Expanding the genetic heterogeneity of intellectual disability
- 2.1k Downloads
Intellectual disability (ID) is a common morbid condition with a wide range of etiologies. The list of monogenic forms of ID has increased rapidly in recent years thanks to the implementation of genomic sequencing techniques. In this study, we describe the phenotypic and genetic findings of 68 families (105 patients) all with novel ID-related variants. In addition to established ID genes, including ones for which we describe unusual mutational mechanism, some of these variants represent the first confirmatory disease–gene links following previous reports (TRAK1, GTF3C3, SPTBN4 and NKX6-2), some of which were based on single families. Furthermore, we describe novel variants in 14 genes that we propose as novel candidates (ANKHD1, ASTN2, ATP13A1, FMO4, MADD, MFSD11, NCKAP1, NFASC, PCDHGA10, PPP1R21, SLC12A2, SLK, STK32C and ZFAT). We highlight MADD and PCDHGA10 as particularly compelling candidates in which we identified biallelic likely deleterious variants in two independent ID families each. We also highlight NCKAP1 as another compelling candidate in a large family with autosomal dominant mild intellectual disability that fully segregates with a heterozygous truncating variant. The candidacy of NCKAP1 is further supported by its biological function, and our demonstration of relevant expression in human brain. Our study expands the locus and allelic heterogeneity of ID and demonstrates the power of positional mapping to reveal unusual mutational mechanisms.
We thank the study families for their enthusiastic participation. This work was supported in part by King Salman Center for Disability Research (FSA). We acknowledge the support of the Saudi Human Genome Program and the Sequencing and Genotyping Core Facilities at KFSRHC. The research by STA reported in this publication was supported by funding from King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Alazami AM, Patel N, Shamseldin HE, Anazi S, Al-Dosari MS, Alzahrani F, Hijazi H, Alshammari M, Aldahmesh MA, Salih MA (2015) Accelerating novel candidate gene discovery in neurogenetic disorders via whole-exome sequencing of prescreened multiplex consanguineous families. Cell Rep 10:148–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhasin TK, Brocksen S, Avchen RN, Braun KVN (2006) Prevalence of four developmental disabilities among children aged 8 years: Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program, 1996 and 2000. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionGoogle Scholar
- Harripaul R, Vasli N, Mikhailov A, Rafiq MA, Mittal K, Windpassinger C, Sheikh T, Noor A, Mahmood H, Downey S et al (2017) Mapping autosomal recessive intellectual disability: combined microarray and exome sequencing identifies 26 novel candidate genes in 192 consanguineous families. Mol Psychiatry. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.60 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hermann R (2014) Regulation of neural progenitor proliferation by ANKHD1. Doctorate Dissertation. doi: 10.11588/heidok.00016467
- Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, Biesecker LG, Brothman AR, Carter NP, Church DM, Crolla JA, Eichler EE, Epstein CJ (2010) Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 86:749–764CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Monies D, Abouelhoda M, AlSayed M, Alhassnan Z, Alotaibi M, Kayyali H, Al-Owain M, Shah A, Rahbeeni Z, Al-Muhaizea MA et al (2017a) The landscape of genetic diseases in Saudi Arabia based on the first 1000 diagnostic panels and exomes. Hum Genet 136(8):921–939CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Monies D, Maddirevula S, Kurdi W, Alanazy MH, Alkhalidi H, Al-Owain M, Sulaiman RA, Faqeih E, Goljan E, Ibrahim N et al (2017b) Autozygosity reveals recessive mutations and novel mechanisms in dominant genes: implications in variant interpretation. Genet Med. doi: 10.1038/glm.2017.22 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riazuddin S, Hussain M, Razzaq A, Iqbal Z, Shahzad M, Polla DL, Song Y, van Beusekom E, Khan A, Tomas-Roca L et al (2016) Exome sequencing of Pakistani consanguineous families identifies 30 novel candidate genes for recessive intellectual disability. Mol Psychiatry. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.109 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E (2015) Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 17:405–423CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Strande NT, Riggs ER, Buchanan AH, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, DiStefano M, Dwight SS, Goldstein J, Ghosh R, Seifert BA, Sneddon TP (2017) Evaluating the clinical validity of gene-disease associations: an evidence-based framework developed by the Clinical Genome Resource. Am J Hum Genet 100(6):895–906CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Study, T.D.D.D (2015) Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders. Nature 519:223–228Google Scholar
- Xu D, Zhang Y (2012) Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field. Proteins: structure. Funct Bioinform 80:1715–1735Google Scholar