horm Behav 95:85–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.07.016 Google Scholar
  94. Petersson M, Uvnäs-Moberg K, Nilsson A, Gustafson L-L, Hydbring-Sandberg E, Handlin L (2017) Oxytocin and cortisol levels in dog owners and their dogs are associated with behavioral patterns: an exploratory study. Front Psychol 8:1796.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01796 Google Scholar
  95. Phillips C (2009) Empathy towards animals. In: The Welfare of Animals. Springer, pp 47–54Google Scholar
  96. Plyusnina I, Oskina I (1997) Behavioral and adrenocortical responses to open-field test in rats selected for reduced aggressiveness toward humans. Physiol Behav 61:381–385.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00445-3 Google Scholar
  97. Prasolova LA, Herbeck YE, Gulevich RG, Shikhevich SG, Konoshenko MY, Kozhemyakina RV, Oskina IN, Plyusnina IZ (2014) The effects of prolonged selection for behavior on the stress response and activity of the reproductive system of male grey rats (Rattus norvegicus). Russ J Genet 50:846–852.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795414080031 Google Scholar
  98. Price EO (2002) Animal domestication and behavior. CABIGoogle Scholar
  99. Rault J-L (2016) Effects of positive and negative human contacts and intranasal oxytocin on cerebrospinal fluid oxytocin. Psychoneuroendocrinology 69:60–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.03.015 Google Scholar
  100. Rault J-L, Carter CS, Garner JP, Marchant-Forde JN, Richert BT, Lay DC (2013) Repeated intranasal oxytocin administration in early life dysregulates the HPA axis and alters social behavior. Physiol Behav 112–113:40–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.02.007 Google Scholar
  101. Rault J-L, van den Munkhof M, Buisman-Pijlman FTA (2017) Oxytocin as an Indicator of psychological and social well-being in domesticated animals: a critical review. Front Psychol 8:1521.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01521 Google Scholar
  102. Rehn T, Handlin L, Uvnäs-Moberg K, Keeling LJ (2014) Dogs’ endocrine and behavioural responses at Reunion are affected by how the human initiates contact. Physiol Behav 124:45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.10.009 Google Scholar
  103. Romero T, Nagasawa M, Mogi K, Hasegawa T, Kikusui T (2014) Oxytocin promotes social bonding in dogs. PNAS 111:9085–9090.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322868111 Google Scholar
  104. Romero T, Nagasawa M, Mogi K, Hasegawa T, Kikusui T (2015) Intranasal administration of oxytocin promotes social play in domestic dogs. Commun Integr Biol 8:e1017157.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1017157 Google Scholar
  105. Ross HE, Young LJ (2009) Oxytocin and the neural mechanisms regulating social cognition and affiliative behavior. Front Neuroendocrinol 30:534–547.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.05.004 Google Scholar
  106. Rotondo F, Butz H, Syro LV, Yousef GM, Di Ieva A, Restrepo LM, Quintanar-Stephano A, Berczi I, Kovacs K (2016) Arginine vasopressin (AVP): a review of its historical perspectives, current research and multifunctional role in the hypothalamo-hypophysial system. Pituitary 19:345–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-015-0703-0 Google Scholar
  107. Samuni L, Preis A, Mundry R, Deschner T, Crockford C, Wittig RM (2017) Oxytocin reactivity during intergroup conflict in wild chimpanzees. PNAS 114:268–273.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616812114 Google Scholar
  108. Shamay-Tsoory SG, Fischer M, Dvash J, Harari H, Perach-Bloom N, Levkovitz Y (2009) Intranasal Administration of Oxytocin Increases Envy and Schadenfreude (gloating). Biol Psychiatry 66:864–870.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.009 Google Scholar
  109. Song Z, Larkin TE, Malley MO, Albers HE (2016) Oxytocin (OT) and arginine-vasopressin (AVP) act on OT receptors and not AVP V1a receptors to enhance social recognition in adult Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Horm Behav 81:20–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.02.004 Google Scholar
  110. Suzuki K, Ikebuchi M, Bischof H-J, Okanoya K (2014) Behavioral and neural trade-offs between song complexity and stress reaction in a wild and a domesticated finch strain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 46:547–556.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.07.011 Google Scholar
  111. Terranova JI, Song Z, Larkin TE II, Hardcastle N, Norvelle A, Riaz A, Albers HE (2016) Serotonin and arginine-vasopressin mediate sex differences in the regulation of dominance and aggression by the social brain. PNAS 113:13233–13238.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610446113 Google Scholar
  112. Trut LN (1999) Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment: foxes bred for tamability in a 40-year experiment exhibit remarkable transformations that suggest an interplay between behavioral genetics and development. Am Sci 87:160–169Google Scholar
  113. Trut L, Oskina I, Kharlamova A (2009) Animal evolution during domestication: the domesticated fox as a model. BioEssays 31:349–360.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.200800070 Google Scholar
  114. Turcsán B, Range F, Rónai Z, Koller D, Virányi Z (2017) Context and individual characteristics modulate the association between oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism and social behavior in border collies. Front Psychol 8:2232.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02232 Google Scholar
  115. van Rooy D, Haase B, McGreevy PD, Thomson PC, Wade CM (2016) Evaluating candidate genes oprm1, drd2, avpr1a, and oxtr in golden retrievers with separation-related behaviors. J Vet Behav 16:22–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2016.03.001 Google Scholar
  116. Vonholdt BM, Pollinger JP, Lohmueller KE, Han E, Parker HG, Quignon P, Degenhardt JD, Boyko AR, Earl DA, Auton A, Reynolds A, Bryc K, Brisbin A, Knowles JC, Mosher DS, Spady TC, Elkahloun A, Geffen E, Pilot M, Jedrzejewski W, Greco C, Randi E, Bannasch D, Wilton A, Shearman J, Musiani M, Cargill M, Jones PG, Qian Z, Huang W, Ding ZL, Zhang YP, Bustamante CD, Ostrander EA, Novembre J, Wayne RK (2010) Genome-wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication. Nature 464:898–902.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08837 Google Scholar
  117. Wang GD, Zhai W, Yang HC, Fan RX, Cao X, Zhong L, Wang L, Liu F, Wu H, Cheng LG, Poyarkov AD, Poyarkov NA Jr, Tang SS, Zhao WM, Gao Y, Lv XM, Irwin DM, Savolainen P, Wu CI, Zhang YP (2013) The genomics of selection in dogs and the parallel evolution between dogs and humans. Nat Commun 4:1860.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2814 Google Scholar
  118. Weiler U, Claus R, Schnoebelen-Combes S, Louveau I (1998) Influence of age and genotype on endocrine parameters and growth performance: a comparative study in wild boars, Meishan and large white boars. Livest Prod Sci 54:21–31Google Scholar
  119. Wilkins AS, Wrangham RW, Fitch WT (2014) The “Domestication Syndrome” in Mammals: A Unified Explanation Based on Neural Crest Cell Behavior and Genetics. Genetics 197:795–808.  https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.165423 Google Scholar
  120. Windle RJ, Kershaw YM, Shanks N, Wood SA, Lightman SL, Ingram CD (2004) Oxytocin attenuates stress-induced c-fos mRNA expression in specific forebrain regions associated with modulation of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal activity. J Neurosci 24:2974–2982.  https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3432-03.2004 Google Scholar
  121. Winslow J, Insel TR (1991a) Vasopressin modulates male squirrel monkeys’ behavior during social separation. Eur J Pharmacol 200:95–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(91)90671-C Google Scholar
  122. Winslow JT, Insel TR (1991b) Social status in pairs of male squirrel monkeys determines the behavioral response to central oxytocin administration. J Neurosci 11:2032–2038Google Scholar
  123. Wittig RM, Crockford C, Deschner T, Langergraber KE, Ziegler TE, Zuberbuhler K (2014) Food sharing is linked to urinary oxytocin levels and bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 281(1778):20133096–20133096.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3096 Google Scholar
  124. Yan X, Yong X, Huang W, Ma Y (2018) Placebo treatment facilitates social trust and approach behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:5732–5737.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800779115 Google Scholar
  125. Yayou K, Ito S, Yamamoto N (2015) Relationships between postnatal plasma oxytocin concentrations and social behaviors in cattle. Anim Sci J 86:806–813.  https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12363 Google Scholar
  126. Young LJ (1999) Frank a. beach award. Oxytocin and vasopressin receptors and species-typical social behaviors. Horm Behav 36:212–221.  https://doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.1999.1548 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RASNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations