Cell proliferation and cytoarchitectural remodeling during spinal cord reconnection in the fresh-water turtle Trachemys dorbignyi
- 148 Downloads
In fresh-water turtles, the bridge connecting the proximal and caudal stumps of transected spinal cords consists of regenerating axons running through a glial cellular matrix. To understand the process leading to the generation of the scaffold bridging the lesion, we analyzed the mitotic activity triggered by spinal injury in animals maintained alive for 20–30 days after spinal cord transection. Flow cytometry and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-labeling experiments revealed a significant increment of cycling cells around the lesion epicenter. BrdU-tagged cells maintained a close association with regenerating axons. Most dividing cells expressed the brain lipid-binding protein (BLBP). Cells with BrdU-positive nuclei expressed glial fibrillary acidic protein. As spinal cord regeneration involves dynamic cell rearrangements, we explored the ultra-structure of the bridge and found cells with the aspect of immature oligodendrocytes forming an embryonic-like microenvironment. These cells supported and ensheathed regenerating axons that were recognized by immunocytological and electron-microscopical procedures. Since functional recovery depends on proper impulse transmission, we examined the anatomical axon-glia relationships near the lesion epicenter. Computer-assisted three-dimensional models revealed helical axon-glial junctions in which the intercellular space appeared to be reduced (5–7 nm). Serial-sectioning analysis revealed that fibril-containing processes provided myelinating axon sheaths. Thus, disruption of the ependymal layer elicits mitotic activity predominantly in radial glia expressing BLBP on the lateral aspects of the ependyma. These cycling cells seem to migrate and contribute to the bridge providing the main support and sheaths for regenerating axons.
KeywordsSpinal cord Cell proliferation Regeneration Radial glia Re-myelination Turtle, Trachemys dorbignyi (Chelonia)
We thank Dr. A. Caputi for statistical advice and Mrs. G. Fabbiani for her kind and efficient technical assistance.
- Fernández A, Radmilovich M, Trujillo-Cenóz O (2002) Neurogenesis and gliogenesis in the spinal cord of turtles. J Comp Neurol 458:293–306Google Scholar
- Gray EG, Guillery RW (1961) The basis for silver staining of synapses of the mammalian spinal cord: a light and electron microscope study. J Physiol (Lond) 157:581–588Google Scholar
- Hasan SJ, Keirstead HS, Muir GD, Steeves JD (1993) Axonal regeneration contributes to repair of injured brainstem-spinal neurons in embryonic chick. J Neurosci 73:492–507Google Scholar
- Iseda T, Nishio T, Kawaguchi S, Yamanoto M, Kawasaki T, Wakisaka S (2004) Spontaneous regeneration of the corticospinal tract after transection in young rats: a key role of reactive astrocytes in making favorable and unfavorable conditions for regeneration. Neuroscience 126:365–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lorente de Nó R (1921) La regeneración de la médula espinal en las larvas de batracios. Trab Lab Invest Biol Univ Madr 19:147–183Google Scholar
- Ramón y Cajal SR (1913–1914) Estudios sobre la degeneración y regeneración del sistema nervioso, TI-II. Degeneración y regeneración de los centros nerviosos. Moya, MadridGoogle Scholar
- Reichenbach A, Wolburg H (2005) Astrocytes and ependymal glia. In: Kettenmann H, Ransom BR (eds) Neuroglia. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 19–35Google Scholar
- Sanes DH, Reh TA, Harris WA (2006) Development of the nervous system, 2nd edn. Elsevier/Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Shifman MI, Jin LQ, Selzer M (2007) Regeneration in the lamprey spinal cord. In: Becker CG, Becker T (eds) Model organisms in spinal cord regeneration. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 229–262Google Scholar
- Sjöstrand F (1967) Electron microscopy of cells and tissues, vol 1. Academic Press, London New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Stensaas LJ (1983) Regeneration in the spinal cord of the newt Notopthalmus (Triturus) pyrrhogaster. In: Kao CC, Bunge RP, Reier PJ (eds) Spinal cord reconstruction. Raven, New York, pp 121–149Google Scholar