Cell and Tissue Research

, Volume 360, Issue 1, pp 13–28 | Cite as

Confocal stereology: an efficient tool for measurement of microscopic structures

Review

Abstract

Quantitative measurements of geometric forms or counting of objects in microscopic specimens is an essential tool in studies of microstructure. Confocal stereology represents a contemporary approach to the evaluation of microscopic structures by using a combination of stereological methods and confocal microscopy. 3-D images acquired by confocal microscopy can be used for the estimation of geometrical characteristics of microscopic structures by stereological methods, based on the evaluation of optical sections within a thick slice and using computer-generated virtual test probes. Such methods can be used for estimating volume, number, surface area and length using relevant spatial probes, which are generated by specific software. The interactions of the probes with the structure under study are interactively evaluated. An overview of the methods of confocal stereology developed during the past 30 years is presented. Their advantages and pitfalls in comparison with other methods for measurement of geometrical characteristics of microscopic structures are discussed.

Keywords

3-D images Confocal microscopy Geometrical characteristics Spatial probes Stereology 

Supplementary material

441_2015_2138_MOESM1_ESM.avi (489 kb)
Movie 1(AVI 488 kb)
441_2015_2138_MOESM2_ESM.avi (997 kb)
Movie 2(AVI 997 kb)
441_2015_2138_MOESM3_ESM.avi (994 kb)
Movie 3(AVI 994 kb)
441_2015_2138_MOESM4_ESM.avi (622 kb)
Movie 4(AVI 622 kb)
441_2015_2138_MOESM5_ESM.avi (787 kb)
Movie 5(AVI 787 kb)

References

  1. Albrechtová J, Janáček J, Lhotáková Z, Radochová R, Kubínová L (2007) Novel efficient methods for measuring mesophyll anatomical characteristics from fresh thick sections using stereology and confocal microscopy: application on acid rain-treated Norway spruce needles. J Exp Bot 58:1451–1461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Åslund N, Carlsson K, Liljeborg A, Majlof L (1983) PHOIBOS, a microscope scanner designed for micro-fluorometric applications, using laser induced fluorescence. In: Proceedings of the Third Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis. Studentliteratur, LundGoogle Scholar
  3. Baddeley AJ, Gundersen HJG, Cruz-Orive LM (1986) Estimation of surface area from vertical sections. J Microsc 142:259–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandaru V, Hansen DJ, Codling EE, Daughtry CS, White-Hansen S, Green CE (2010) Quantifying arsenic-induced morphological changes in spinach leaves: implications for remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 31:4163–4177Google Scholar
  5. Baquet ZC, Williams D, Brody J, Smeyne RJ (2009) A comparison of model-based (2D) and design-based (3D) stereological methods for estimating cell number in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) of the C57BL/6J mouse. Neuroscience 161:1082–1090PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer J, Bahmer FA, Wörl J, Neuhuber W, Schuler G, Fartasch M (2001) A strikingly constant ratio exists between Langerhans cells and other epidermal cells in human skin. A stereologic study using the optical disector method and the confocal laser scanning microscope. J Investig Dermatol 116:313–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjaalije JG (2002) Localization in the brain: new solutions emerging. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:322–325Google Scholar
  8. Burdíková Z, Čapek M, Ostašov P, Machač J, Pelc R, Mitchell EAD, Kubínová L (2010) Testate amoebae examined by confocal and two-photon microscopy: implications for taxonomy and ecophysiology. Microsc Microanal 16:735–746PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Čapek M, Janáček J, Kubínová L (2006) Methods for compensation of the light attenuation with depth of images captured by a confocal microscope. Microsc Res Tech 69:624–635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Čebašek V, Kubínová L, Ribarič S, Eržen I (2004) A novel staining method for quantification and 3D visualisation of capillaries and muscle fibres. Eur J Histochem 48:151–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Čebašek V, Kubínová L, Ribarič S, Eržen I (2005) Capillary network in slow and fast muscles and in oxidative and glycolitic muscle fibres. Image Anal Stereol 24:51–58Google Scholar
  12. Čebašek V, Radochová R, Ribarič S, Kubínová L, Eržen I (2006) Nerve injury affects the capillary supply in rat slow and fast muscles differently. Cell Tissue Res 323:305–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Čebašek V, Kubínová L, Janáček J, Ribarič S, Eržen I (2007) Adaptation of muscle fibre types and capillary network to acute denervation and shortlasting reinnervation. Cell Tissue Res 330:279–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Čebašek V, Eržen I, Vyhnal A, Janáček J, Ribarič S, Kubínová L (2010) The estimation error of skeletal muscle capillary supply is significantly reduced by 3D method. Microvasc Res 79:40–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cruz-Orive LM (1989) On the precision of systematic sampling: a review of Matheron’s transitive methods. J Microsc 153:315–333Google Scholar
  16. Cruz-Orive LM (1993) Systematic sampling in stereology. Bull Intern Statis Inst Proceedings 49th Session, Florence 1993, 55: 451–468Google Scholar
  17. Cruz-Orive LM (1997) Stereology of single objects. J Microsc 186:93–107Google Scholar
  18. Cruz-Orive LM (1999) Precision of Cavalieri sections and slices with local errors. J Microsc 193:182–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cruz-Orive LM, Howard CV (1991) Estimating the length of a bounded curve in three dimensions using total vertical projections. J Microsc 163:101–113Google Scholar
  20. Cruz-Orive LM, Howard CV (1995) Estimation of individual feature surface area with the vertical spatial grid. J Microsc 178:146–151Google Scholar
  21. Delorme R, Benchaib M, Bryon PA, Souchier C (1998) Measurement accuracy in confocal microscopy. J Microsc 192:151–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Denk W, Strickler JH, Webb WW (1990) Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248:73–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Diaspro A (ed) (2002) Confocal and two-photon microscopy. Wiley-Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Difato F, Mazzone F, Scaglione S, Fato M, Beltrame F, Kubínová L, Janáček J, Ramoino P, Vicidomini G, Diaspro A (2004) Improvement in volume estimation from confocal sections after image deconvolution. Microsc Res Tech 64:151–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dorph-Petersen KA, Nyengaard JR, Gundersen HJG (2001) Tissue shrinkage and unbiased stereological estimation of particle number and size. J Microsc 204:232–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dvořák J, Jensen EBV (2013) On semiautomatic estimation of surface area. J Microsc 250:142–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Eržen I, Janáček J, Kubínová L (2011) Characterisation of the capillary network in skeletal muscles from 3D data—a review. Physiol Res 60:1–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Everall IP, Heaton RK, Marcotte TD, Ellis RJ, McCutchan JA, Atkinson JH, Grant I, Mallory M, Masliah E (1999) Cortical synaptic density is reduced in mild to moderate human immunodeficiency virus neurocognitive disorder. HNRC Group. HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center. Brain Pathol 9:209–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gardi JE, Nyengard JR, Gundersen HJG (2008) Automatic sampling for unbiased and efficient stereological estimation using the proportionator in biological studies. J Microsc 230:108–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Geuna S, Herrera-Rincon C (2015) Update on stereology for light microscopy. Cell Tissue Res (in press)Google Scholar
  31. Gokhale AM (1990) Unbiased estimation of curve length in 3D using vertical slices. J Microsc 159:133–141Google Scholar
  32. Gokhale AM, Evans RA, Mackes JL, Mouton PR (2004) Design-based estimation of surface area in thick tissue sections of arbitrary orientation using virtual cycloids. J Microsc 216:25–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gundersen HJG (1977) Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: the edge effect. J Microsc 111:219–223Google Scholar
  34. Gundersen HJG (1986) Stereology of arbitrary particles. A review of unbiased number and size estimators and the presentation of some new ones, in memory of William R. Thompson. J Microsc 143:3–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gundersen HJG (1988) The nucleator. J Microsc 151:3–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gundersen HJG (2002a) Stereological estimation of tubular length. J Microsc 207:155–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gundersen HJG (2002b) The smooth fractionator. J Microsc 207:191–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gundersen HJG, Jensen EB (1987) The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. J Microsc 147:229–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Gundersen HJ, Østerby R (1981) Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or ‘do more less well!’. J Microsc 121:65–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gundersen HJG, Bagger P, Bendtsen TF, Evans SM, Korbo L, Marcussen N, Møller A, Nielsen K, Nyengaard JR, Pakkenberg B, Sørensen FB, Vesterby A, West MJ (1988) The new stereological tools: disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS 96:857–881PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Gundersen HJG, Jensen EBV, Kiêu K, Nielsen J (1999) The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology - reconsidered. J Microsc 193:199–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Hahn U, Sandau K (1989) Precision of surface area estimation using spatial grids. Acta Stereol 8:425–430Google Scholar
  43. Hansen LV, Nyengaard JR, Andersen JB, Jensen EBV (2011) The semi-automatic nucleator. J Microsc 242:206–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Howard CV, Reed MG (1998) Unbiased stereology: three-dimensional measurement in microscopy. Microscopy handbooks, vol 41. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Howard CV, Sandau K (1992) Measuring the surface area of a cell by the method of the spatial grid with a CSLM – a demonstration. J Microsc 165:183–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Howard CV, Reid S, Baddeley A, Boyde A (1985) Unbiased estimation of particle density in the tandem scanning reflected light microscope. J Microsc 138:203–212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Howell K, Hopkins N, McLaughlin P (2002) Combined confocal microscopy and stereology: a highly efficient and unbiased approach to quantitative structural measurement in tissues. Exp Physiol 87:747–756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Huang CX, Qiu X, Wang S, Wu H, Xia L, Li C, Gao Y, Zhang L, Xiu Y, Chao F, Tang Y (2013) Exercise-induced changes of the capillaries in the cortex of middle-aged rats. Neuroscience 233:139–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Janáček J (1999) Errors of spatial grids estimators of volume and surface area. Acta Stereol 18:389–396Google Scholar
  50. Janáček J, Kubínová L (2010) Variances of length and surface area estimates by spatial grids: preliminary study. Image Anal Stereol 29:45–52Google Scholar
  51. Janáček J, Kreft M, Čebašek V, Eržen I (2012) Correcting the axial shrinkage of skeletal muscle thick sections visualized by confocal microscopy. J Microsc 246:107–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Jensen EBV, Gundersen HJG (1993) The rotator. J Microsc 170:35–44Google Scholar
  53. Jirkovská M, Kubínová L, Krekule I, Hach P (1998) Spatial arrangement of fetal placental capillaries in terminal villi: a study using confocal microscopy. Anat Embryol 197:263–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Jirkovská M, Kubínová L, Janáček J, Moravcová M, Krejčí V, Karen P (2002) Topological properties and spatial organization of villous capillaries in normal and diabetic placentas. J Vasc Res 39:268–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Kiêu K, Jensen EBV (1993) Stereological estimation based on isotropic slices through fixed points. J Microsc 170:45–51Google Scholar
  56. Kiêu K, Xiong W, Trubuil A (1998) Precision of systematic counts. Rapport Technique 1998–1, Unité de Biométrie, INRA-VersaillesGoogle Scholar
  57. Kubínová L, Janáček J (1998) Estimating surface area by isotropic fakir method from thick slices cut in arbitrary direction. J Microsc 191:201–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Kubínová L, Janáček J (2001) Confocal microscopy and stereology: estimating volume, number, surface area and length by virtual test probes applied to three-dimensional images. Microsc Res Tech 53:425–435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Kubínová L, Janáček J (2009) Systematic sampling in 3d using virtual test probes and its application to surface area and length measurement. Proc 10th European Congress of Stereology and Image Analysis, Milan, Italy, Jun 22–59, 2009: 253–260Google Scholar
  60. Kubínová L, Karen P, Indra M, Jirkovská M, Palovský R, Krekule I (1995) The role of stereology, confocal microscopy and 3-D reconstructions in morphometrical analysis of 3-D biological structures. Biomed Tech 40:196–197Google Scholar
  61. Kubínová L, Janáček J, Antoš K, Ježek B, Indra M, Jirák D, Krekule I (1996a) Application of graphical workstation SGI INDY and IBM PC to rendering and visualization of the objects captured by a confocal microscope. Acta Vet Brno 65:253–262Google Scholar
  62. Kubínová L, Jirkovská M, Hach P (1996b) Stereology and confocal microscopy: application to the study of placental terminal villus. Acta Stereol 15:153–158Google Scholar
  63. Kubínová L, Janáček J, Guilak F, Opatrný Z (1999) Comparison of several digital and stereological methods for estimating surface area and volume of cells studied by confocal microscopy. Cytometry 36:85–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Kubínová L, Janáček J, Ribarič S, Čebašek V, Eržen I (2001) Three-dimensional study of the capillary supply of skeletal muscle fibers using confocal microscopy. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 22:217–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Kubínová L, Janáček J, Krekule I (2002) Stereological methods for estimating geometrical parameters of microscopical structure studied by three-dimensional microscopical techniques. In: Diaspro A (ed) Confocal and two-photon microscopy. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 299–332Google Scholar
  66. Kubínová L, Mao XW, Janáček J, Archambeau JO (2003) Stereology techniques in radiation biology. Radiat Res 160:110–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Kubínová L, Janáček J, Karen P, Radochová B, Difato F, Krekule I (2004) Confocal stereology and image analysis: methods for estimating geometrical characteristics of cells and tissues from three-dimensional confocal images. Physiol Res 53(Suppl 1):S47–S55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Kubínová L, Janáček J, Albrechtová J, Karen P (2005) Stereological and digital methods for estimating geometrical characteristics of biological structures using confocal microscopy. In: Evangelista V, Barsanti L, Passarelli V, Gualtieri P (eds) From cells to proteins: imaging nature across dimensions, vol 3, NATO Security through Science Series, Sub-Series B: Physics and Biophysics. Springer, New York, pp 271–321Google Scholar
  69. Kubínová L, Mao XW, Janáček J (2013) Blood capillary length estimation from three-dimensional microscopic data by image analysis and stereology. Microsc Microanal 19:898–906PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Kubínová Z, Janáček J, Lhotáková Z, Kubínová L, Albrechtová J (2014) Unbiased estimation of chloroplast number in mesophyll cells: advantage of a genuine three-dimensional approach. J Exp Bot 65:609–620PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Larsen JO, Gundersen HJG, Nielsen J (1998) Global spatial sampling with isotropic virtual planes: estimators of length density and total length in thick, arbitrarily orientated sections. J Microsc 191:238–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Lhotáková Z, Albrechtová J, Janáček J, Kubínová L (2008) Advantages and pitfalls of using free-hand sections of frozen needles for three-dimensional analysis of mesophyll by stereology and confocal microscopy. J Microsc 232:56–63PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Lhotáková Z, Urban O, Dubánková M, Cvikrová M, Tomášková I, Kubínová L, Zvára K, Marek MV, Albrechtová J (2012) The impact of long-term CO2 enrichment on sun and shade needles of Norway spruce (Picea abies): photosynthetic performance, needle anatomy and phenolics accumulation. Plant Sci 188:60–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Malmgren LT, Fisher PJ, Jones CE, Bookman LM, Uno T (2000) Numerical densities of myonuclei and satellite cells in muscle fiber types in the aging human thyroarytenoid muscle: an immunohistochemical and stereological study using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:377–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Mao XW, Favre CJ, Fike JR, Kubínová L, Anderson E, Campbell-Beachler M, Jones T, Smith A, Rightnar S, Nelson GA (2010) High-LET radiation-induced response of microvessels in the hippocampus. Radiat Res 173:486–493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Matheron G (1965) Les variables régionalisées et leur estimation. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  77. Mattfeldt T, Möbius H-J, Mall G (1985) Orthogonal triplet probes; an efficient method for unbiased estimation of length and surface of objects with unknown orientation in space. J Microsc 139:279–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Mattfeldt T, Mall G, Gharehbaghi H, Moller P (1990) Estimation of surface area and length with the orientator. J Microsc 159:301–317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Mokin M, Keifer J (2006) Quantitative analysis of immunofluorescent punctate staining of synaptically localized proteins using confocal microscopy and stereology. J Neurosci Methods 157:218–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Mouton PR (2011) Unbiased stereology: a concise guide. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  81. Mouton PR, Gokhale AM, Ward NL, West MJ (2002) Stereological length estimation using spherical probes. J Microsc 206:54–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Nakamura O (1999) Fundamental of two-photon microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 47:165–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Pawley J (ed) (1995) Handbook of biological confocal microscopy, 2nd edn. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  84. Pawley JB (ed) (2006) Handbook of biological confocal microscopy, 3rd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  85. Peterson DA (1999) Quantitative histology using confocal microscopy: implementation of unbiased stereology procedures. Methods 18:493–507PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Peterson DA (2014) High-resolution estimation of multiple cell populations in tissue using confocal stereology. In: Cornea A, Conn PM (eds) Fluorescence microscopy: super-resolution and other novel techniques. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  87. Petráň M, Hadravský M, Egger MD, Galambos R (1968) Tandem-scanning reflected-light microscope. J Opt Soc Am 58:661–664Google Scholar
  88. Postlethwait EM, Joad JP, Hyde DM, Schelegle ES, Bric JM, Weir AJ, Putney LF, Wong VJ, Velsor LW, Plopper CG (2000) Three-dimensional mapping of ozone-induced acute cytotoxicity in tracheobronchial airways of isolated perfused rat lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 22:191–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Puelles VG, Douglas-Denton RN, Cullen-McEwen L, McNamara BJ, Salih F, Li J, Hughson MD, Hoy WE, Nyengaard JR, Bertram JF (2014) Design-based stereological methods for estimating numbers of glomerular podocytes. Ann Anat 196:48–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Rigaut JP (1989) Image analysis in histology – hope, disillusion, and hope again. Acta Stereol 8:3–12Google Scholar
  91. Rigaut JP, Carvajal-Gonzales S, Vassy J (1992) 3-D image cytometry. In: Kriete A (ed) Visualization in biomedical microscopies. VCH, Weinheim, New York, pp 205–248Google Scholar
  92. Romek M, Karasinski J (2011) Quantification of connexin43 gap junctions in porcine myometrium by confocal microscopy and stereology. Reprod Domest Anim 46:29–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Rostkowski AB, Teppen TL, Peterson DA, Urban JH (2009) Cell-specific expression of neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor immunoreactivity in the rat basolateral amygdala. J Comp Neurol 517:166–176PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Sajko Š, Kubínová L, Cvetko E, Kreft M, Wernig A, Eržen I (2004) Frequency of M-Cadherin-stained satellite cells declines in human muscles during aging. J Histochem Cytochem 52:179–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Sandau K (1987) How to estimate the area of a surface using a spatial grid. Acta Stereol 6:31–36Google Scholar
  96. Santaló LA (1976) Integral geometry and geometric probability. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  97. Schmitz C, Hof PR (2005) Design-based stereology in neuroscience. Neuroscience 130:813–831PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Schmitz C, Eastwood BS, Tappan SJ, Glaser JR, Peterson DA, Hof PR (2014) Current automated 3D cell detection methods are not a suitable replacement for manual stereologic cell counting. Front Neuroanat 8:27PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Shaw P (1994) Deconvolution in 3-D optical microscopy. Histochem J 26:687–694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Sheppard CJR, Török P (1997) Effects of specimen refractive index on confocal imaging. J Microsc 185:366–374Google Scholar
  101. Sterio DC (1984) The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector. J Microsc 134:127–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Tandrup T, Gundersen HJG, Jensen EBV (1997) The optical rotator. J Microsc 186:108–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Tomori Z, Matis L, Karen P, Kubínová L, Krekule I (2000) STESYS2: extended STESYS software for MS WINDOWS. Physiol Res 49:695–701PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Tomori Z, Krekule I, Kubínová L (2001) DISECTOR program for unbiased estimation of particle number, numerical density and mean volume. Image Anal Stereol 20:119–130Google Scholar
  105. Wan D-S, Rajadhyaksha M, Webb RH (2000) Analysis of spherical aberration of a water immersion objective: application to specimens with refractive indices 1.33–1.40. J Microsc 197:274–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Weibel ER (1979) Stereological methods, vol. 1: practical methods for biological morphometry. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  107. West MJ (2012) Basic stereology for biologists and neuroscientists. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  108. West MJ, Gundersen HJG (1990) Unbiased stereological estimation of the number of neurons in the human hippocampus. J Comp Neurol 296:1–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Zakiewicz IM, van Dongen YC, Leergaard TB, Bjaalie JG (2011) Workflow and atlas system for brain-wide mapping of axonal connectivity in rat source. PLoS ONE 6:e22669PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomathematics, Institute of PhysiologyAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations