Advertisement

Cell and Tissue Research

, Volume 368, Issue 1, pp 47–59 | Cite as

Chondrogenesis of embryonic limb bud cells in micromass culture progresses rapidly to hypertrophy and is modulated by hydrostatic pressure

  • Anurati Saha
  • Rebecca Rolfe
  • Simon Carroll
  • Daniel J. Kelly
  • Paula Murphy
Regular Article

Abstract

Chondrogenesis in vivo is precisely controlled in time and space. The entire limb skeleton forms from cells at the core of the early limb bud that condense and undergo chondrogenic differentiation. Whether they form stable cartilage at the articular surface of the joint or transient cartilage that progresses to hypertrophy as endochondral bone, replacing the cartilage template of the skeletal rudiment, is spatially controlled over several days in the embryo. Here, we follow the differentiation of cells taken from the early limb bud (embryonic day 11.5), grown in high-density micromass culture and show that a self-organising pattern of evenly spaced cartilage nodules occurs spontaneously in growth medium. Although chondrogenesis is enhanced by addition of BMP6 to the medium, the spatial pattern of nodule formation is disrupted. We show rapid progression of the entire nodule to hypertrophy in culture and therefore loss of the local signals required to direct formation of stable cartilage. Dynamic hydrostatic pressure, which we have previously predicted to be a feature of the forming embryonic joint region, had a stabilising effect on chondrogenesis, reducing expression of hypertrophic marker genes. This demonstrates the use of micromass culture as a relatively simple assay to compare the effect of both biophysical and molecular signals on spatial and temporal control of chondrogenesis that could be used to examine the response of different types of progenitor cell, both adult- and embryo-derived.

Keywords

Chondrogenesis Hydrostatic pressure Micromass culture Embryonic cells Hypertrophy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

AS was funded by Trinity College and Government of Ireland studentships. RR was funded by a Trinity Collage Innovation Bursary. All animal work was subject to ethical approval within Trinity College and carried out under licence (to AS) by the Health Products Regulatory Authority (formerly the Irish Medicines Board). Thanks to Prof Greg Lunstrum, Research Centre Shriners Hospital for Children, Portland USA, for providing the collagen X antibody. Thanks to Peter O’Reilly, Mechanical engineering, Peter Stafford and Alison Boyce, Zoology, for technical support.

References

  1. Ahrens PB, Solursh M, Reiter RS (1977) Stage-related capacity for limb chondrogenesis in cell culture. Dev Biol 60:69–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Akiyama H, Chaboissier MC, Martin JF, Schedl A, de Crombrugghe B (2002) The transcription factor Sox9 has essential roles in successive steps of the chondrocyte differentiation pathway and is required for expression of Sox5 and Sox6. Genes Dev 16:2813–2828CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bobick BE, Chen FH, Le AM, Tuan RS (2009) Regulation of the chondrogenic phenotype in culture. Birth Defects Res C 87:351–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boskey A, Paschalis E, Binderman I, Doty S (2002) BMP‐6 accelerates both chondrogenesis and mineral maturation in differentiating chick limb‐bud mesenchymal cell cultures. J Cell Biochem 84:509–519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll SF, Buckley CT, Kelly DJ (2014) Cyclic hydrostatic pressure promotes a stable cartilage phenotype and enhances the functional development of cartilaginous grafts engineered using multipotent stromal cells isolated from bone marrow and infrapatellar fat pad. J Biomech 47:2115–2121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Choocheep K, Hatano S, Takagi H, Watanabe H, Kimata K, Kongtawelert P, Watanabe H (2010) Versican facilitates chondrocyte differentiation and regulates joint morphogenesis. J Biol Chem 285:21114–21125CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Decker RS, Koyama E, Pacifici M (2015) Articular cartilage: structural and developmental intricacies and questions. Curr Osteoporos Rep 13:407–414CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickhut A, Pelttari K, Janicki P, Wagner W, Eckstein V, Egermann M, Richter W (2009) Calcification or dedifferentiation: requirement to lock mesenchymal stem cells in a desired differentiation stage. J Cell Physiol 219:219–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Elder BD, Athanasiou KA (2009) Hydrostatic pressure in articular cartilage tissue engineering: from chondrocytes to tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng B 15:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greco K, Iqbal A, Rattazzi L, Nalesso G, Moradi-Bidhendi N, Moore A, Goldring M, Dell’Accio F, Perretti M (2011) High density micromass cultures of a human chondrocyte cell line: a reliable assay system to reveal the modulatory functions of pharmacological agents. Biochem Pharmacol 82:1919–1929CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hellingman CA, Koevoet W, van Osch GJ (2012) Can one generate stable hyaline cartilage from adult mesenchymal stem cells? A developmental approach. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 6:e1–e11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu JC, Athanasiou KA (2006) The effects of intermittent hydrostatic pressure on self-assembled articular cartilage constructs. Tissue Eng 12:1337–1344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Huegel J, Mundy C, Sgariglia F, Nygren P, Billings PC, Yamaguchi Y, Koyama E, Pacifici M (2013) Perichondrium phenotype and border function are regulated by Ext1 and heparan sulfate in developing long bones: a mechanism likely deranged in Hereditary Multiple Exostoses. Dev Biol 377:100–112CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Ikenoue T, Trindade MC, Lee MS, Lin EY, Schurman DJ, Goodman SB, Smith RL (2003) Mechanoregulation of human articular chondrocyte aggrecan and type II collagen expression by intermittent hydrostatic pressure in vitro. J Orthop Res 21:110–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ito T, Sawada R, Fujiwara Y, Tsuchiya T (2008) FGF-2 increases osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation potentials of human mesenchymal stem cells by inactivation of TGF-beta signaling. Cytotechnology 56:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Juhász T, Matta C, Somogyi C, Katona É, Takács R, Soha RF, Szabó IA, Cserháti C, Sződy R, Karácsonyi Z (2014) Mechanical loading stimulates chondrogenesis via the PKA/CREB-Sox9 and PP2A pathways in chicken micromass cultures. Cell Signal 26:468–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahn J, Shwartz Y, Blitz E, Krief S, Sharir A, Breitel DA, Rattenbach R, Relaix F, Maire P, Rountree RB, Kingsley DM, Zelzer E (2009) Muscle contraction is necessary to maintain joint progenitor cell fate. Dev Cell 16:734–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelly DJ, Jacobs CR (2010) The role of mechanical signals in regulating chondrogenesis and osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Birth Defects Res C:: Rev 90:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klumpers DD, Smit TH, Mooney DJ (2015) The effect of growth-mimicking continuous strain on the early stages of skeletal development in micromass culture. PLoS ONE 10:e0124948CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Lai LP, Lilley BN, Sanes JR, McMahon AP (2013) Lkb1/Stk11 regulation of mTOR signaling controls the transition of chondrocyte fates and suppresses skeletal tumor formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:19450–19455CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Lenas P, Moos M, Luyten FP (2009) Developmental engineering: a new paradigm for the design and manufacturing of cell-based products. Part I: from three-dimensional cell growth to biomimetics of in vivo development. Tissue Eng B 15:381–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li Y, Ahrens MJ, Wu A, Liu J, Dudley AT (2011) Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II activity regulates the proliferative potential of growth plate chondrocytes. Development 138:359–370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Long F, Zhang XM, Karp S, Yang Y, McMahon AP (2001) Genetic manipulation of hedgehog signaling in the endochondral skeleton reveals a direct role in the regulation of chondrocyte proliferation. Development 128:5099–5108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lunstrum GP, Keene DR, Weksler NB, Cho YJ, Cornwall M, Horton WA (1999) Chondrocyte differentiation in a rat mesenchymal cell line. J Histochem Cytochem 47:1–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Malko AV, Villagomez M, Aubin JE, Opas M (2013) Both chondroinduction and proliferation account for growth of cartilage nodules in mouse limb bud cultures. Stem Cell Rev Rep 9:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mello MA, Tuan RS (2006) Effects of TGF‐β1 and triiodothyronine on cartilage maturation: In vitro analysis using long‐term high‐density micromass cultures of chick embryonic limb mesenchymal cells. J Orthop Res 24:2095–2105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Miyanishi K, Trindade MC, Lindsey DP, Beaupre GS, Carter DR, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, Smith RL (2006a) Dose- and time-dependent effects of cyclic hydrostatic pressure on transforming growth factor-beta3-induced chondrogenesis by adult human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Tissue Eng 12:2253–2262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Miyanishi K, Trindade MC, Lindsey DP, Beaupré GS, Carter DR, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, Smith RL (2006b) Effects of hydrostatic pressure and transforming growth factor-β 3 on adult human mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis in vitro. Tissue Eng 12:1419–1428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ng LJ, Wheatley S, Muscat GE, Conway-Campbell J, Bowles J, Wright E, Bell DM, Tam PP, Cheah KS, Koopman P (1997) SOX9 binds DNA, activates transcription, and coexpresses with type II collagen during chondrogenesis in the mouse. Dev Biol 183:108–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nowlan NC, Murphy P, Prendergast PJ (2008) A dynamic pattern of mechanical stimulation promotes ossification in avian embryonic long bones. J Biomech 41:249–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nowlan NC, Bourdon C, Dumas G, Tajbakhsh S, Prendergast PJ, Murphy P (2010) Developing bones are differentially affected by compromised skeletal muscle formation. Bone 46:1275–1285CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Raspopovic J, Marcon L, Russo L, Sharpe J (2014) Digit patterning is controlled by a Bmp-Sox9-Wnt Turing network modulated by morphogen gradients. Science 345:566–570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ray A, Singh PN, Sohaskey ML, Harland RM, Bandyopadhyay A (2015) Precise spatial restriction of BMP signaling is essential for articular cartilage differentiation. Development 142:1169–1179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Reinhold MI, Abe M, Kapadia RM, Liao Z, Naski MC (2004) FGF18 represses noggin expression and is induced by calcineurin. J Biol Chem 279:38209–38219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Richter W (2009) Mesenchymal stem cells and cartilage in situ regeneration. J Intern Med 266:390–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Roddy KA, Kelly GM, van Es MH, Murphy P, Prendergast PJ (2011a) Dynamic patterns of mechanical stimulation co-localise with growth and cell proliferation during morphogenesis in the avian embryonic knee joint. J Biomech 44:143–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Roddy KA, Prendergast PJ, Murphy P (2011b) Mechanical influences on morphogenesis of the knee joint revealed through morphological, molecular and computational analysis of immobilised embryos. PLoS ONE 6:e17526CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Sekiya I, Colter DC, Prockop DJ (2001) BMP-6 enhances chondrogenesis in a subpopulation of human marrow stromal cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 284:411–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Shea C, Rolfe R, Murphy P (2015) The importance of foetal movement for co-ordinated cartilage and bone development in utero clinical consequences and potential for therapy. Bone Joint Res 4:105–116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Sheehy EJ, Vinardell T, Buckley CT, Kelly DJ (2013) Engineering osteochondral constructs through spatial regulation of endochondral ossification. Acta Biomater 9:5484–5492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith RL, Lin J, Trindade MC, Shida J, Kajiyama G, Vu T, Hoffman AR, van der Meulen MC, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, Carter DR (2000) Time-dependent effects of intermittent hydrostatic pressure on articular chondrocyte type II collagen and aggrecan mRNA expression. J Rehabil Res Dev 37:153–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Theiler K (1989) The house mouse. Atlas of Embryonic Development. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Vinardell T, Rolfe RA, Buckley CT, Meyer EG, Ahearne M, Murphy P, Kelly DJ (2012) Hydrostatic pressure acts to stabilise a chondrogenic phenotype in porcine joint tissue derived stem cells. Eur Cell Mater 23:121–132, discussion 133–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Vortkamp A, Lee K, Lanske B, Segre GV, Kronenberg HM, Tabin CJ (1996) Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein. Science 273:613–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wagner DR, Lindsey DP, Li KW, Tummala P, Chandran SE, Smith RL, Longaker MT, Carter DR, Beaupre GS (2008) Hydrostatic pressure enhances chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells in osteochondrogenic medium. Ann Biomed Eng 36:813–820CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Weiss HE, Roberts SJ, Schrooten J, Luyten FP (2012) A semi-autonomous model of endochondral ossification for developmental tissue engineering. Tissue Eng A 18:1334–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wright E, Hargrave MR, Christiansen J, Cooper L, Kun J, Evans T, Gangadharan U, Greenfield A, Koopman P (1995) The Sry-related gene Sox9 is expressed during chondrogenesis in mouse embryos. Nat Genet 9:15–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang Y, Topol L, Lee H, Wu J (2003) Wnt5a and Wnt5b exhibit distinct activities in coordinating chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development 130:1003–1015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang L, Tsang KY, Tang HC, Chan D, Cheah KSE (2014) Hypertrophic chondrocytes can become osteoblasts and osteocytes in endochondral bone formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A111:12097–12102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Yeung Tsang K, Wa Tsang S, Chan D, Cheah KS (2014) The chondrocytic journey in endochondral bone growth and skeletal dysplasia. Birth Defects Res Part C: Rev 102:52–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang X, Ziran N, Goater JJ, Schwarz EM, Puzas JE, Rosier RN, Zuscik M, Drissi H, O’Keefe RJ (2004) Primary murine limb bud mesenchymal cells in long-term culture complete chondrocyte differentiation: TGF-β delays hypertrophy and PGE2 inhibits terminal differentiation. Bone 34:809–817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang L, Su P, Xu C, Yang J, Yu W, Huang D (2010) Chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: a comparison between micromass and pellet culture systems. Biotechnol Lett 32:1339–1346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhou X, von der Mark K, Henry S, Norton W, Adams H, de Crombrugghe B (2014) Chondrocytes transdifferentiate into osteoblasts in endochondral bone during development, postnatal growth and fracture healing in mice. PLoS Genet 10:e1004820CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anurati Saha
    • 1
  • Rebecca Rolfe
    • 1
    • 2
  • Simon Carroll
    • 2
  • Daniel J. Kelly
    • 2
  • Paula Murphy
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Zoology, School of Natural SciencesTrinity CollegeDublinIreland
  2. 2.Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, School of EngineeringTrinity CollegeDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations