Advertisement

Human Genetics

, Volume 138, Issue 3, pp 291–292 | Cite as

Author response to “a response to ‘personalised medicine and population health: breast and ovarian cancer’”

  • Steven A. NarodEmail author
Letter to the Editor
  • 150 Downloads

Abstract

The author engages in further debate between numerous signatories of a letter who disputes that the author has put forward that the anticipated benefits of a personalised program for cancer prevention and screening are unwarranted. In the event that a cancer screening program is an effective means of mortality reduction, then the best strategy is universality. The benefit of a novel intervention should be evaluated prior to its introduction.

Notes

References

  1. Narod SA, Sopik V (2018) Is invasion a necessary step for metastases in breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat 169:9–23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29353366Google Scholar
  2. Sopik V, Narod SA (2018) The relationship between tumour size, nodal status and distant metastases: on the origins of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 170:647–656. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29693227Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Women’s College Research InstituteWomen’s College HospitalTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations